Skip to main content
Log in

A new integrated approach to cardiac mechanics: reference values for normal left ventricle

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The association between left ventricular (LV) myocardial deformation and hemodynamic forces is still mostly unexplored. The normative values and the effects of demographic and technical factors on hemodynamic forces are not known. The authors studied the association between LV myocardial deformation and hemodynamic forces in a large cohort of healthy volunteers. One-hundred seventy-six consecutive subjects (age range, 16–82; 51% women), with no cardiovascular risk factors or any relevant diseases, were enrolled. All subjects underwent an echo-Doppler examination. Both 2D global myocardial and endocardial longitudinal strain (GLS), circumferential strain (GCS), and the hemodynamic forces were measured with new software that enabled to calculate all these values and parameters from the three apical views. Higher LV mass index and larger LV volumes were found in males compared to females (85 ± 17 vs 74 ± 15 g/m2 and 127 ± 28 vs 85 ± 18 ml, p < 0.0001 respectively) while no differences of the mean values of endocardial and myocardial GLS and of myocardial GCS were found (p = ns) and higher endocardial GCS in women (− 30.6 ± 4.2 vs − 31.8 ± 3.7; p = 0.05). LV longitudinal force, LV systolic longitudinal force and LV impulse were higher in men (16.2 ± 5.3 vs 13.2 ± 3.6; 25.1 ± 7.9 vs 19.4 ± 5.6 and 20.4 ± 7 vs 16.6 ± 5.2, p < 0.0001, respectively). A weak but statistically significant decline with age (p < 0.0001) was also found for these force parameters. This new integrated approach could differentiate normality from pathology by providing average deformation values and hemodynamic forces parameters, differentiated by age and gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Solomon SD, Anavekar N, Skali H, McMurray J, Swedberg K, Yusuf S et al (2005) Influence of ejection fraction on cardiovascular outcomes in a broad spectrum of heart failure patients. Circulation 112(24):3738–3744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tops LF, Delgado V, Marsan NA, Bax JJ (2017) Myocardial strain to detect subtle left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Eur J Heart Fail 19(3):307–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, Capodanno D, Barbato E, Funck-Brentano C et al (2020) 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 41:407–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pedrizzetti G, Lapinskas T, Tonti G, Stoiber L, Zaliunas R, Gebker R et al (2019) The Relationship Between EF and Strain Permits a More Accurate Assessment of LV Systolic Function. J Am Coll Cardiol Img 12(9):1893–1895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lapinskas T, Pedrizzetti G, Stoiber L, Düngen HD, Edelmann F, Pieske B et al (2019) The intraventricular hemodynamic forces estimated using routine CMR cine images: a new marker of the failing heart. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 12(2):377–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arvidsson PM, Töger J, Carlsson M, Steding-Ehrenborg K, Pedrizzetti G, Heiberg E et al (2017) Left and right ventricular hemodynamic forces in healthy volunteers and elite athletes assessed with 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Physiol 312:H314–H328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eriksson J, Bolger AF, Ebbers T, Carlhäll CJ (2016) Assessment of left ventricular hemodynamic forces in healthy subjects and patients with dilated cardiomyopathy using 4D flow MRI. Physiol Rep 4:741–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dal Ferro M, Stolfo D, De Paris V, Lesizza P, Korcova R, Collia D et al (2018) Cardiac fluid dynamics meets deformation imaging. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 16(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cosyns B, Garbi M, Separovic J, Pasquet A, Lancellotti P (2013) Update of the Echocardiography Core Syllabus of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 14(9):837–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American society of echocardiography and the European association of cardiovascular imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16(3):233–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Devereux RB, Alonso DR, Lutas EM, Gottlieb GJ, Campo E, Sachs IRN (1986) Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 57:450–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FF, Foster E, Pellikka PA et al (2005) Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s guidelines and standards committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiograph. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18(12):1440–1463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nagueh SF, Smiseth OA, Appleton CP, Byrd BF, Dokainish H, Edvardsen T et al (2016) Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17(12):1321–1360 Epub 2016 Jul 15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Voigt JU, Pedrizzetti G, Lysyansky P, Marwick TH, Houle H, Baumann R et al (2015) Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16(1):1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Saito K, Okura H, Watanabe N, Hayashida A, Obase K, Imai K et al (2009) Comprehensive evaluation of left ventricular strain using speckle tracking echocardiography in normal adults: comparison of three-dimensional and two-dimensional approaches. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22(9):1025–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stokke TM, Hasselberg NE, Smedsrud MK, Sarvari SI, Haugaa KH, Smiseth OA et al (2017) Geometry as a confounder when assessing ventricular systolic function: comparison between ejection fraction and strain. J Am Coll Cardiol 70(8):942–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pedrizzetti G, Tanacli R, Lapinskas T, Zovatto L, Pieske B, Tonti G et al (2019) Integration between volumetric change and strain for describing the global mechanical function of the left ventricle. Med Eng Phys 74:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pedrizzetti G, Arvidsson PM, Töger J, Borgquist R, Domenichini F, Arheden H et al (2017) On estimating intraventricular hemodynamic forces from endocardial dynamics: a comparative study with 4D flow MRI. J Biomech 60:203–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pedrizzetti G (2019) On the computation of hemodynamic forces in the heart chambers. J Biomech 95:109323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Muraru D, Cucchini U, Mihǎilǎ S, Miglioranza MH, Aruta P, Cavalli G et al (2014) Left ventricular myocardial strain by three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography in healthy subjects: reference values and analysis of their physiologic and technical determinants. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 27(8):858–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Altiok E, Neizel M, Tiemann S, Krass V, Kuhr K, Becker M et al (2012) Quantitative analysis of endocardial and epicardial left ventricular myocardial deformation—comparison of strain-encoded cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 25(11):1179–1188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Path G, Robitaille PM, Merkle H, Tristani M, Zhang J, Garwood M et al (1990) Correlation between transmural high energy phosphate levels and myocardial blood flow in the presence of graded coronary stenosis. Circ Res 67(3):660–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Alcidi GM, Esposito R, Evola V, Santoro C, Lembo M, Sorrentino R et al (2018) Normal reference values of multilayer longitudinal strain according to age decades in a healthy population: a single-centre experience. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 19(12):1390–1396

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marwick TH, Leano RL, Brown J, Sun JP, Hoffmann R, Lysyansky P et al (2009) Myocardial strain measurement with 2-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography. Definition of normal range. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 2(1):80–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sugimoto T, Dulgheru R, Bernard A, Ilardi F, Contu L, Addetia K et al (2017) Echocardiographic reference ranges for normal left ventricular 2D strain: results from the EACVI NORRE study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18(8):833–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Coiro S, Huttin O, Bozec E, Selton-Suty C, Lamiral Z, Carluccio E et al (2017) Reproducibility of echocardiographic assessment of 2D-derived longitudinal strain parameters in a population-based study (The STANISLAS Cohort Study). Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33(9):1361–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheng S, Fernandes VRS, Bluemke DA, McClelland RL, Kronmal RA, Lima JAC (2009) Age-related left ventricular remodeling and associated risk for cardiovascular outcomes the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2(3):191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Potter E, Marwick TH (2018) Assessment of left ventricular function by echocardiography: the case for routinely adding global longitudinal strain to ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 11(2P1):260–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tanaka H (2019) Utility of strain imaging in conjunction with heart failure stage classification for heart failure patient management. J Echocardiogr 17(1):17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Arvidsson PM, Töger J, Carlsson M, Steding-Ehrenborg K, Pedrizzetti G, Heiberg E et al (2017) Left and right ventricular hemodynamic forces in healthy volunteers and elite athletes assessed with 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 312(2):H314–H328

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

DC and GP received partial support for this study from the Italian Ministry of Education and Research, project PRIN No. 2017A889FP.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GF and GP conceived and designed research; GF, GP and DC interpreted results of experiments; DC prepared figures; DC, and GP analyzed data; SF, LP, MZ, performed experiments; GF, and GP drafted manuscript; ADL edited and revised manuscript; GF, DC, SF, LP, MZ, GP, and ADL approved final version of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giorgio Faganello.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

GP is s senior scientific consultant for Medis Medical Imaging Systems BV (Leiden, The Netherlands). GF, DC, SF, LP, MZ and ADL have no conflict of interest to declare.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faganello, G., Collia, D., Furlotti, S. et al. A new integrated approach to cardiac mechanics: reference values for normal left ventricle. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 36, 2173–2185 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01934-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-020-01934-1

Keywords

Navigation