Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The great divide: understanding the role of media and other drivers of the partisan divide in public concern over climate change in the USA, 2001–2014

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent scholarship has identified a large and growing divide on how Republicans and Democrats view the issue of climate change. A number of these studies have suggested that this polarization is a product of systematic efforts to spread doubt about the reality of climate change through the media in general and conservative media in particular. However, research to date has largely relied on speculation about such a relationship rather than empirical evidence. We improve on existing research by conducting an empirical analysis of the factors affecting national-level, quarterly shifts in public concern about climate change between January 2001 and December 2014. Our analysis focuses on the potential role played by four factors that should account for changes in levels of concern regarding climate change: (1) media coverage, (2) extreme weather, (3) issuance of major scientific reports, and (4) changes in economic activity and foreign conflict. Some results suggest that partisan media influences beliefs in ways expected by communication scholars who describe “echo chamber” effects and “boomerang” effects. Among other supporting evidence, we find that partisan media not only strengthen views of like-minded audiences but also when Republicans are presented with opposing frames about climate change from liberal media, they appear to reject the messages such that they are less concerned about the issue. Findings also demonstrate that the dissemination of science increases concern about climate change among Democrats but has no influence on Republicans. Finally, extreme weather does not increase concern among Democrats or Republicans. Implications for future research are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bauer M, Allum N, Miller S (2007) What can we learn from 25-years of PUS research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Underst Sci 16:79–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkland TA (2006) Lessons of disaster: policy change after catastrophic events. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer PR, McKnight J (2015) Climate as comedy the effects of satirical television news on climate change perceptions. Sci Commun 37(5):635–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brulle RJ, Carmichael JT, Jenkins JC (2012) Climate change and public concern: 2002–2010. Clim Chang 114:169–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capstick S, Whitmarsh L et al (2015) International trends in public perceptions of climate change over the past quarter century. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Chang 1:35–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook J, Nuccitelli D, Green SA, Richardson M, Winkler B, Painting R, Way R, Jacobs P, Skuce A (2013) Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environ Res Lett 8: 1-7

  • Dumitrescu D, Mughan A (2010) Mass Media and Democratic Politics. In: Leicht K, Jenkins JC (eds) The handbook of politics: state and civil society. Global Perspective Springer Publishers, New York, pp 477–491

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE (2013) Climate change skepticism and denial: an introduction. Am Behav Sci 57:691–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2011) Organized climate change denial. In: Dryzek J, Norgaard R, Schlosberg D (eds) Oxford handbook of climate change and society. Oxford Press, Cambridge, pp 144–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, McCright AM, Yarosh JH (2016) The political divide on climate change: partisan polarization widens in the U.S. Environ: Sci Policy Sustain Dev 58:4–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman LP, Hart PS, Milosevic T (2015) Polarizing news? Representations of threat and efficacy in leading U.S. newspapers’ coverage of climate change. Public Understand Sci 1–17

  • Gelpi C, Feaver P, Reifler J (2009) Paying the human costs of war: american public opinion and casualties in military conflicts. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guber DL (2013) A cooling climate for change? Party polarization and the politics of global warming. Am Behav Sci 57(1):93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunther AC, Schmitt K (2004) Mapping boundaries of the hostile media effect. Journal of Communication 54:55–70

  • Hamilton LC, Stampone M (2013) Blowin' in the wind: short-term weather and belief in anthropogenic climate change. Weather, Climate, and Society 5:112–119

  • Hmielowski JD, Feldman L, Myers TA, Leiserowitz A, Maibach E (2014) An attack on science? Media use, trust in scientists, and perceptions of global warming. Public Underst Sci 23(7):866–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson KH, Cappella JN (2008) Echo chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the conservative media establishment. Oxford University Press

  • Kahn ME, Kotchen MJ (2010) Environmental concern and the business cycle: the chilling effect of recessions. NBER working paper series. Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Konisky D, Hughes L, Kaylor C (2016) Extreme weather events and climate change concern. Clim Chang 134:533–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N (2010) Climate change in the American Mind: Americans’ global warming beliefs and attitudes in June 2010. Yale University and George Mason University

  • Marquart-Pyatt ST, Shwom RL, Dietz T et al (2011) Understanding public opinion on climate change: a call for research. Environment 53(4):38–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquart-Pyatt ST, McCright A, Dietz T, Dunlap R (2014) Politics eclipses climate extremes for climate change perceptions. Glob Environ Chang 29:246–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright A, Dunlap R (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol Quart 52(2):155–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCright AM, Dunlap RE, Xiao C (2014) Increasing influence of party identification on percieved agreement and support for government action on climate change in the United States, 2006–12. Weather, Climate, and Society 6:194–201

  • Mcknight D (2010) A change in the climate? The journalism of opinion at News Corporation. Journalism 11(6):693–706

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scruggs L, Bengal S (2012) Declining public concern about climate change: can we blame the great recession? Glob Environ Chang 22:505–515

  • Sellers P (2010) Cycles of Spin: Strategic Communication in the U.S. Congress. Cambridge University Press

  • Shao W, Keim BD, Garand JC, Hamilton LC (2014) Weather, climate, and the economy: explaining risk perceptions of global warming. Weather Clim Soc 6:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove E (2010) Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ Plan 42:1273–1285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shwom RL, McCright AM, Berchin SR (2015) Public opinion on climate change. In: Dunlap RE, Brulle RJ (eds) Climate change and society: sociological perspectives. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 269-299

  • Spence A, Poortinga W, Butler C, Pidgeon N (2011) Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nat Clim Chang 1:46–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoknes PE (2014) Rethinking climate communications and the “psychological climate paradox”. Energ Res Soc Sci 1:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroud NJ (2011) Niche news: the politics of news choice. Oxford University Press

  • Weber E, Stern P (2011) Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am Psychol 66(4):315–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe M, Jones BD, Baumgartner FR (2013) A Failure to communicate: agenda setting in media and policy studies. Political Communication 30:175–192

  • Zaller JR (1992) The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser-Renouf C (2011) Attention to science/environment news positively predicts and attention to political news negatively predicts global warming risk perceptions and policy support. J Commun 61:713–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J (2016) Boomerang versus javelins: how polarization constrains communication on climate change. Environ Politics 25:788–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason T. Carmichael.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 295 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Carmichael, J.T., Brulle, R.J. & Huxster, J.K. The great divide: understanding the role of media and other drivers of the partisan divide in public concern over climate change in the USA, 2001–2014. Climatic Change 141, 599–612 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1908-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-1908-1

Keywords

Navigation