Skip to main content
Log in

Globalization strategies for Mesh Adaptive Direct Search

  • Published:
Computational Optimization and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The class of Mesh Adaptive Direct Search (Mads) algorithms is designed for the optimization of constrained black-box problems. The purpose of this paper is to compare instantiations of Mads under different strategies to handle constraints. Intensive numerical tests are conducted from feasible and/or infeasible starting points on three real engineering applications.

The three instantiations are Gps, LTMads and OrthoMads. Constraints are handled by the extreme barrier, the progressive barrier, or by a mixture of both. The applications are the optimization of a styrene production process, a MDO mechanical engineering problem, and a well positioning problem, and the codes are publicly available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abramson, M.A., Audet, C., Couture, G., Dennis, J.E. Jr., Le Digabel, S.: The nomad project. Software available at http://www.gerad.ca/nomad

  2. Abramson, M.A., Audet, C., Dennis, J.E. Jr., Le Digabel, S.: OrthoMADS: A deterministic MADS instance with orthogonal directions. SIAM J. Optim. (2009, to appear)

  3. Audet, C., Dennis, J.E. Jr.: Mesh adaptive direct search algorithms for constrained optimization. SIAM J. Optim. 17(1), 188–217 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Audet, C., Dennis, J.E. Jr.: A progressive barrier for derivative-free nonlinear programming. SIAM J. Optim. 20(4), 445–472 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Audet, C., Béchard, V., Le Digabel, S.: Nonsmooth optimization through mesh adaptive direct search and variable neighborhood search. J. Glob. Optim. 41(2), 299–318 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Booker, A.J., Dennis, J.E. Jr., Frank, P.D., Serafini, D.B., Torczon, V.: Optimization using surrogate objectives on a helicopter test example. In: Borggaard, J., Burns, J., Cliff, E., Schreck, S. (eds.) Optimal Design and Control, Progress in Systems and Control Theory, pp. 49–58. Birkhäuser, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Booker, A.J., Dennis, J.E. Jr., Frank, P.D., Serafini, D.B., Torczon, V., Trosset, M.W.: A rigorous framework for optimization of expensive functions by surrogates. Struct. Optim. 17(1), 1–13 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi, T.D., Kelley, C.T.: Superlinear convergence and implicit filtering. SIAM J. Optim. 10(4), 1149–1162 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Conn, A.R., Scheinberg, K., Vicente, L.N.: Introduction to Derivative-Free Optimization. MPS/SIAM Book Series on Optimization. SIAM, Philadelphia (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fiacco, A.V., McCormick, G.P.: Nonlinear Programming: Sequential Unconstrained Minimization Techniques. Wiley, New York (1968). Reissued in 1990 by SIAM Publications, Philadelphia, as Vol. 4 in the series Classics in Applied Mathematics

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Fletcher, R., Leyffer, S.: Nonlinear programming without a penalty function. Math. Program. Ser. A 91, 239–269 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Fletcher, R., Leyffer, S., Toint, Ph.L.: On the global convergence of a filter–SQP algorithm. SIAM J. Optim. 13(1), 44–59 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Fletcher, R., Leyffer, S., Toint, Ph.L.: A brief history of filter methods. SIAM SIAG/OPT Views-and-News 18(1), 2–12 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fowler, K.R., Reese, J.P., Kees, C.E., Dennis, J.E. Jr., Kelley, C.T., Miller, C.T., Audet, C., Booker, A.J., Couture, G., Darwin, R.W., Farthing, M.W., Finkel, D.E., Gablonsky, J.M., Gray, G., Kolda, T.G.: Comparison of derivative-free optimization methods for groundwater supply and hydraulic capture community problems. Adv. Water Resour. 31(5), 743–757 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gill, P.E., Murray, W., Saunders, M.A.: User’s guide for snopt version 7: Software for large-scale nonlinear programming (2006)

  16. Halton, J.H.: On the efficiency of certain quasi-random sequences of points in evaluating multi-dimensional integrals. Numer. Math. 2(1), 84–90 (1960)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Marsden, A.L.: Aerodynamic noise control by optimal shape design. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University (2004)

  18. Perez, R., Liu, H.H.T., Behdinan, K.: Evaluation of multidisciplinary optimization approaches for aircraft conceptual design. In: AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Albany, NY, September 2004

  19. Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., Agte, J.S., Sandusky, R.R. Jr.: Bi-level integrated system synthesis (BLISS). Technical Report NASA/TM-1998-208715, NASA, Langley Research Center, August 1998

  20. Torczon, V.: On the convergence of pattern search algorithms. SIAM J. Optim. 7, 1–25 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Waltz, R.A., Plantenga, T.D.: knitro user’s manual, version 6.0. Ziena optimization, inc. (2009)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. E. Dennis Jr..

Additional information

Work of the first author was supported by Nserc grant 239436-05. The second author was supported by Lanl 94895-001-04 34, and the first two authors were supported by Afosr FA9550-07-1-0302, the Boeing Company and ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Audet, C., Dennis, J.E. & Le Digabel, S. Globalization strategies for Mesh Adaptive Direct Search. Comput Optim Appl 46, 193–215 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-009-9266-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-009-9266-1

Keywords

Navigation