Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Corruption Suppression Models: the Role of Inspectors’ Moral Level

  • Published:
Computational Mathematics and Modeling Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Controllers and auditors often encounter corruption in organizations, which involves mutually profitable collusion between the audited agent and the auditing inspector. Due to such corrupt collusion, the audited agents avoid the required inspection of their behavior. To enforce the desired behavior of agents and prevent corruption, a hierarchical inspection structure is organized. In the proposed model we apply the game-theoretical approach to examine the optimal organization of hierarchical structures that enforce honest behavior of both the audited agents and the auditors. Inspections are carried out by honest inspectors, who always perform honest audits, and by so-called rational inspectors, who take bribes when they find it advantageous. The inspection superintendent has information on the proportion of honest inspectors at each level of audit and uses this information to reduce the cost of enforcing honest behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. http://www.transparency.org.ru/indeks-vospriiatiia-korruptcii/rossiia-v-indekse-vospriiatiia-korruptcii-2012-novaia-tochka-otscheta.

  2. G. A. Satarov, Anticorruption Policies [in Russian], Fond “Indem”, RA “SPAS”, Moscow (2004).

  3. M. I. Levin and M. L. Tsirik, “Mathematical modeling of corruption,” Ekon. i Matem. Metody, 34, № 4, 34–55 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Chander and L. Wilde, “Corruption in Tax Administration,” J. of Public Econ., 49, № 3, 333–349 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Hindriks, M. Keen, and A. Muthoo, “Corruption, Extortion and Evasion,” J. of Public Econ., 74, № 3, 395–430 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Keren and D. Levhari, “The Internal Organization of the Firm and the Shape of Average Costs,” The Bell Journal of Economics, 14, № 2, 474–486 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Qian, “Incentives and Loss of Control in an Optimal Hierarchy,” Review of Economic Studies, 61, № 3, 527–544 (1994).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. A. A. Vasin, P. A. Kartunova, and A. S. Urazov, “Models of Organization of State Inspection and Anticorruption Measures,” Matem. Modeling, 22, № 4, 67–89 (2010).

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. A. A. Vasin, Noncooperative Games in Nature and Society [in Russian], MAKS Press, Moscow (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. A. Vasin, P. V. Nikolaev, and A. S. Urazov, “Corruption Suppression Mechanisms,” Zhurnal Novoi Ekonomicheskoi Assotsiatsii (2011).

  11. A. A. Vain, P. V. Nikolaev, and A. S. Urazov, “Optimal organization of a monitoring structure,” Dokl. RAN, 444, № 3, 262–265 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. Fundenberg and J. Tirole, Game Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge MA (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. S. N. Chernikov, Linear Inequalities [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1968), pp. 136–140.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. A. Vasin, P. S. Krasnoshchekov, and V. V. Morozov, Operations Research [in Russian], Izd. tsentr “Akademiya”, Moscow (2008), pp. 27–36.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. V. Nikolaev.

Additional information

Translated from Prikladnaya Matematika i Informatika, No. 42, 2013, pp. 91–111.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nikolaev, P.V. Corruption Suppression Models: the Role of Inspectors’ Moral Level. Comput Math Model 25, 87–102 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10598-013-9210-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10598-013-9210-1

Keywords

Navigation