Skip to main content
Log in

Young Offenders’ Decisions to Re-offend as A Breakdown of Self-Regulation of Hierarchically Organised Feedback Loops: The Role of Moral Disengagement in Formulating Decisions to Re-offend

  • Published:
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present paper examines young offenders’ decisions to re-offend, as a function of a breakdown of self-regulation, as represented by moral disengagement. There were 152 male inmates randomly selected from the largest young offender institution in Scotland and were asked to fill-in a moral disengagement scale and a questionnaire which assessed their cognitive representations. It was found that moral disengagement was neither related to frequency of offending nor age of initiation of delinquent behaviour. Moral disengagement was significantly related to attitudes, perceived behavioural control and intentions to offend in the future. Moral disengagement contributed to the prediction of intentions when the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB) was operationalised through the direct measurement of the constructs of the model, although such did not contribute to the prediction of intentions when the constructs were operationalised by indirect, belief-based measurements of the constructs of the model. A model is proposed in terms of self-regulation of hierarchically organised feedback loops. Attitudes and perceived behavioural control are operating at the level of program control, as a function of disengagement of moral principles at the level of principles control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The belief-based measures of the constructs of the TPB were developed from a pilot study of 36 male young offenders who were asked to provide behavioural, normative and control beliefs regarding their future offending behaviour.

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action control: From cognition to behavior. Heidelberg: Springer.

  • Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, personality and behaviour. Homewood: Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. & Driver, B. L. (1991). Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 13, 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1970). The Prediction of Behavior from Attitudinal and Normative Variables. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 466–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood-Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (1999). Predictive Validity of The Theory of Planned Behaviour: The Role of Questionnaire Format and Social Desirability. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 9, 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrera, M., Prelow, H. M., Dumka, L. E., Gonzales, N. A., Knight, G. P., & Michaels, M. L. (2002). Pathways from family economic conditions to adolescents’ distress: Supportive parenting, stressors outside the family, and deviant peers. Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In Kurtines, W.M. & Gewirtz, J.L. (Eds.), Handbook of moral behaviour and development: Theory, research and applications (Vol. , 45-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996a). Mechanisms of moral disengagement in the exercise of moral agency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 364–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996b). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67, 1206–1222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., Underwood, B., & Fromson, M. E. (1975). Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumenisation of victims. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolger, K. E., & Patterson, C. J. (2001). Pathways from child maltreatment to internalising problems: Perceptions of control as mediators and moderators. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 913–940.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). Contexts of child rearing: Problems and prospects. American Psychologist, 34, 844–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C., & Scheier, M. (1982). Control theory: A useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 111–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C., & Scheier, M. (1992). Perspectives on personality. USA: Ally & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. & Scheier, M. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambrigde University Press.

  • Cermak, I., & Blatny, M. (1995). Personality indicators of aggression and moral disengagement. Studia Psychologica, 37, 199–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicchetti, D. & Rogosh, F. (1996). Editorial: Equifinality and multifinality in developmental psychopathology. Development and Psychopathology, 8, 597–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conger, R. D., Wallace, L. E., Sun, Y., Simons, R. L., McLoyd, V. C., & Brody, G. H. (2002). Economic pressure in African American families: A replication and extension of the family stress model. Development and Psychopathology, 38, 179–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T. W., & Farmer, E. M. Z. (2001). Developmental science, systems of care and prevention of emotional and behavioral problems in youth. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 7, 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1995). The twelfth Jack Tizard memorial lecture. the development of offending and antisocial behaviour form childhood: Key findings from the cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 360, 929–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (1993). Motivations for Conduct Disorder and Delinquency. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 225–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haritos-Fatouros, M. (1988). The official torturer: A learning model for obedience to the authority of violence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1107–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiriakidis, S. (2005). Perceived parental care and supervision: Relations with cognitive representations of future offending in a sample of young offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 50(2), 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiriakidis, S. (2000). Psychosocial correlates of juvenile delinquency. University of Stirling: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liska, A. E. (1984). A Critical Examination of the Causal Structure of the Fisbein/ Ajzen Attitude-Behaviour Model. Social Psychology Quarterly, 47, 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The Measurement of Meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D., Manstead, A. S. R., & Stradling, S. G. (1995). Extending the theory of planned behaviour: The role of personal norm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 127–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M. (2005). Multiple meanings of a developmental perspective on psychopathology. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2(3), 221–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Giller, H., & Hagell, A. (1998). Antisocial behaviour by young people. New York: Cambrigde University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Meyer, J., Pickles, A., Silberg, J., Simonoff, E. & Taylor, E. (1997). Heterogeneity of antisocial behaviour: Causes, continuities and consequences. In Osgood, D.W. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Motivation and Delinquency, (Vol 44, 45-118), (Dienstbier, R.A.) (Gen. Ed.), Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

  • Sparks, P., Guthrie, C., & Shepherd, R. (1997). The dimensional structure of the perceived behavioral control construct. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 418–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralisation: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22, 664–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terry, D. J., & O’Leary, J. E. (1995). The theory of planned behaviour: The effects of perceived behavioural control and self-efficacy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 199–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry, T. P., Ireland, T. O., & Smith, C. A. (2001). The importance of timing: The varying impact of childhood and adolescent maltreatment on multiple problem outcomes. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 957–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wadsworth, M. E., & Compas, B. E. (2002). Coping with family and economic strain: The adolescent perspective. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 243–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willott, S., & Griffin, C. (1999). Building your own lifeboat: Working-class male offenders talk about economic crime. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 445–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This article is based on research which was financed by the Greek State Scholarships Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stavros P. Kiriakidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiriakidis, S.P. Young Offenders’ Decisions to Re-offend as A Breakdown of Self-Regulation of Hierarchically Organised Feedback Loops: The Role of Moral Disengagement in Formulating Decisions to Re-offend. Eur J Crim Policy Res 16, 237–250 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-010-9129-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-010-9129-4

Keywords

Navigation