Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Public Attitudes in Australia to the Reintegration of ex-Offenders: Testing a Belief in Redeemability (BiR) scale

  • Published:
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report the results of a large scale Australian survey of public attitudes to offender reintegration. A representative sample of 1215 respondents gave their views about the possibility that offenders could make a good life for themselves after having committed crime. Views expressed were significantly positive with around four out of five respondents indicating they believed reintegration was possible and should be attempted. On the basis of the responses an overall score was calculated for each respondent. Analysis of the data suggested that three factors contributed to the overall score. We named these: Human capital, Possibility of change and Agency and the rationale for these is discussed. Some demographic factors (age, gender, presence of children in the household and highest level of schooling) were significantly related to scores in one of the components. Respondents also reported whether they, or someone close to them, had been a victim of crime or had been arrested, and whether they had worked in the field of law enforcement or the field of human services. Inclusion in these categories was found to be significantly related to certain components of the overall score. These findings are discussed in the light of related surveys in other jurisdictions and we invite other researchers to use the scale and suggest improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, S., & Mohr, P. (2005). Law-and-order politics, public opinion polls and the media. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12(1), 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F., Fisher, B., & Applegate, B. (2000). Public opinion about punishment and corrections. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice, a review of research, volume 27. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumberland, J., & Zamble, E. (1992). General and specific measures of attitudes toward early release of criminal offenders. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 24(4), 442–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries Robbé, M., Mann, R., Maruna, S., & Thornton, D. (2015). An exploration of protective factors supporting desistance from sexual offending. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(1), 16–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, T., Nicholas, S., Povey, D., & Walker, A. (2004). Crime in England and Wales 2003/2004. Statistical Bulletin – Home Office Research Development and Statistics Directorate.

  • Doob, A., & Roberts, J. (1988). Public punitiveness and public knowledge of the facts: some Canadian surveys. In N. Walker & M. Hough (Eds.), Public attitudes to sentencing. Gower, Aldershot: Cambridge Studies in Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowler, K. (2003). Media consumption and public attitudes towards crime and justice: the relationship between fear of crime, punitive attitudes and perceived police effectiveness. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 10(2), 109–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, B., Wodahl, E., & Schuhmann, R. (2011). Value conflict and public opinion toward prisoner reentry initiatives. Criminal Justice Policy Review, doi: 10.1177/0887403411424081.

  • Garland, B., Wodahl, E., & Cota, L. (2015). Measuring public support for prisoner reentry options. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, doi: 10.1177/0306624X15578438.

  • Garland, B., Wodahl, E., & Smith, R. G. (2015). Religious Beliefs and Public Support for Prisoner Reentry. Criminal Justice Policy Review, doi: 10.1177/0887403415619985.

  • Gelb, K. (2006). Myths and misconceptions: public opinion versus public judgement about sentencing (Sentencing advisory council Victoria). Melbourne: Sentencing Advisory Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanz, L. (1994). The South African public’s attitudes towards imprisonment and the release of offenders. Acta Criminologica, 7, 64–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halman, L. (2001). The European values study: a third wave. Sourcebook of the 1999/2000 European values study. Tilburg: Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschfield, P., & Piquero, A. (2010). Normalization and legitimation: modeling stigmatizing attitudes towards offenders. Criminology, 48(1), 27–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M., & Roberts, J. (1998). Attitudes to punishment: findings from the British crime survey (Home office research study No. 179). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, N. (2005). Beyond populist punitiveness? Punishment and Society, 7(3), 243–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Immerwahr, J., & Johnson, J. (2002). The revolving door—exploring public attitudes toward prisoner reentry. Washington DC: Urban Institute.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Indermaur, D. (1987). Public perception of sentencing in Perth, Western Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 20(3), 163–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indermaur, D., & Roberts, L. (2009). Confidence in the criminal justice system (Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice, number 387). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 20252 (2006). Market, opinion and social research—vocabulary and service requirements. Download from: http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=39339.

  • Krisberg, B., & Marchionna, S. (2006). Attitudes of US voters toward prisoner rehabilitation and reentry policies. Washington DC, US: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leverentz, A. (2011). Neighborhood context of attitudes toward crime and re-entry. Punishment and Society, 13(1), 64–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, T., & Bennet. (1982). Burglary in a dwelling—the offense, the offender and the victim. Exeter: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majer, J., Olson, B., Komer, A., & Jason, L. (2015). Motivation among ex-offenders exiting treatment: the role of abstinence self-efficacy. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 54, 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: how ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S., & King, A. (2004). Public opinion and community penalties. Alternatives to Prison: Options for an Insecure Society, 83-112.

  • Maruna, S., & King, A. (2009). Once a criminal always a criminal? “Redeemability” and the psychology of public punitive attitudes. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 15, 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S., LeBel, T., Mitchell, N., & Naples, M. (2004). Pygmalion in the reintegration process: desistance from crime through the looking glass. Psychology Crime and Law, 10(3), 271–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCorkle, R. (1993). Research note: punish and rehabilitate? public attitudes toward six common crimes. Crime and Delinquency, 39(2), 240–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, F. (2009). What works and what’s just? European Journal of Probation University of Bucharest, 1(1), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter D. Hart Research Associates, Inc. (2001). Changing public attitudes toward the criminal justice system: telephone survey of 1,056 U.S. adults and six focus groups, May–December 2001. Download 20.06.2015 from www.njisj.org/assets/documents/eagleton_report.pdf.

  • Roberts, J., & Doob, A. (1990). News media influences on public views on sentencing. Law and Human Behavior, 14(5), 451–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J., & Hough, J. (2005). Understanding public attitudes to criminal justice. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, L., & Indermaur, D. (2009). What Australians think about crime and justice: results from the 2007 survey of social attitudes (Research and public policy series, number 101). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C., Clawson, E., Doble, J., Selton, C., & Briker, A. (2005). Rethinking justice in Massachusetts: public attitudes towards crime and punishment. Boston: Crime and Justice Institute at Community Resources for Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandys, M., & McGarrell, E. (1997). Beyond the Bible belt: the influence (or lack thereof) of religion on attitudes towards the death penalty. Journal of Crime and Justice, 20(1), 179–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unnever, J., Cullen, F., & Fisher, B. (2007). “A liberal is someone who has not been mugged”: criminal victimization and political beliefs. Justice Quarterly, 24(2), 309–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban Institute. (2006). Jail reentry roundtable initiative. Washington D.C: The Urban Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, J. J. M., Mayhew, P., & Killias, M. (1990). Experiences of crime across the world: key findings from the 1989 international crime survey. Deventer: Kluwer Law and Taxation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, J., Collins, M., & Wilson, P. (1987). How the public sees sentencing: a Australian survey (Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice, 4). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weatherburn, D. & Indermaur, D. (2004). Public perceptions of crime trends in New South Wales and Western Australia. Crime and justice bulletin: contemporary issues in crime and justice, No.80. Sydney: Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.

  • Wellford, C. (1975). Labelling theory and criminology: an assessment. Social Problems, 22(3), 332–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Stephen Watson, market researcher, London, UK.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin O’Sullivan.

Additional information

David Holderness regrettably died before this paper was submitted.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Sullivan, K., Holderness, D., Hong, X.Y. et al. Public Attitudes in Australia to the Reintegration of ex-Offenders: Testing a Belief in Redeemability (BiR) scale. Eur J Crim Policy Res 23, 409–424 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-016-9328-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-016-9328-8

Keywords

Navigation