Abstract
Evidence shows that waste crimes, principally trafficking, are facilitated by unclear regulatory frameworks. Indeed, lax legislation can unintentionally generate crime opportunities. The aim of this study is to combine criminological and legal knowledge to identify loopholes in the waste regulatory frameworks of the European Union and Italian government. A crime proofing analysis was conducted to identify vulnerabilities in the selected waste legislation. Results indicate the existence of three macrocategories of loopholes: the legal framework, the supply chain, and the justice response system. Policy implications involve the necessity to simplify the language in waste legislation, to create effective measures via which to improve the traceability of waste, and to provide law enforcement authorities with adequate training and technological resources to perform inspection activities. Given the transnational nature of illicit waste trafficking, international cooperation is integral for fighting this crime type.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, published on the OJ L 312, 22.11.2008, p. 3–30.
Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste (Text with EEA relevance) {SWD (2015) 259 final} {SWD (2015) 260 final} Brussels, 2.12.2015 COM(2015) 595 final 2015/0275 (COD).
Regulation (EU) No 660/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 amending Regulation (EC) No 1013/2006 on shipments of waste, published in the OJ L 189, 27.6.2014, p. 135–142.
Italian legislative decree No 152/2006 (as amended from time-to-time), published in the Italian Gazette No 88 of 14 April 2006 – Ordinary Supplement No 96.
The Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal was adopted on 22 March 1989 by the Conference of Plenipotentiaries in Basel, Switzerland.
Formulario Identificativo del Rifiuto.
Testo Unico Ambientale.
Parte IV: Norme in materia di gestione dei rifiuti e di bonifica dei siti inquinati.
Sistema sanzionatorio e disposizioni transitorie e finali.
The value of the fine can vary from Euro 1550.00 to Euro 26,000.00.
An expanded explanation of the CPL method can be found here: “A study on crime proofing – Evaluation of crime risk implications of the European Commission’s proposals covering a range of policy areas” (Transcrime, 2006).
The cooperation between the academia and the institutions usually requires specific agreements that could not be achieved for this study. For this reason, the crime risk management is out of the scope of this analysis, although it may be the object of future research.
The CPL is the result of an analysis firstly conducted by one researcher (law expert) and secondly checked by the other members of the research group (criminology experts), who verified the content of the analysis and the rigorous application of the CPL in order to minimize subjectivity in the identification of the vulnerabilities. Moreover, since the study is part of a wider project that involved other universities, the preliminary results of our analysis were also validated by other research teams.
Additional information on the empirical strategy and its application can be found in the report “Crime Proofing analysis of the waste regulation. A specific focus on the European Union, Finland, Italy, and the Netherlands” (https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_z0dJCe4UmYYWlUNjcxTlRJUkhxUENvOXlDVWN5TWFhQWxz/view)
A policy option can be considered as a measure of intervention outlined by the legislation. Policy options are regulatory provisions whose aim is to tackle a phenomenon and that have economic, social and environmental impacts. For a detailed explanation, see also https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-making-process/planning-and-proposing-law/better-regulation-why-and-how/better-regulation-guidelines-and-toolboxen
Article 3 and Article 4 of the European Waste Shipment Regulation.
Under the framework of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, the EU has the power to act—at different degrees of exclusivity—only when the Treaty recognizes its competence, competence that has been transferred by the EU MSs. Up to now, criminal law is still an exclusive competence of the EU MSs.
The offences can be persecuted only through a limited number of years (generally, five or ten). When the time lapse expires without any initiative of persecuting, there is no chance to assess the criminal liability (concept of “prescrizione del reato”).
References
Baird, J., Curry, R., & Cruz, P. (2014). An overview of waste crime, its characteristics, and the vulnerability of the EU waste sector. Waste Management and Research, 32(2), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X13517161.
Bernard, S. (2011). Transboundary movement of waste: second-hand market and illegal shipments. CIRANO - Scientific Publications 2011s-77. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228176407TransboundaryMovementofWasteSecond-HandMarketsandIllegalShipments. Accessed 14 Mar 2018
Bisschop, L. (2012). Is it all going to waste? Illegal transports of e-waste in a European trade hub. Crime, Law and Social Change, 58(3), 221–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-012-9383-0.
Bisschop, L. (2014). How e-Waste challenges environmental governance. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v3i2.178.
Calderoni, F., Maggioni, M., Martocchia, S., & Savona, E. U. (2006). A study on crime proofing - evaluation of crime risk implication of the European Commission’s Proposals Covering a Range of Policy Areas. Transcrime.
Calderoni, F., Savona, E. U., & Solmi, S. (2012). Crime proofing the policy options for the revision of the tobacco products directive. Proofing the policy options under consideration for the revision of EU directive 2001/37/EC against the risk of unintended criminal opportunities. Trento: Transcrime.
Caneppele, Stefano. (2017). Crime proofing of legislation in practice: The case of the 2014 EU Tobacco Products Directive. In Crime Prevention in the 21st Century, 275–92. Springer.
Caneppele, S., Savona, E. U., & Aziani, A. (2013). Crime Proofing of the New Tobacco Products Directive. Proofing the EU Commission Proposal for a Revised Tobacco Products Directive against the Risks of Unintended Criminal Opportunities. Trento: Transcrime - Università degli Studi di Trento. http://www.transcrime.it/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Crime-Proofing-of-the-NEW-TPD6.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Cassinelli, N, & Del Duro, R. (2007). La normativa sulla gestione integrata dei rifiuti in Italia. In La raccolta differenziata dei rifiuti e il riciclo delle materie secondarie, 211. Milan: FrancoAngeli s.r.l.
Cassotta, S. (2012). Extended producer responsibility in waste regulations in a multilevel global approach: nanotechnology as a case study. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 21(5), 198–219.
Cerulli Irelli, V., & di San Luca, G. C. (2011a). La disciplina giuridica dei rifiuti in Italia. Volume I: Analisi della disciplina nazionale. Vol. I. 2 vols. Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica.
Cerulli Irelli, V., & di San Luca, G. C. (2011b). La disciplina giuridica dei rifiuti in Italia. Volume II: Ricognizione ragionata della legislazione regionale. Vol. II. 2 vols. Editoriale Scientifica.
Cesi, B., D’Amato, A., & Zoli, M. (2017). Corruption in environmental policy: THE case of waste. Economia Politica. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-017-0087-x.
Commissione parlamentare inchiesta rifiuti (2014). ‘Commissione parlamentare di inchiesta sulle attività illecite connesse al ciclo dei rifiuti e su illeciti ambientali ad esse correlati_Resoconto stenografico 9_Seduta di martedì 4 novembre 2014_Presidenza del Presidente Alessandro Bratti_ Audizione del direttore dell’Agenzia delle dogane e dei monopoli, Giuseppe Peleggi - Audizione del procuratore nazionale antimafia, Franco Roberti’. Italian Parliament.
Commissione parlamentare inchiesta rifiuti (2016a). ‘Commissione parlamentare di inchiesta sulle attività illecite connesse al ciclo dei rifiuti e su illeciti ambientali ad esse correlati_Resoconto stenografico 94_Seduta di giovedì 14 aprile 2016_Presidenza del Presidente Alessandro Bratti_Audizione del comandante generale del Corpo delle Capitanerie di porto – Guardia Costiera, Vincenzo Melone, Caligiore, Piras, Menna, Giovannone’. Italian Parliament.
Commissione parlamentare inchiesta rifiuti (2016b). Commissione parlamentare di inchiesta sulle attività illecite connesse al ciclo dei rifiuti e su illeciti ambientali ad esse correlati_Resoconto stenografico_Audizione 114_Seduta di martedì 2 agosto 2016_Presidenza del Presidente Alessandro Bratti_Audizioni di delegati RSU della Miteni S.p.A. - Audizione del presidente del consiglio di amministrazione di AMA Spa, Daniele Fortini. Italian Parliament.
Curtol, F., Di Nicola, A., Martocchia, S., & Savona, E. U. (2006a). Regulation of offshore banking services and financial entities. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 12(3–4), 279–298.
Curtol, F., Pesarin, G., & Vander Beken, T. (2006b). Testing the mechanism on EU public procurement legislation. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 12(3–4), 337–364.
De Leonardis, F. (2011). I rifiuti: dallo smaltimento alla prevenzione. In Diritto dell’Ambiente, Seconda (pp. 303–20). Torino: G. Giappichelli.
De Santis, G. (2008). Il delitto di “attività organizzate per il traffico illecito di rifiuti” nel quadro della annunciata riforma dello Statuto penale dell’ambiente. Responsabilità civile e previdenza, 4(April), 756–784.
della Scala, M. G. (2009). La circolazione dei rifiuti tra discipline regionali, normativa statale, vincoli costituzionali e principi del diritto europeo (nota a C. cost., 23 gennaio 2009, n. 10). Il Foro Amministrativo C.d.S. Rivista mensile di dottrina e giurisprudenza, VIII(2), 361–385.
Dorn, N., van Daele, S., & Vander Beken, T. (2007). Reducing vulnerabilities to crime of the European waste management industry: the Research Base and the prospects for policy. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice, 23, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1163/092895607X193524.
Dorn, N., & Levi, M. (2006). Regulation of insurance and corporate security: integrating crime and terrorism seriousness into the analysis. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 12(3–4), 257–277.
EnviCrimeNet (2015). Report on Environmental Crime in Europe. IPEC. https://www.europol.europa.eu/publications-documents/report-environmental-crime-in-europe. Accessed 11 April 2017
European Commission and Council (2015). Proposal for a Directive European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 2008/98/EC on Waste. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52015PC0595. Accessed 20 April 2017
European Commission, Directorate-General Environment, and Director-General (2012). Guidance on the Interpretation of Key Provisions of Directive 2008/98/EC on Waste. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/framework/pdf/guidance_doc.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2017
European Environment Agency (2012). Movements of Waste across the EU’s Internal and External Borders’. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/movements-of-waste-EU-2012. Accessed 11 April 2017
Ezroj, A. (2009). Extended producer responsibility programs in the European Union: In search of the optimal legal basis. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 20, 199.
Germani, A. R., Pergolizzi, A., & Reganati, F. (2015). Illegal trafficking and unsustainable waste Management in Italy: Evidence at regional level. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 4(4), 369–389. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2015.4(5).
Hayman, G., & Brack, D. (2002). ‘International Environmental Crime. The Nature and Control of Environmental Black Markets’. Royal Institute of international affairs. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/docum/pdf/02544environmentalcrimeworkshop.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2017
Hedemann-Robinson, M. (2012). EU enforcement of international environmental agreements: the role of the European Commission. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 21(1), 2–30.
Hedemann-Robinson, M. (2015). Enforcement of EU environmental law: taking stock of the evolving union legal framework. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 24(5), 115–129.
Iacoviello, A. (2007). La disciplina della circolazione dei rifiuti nella recente giurisprudenza della Corte Costituzionale. Rivista giuridica dell’Edilizia, 1(February), 15–32.
Interview no. 1 (2016). Interview with selected EU expert from the academia.
Interview no. 2 (2016). Interview with selected EU expert from the academia.
Interview no. 3 (2016). Interview with selected EU expert from the judicial system.
Interview no. 4. (2016). Interview with selected Italian expert from the academia.
Interview no. 5. (2016). Interview with selected Italian expert from the judicial system.
Interview no. 6. (2016). Interview with selected Italian expert from national observatory environment and legality.
Interview no. 7 (2016). Interview with selected Italian expert from the academia and judicial system.
Interview no. 8 (2016). Interview with selected Italian expert from the judicial system.
Klenovšek, A., & Meško, G. (2011). International waste trafficking: Preliminary explorations. In G. Meško, D. Dimitrijević, & C. B. Fields (Eds.), Understanding and managing threats to the environment in South Eastern Europe (Vol. 2, pp. 79–99). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0611-85.
Legambiente. (2015). Ecomafia 2015 - Corrotti, clan e inquinatori: Ladri di futuro all’assalto del belpaese. Napoli: Marotta & Cafiero.
Liddick, D. (2010). The traffic in garbage and hazardous wastes: an overview. Trends in Organized Crime, 13(2–3), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-009-9089-6.
Liu, Y., Kong, F., & Gonzalez, E. D. R. S. (2017). Dumping, waste management and ecological security: evidence from England. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167(November), 1425–1437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.097.
Mancuso, M., & Savona, E. U. (2017). ‘Fighting Lllicit Firearms_Trafficking Routes and Actors at European Level. Final Report of Project FIRE (Www.Fireproject.Eu).’ Milan, Italy: Transcrime - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore. http://www.transcrime.it/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/FIREFinalReport.pdf. Accessed 20 Dec 2017
Massari, M., & Monzini, P. (2004). Dirty businesses in Italy: a case-study of illegal trafficking in hazardous waste. Global Crime, 6(3–4), 285–304.
Mastrodonato, G. (2010). The implementation of EC directives in Italy: the environmental code and the transversal tools. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 19(2), 80–86.
Mastrodonato, G. (2012). Environmental protection and markets in waste management. The transposition of directive 2008/98/EC into the Italian legal system. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 21(4), 165–175.
Nash, H. A. (2009). The revised directive on waste: resolving legislative tensions in waste management? Journal of Environmental Law, 1, 139–149.
Pak, P. (2008). Haste makes E-waste: A comparative analysis of how the United States should approach the growing e-waste threat. Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, 16, 241.
Paone, V. (2008). La tutela dell’ambiente e l’inquinamento da rifiuti. Dal D.p.r. 915/1982 al D. lgs. 4/2008. Giuffrè Editore.
Pernice, M., & Mininni, G. (2008). Il sistema normativo e tecnico di gestione dei riufiuti. La nuova disciplina dopo il d. lgs. 152/2006 e la sua riforma. Testo Unico Ambientale 4. Trento: IPSOA Gruppo Wolters Kluwer.
Pirlone, Francesca. 2015. I rifiuti urbani e i piani di gestione urbana all’interno della governance. Città e Territorio. Milan, Italy: FrancoAngeli s.r.l.
Roraima, A., Benjamin, H. A., Helgessen, V., Jianlong, Z., Sarney Filho, J., & Widodo, J. (2017). Environmental crime. Tackling the Greatest Threats to Our Planet. UNEP. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/20259/Our%20Planet%20March%202017.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 4 Feb 2018
Rucevska, I., Nellemann, C., Isarin, N., Yang, W., Liu, N., Yu, K., Sandnaes, S., et al. (2015). Waste crime - waste risk: gaps in meeting the Global Waste Challenge. A UNEP Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme and GRID-Arendal.
Ruggiero, V., & South, N. (2010). Green criminology and dirty collar crime. Critical Criminology, 18(4), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-010-9122-8.
Sahramäki, I., Favarin, S., Mehlbaum, S., Savona, E., Spapens, T., & Kankaanranta, T. (2017). Wasting opportunities-prevention of illicit cross-border waste trafficking. European Journal of Policing Studies. http://www.maklu-online.eu/nl/tijdschrift/ejps/online-first/online-first/wasting-opportunities-prevention-illicit-cross-bor/pdf/. Accessed 19 Feb 2018
Savona, E. U. (2006). ‘The Crime Risk Assessment Mechanism (CRAM) for Proofing EU and National Legislation against Crime. Final Report of Project MARC - Developing Mechanisms for Assessing the Risk of Crime Due to Legislation and Products in Order to Proof Them against Crime at an EU Level’. Transcrime.
Savona, E. U. (2007). Double thematic issue on: proofing Eu legislation against crime. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 12(3–4), 177–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-007-9033-8.
Savona, Ernesto U. (2017). Proofing legislation against crime as situational prevention measure. In Crime prevention in the 21st century. Insightful approaches for crime prevention initiatives (p. 396). Dordrecht: Springer.
Spapens, T. (2014). Invisible victims: The problem of policing environmental crime. In T. Spapens, R. White, & M. Kluin (Eds.), Environmental crime and its victims perspectives within green criminology (pp. 221–236). Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Limited.
Staab, Andreas. (2013). Environment. In The European Union Explained: Institutions, Actors, Global Impact (3), Terza (pp. 171–79). Bloomington: Indiana Press University.
Vagliasindi, G. M., Lucifora, A., & Bianco, F. (2015). ‘Fighting Environmental Crime in Italy: A Country Report. Study in the Framework of the EFFACE Research Project, Catania: University of Catania’. Catania, Italy: University of Catania. http://efface.eu/sites/default/files/EFFACEFighting%20Environmental%20Crime%20in%20Italy.pdf. Accessed 11 April 2017
Vander Beken, T., & Balcaen, A. (2006). Crime opportunities provided by legislation in market sectors: mobile phones, waste disposal, banking, pharmaceuticals. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 12(3), 299–323.
White, R., & Heckenberg, D. (2011). Key vulnerabilities and limitations in the management of hazardous waste and its disposal: a checklist assessment tool. Journal of Environmental Protection, 02(09), 1257–1263. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2011.29145.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morganti, M., Favarin, S. & Andreatta, D. Illicit Waste Trafficking and Loopholes in the European and Italian Legislation. Eur J Crim Policy Res 26, 105–133 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-018-9405-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-018-9405-2