Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

International Anti-Corruption Initiatives: a Classification of Policy Interventions

  • Published:
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent decades, the number of anti-corruption policies developed in the public sector increased considerably. However, existing attempts at classifying them do not fully address the complexity of corruption types, risk factors, and policy environments. Owing to a limited problem description, existing classifications do not always account for the full spectrum of potential policy tools, thus impeding the design, monitoring, and evaluation of anti-corruption interventions. By reviewing the main features of more than 30 international initiatives targeting administrative corruption, this paper aims at identifying the core elements for a comprehensive and actionable typology of anti-corruption policies. A content analysis of the existing international efforts highlights the importance of considering three main groups of variables for classifying anti-corruption initiatives: the type of gain involved in the corrupt conduct, the mechanism of intervention exploited by the policy, and the type of policy tool. The typology provides an interdisciplinary perspective on existing anti-corruption efforts, confronting well-known criminological distinctions with a detailed classification of policy instruments. The study also identifies the main features and limits of existing anti-corruption classifications and efforts, such as the predominance of the economic paradigm and the focus on the characteristics of developing countries for problematizing corruption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term typology refers to multidimensional conceptual classifications (Bailey 1994).

References

  • Báger, G. (2011). Corruption Risk in Public Administration. Public Finance Quarterly, 56(1), 44–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blind PK (2011). Perspective of corruption metrics. Prepared for the workshop on Engaging Citizens to Counter Corruption for Better Public Service Delivery and Achievement of the Millenium Development Goals. 4th Session of the Conference of the State Partie (CoSP) to the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC), Morocco.

  • Booth, D., & Fritz, V. (2008). Good Governance, Aid Modalities and Poverty Reduction: From Better Theory to Better Practice. Dublin: Advisory Board for Irish Aid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunetti, A., & Weder, B. (2003). A Free Press Is Bad News for Corruption. Journal of Public Economics, 87(7–8), 1801–1824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. V. (1995). Situational crime prevention. In M. Tonry & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), Building a safer society: Strategic approaches to crime prevention (pp. 91–150). Crime and Justice vol 19. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.

  • Council of Europe (2013). Designing and implementing anti-corruption policies handbook. Eastern Partnership-Council of Europe Facility Project on “Good Governance and Fight against Corruption”. https://rm.coe.int/16806d8ad7.

  • Dish, A., Vigeland, E., Sundet, G. & Gibson, S. (2009). Anti-corruption approaches: a literature review. Joint Evaluation 2009:1. https://norad.no/en/toolspublications/publications/2009/anti-corruption-approaches-a-literature-review/ Accessed 13 June 2017.

  • Esadze, L. (2013). Glossary of the conflict of interest and corruption terms. http://www.info-evropa.rs/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Londa-Esadze-Glossary-of-the-Conflict-of-Interest-and-Corruption-Terms.pdf Accessed 11 July 2017.

  • European Commission (2014). Report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament. EU Anti-Corruption Report. 3.2.2014 COM (2014) 38 final, Brussels

  • Felson, M. (2006). Crime and nature. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, D. J. (1991). Administrative Corruption: Incidence, Causes, and Remedial Strategies. In A. Farazmand (Ed.), Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration (pp. 467–480). New York: Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graycar, A. (2015). Corruption: Classification and analysis. Policy and Society, 34(2015), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graycar, A., & Masters, A. B. (2018). Preventing Malfeasance in Low Corruption Environments. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(1), 170–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graycar, A., & Monaghan, O. (2015). Rich Country Corruption. International Journal of Public Administration, 38(8), 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.949757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graycar, A., & Sidebottom, A. (2012). Corruption and control: a corruption reduction approach. Journal of Financial Crime, 19(4), 384–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R., & Mathisen, H. (2011). Understanding Success and Failure of Anti-Corruption Initiatives. Crime, Law and Social Change, 58(5), 533–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-011-9361-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, L. (2015). Corruption: A Very Short Introduction (p. 2015). Oxford University Press.

  • Howlett, M. (2010). Designing Public Policies: Principles and Instruments. Policy Studies. Abingdon: Routledge.

  • Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Wu, X. (2015). Understanding the persistence of policy failures: The role of politics, governance and uncertainty. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3–4), 209–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huberts, L. W. J. C. (1998). What can be done against public corruption and fraud: expert views on strategies to protect public integrity. Crime, Law and Social Change, 29, 209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Independent Commission Against Corruption (European Union) – ICAC (2009). Public Sector Anti-Corruption Framework Manual. European Union Decentralised Cooperation Programme. https://www.icac.mu/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Public-Sector-Anti-Corruption-Framework.pdf.

  • Jancsics, D. (2019). Corruption as Resource Transfer: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis. Public Administration Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13024.

  • Johnsøn, J. (2012). Theories of change in anti-corruption work: A tool for programme design and evaluation (U4 Issues Paper No. 2012:6). Bergen: U4, Chr. Michelsen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2008). Governance indicators: where are we, where should we be going? The World Bank Research Observer, 23, 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, D., & Vicente, P. C. (2011). Legal Corruption. Economics and Politics, 23(2), 195–219. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0343.2010.00377.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff, J. G. (2009). The Organization of Anticorruption: Getting Incentives Right. In R. I. Rotberg (Ed.), Corruption, Global Security, and World Order. Washington D.C.: The Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, D. (2008). A Multidimensional Conceptualization of Organizational Corruption Control. Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 710–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCusker, R. (2006). Review of Anti-Corruption Strategies. Technical and Background Paper, 23. Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, Australia and Transparency International/United Nations Human Settlements Programme 2004. Tools to support transparency in local governance. Urban governance toolkit series. Nairobi: UN-Habitat OECD Publishing.

  • Mills May, A. (2012). Causes of corruption in public sector institutions and its impact on development: turning what we know into what we do. Expert Group Meeting UNPAN, 14th June 2012. http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/un-dpadm/unpan049589.pdf.

  • Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). The Quest for Good Governance: How Societies Develop Control of Corruption. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Organizations for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2003). Anti-Corruption Instruments and The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. Abingdon: OECD Secreteriat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organizations for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2007a). Bribery in Public Procurement. Methods, Actors and Counter-Measures. Abingdon: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organizations for Economic Co-operation and Development (2007b). Corruption. A glossary of international and criminal standards.

  • Organizations for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2009). Recommendation for further Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials. Abingdon: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organizations for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). Good Practice Guidance on Internal Controls, Ethics, and Compliance. Abingdon: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organizations for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). Consequences of Corruption at the Sector Level and Implications for Economic Growth and Development. Abingdon: OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264230781-en.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Organizations for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). Recommendation of the Council for Development Cooperation Actors on Managing the Risk of Corruption. Abingdon: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, A., Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2013). Why Anticorruption Reforms Fail—Systemic Corruption as a Collective Action Problem. Governance, 26(3), 449–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1978). Corruption: a study in political economy. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank (1997). Helping Countries Combat Corruption. The Role of the World Bank. Poverty Reduction and Economic Management. The World Bank. September 1997. http://www1.worldbank.org/publicsector/anticorrupt/corruptn/corrptn.pdf

  • The World Bank (2003). Youth for Good Governance. Module III. Introduction to Corruption. http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/35970/mod03.pdf

  • Transparency International (2002). Corruption Fighters Toolkit: Civil Society Experiences and Emerging Strategies.

  • Transparency International (2013). Best Practices for Anti-Corruption Commissions.

  • Transparency International (2015). Together against Corruption: Transparency International Strategy 2020.

  • United Nations Development Programme (2011). Practitioners’ Guide: Capacity Assessment of ACAs.

  • United Nations Development Programme (2014a). Global Anti-Corruption Initiative (GAIN): Highlights of the Key Achievements in 2014.

  • United Nations Development Programme (2014b). UNDP Global Anti-Corruption Initiative (GAIN) 2014-2017.

  • United Nations Development Programme (2015). Users Guide Measuring Corruption and Anticorruption.

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2003). United Nations Guide on Anti-Corruption Policy. Vienna, Austria.

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2004). United Nations Convention Against Corruption. Vienna, Austria. http://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/UNCAC/Publications/Convention/08-50026_E.pdf

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2006). Legislative guide for the implementation of the United Nations Convention against Corruption.

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2013). Guidebook on anti-corruption in public procurement and the management of public finances. Good practices in ensuring compliance with article 9 of the United Nations Convention against Corruption. United Nations, Vienna.

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (2015). National Anti-Corruption Strategies: a Practical Guide for Development and Implementation. Vienna.

  • United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime and United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research. (2009). Technical guide to the united nations convention against corruption. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • USAID (2009). Anticorruption Assessment Handbook Final Report. USAID & Management Systems International 2009.

  • Vannucci, A. (2015). Three paradigms for the analysis of corruption. Labour & Law Issues, 1(2).

  • World Bank (2006). Governance and Anti-Corruption: Ways to Enhance the World Bank’s Impact http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTOED/Resources/governance_anticorruption.pdf.

  • Zhang, Y., & Vargas-Hernández, J. G. (2017). Introduction: Corruption and Government Anti-Corruption Strategies. In Y. Zhang & C. Lavena (Eds.), Government Anti-Corruption Strategies: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giulia Mugellini.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Villeneuve, JP., Mugellini, G. & Heide, M. International Anti-Corruption Initiatives: a Classification of Policy Interventions. Eur J Crim Policy Res 26, 431–455 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-019-09410-w

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-019-09410-w

Keywords

Navigation