Abstract
Sales of private goods with affiliated public good attributes have markedly risen in recent years. This fact is difficult to explain within the paradigm of purely self-interested behavior. This paper investigates factors influencing consumer demand for pork products with certifications related to the environment, animal welfare, and antibiotics. Using psychometric scaling techniques, we measure individuals’ degree of altruism and propensity toward free riding. Results of a random parameter logit model applied to choice data obtained from a nationwide survey in the United States indicates that more altruistic individuals are willing to pay more for pork products with public good attributes than less altruistic individuals and free riders. These results indicate that private purchases of goods with public-good attributes are not simply a result of individuals’ perceptions of the ability to mitigate private risks such as food safety, but that individuals are making private choices to affect public outcomes. Results have implications for policy makers weighing the relative costs and benefits of food labeling policies versus bans related to certain livestock production practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamowicz W., Boxall R., Williams M., Louviere J. (1998) Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80:64–75
Anderson W. T., Cunningham W. H. (1972) The Socially Conscious Consumer. Journal of Marketing 36:23–31
Anderson S. P., Goeree J. K., Holt C. A. (1998) A Theoretical Analysis of Altruism and Decision Error in Public Good Games. Journal of Public Economics 70:297–323
Andreoni J. (1990) Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving. The Economic Journal 100:464–477
Andreoni J. (1993) An Experimental Test of the Public-Goods Crowding-Out Hypothesis. American Economic Review 83:1317–1327
Andreoni J. (1995) Cooperation in Public-Good Experiments: Kindness or Confusion?. American Economic Review 85:8981–8904
Andreoni J., Petrie R. (2004) Public Goods Experiments Without Confidentiality: A Glimpse into Fund-Raising. Journal of Public Economics 88:1605-1624
Bagnoli M., Watts S. G. (2003) Selling to Socially Responsible Consumers: Competition and the Private Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 12:419–445
Becker R., Henderson V. (2000) Effects of Air Quality Regulations on Polluting Industries. Journal of Political Economy 108:379–421
Bergstrom T. C., Blume L. E., Varian H. R. (1986) On the Private Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Public Economics. 29:25–49
Blanchflower D. G., Oswald A. J. (2004) Well-being Over Time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics 88:1359–1386
Brown-Kruse J., Hummel D. (1993) Gender Effects in Laboratory Public Good Contributions. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 22:255–267
Buhr B. L., Hayes D. J., Shogren J. F., Kliebenstein J. B. (1993) Valuing Ambiguity: The Case of Genetically Engineered Growth Enhancers. Journal of Agricultural Resource Economics 18:175–184
Cason T.N., Gangadharan L. (2002) Environmental Labeling and Incomplete Consumer Information in Laboratory Markets. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43 :113–134
Carlsson F., Martinsson P. (2001) Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41:179-192
Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI). CSPI Newsroom. ‘Consumer Group Urges FDA to Take Swift Action to Protect Effectiveness of Antibiotics.’ May 19, 1999
Churchill G. A. (1979) A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 16:64–73
Di Tella R., MacCulloch R., Oswald A. J. (2001) Preferences Over Inflation and Unemployment: Evidence from Surveys of Happiness. American Economic Review 91:335–341
England P. (1989) A Feminist Critique of Rational-Choice Theories: Implications for Sociology. American Sociologist 20:14–28
Fehr E., Schmidt K. M. (2000) Fairness, Incentives, and Contractual Choices. European Economic Review 44:1057-1068
Fox J. A., Shogren J. F., Hayes D. J., Kliebenstein J. B. (1998) CVM-X: Calibrating Contingent Values with Experimental Auction Markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80:455–465
Goeree J. K., Holt C. A., Laury S.K. (2002) Private Costs and Public Benefits: Unraveling the Effects of Altruism and Noisy Behavior. Journal of Public Economics 83:255–276
Hamilton S. F., Sunding D. L., Zilberman D. (2003) Public Goods and the Value of Product Quality Regulations: The Case of Food Safety. Journal of Public Economics 87:799–817
Hindriks J., Pancs R. (2002) Free Riding on Altruism and Group Size. Journal of Public Economic Theory 4:335–346
Isaac R. M., McCue K., Plott C. (1985) Public Goods Provision in an Experimental Environment. Journal of Public Economics 26:51–74
Isaac R. M., Walker J., Thomas S. (1984) Divergent Evidence on Free Riding: An Experimental Examination of Possible Explanations. Public Choice 43:113–149
Jayne T. S., Rubey L., Lupi F., Tschirley D., Weber M. T. (1996) Estimating Consumer Response to Food Market Reform Using Stated Preference Data: Evidence from Eastern and Southern Africa. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78: 820–824
Krinsky I., Robb A. L. (1986) On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics. 64:715–719
Layton D. F., Brown G. (2000) Heterogeneous Preferences Regarding Global Climate Change. The Review of Economics and Statistics 82:616–624
Ledyard, J. O. (1995), ‘Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research’, in J. H. Kages and A. E. Roth, eds., Handbook of Experimental Economics. Princeton University Press
Likert, R. A. (1932), ‘Technique for the Measurement of Attitudes’, Archives of Psychology 140
List J. A., Gallet C. A. (2001) What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?. Environmental and Resource Economics 20:241–254
Louviere J. J., Hensher D. A., Swait J. D. (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lusk J.L., Roosen J., Fox J.A. (2003) Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Growth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85:16–29
Lusk J. L., Schroeder T. C. (2004) Are Choice Experiments Incentive Compatible? A Test with Quality Differentiated Beef Steaks. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86:467–482
Marwell G., Ames R. (1979) Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods I: Resources, Interest, Groups Size, and the Free-Rider Problem. American Journal of Sociology 84:1335–1360
Marwell G., Ames R. (1981) Economists Free Ride, Does Anyone Else? Experiments on the Provision of Public Goods. Journal of Public Economics 15:295–310
McFadden D. (1974) Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. In: Zarembka P. (eds), Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press, New York, pp 105–142
Nunnaly, J. C. and I. H. Bernstein (1994), Psychometric Theory, 3rd Edition. New York: McCraw-Hill
Parkhurst G., Shogren J. F., Dickinson D. L. (2004) Negative Values in Vickrey Auctions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86:222–235
Pecotich A., Hattie J., Low L. P. (1999) Development of Industruct: A Scale for the Measurement of Perceptions of Industry Structure. Marketing Letters 10:403–416
Pennings J. M. E., Garcia P. (2001) Measuring Producers’ Risk Preferences: A Global Risk Attitude Construct. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83:993–1009
Pennings J. M. E., Smidts A. (2000) Assessing the Construct Validity of Risk Attitude. Management Science 46:1337–1349
Pennings J. M. E., Wansink B., Meulenberg M. T. G. (2002) A Note on Modeling Consumer Reactions to a Crisis: The Case of the Mad Cow Disease. International Journal of Research in Marketing 19:91–100
Revelt D., Train K. (1998) Mixed Logit with Repeated Choices: Households’ Choices of Appliance Efficiency Level. The Review of Economics and Statistics 80:647–657
Roberts J.A. (1995) Profiling Levels of Socially Responsible Consumer Behavior. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice 3:97–118
Rushton J.P., Chrisjohn R.D., Fekken C.G. (1981) The Altruistic Personality and the Self-Report Altruism Scale. Personality & Individual Differences 2:293–302
Smith V. H., Kehoe M. R., Cremer M. E. (1995) The Private Provision of Public Goods: Altruism and Voluntary Giving. Journal of Public Economics 58:107–126
Teisl M. F., Roe B., Hicks R. L. (2002) Can Eco-labels Tune a Market? Evidence from Dolphin-Safe Labeling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43:339–359
Thurstone L .L. (1927) Psychological Analysis. American Journal of Psychology 38:368–389
Train, K. (2003), Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge University Press
Train K.E. (1998) Recreation Demand Models with Taste Differences Over People. Land Economics 74:230–239
Webb D. J., Green C. L., Brashear T. G. (2000) Development and Validation of Scales to Measure Attitudes Influencing Monetary Donations to Charitable Organizations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 28:299–309
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Tim Cason and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on a previous version of the paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lusk, J.L., Nilsson, T. & Foster, K. Public Preferences and Private Choices: Effect of Altruism and Free Riding on Demand for Environmentally Certified Pork. Environ Resource Econ 36, 499–521 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9039-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9039-6