Skip to main content
Log in

Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing: Integrating Domain Specificity and Domain Generality: A Response to Muis, Bendixen, and Haerle (2006)

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

In their review of the empirical research, Muis, Bendixen, and Haerle (2006) bring closure to the debate between domain specificity and domain generality of epistemic beliefs and provide a framework for future research. In response to their review, this article comments on issues that remain for those who wish to examine the nature of the interaction between epistemic domain specificity and domain generality and its relation to learning. These issues include methodological concerns, philosophical contributions, terminology, epistemology beyond academic domains, and educational implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1992). Knowing and Reasoning in College: Gender-Related Patterns in Students’ Intellectual Development, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.

  • Belenky, M. F., Clinchy, B. M., Goldberger, N. R., and Tarule, J. M. (1986). Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice and Mind, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P., and Linn, M. C. (2002). Beliefs about science: How does science instruction contribute? In Hofer, B. K., and Pintrich, P. R. (eds.), Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 321–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buehl, M. M., Alexander, P. A., and Murphy, P. K. (2002). Beliefs about schooled knowledge: Domain specific or domain general? Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 27: 415–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, M. J., Hallett, D., and Sokol, B. W. (2002). Competing claims about competing knowledge claims. In Hofer, B. K., and Pintrich, P. R. (eds.), Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 145–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conley, A. M., Pintrich, P. R., Vekiri, I., and Harrison, D. (2004). Changes in epistemological beliefs in elementary science students. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 29: 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Corte, E., Eynde, O. T., and Verschaffel, L. (2002). “Knowing what to believe”: The relevance of students’ mathematical beliefs for mathematics education. In Hofer, B. K., and Pintrich, P. R. (eds.), Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 297–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elby, A., and Hammer, D. (2001). On the substance of a sophisticated epistemology. Sci. Educ. 85: 554–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (1997). The Development of Personal Epistemology: Dimensions, Disciplinary Differences, and Instructional Practices. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (1999). Instructional context in the college mathematics classroom: Epistemological beliefs and student motivation. J. Staff, Program, and Organ. Dev. 16(2): 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2000). Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contem. Educ. Psychol. 25: 378–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 13(4): 353–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K. (2005). The legacy and the challenge: Paul Pintrich's contributions to personal epistemology research. Educ. Psychol. 40: 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, B. K., and Karabenick, S. A. (2005, November). Assessing Espoused and Enacted Beliefs of Teachers, Southwest Consortium for Innovations in Psychology in Education, Las Vegas, Nevada.

  • Hofer, B. K., and Pintrich, P. R. (1997). The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Rev. Educ. Res. 67: 88–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jehng, J.-C. J., Johnson, S. D., and Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and students’ epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 18: 23–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, P. M., and Kitchener, K. S. (1994). Developing Reflective Judgment: Understanding and Promoting Intellectual Growth and Critical Thinking in Adolescents and Adults, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D. (1991). The Skills of Argument, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., and Weinstock, M. (2002). What is epistemological thinking and why does it matter? In Hofer, B. K., and Pintrich, P. R. (eds.), Personal Epistemology: The Psychology of Beliefs about Knowledge and Knowing, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, D., Weinstock, M., and Flaton, R. (1994). How well do jurors reason? Competence dimensions of individual variation in a juror reasoning task. Psychol. Sci. 5: 289–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonka, K., and Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (1996). Epistemologies, conceptions of learning, and study practices in medicine and psychology. Higher Educ. 31: 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L. (2003). High school students’ beliefs about maths, mathematical problem solving, and their achievement in maths: A cross-sectional study. Educ. Psychol. 23(1): 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, L., and Scrivani, L. (2004). Enhancing students’ mathematical beliefs: An intervention study. Learn. Instr. 14: 153–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mtetwa, D., and Garofalo, J. (1989). Beliefs about mathematics: An overlooked aspect of student difficulties. Acad. Ther. 24(5): 611–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muis, K. R. (2004). Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Rev. Edu. Res. 74.

  • Muis, K. R., Bendixen, L. D., and Haerle, F. C. (2006). Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical questions in the development of a theoretical model. Edu. Psychol. Rev 18.

  • Murphy, P. K. (2003). The philosophy in thee: Tracing philosophical influences in educational psychology. Educ. Psychol. 38: 137–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

  • Royce, J. R., Coward, H., Egan, E., Kessel, F., and Mos, L, (1978). Psychological epistemology: A critical review of the empirical literature and the theoretical issues. Gene. Psychol. Monogra. 97: 265–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition and sense making in mathematics. In Grouws, D. A. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, Macmillan, New York, pp. 334–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1989). Exploration of student’ mathematical beliefs and behavior. J. Res. Mathe. Educ. 20: 338–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. J. Educ. Psychol. 82: 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schommer-Aikins, M., Duell, O. K., and Barker, S. (2003). Epistemological beliefs across domains using Biglan's classification of academic disciplines. Res. Higher Educ. 44: 347–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Songer, N. B., and Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration? J. Res. Sci. Teach. 28: 761–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Southerland, S. A., Sinatra, G. M., and Matthews, M. R. (2001). Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 13: 325–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stodolsky, S. S., Salk, S., and Glaessner, B. (1991). Student views about learning math and social studies. Am. Edu. Res. J. 28(1): 89–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, M., and Cronin, M. A. (2003). The everyday production of knowledge: Individual differences in epistemological understanding and juror-reasoning skill. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 17: 161–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. J. Educ. Psychol. 83: 73–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wineburg, S. (1998). Reading Abraham Lincoln: An expert/expert study in the interpretation of historical texts. Cogn. Sci. 22: 319–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara K. Hofer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hofer, B.K. Beliefs About Knowledge and Knowing: Integrating Domain Specificity and Domain Generality: A Response to Muis, Bendixen, and Haerle (2006). Educ Psychol Rev 18, 67–76 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9000-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9000-9

KEY WORDS:

Navigation