Abstract
Perry and Winne (2006) describe their computer program, ‘gStudy’, and argue that it facilitates valid measurement of self-regulated learning (SRL) over time. This commentary addresses the assumptions underlying this argument and raises additional validity questions regarding the use of this tool. These include issues related to the development of SRL in young children, the difficulty in embedding assessments in a learning tool, and the extent to which the log analyzer can separate SRL sequences from other behavior. Finally, the extent to which behavior ‘inside’ gStudy reflects SRL in other contexts is discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(3), 545–561.
Boekaerts, M. (2002). The on-line motivation questionnaire: A self-report instrument to assess students' context sensitivity. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 77–120). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215–251.
Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G., & White, C. (1989). Effects of “seductive details” on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition & Instruction, 6(1), 41–57.
Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition & Instruction, 5(4), 269–287.
Nolen, S. B. (1995). Effects of a visible author in statistical texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 47–65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nolen, S.B. Validity in Assessing Self-Regulated Learning: A Comment on Perry & Winne. Educ Psychol Rev 18, 229–232 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9016-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-006-9016-1