Abstract
Research on cognitive load theory (CLT) has focused primarily on identifying the mechanisms and strategies that enhance cognitive learning outcomes. However, CLT researchers have given less attention to the ways in which cognitive load may interact with the motivational and emotional aspects of learning. Motivational beliefs have typically been assumed to be merely a precursor to the cognitive process. This view provides an incomplete picture of the dynamic relationship between cognitive load and motivational beliefs. In this review, we synthesize previous scholarly efforts concerning the motivational effects of anticipated investment of mental effort, new developments in the expectancy-value theory of motivation, and recent findings implicating cognitive load in the formulation of motivational beliefs. By conceptualizing cognitive load as motivational cost, we argue that motivational beliefs are an important outcome that results from instruction. We examine recent empirical evidence supporting this proposition and consider the implications for the further development of both CLT and motivational theories through their integration.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, E. J., Nguyen, A. T., & Cowan, N. (2018). Theories of working memory: differences in definition, degree of modularity, role of attention, and purpose. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 49, 340–355.
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261–271.
Ayres, P. (2006). Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems. Learning and Instruction, 16(5), 389–400.
Ayres, P. (2018). Subjective measures of cognitive load: What can they reliability measure? In R. Z. Zheng (Ed.), Cognitive load measurement and application: a theoretical framework for meaningful research and practice (pp. 9–28). New York, NY: Routledge.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New York, NY: W. H. Freeman.
Bandura, A., Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., & Pastorelli, C. (1996). Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. Child Development, 67(3), 1206–1222.
Barron, K. E., & Hulleman, C. S. (2015). The expectancy-value-cost model of motivation. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 503–509). Oxford: Elsevier Ltd..
Battle, A., & Wigfield, A. (2003). College women’s value orientations toward family, career, and graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62(1), 56–75.
Beck, J. W., & Schmidt, A. M. (2018). Negative relationships between self-efficacy and performance can be adaptive: the mediating role of resource allocation. Journal of Management, 44, 555–588.
Boekaerts, M. (2017). Cognitive load and self-regulation: attempts to build a bridge. Learning and Instruction, 51, 90–97.
Bong, M. (2001). Role of self-efficacy and task value in predicting college students’ course enrollments and intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 553–570.
Brünken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 53–61.
Callan, G. L., & Cleary, T. J. (2018). Multidimensional assessment of self-regulated learning with middle school math students. School Psychology Quarterly, 33, 103–111.
Cennamo, K. S. (1993). Learning from video: Factors influencing learners' preconceptions and invested mental effort. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 33–45.
Cennamo, K. S., Savenye, W. C., & Smith, P. L. (1991). Mental effort and video-based learning: the relationship of preconceptions and the effects of interactive and covert practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(1), 5–16.
Chen, A., & Liu, X. (2009). Task values, cost, and choice decisions in college physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 28, 192–213.
Chen, J. A., & Usher, E. L. (2013). Profiles of the sources of science self-efficacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 24, 11–21.
Chiang, E. S., Byrd, S. P., & Molin, A. J. (2011). Children’s perceived cost for exercise: application of an expectancy-value paradigm. Health Education and Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education, 38(2), 143–149.
Clark, R. E. (1999). The CaNE (Commitment and Necessary Effort) model of work motivation: a two-stage process of goal commitment and mental effort. In J. Lowyck (Ed.), Trends in corporate training. Leuven, Belgium: University of Leuven Press.
Cleary, T. J., & Chen, P. (2009). Self-regulation, motivation, and math achievement in middle school: variations across grade level and math context. Journal of School Psychology, 47(5), 291–314.
Cleary, T. J., Velardi, B., & Schnaidman, B. (2017). Effects of the Self-Regulation Empowerment Program (SREP) on middle school students’ strategic skills, self-efficacy, and mathematics achievement. Journal of School Psychology, 64, 28–42.
Conley, A. M. (2012). Patterns of motivation beliefs: combining achievement goal and expectancy-value perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(1), 32–47.
Covington, M. (2009). Self-worth theory: retrospects and prospects. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 141–170). New York, NY: Routledge.
Cowan, N. (2001). Metatheory of storage capacity limits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 154–176.
Davis-Kean, P. E., Huesmann, L. R., Jager, J., Collins, W. A., Bates, J. E., & Lansford, J. E. (2008). Changes in the relation of self-efficacy beliefs and behaviors across development. Child Development, 79(5), 1257–1269.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
DeLeeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). A comparison of three measures of cognitive load: evidence for separable measures of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane load. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 223–234.
Denissen, J. J. A., Zarrett, N. R., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). I like to do it, I’m able, and I know I am: longitudinal couplings between domain-specific achievement, self-concept, and interest. Child Development, 78(2), 430–447.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: the new psychology of success. London, England: Constance and Robinson.
Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender. Roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–172.
Eccles, J. S. (2005). Subjective task value and the Eccles et al. model of achievement related choices. In A. S. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 105–121). New York: The Guildford Press.
Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78–89.
Eccles, J. S., & Harold, R. D. (1991). Gender differences in sport involvement: applying the Eccles' expectancy-value model. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 3, 7–35.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: the structure of adolescents' achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215–225.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., et al. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives: psychological and sociological approaches (pp. 75–138). San Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.
Eccles, J. S., Wigfield, A., & Schiefele, U. (1998). Motivation. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., pp. 1017–1095). New York: Wiley.
Eccles, J. S., Vida, M. N., & Barber, B. (2004). The relation of early adolescents’ college plans and both academic ability and task-value beliefs to subsequent college enrollment. Journal of Early Adolescence, 24, 63–77.
Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.
Feldon, D. F. (2007). Implications of research on expertise for curriculum and pedagogy. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 91–110.
Feldon, D. F., Franco, J., Chao, J., Peugh, J., & Maahs-Fladung, C. (2018). Self-efficacy change associated with a cognitive load-based intervention in an undergraduate biology course. Learning & Instruction, 56, 64–72.
Flake, J. K., Barron, K. E., Hulleman, C., McCoach, B. D., & Welsh, M. E. (2015). Measuring cost: the forgotten component of expectancy-value theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 41, 232–244.
Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Catrambone, R. (2006). Can learning from molar and modular worked examples be enhanced by providing instructional explanations and prompting self-explanations? Learning and Instruction, 16(2), 104–121.
Gerjets, P., Scheiter, K., & Cierniak, G. (2009). The scientific value of cognitive load theory: a research agenda based on the structuralist view of theories. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 43–54.
Gobet, F. (1998). Expert memory: a comparison of four theories. Cognition, 66(2), 115–152.
Hailikari, T., Nevgi, A., & Komulainen, E. (2008). Academic self-beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of student achievement in Mathematics: a structural model. Educational Psychology, 28(1), 59–71.
Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload (pp. 139–183). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Harter, S. (2012). The construction of the self: a developmental perspective (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Heggestad, E. D., & Kanfer, R. (2005). The predictive validity of self-efficacy in training performance: little more than past performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 11, 84–97.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.
Huang, X. (2017). Example-based learning: effects of different types of examples on student performance, cognitive load and self-efficacy in a statistical learning task. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 283–294.
Huang, X. (2018). Personal communication. October, 12, 2018.
Jiang, Y., Rsoenzweig, E. Q., & Gaspard, H. (2018). An expectancy-value-cost approach in predicting adolescent students’ academic motivation and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 54, 139–152.
Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory: how many types of load does it really need? Educational Psychology Review, 23, 1–19.
Kalyuga, S., & Plass, J. L. (2018). Cognitive load as a local characteristic of cognitive processes: Implications for measurement approaches. In R. Z. Zheng (Ed.), Cognitive load measurement and application: a theoretical framework for meaningful research and practice (pp. 59–74). New York, NY: Routledge.
Kester, L., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2010). Instructional control of cognitive load in the design of complex learning environments. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brunken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 109–130). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kimchi, R. (1982). Mental effort and task interference in auditory attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 32, 473–480.
Klassen, R. M., & Usher, E. L. (2010). Self-efficacy in educational settings: recent research and emerging directions. In T. C. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 16A. The decade ahead: theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (pp. 1–33). Bigley, England: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Knörzer, L., Brünken, R., & Park, B. (2016). Facilitators or suppressors: effects of experimentally induced emotions on multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 44, 97–107.
Lawson, A. E., Banks, D. L., & Logvin, M. (2007). Self-efficacy, reasoning ability, and achievement in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 706–724.
Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van der Vleuten, C. P., Van Gog, T., & Van Merriënboer, J. J. (2013). Development of an instrument for measuring different types of cognitive load. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1058–1072.
Leppink, J., Paas, F., Van Gog, T., van Der Vleuten, C. P., & Van Merrienboer, J. J. (2014). Effects of pairs of problems and examples on task performance and different types of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 30, 32–42.
Likourezos, V., & Kalyuga, S. (2017). Instruction-first and problem-solving-first approaches: alternative pathways to learning complex tasks. Instructional Science, 45(2), 195–219.
Luszczynska, A., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). The general self-efficacy scale: multicultural validation studies. The Journal of Psychology, 139(5), 439–457.
Luttrell, V. R., Callen, B. W., Allen, C. S., Wood, M. D., Deeds, D. G., & Richard, D. C. S. (2010). The mathematics value inventory for general education students: development and initial validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(1), 142–160.
Martin, S. (2018). A critical analysis of the theoretical construction and empirical measurement of cognitive load. In R. Z. Zheng (Ed.), Cognitive load measurement and application: a theoretical framework for meaningful research and practice (pp. 29–44). New York, NY: Routledge.
Meece, J. L., Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (1990). Predictors of math anxiety and its consequences for young adolescents’ course enrollment intentions and performances in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 60–70.
van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sluijsmans, D. M. (2009). Toward a synthesis of cognitive load theory, four-component instructional design, and self-directed learning. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 55–66.
van Merriënboer, J. J., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147–177.
Moreno, R. (2006). Learning in high-tech and multimedia environments. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(2), 63–67.
Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitive-load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–434.
Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (1993). The efficiency of instructional conditions: an approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human Factors, 35, 737–743.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–4.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Darabi, A. A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 25–34.
Park, B., & Brünken, R. (2015). The rhythm method: a new method for measuring cognitive load—an experimental dual-task study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 29(2), 232–243.
Park, B., Plass, J. L., & Brünken, R. (2014). Cognitive and affective processes in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 125–127.
Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 315–329.
Pintrich, P. R. (1990). Implications of psychological research on student learning and college teaching for teacher education. In W. R. Houston (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 826–857). New York: Macmillan.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students’ motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom academic tasks. Student perceptions in the classroom, 7, 149–183.
Plass, J. L., & Kaplan, U. (2015). Emotional design in digital media for learning. In S. Tettegah & M. Gartmeier (Eds.), Emotions, technology, design, and learning (pp. 131–162). New York, NY: Elsevier.
Plass, J. L., Heidig, S., Hayward, E. O., Homer, B. D., & Um, E. (2014). Emotional design in multimedia learning: effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 128–140.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory: an organismic-dialectical perspective. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3–33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2009). Promoting self-determined school engagement: motivation, learning, and well-being. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 171–195). New York, NY: Routledge.
Salomon, G. (1983). The differential investment of mental effort in learning from different sources. Educational Psychologist, 18, 42–50.
Salomon, G. (1984). Television is “easy” and print is “tough”: the differential investment of mental effort in learning as a function of perceptions and attributions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 647–658.
Salomon, G., & Leigh, T. (1984). Predispositions about learning from, print and television. Journal of Communication, 34(2), 119–135.
Sansone, C., & Harackiewicz, J. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: the search for optimal motivation and performance. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Schnotz, W., Fries, S., & Horz, H. (2009). Motivational aspects of cognitive load theory. In M. Wosnita, S. A. Karabenick, A. Efklides, & P. Nenniger (Eds.), Contemporary motivation research: from global to local perspectives (pp. 69–96). Cambridge, MA: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1985). Peer models: influence on children’s self-efficacy and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 313–322.
Schunk, D. H., & Hanson, A. R. (1989). Influence of peer-model attributes on children’s beliefs and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 431–434.
Schunk, D., & Pajares, F. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation in school (pp. 35–54). New York: Taylor Francis.
Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (1996). Motivation in education: theory, research and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
Schwoerer, C. E., May, D. R., Hollensbe, E. C., & Mencl, J. (2005). General and specific self-efficacy in the context of a training intervention to enhance performance expectancy. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16(1), 111–129.
Seufert, T. (2018). The interplay between self-regulation in learning and cognitive load. Educational Research Review, 24, 116–129.
Shah, J., & Higgins, E. T. (1997). Expectancy x value effects: regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 447–458.
Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: a longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42(1), 70–83.
Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Harlaar, N., & Plomin, R. P. (2006). Predicting school achievement from intelligence, self-perceived ability and intrinsic value. Intelligence, 34, 363–374.
Steele-Johnson, D., Beauregard, R. S., Hoover, P. B., & Schmidt, A. M. (2000). Goal orientation and task demand effects on motivation, affect, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(5), 724–738.
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257–285.
Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295–312.
Sweller, J. (2004). Instructional design consequences of an analogy between evolution by natural selection and human cognitive architecture. Instructional Science, 32, 9–31.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123–138.
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Measuring cognitive load. In J. Sweller, P. Ayres, & S. Kalyuga (Eds.), Cognitive load theory: explorations in the learning sciences, instructional systems and performance technologies (pp. 71–85). New York: Springer.
Tobias, S. (1994). Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 64, 37–54.
Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy–value theory: a latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 763–777.
Um, E., Plass, J. L., Hayward, E. O., & Homer, B. D. (2012). Emotional design in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 485–498.
Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 524–551.
Vallerand, R. J. (2001). A hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and exercise. In G. C. Roberts (Ed.), Advances in motivation in sport and exercise (pp. 263–319). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., & Williams, A. A. (2001). The changing signs in the relationships among self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 605–620.
Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., Tischner, E. C., & Putka, D. J. (2002). Two studies examining the negative effect of self-efficacy on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 506–516.
Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92, 548–573.
Wentzel, K. R., & Wigfield, A. (2007). Motivational interventions that work: themes and remaining issues. Educational Psychologist, 42, 261–271.
Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (6th ed., pp. 933–1002). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Winne, P. H. (2010). Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 45, 267–276.
Yeh, Y. Y., & Wickens, C. D. (1988). Dissociation of performance and subjective measures of workload. Human Factors, 30, 111–120.
Yeo, G., & Neal, A. (2008). Subjective cognitive effort: a model of states, traits, and time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 617–631.
Yeo, G., & Neal, A. (2013). Revisiting the functional properties of self-efficacy: a dynamic perspective. Journal of Management, 39(6), 1385–1396.
Zeidner, M. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: concepts, findings, and future directions. In P. A. Schutz & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 165–184). San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2018). Grace under pressure in educational contexts: emotional intelligence, stress, and coping. In K. Keefer, J. Parker, & D. Saklofske (Eds.), Emotional intelligence in education (pp. 82–110). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: a social-cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feldon, D.F., Callan, G., Juth, S. et al. Cognitive Load as Motivational Cost. Educ Psychol Rev 31, 319–337 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09464-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09464-6