Skip to main content
Log in

Heteroscedastic semiparametric models for domestic water consumption aggregated data

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heteroscedastic additive and multiplicative models are proposed to disaggregate household data on water consumption from Athens and provide individual consumption estimates. The models adjust for heteroscedasticity assuming that variances relate to covariates. Household characteristics that can influence consumption are also included into models in order to allow for a clearer measurement of individual characteristics effects. Estimation is accomplished through a penalized least squares approach. The method is applied to a sample of real data related to domestic water consumption in Athens. The results show a greater consumption of water for males while the single-female households are these that use the lowest quantities of water. The consumption curves by age and gender are constructed presenting differences between the two sexes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chesher A (1997). Diet Revealed?: semiparametric estimation of nutrient intake-age relationships. J Roy Stat Soc A160: 389–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Granger CWJ, Rice JA and Weiss A (1986). Semiparametric estimates of the relation between weather and electricity sales. J Am Stat Assoc 81: 310–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu WJ (2003). Penalized estimating equations. Biometrics 59: 126–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green PJ and Silverman BW (1994). Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models: a roughness penalty approach. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang KY and Zeger SL (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika 73: 13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linhart H and Zucchini W (1986). Model selection. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Espineira R (2002). Residential water demand in the northwest of Spain. Environ Resour Econ 21: 161–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay A, Akber A and Al-Awadi E (2001). Analysis of freshwater consuption patterns in the private residences of Kuwait. Urban Water 3: 53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opaluch JJ (1982). Urban residential demand for water in the United States. Land Econ 58: 225–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice RL and Zhao LP (1991). Estimating equations for parameters in means and covariances of multivariate discrete and continuous responses. Biometrics 47: 825–839

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vasdekis VGS and Trichopoulou A (2000). Nonparametric estimation of individual food availability along with bootstrap confidence intervals in household budget surveys. Stat Probab Lett 46: 337–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahba G (1975). Smoothing noisy data with spline functions. Numerische Mathematik 24: 309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YD, Byrne J, Song JS, Chen Y (1998) The 1992-97 panel study of residential water conservation impact. Center for Energy and Environmental Policy, University of Delaware

  • White H (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrika 48: 817–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou SL, McMahon TA, Walton A and Lewis J (2000). Forecasting daily urban water demand: a case study of Melbourne. J Hydrol 236: 153–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dimitris Karlis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karlis, D., Vasdekis, V.G.S. & Banti, M. Heteroscedastic semiparametric models for domestic water consumption aggregated data. Environ Ecol Stat 16, 355–367 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0055-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-007-0055-7

Keywords

Navigation