Skip to main content
Log in

Finite population properties of individual predictors based on spatial patterns

  • Published:
Environmental and Ecological Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study a conceptual framework for assessing the statistical properties of a non-stochastic spatial interpolator is developed through the use of design-based finite population inference tools. By considering the observed locations as the result of a probabilistic sampling design, we propose a standardized weighted predictor for spatial data starting from a deterministic interpolator that usually does not provide uncertainty measures. The information regarding the coordinates of the spatial locations is known at the population level and is directly used in constructing the weighting system. Our procedure captures the spatial pattern by means of the Euclidean distances between locations, which are fixed and do not require any further assessment after the sample has been drawn. The predictor for any individual value turns in a ratio of design-based random quantities. We illustrate the predictor design-based statistical properties, i.e. asymptotically p-unbiasedness and p-consistency, for simple random sampling without replacement. An application to a couple of environmental datasets is presented, for assessing predictor performances in correspondence of different population characteristics. A comparison with the equivalent non-spatial predictor is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baffetta F, Fattorini L, Franceschi S, Corona P (2009) Design-based approach to k-nearest neighbours technique for coupling field and remotely sensed data in forest surveys. Remote Sens Environ 113: 463–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao Y, Ullah A (2010) Expectation of quadratic forms in normal and nonnormal variables with applications. J Stat Plan Infer 140: 1193–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolfarine H, Zacks S (1992) Prediction theory for finite populations. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brus DJ, de Gruijter JJ (1997) Random sampling or geostatistical modelling? Choosing between design-based and model-based sampling strategies for soil (with discussion). Geoderma 80: 1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cicchitelli G, Montanari GE (2012) Model-assisted estimation of a spatial population mean. Int Stat Rev 80: 111–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocchi D, Mouchart M (1996) Quasi-linear bayes estimation in stratified finite populations. J Roy Stat Soc B 58: 293–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Diggle PJ, Ribeiro PJ Jr. (2007) Model-based geostatistics. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dol W, Steerneman T, Wansbeek T (1996) Matrix algebra and sampling theory: the case of the Horvitz–Thompson estimator. Linear Algebra Appl 237: 225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fattorini L (2006) Applying the Horvitz–Thompson criterion in complex designs: a computer-intensive perspective for estimating inclusion probabilities. Biometrika 93: 269–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaetan C, Guyon X (2010) Spatial statistics and modeling. Modélisation et statistique spatiales. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Gelfand AE, Mølhave T (2012) Attaching uncertainty to deterministic spatial interpolations. Stat Methodol 9: 251–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregoire TG (1998) Design-based and model-based inference in survey sampling: appreciating the difference. Can J Forest Res 28: 1429–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzel A (1986) Sampling without replacement with unequal probabilities: sample designs with preassigned joint inclusion probabilities of any order. Metron 44: 49–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnus JR, Neudecker H (2007) Matrix differential calculus with application in statistics and econometrics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Royall RM, Pfeffermann D (1982) Balanced samples and robust Bayesian inference in finite population sampling. Biometrika 69: 401–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Särndal C-E, Swensson B, Wretman J (1992) Model assisted survey sampling. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard D (1968) A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data. In: Proceedings of the 1968 23rd association for computing machinery national conference, pp 517–523

  • Stuart A, Ord K (1987) Kendall’s advanced theory of statistics, distribution theory, vol 1. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler WR (1970) A computer movie simulating urban growth in the Detroit region. Econ Geogr 46: 234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ver Hoef J (2002) Sampling and geostatistics for spatial data. Ecoscience 9: 152–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster R, Oliver MA (2007) Geostatistics for environmental scientists. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesca Bruno.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Pierre Dutilleul.

Work supported by the project PRIN 2008, New developments in sampling theory and practice, Project number 2008CEFF37, sector: Economics and Statistics, awarded by the Italian Government.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruno, F., Cocchi, D. & Vagheggini, A. Finite population properties of individual predictors based on spatial patterns. Environ Ecol Stat 20, 467–494 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-012-0229-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10651-012-0229-9

Keywords

Navigation