Skip to main content
Log in

Large-eddy simulation of low-level jet-like flow in a canopy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The computational method of Large-Eddy Simulations has been used to study the weak, neutrally stable drainage flow within tree canopies. The computational results show that a secondary velocity maximum that resembles a jet is formed within the canopy under the nocturnal flow conditions. This jet-like flow is important in the analysis and measurements of the net ecosystem-atmosphere exchange (NEE) for carbon dioxide (CO2). A uniformly distributed, plane source was placed within the canopy in order to simulate the nocturnal production of CO2. The NEE is calculated as the sum of the integration of the rate of change of the concentration of CO2 over the computational domain, the vertical turbulent flux measured directly by eddy-covariance (EC) method, and the advection terms, which are not taken into account in the EC method. Numerical results of the velocity and concentration fields, within and above the canopy, are presented and their impact on the CO2 transport is investigated in detail. The computational results show that 15–20% of NEE is drained out by the advection process under the canopy. The results also show that the turbulent fluctuations in the lateral direction are also significant and may result in 2–5% CO2 transport.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amiro BD (1990) Comparison of turbulence statistics within 3 boreal forest canopies. Bound-Lay Meteorol 51:99–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andren A (1995) The structure of stably stratified atmospheric boundary layers: a large-eddy simulation study. Q J R Meteorol Soc 121:961–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aubinet M, Heinesch B, Yernaux M (2003) Horizontal and vertical CO2 advection in a sloping forest. Bound-Lay Meteorol 108:397–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baldocchi DD, Meyers TP (1998) Turbulence structure in a deciduous forest. Bound-Lay Meteorol 43:345–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baldocchi DD, Meyers TP (1991) Trace gas exchange at the floor of a deciduous forest I. Evaporation and CO2 efflux. J Geophys Res 96:7271–7285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bakwin PS, Davis KJ, Yi C, Wofsy SW, Munger JW (2004) Regional carbon dioxide flues from mixing ratio data. Tellus 56B:301–311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cava D, Giostra U, Siqueria M, Katul GG (2004) Organized motion and radiative perturbations in the nocturnal canopy sublayer above an even-aged pine forest. Bound-Lay Meteorol 112:129–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cionco RM (1965) A mathematical model for air flow in a vegetative canopy. J Appl Meteorol 4:517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Coppin PA, Raupach MR, Legg BJ (1986) Experiments on scalar dispersion within a model plant canopy. Part II: An elevated plant source. Bound-Lay Meteorol 35:167–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deardorff JW (1980) Stratocumulus-capped mixed layers derived from a three-dimensional model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 18:495–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ding F, Arya SP, Lin YL (2001) Large-eddy simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer using a new subgrid-scale model. Environ Fluid Mech 1:49–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Finnigan J (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32:519–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Finnigan J (1999) A comment on the paper by Lee (1998): on micrometeorological observations of surface-air exchange over tall vegetation. Agric For Meteorol 97:43–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fitzmaurice Li, Shaw RH, Paw U KT, Patton EG (2004) Three-dimensional scalar microfront systems in a large-eddy simulation of vegetation canopy flow. Bound-Lay Meteorol 112:107–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Glauert MB (1956) The wall jet. J Fluid Mech 1:625–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Galmarini S, Beets C, Duynkerke PG, Vila-Guerau de J (1998) Stable nocturnal boundary layers: a comparison of one-dimensional and large-eddy simulation models. Bound-Lay Meteorol 88:181–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Garratt JR (1992) The atmospheric boundary layer. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 316

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gross G (1993) Numerical simulation of canopy flows. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 168

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gu L, Shugart HH, Fuentes JD, Black TA, Shewchuk SR (1999) Micrometeorology, biophysical exchange and NEE decomposition in a two-story boreal forest-development and test of an integrated model. Agricul For Meteorol 94:123–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jimenez MA, Cuxart J (2005) Large-eddy simulation of the stable boundary layer using the standard kolmogorov theory: range of application. Bound-Lay Meteorol 115:241–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Katul GG, Albertson JD (1998) An investigation of higher-order closure models for a forest canopy. Bound-Lay Meteorol 89:47–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Katul GG, Leuning R, Kim J, Denmead OT, Miyata A, Harazono Y (2001) Estimation CO2 source/sink distributions within a rice canopy using high-order closure model. Bound-Lay Meteorol 98:103–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kelliher FM et al (1998) Evaporation from a central Siberian pine forest. J Hydro 205:279–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lai CT, Katul G, Ellsworth D, Oren R (2000) Modelling vegetation-atmosphere CO2 exchange by a coupled Eulerian-Langrangian approach. Bound-Lay Meteorol 95:91–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee X (1998) On micrometeorological observations of surface-air exchange over tall vegetation. Agric For Meteorol 91:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mahrt L (1982) Momentum balance of gravity flows. J Atmos Sci 39:2701–2711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mahrt L, Vickers D, Nakamura R, Soler MR, Sun J, Burns S, Lenschow DH (2001) Shallow drainage flow. Bound-Lay Meteorol 101:243–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mason PJ, Derbyshire SH (1990) Large-eddy simulation of the stably-stratified atmospheric boundary layer. Bound-Lay Meteorol 53:117–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Meyers TP, Paw U KT (1986) Testing of a higher-order closure model for modeling airflow within and above plant canopies. Bound-Lay Meteorol 37:297–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Moeng C-H (1984) A large-eddy-simulation model for the study of planetary boundary-layer turbulence. J Atmos Sci 41(13):2052–2062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Nepf HM, Vivoni ER (2000) Flow structure in depth-limited vegetation flow. J Geophy Res (Oceans) 105:28547–28557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nieuwstadt FTM (1984) The turbulent structure of the stable, nocturnal boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 41:2202–2216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Panofsky HA, Dutton JA (1984) Atmospheric turbulence: models and methods for engineering applications. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  34. Patton EG, Shaw RH, Judd MJ, Raupach MR (1998) Large-eddy simulation of windbreak flow. Bound-Lay Meteorol 87:275–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Paw U KT, Baldocchi DD, Meyers TP, Wilson L (2000) Correction of eddy-covariance measurements incorporating both advective effects and density fluxes. Bound-Lay Meteorol 97:487–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Raupach MR (1988) Canopy transport processes. In: Steffer WL, Denmead OT (eds) Flow and transport in the natural environment: advances and application. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 95–127

    Google Scholar 

  37. Raupach MR, Thom AS (1981) Turbulence in and above plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 13:97–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Saiki EM, Moeng C-.H, Sullivan PP (2000) Large-eddy simulation of the stably stratified planetary boundary layer. Bound-Lay Meteorol 95:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Seffal R, Michaelides EE (1996) Similarity solutions for a turbulent round jet. J Fluids Eng 118:618–622

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Shaw RH (1977) Secondary wind speed maxima inside plant canopies. J Appl Meteorol. 16:514–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shaw RH, Schumann U (1992) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow above and within a forest. Bound-Lay Meteoro.l 61:47–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Shaw RH, Seginer I (1985) The dissipation of turbulence in plant canopies. In: 7th symposium of the American meteoriological society on turbulence and diffusion. Boulder, Colorado, pp 200–203

  43. Shaw RH, Hortog GD, Neumann HH (1988) Influence on foliar density and thermal stability on profile of Reynolds stress and turbulence intensity in a deciduous forest. Bound-Lay Meteorol 45:391–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Shen S, Leclerc MY (1997) Modelling the turbulence structure in the canopy layer. Agric For Meteorol 87:3–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Sogachev A, Lloyd J (2004) Using a one-and-a-half order closure model of the atmospheric boundary layer for surface flux footprint estimation. Bound-Lay Meteorol 112:467–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Staebler RM, Fitzjarrald DR (2004) Observing subcanopy CO2 advection. Agric For Meteorol 122:139–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Su HB, Shaw RH, Paw U KT (2000) Two-point correlation analysis of neutrally stratified flow within and above a forest from large-eddy simulation. Bound-Lay Meteorol 94:423–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sullivan PP, Williams JC, Meong C-H (1994) A subgrid-scale model for large-eddy simulation of planetary boundary-layer flows. Bound-Lay Meteorol 71:247–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Verma SB, Baldocchi DD, Anderson DE, Matt DR, Clement RJ (1986) Eddy fluxes of CO2, water vapor, and sensitive heat over a deciduous forest. Bound-Lay Meteorol 36:71–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Vinkovic I, Aguirre C, Simoens S (2006) Large-eddy simulation and Lagrangian stochastic modeling of passive scalar dispersion in a turbulent boundary layer. J Turbul 7:030

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wilson JD (1988) A 2nd-order closure-model for flow through vegetation. Bound-Lay Meteorol 42:371–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wilson NR, Shaw RH (1977) A higher order closure model for canopy flow. J Appl Meteorol 16:1198–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Xie Z, Hayden P, Voke PR, Robbins AG (2004) Large-eddy simulation of dispersion: comparison between elevated and ground-level sources. J Turbul 5:031

    Google Scholar 

  54. Yang B, Raupach MR, Shaw RH, Paw U KT, Morse AP (2006) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow across a forest edge. Part I: flow statistics. Bound-Lay Meteorol 120:377–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Yi C, Anderson DE, Turnipseed AA, Burns SP, Sparks JP, Stannard D, Monson RK (2006) The contribution of advection fluxes to net ecosystem CO2 exchange in a high-evelation, subalpine forest ecosystem. to appear in Ecol Appl

  56. Yi C, Davis KJ, Bakwin PS, Berger BW, Marr LC (2000) Influence of advection on measurement of the net ecosystem-atmosphere exchange of CO 2 from a very tall tower. J Geophysical Research 105:9991–9999

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Yi C, Monson RK, Zhai Z, Anderson DE, Lamb B, Allwine G, Turnipseed AA, Burns SP (2005) Modeling and measuring the nocturnal drainage flow in a high-elevation, subalpine forest with complex terrain. J Geophys Res 110:D22303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaolin Mao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mao, S., Feng, Z.G. & Michaelides, E.E. Large-eddy simulation of low-level jet-like flow in a canopy. Environ Fluid Mech 7, 73–93 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-006-9014-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-006-9014-3

Keywords

Navigation