Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of a two-layer cloud system with RAMS model and comparison to airborne observations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Fluid Mechanics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A three-dimensional numerical model (Regional Atmospheric Modeling System—-RAMS) was used to study the formation and evolution of water forms in a two-layer cloud structure observed during a field campaign over Brest (France). The model performance in regular operations, using conventional meteorological data as initial and lateral boundary conditions, was also examined. Remote sensing observations of the cloud system and in-situ aircraft data, selected during the campaign, were used to validate the model outputs. The model simulations showed that the lower cloud formation was characterized by high number concentration of pristine ice and snow, while the concentration of aggregates, graupel and hail were considerably lower. Hydrometeors in liquid phase appeared demonstrating high number concentration and water content on the top of this layer. The upper cloud layer consisted only of frozen water substances in lower amounts. The qualitative and quantitative comparison of the model-calculated meteorological and microphysical fields to the available observational data revealed that the model reflected fairly well the cloud structure (e.g., the spatio-temporal variability of the cloud parameters, the geometry of the cloud system). However, there were deviations as far as the model underestimating the ice water content (IWC) and number concentration (Nt) fields is concerned, especially at the atmospheric layer between 2.5 and 4 km of altitude. These deviations of the model simulated quantities from the measured ones may be attributed either to the performance of the model’s microphysics scheme, to instrument inaccuracies and to the local disturbance caused by the aircraft.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kain JS and Fritsch JM (1990). A one-dimensional entraining/ detraining plume model and its application in convective parameterization. J Atmos Sci 47(23): 2784–2802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tremback CJ (1990) Numerical simulation of a mesoscale convective complex: model development and numerical results. Ph.D. dissertation, Atmos Sci Paper No. 465, Colorado State University, Dept of Atmos Science, Fort Collins, Co 8523.

  3. Pielke RA, Cotton WR, Walko RL, Tremback CJ, Lyons LD, Grasso WA, Nicholls ME, Moran MD, Wesley DA, Lee TJ and Copeland JH (1992). A comprehensive meteorological modeling system - RAMS. Meteorol Atmos Phys 49: 69–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang C and Chang JS (1993). A three-dimensional numerical model of cloud dynamics, microphysics and chemistry. 1: Concepts and formulation. J Geophys Research 98(D8): 14827–14844

    Google Scholar 

  5. Heckman ST and Cotton WR (1993). Mesoscale numerical simulation of cirrus clouds–FIRE case study and sensitivity analysis. Mon Wea Rev 121: 2264–2284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen J-P (1994). Notes and Correspondence: Prediction of saturation ratio for cloud microphysical models. J Atmos Sci 51(10): 1332–1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevens B, Cotton WR and Feingold G (1998). A critique of one- and two-dimensional models of boundary layer clouds with a binned representation of drop microphysics. J Atmos Res 47–48: 529–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bernardet LR and Cotton WR (1998). Multi–scale evolution of a derecho–producing MCS. Mon Wea Rev 126: 2991–3015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harrington JY, Reisin T, Cotton WR and Kreidenweis SM (1999). Cloud resolving simulations of Arctic stratus. Part II: Transition – season clouds. Atmos Res 51: 45–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wu T, Cotton WR and Cheng WYY (2000). Radiative effects on the diffusional growth of ice particles in cirrus clouds. J Atmos Sci 57: 2892–2904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jiang H and Cotton WR (2000). Large–eddy simulation of shallow cumulus convection during BOMEX: sensitivity to microphysics and radiation. J Atmos Sci 57: 582–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiang H, Cotton WR, Pinto JO, Curry JA and Weissbluth MJ (2000). Cloud resolving simulations of mixed-phase Arctic stratus observed during BASE: Sensitivity to concentration of ice crystals and large – scale heat and moisture advection. J Atmos Sci 57: 2105–2117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mace GG, Starr DO’C, Ackerman TP and Minnis P (1995). Examination of coupling between an upper – tropospheric cloud system and synoptic – scale dynamics diagnosed from wind profiler and radiosonde data. J Atmos Sci 5: 4094–4127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown PRA and Swann HA (1997). Evaluation of key microphysical parameters in three–dimensional cloud–model simulations using aircraft and multiparameter radar data. Quart J Roy Meteor Soc 123: 2245–2275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guan H, Cober SG and Isaac GA (2001). Verification of supercooled water forecasts with in situ aircraft measurements. Wea Forecasting 16: 145–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guan H, Cober SG, Isaac GA, Tremblay A and Methot A (2002). Comparison of three cloud forecast schemes with in situ aircraft measurements. Wea Forecasting 17: 1226–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nasiri SL, Baum BA, Heymsfield AJ, Yang P, Poellot MR, Kratz DP and Hu Y (2002). The development of midlatitude cirrus models for MODIS using FIRE-I, FIRE-II, and ARM in-situ data. J Appl Meteor 41: 197–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lekas ITh, Mavromatidis E, Kallos G (2006) Some considerations on the airborne cloud microphysical probing. Meteorol Atmos Phys 92:217–230, published online: December 22, 2005

  19. Snook JS, Stamus PA, Edwards J, Christidis Z and McGinley JA (1998). Local–domain analysis and forecast model support for the 1996 centennial Olympic Games. Wea Forecasting 13: 138–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Powell MD and Rinard SK (1998). Marine forecasting at the 1996 centennial Olympic Games. Wea Forecasting 13: 764–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McQueen JT, Valigura RA and Stunder BJB (1997). Evaluation of the RAMS model for estimating turbulent fluxes over the Chesapeake Bay. Atmos Environ 31: 3803–3819

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Case LJ, Manobianco J, Dianic AV, Wheeler MM, Harms DE and Parks CR (2002). Verification over East – Central Florida during the 1999 and 2000 Summer Months. Wea Forecasting 17: 1133–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Warren GS, Hahn CJ and London J (1985). Simultaneous occurrence of different cloud types. J Climate Appl Meteor 24: 658–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tian L and Curry JA (1989). Cloud overlap statistics. J Geophys Res 94: 9925–9935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pelon J, Testud J, Noel V, Tinel C, Guyot A, Caillaud K, Protat A, Chepfer H, Trouillet V, Baudin F, Flamant H, Quante M, Nagel D, Lemke H, Danne O, Albers F, Raschke E, Kallos G, Mavromatidis E (2001) Investigation of cloud by ground-based and airborne radar and lidar (CARL). Final Report for the European Commission, DGXII, Contract PL-970567

  26. Cotton WR, Pielke RA Sr, Walko RL, Liston GE, Tremback CJ, Jiang H, McAnelly RL, Harrington JY, Nicholls ME, Carrio GG and McFadden JP (2002). RAMS 2001: current status and future directions. Meteor Atmos Phys 82: 5–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smagorinsky J (1963). General circulation experiments with the primitive equations. Part I, The basic experiment. Mon Wea Rev 91: 99–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hill GE (1974). Factors controlling the size and spacing of cumulus clouds as revealed by numerical experiments. J Atmos Sci 31: 646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lilly DK (1962). On the numerical simulation of buoyant convection. Tellus, XIV 2: 148–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Walko RL, Cotton WR, Meyers MP and Harrington JY (1995). New RAMS cloud microphysics parameterization. Part I: the single moment scheme. Atmos Res 38: 29–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Harrington JY, Meyers MP, Walko RL and Cotton WR (1995). Parameterization of ice crystal conversion processes due to vapor deposition for mesoscale model using double-moment basis functions. Part I: Basic formulation and parcel model results. J Atmos Sci 52: 4344–4366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Meyers MP, Walko RL, Harrington JY and Cotton WR (1997). New RAMS cloud microphysics parameterization. Part II: The two-moment scheme. Atmos Res 45: 3–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Flatau PJ, Tripoli GJ, Verlinde J, Cotton WR (1989) The CSU-RAMS cloud microphysical module: general theory and code documentation. Colorado State Univ., Dep Atmos Sci, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, Atmos Sci Pap, 451, 88 pp

  34. Verlinde J, Flatau PJ and Cotton WR (1990). Analytical solutions to the collection growth equation: Comparison with approximate methods and application to cloud microphysics parameterization schemes. J Atmos Sci 47: 2871–2880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Meyers MP, DeMott PJ and Cotton WR (1992). New primary ice-nucleation parameterization in an explicit cloud model. J Appl Meteor 33: 617–626

    Google Scholar 

  36. DeMott PJ, Meyers MP and Cotton WR (1994). Parameterization and impact of ice initiation processes relevant to numerical model simulations of cirrus clouds. J Atmos Sci 51: 77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mossop SC (1978). The influence of drop size distribution on the production of secondary ice particles during graupel growth. Q J Roy Meteor Soc 104: 323–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Klemp JB and Wilhelmson RB (1978). The simulation of three-dimensional convective storm dynamics. J Atmos Sci 35: 1070–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kain JS, Fritsch JM (1993) Convective parameterization for mesoscale models: The Kain–Fritsch scheme. The representation of cumulus convection in numerical models of the atmosphere. Meteor Monogr No 46, Amer Meteor Soc 165–170

  40. Chen C and Cotton WR (1987). The physics of the marine stratocumulus-capped mixed layer. J Atmos Sci 44: 2951–2977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Walko RL, Band LE, Baron J, Kittel TGF, Lammers R, Lee TJ, Ojima D, Pielke RA Sr, Taylor C, Tague C, Tremback CJ and Vidale PL (2000). Coupled atmosphere-biophysics-hydrology models for environmental modelling. J Appl Meteor 39: 931–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Krichak SO and Levin Z (2000). On the cloud microphysical processes during the November 2, 1994 hazardous storm in the southeastern Mediterranean as simulated with a mesoscale model. Atmos Res 53: 63–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Houze AR Jr (1993) Cloud dynamics. Academic Press, Inc., International Geophysical Series, vol 53, ISBN: 0-12-356881-1

  44. Hobbs PV, Rangno AL, Uttal T and Shupe M (2001). Airborne studies of cloud structures over the Arctic Ocean and comparisons with retrievals from ship-based remote sensing measurements. J Geophys Res 106: 15029–15044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Cotton WR, Anthes RA (1989) Storm and cloud dynamics. Academic Press, Inc. ISBN: 0-12-192530-7

  46. Pruppacher RH, Klett JD (1997) Microphysics of clouds and precipitation (Second revised and enlarged edition), vol 18 Kluwer Academic Publishers, Atmospheric and Oceanographic Sciences Library, ISBN: 0-7923-4211-9

  47. Fleishauer RP, Larson VE and Vonder Haar TH (2002). Observed microphysical structure of midlevel, mixed-phase clouds. J Atmos Sci 59: 1779–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lawson RP, Baker BA, Schmitt CG and Jensen TL (2001). An overview of microphysical properties of Arctic clouds observed in may and July during FIRE. J Geophys Res 106: 14989–15014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Albrecht BA, Randall DA and Nicholls S (1988). Observations of marine stratocumulus clouds during FIRE. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 69: 618–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Bretherton CS and Pincus R (1993). Cloudiness and marine boundary layer dynamics in the ASTEX Langragian experiment. Part I: Synoptic setting and vertical structure. J Atmos Sci 52: 2707–2723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Gardiner BA and Hallett J (1985). Degradation of in-cloud forward scattering spectrometer probe measurements in the presence of ice particles. J Atmos Ocean Technol 2: 171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. McFarquhar GM and Heymsfield AJ (1996). Microphysical characteristics of three anvils sampled during the Central Equatorial Pacific Experiment (CEPEX). J Atmos Sci 53: 2401–2423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Arnott WP, Mitchell D, Schmitt C, Kingsmill D, Ivanova D (2000) Analysis of the FSSP performance for measurement of small crystal spectra in cirrus. In: Proceedings 13th international conference on clouds and precipitation, Reno, NV, ICCP, pp 191–193

  54. Mavromatidis E and Kallos G (2003). An investigation of cold cloud formation with a three dimensional model with explicit microphysics. J Geophys Res 108(D14): 4420–4450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Guffond D (1981) Ice accretion on a protected surface during a flight in icing conditions. (In French). ONERA, RT, no 3/5146 SY

  56. Clift R, Grace JR, Weber ME (1978) Bubbles, drops and particles. Academic press

  57. Beard KV (1976). Terminal velocity and shape of cloud precipitation drops aloft. J Atmos Sci 33: 851–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Auer AH Jr and Veal DL (1970). The dimension of ice crystals in natural clouds. J Atmos Sci 27: 919–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Katz J, Plotkin A (1991) Low speed aerodynamics. Mc Graw-Hill Publishers

  60. Pitter RT and Pruppacher HR (1974). A numerical investigation of collision efficiencies of simple ice plates colliding with supercooled water drops. J Atmos Sci 31: 551–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Schlamp R, Pruppacher HR and Hamielec AC (1975). A numerical investigation of the efficiency with which simple columnar ice crystals collide with supercooled water drops. J Atmos Sci 32: 2330–2337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Physics, Division of Applied Physics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, University Campus, Bldg PHYS-5, 15784, Athens, Attika, Greece

    Elias Mavromatidis & George Kallos

  2. Department of Aerodynamics and Flight Mechanics, Hellenic Air Force Academy, Dekelia Air Force Base, TGA 1010, Dekelia, Attika, Greece

    Theodoros I. Lekas

Authors
  1. Elias Mavromatidis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Theodoros I. Lekas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. George Kallos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Kallos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mavromatidis, E., Lekas, T.I. & Kallos, G. Analysis of a two-layer cloud system with RAMS model and comparison to airborne observations. Environ Fluid Mech 7, 537–568 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-007-9043-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10652-007-9043-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation