Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accuracy of land use change detection using support vector machine and maximum likelihood techniques for open-cast coal mining areas

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One objective of the present study was to evaluate the performance of support vector machine (SVM)-based image classification technique with the maximum likelihood classification (MLC) technique for a rapidly changing landscape of an open-cast mine. The other objective was to assess the change in land use pattern due to coal mining from 2006 to 2016. Assessing the change in land use pattern accurately is important for the development and monitoring of coalfields in conjunction with sustainable development. For the present study, Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper (TM) data of 2006 and Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI)/Thermal Infrared Sensor (TIRS) data of 2016 of a part of Jharia Coalfield, Dhanbad, India, were used. The SVM classification technique provided greater overall classification accuracy when compared to the MLC technique in classifying heterogeneous landscape with limited training dataset. SVM exceeded MLC in handling a difficult challenge of classifying features having near similar reflectance on the mean signature plot, an improvement of over 11 % was observed in classification of built-up area, and an improvement of 24 % was observed in classification of surface water using SVM; similarly, the SVM technique improved the overall land use classification accuracy by almost 6 and 3 % for Landsat 5 and Landsat 8 images, respectively. Results indicated that land degradation increased significantly from 2006 to 2016 in the study area. This study will help in quantifying the changes and can also serve as a basis for further decision support system studies aiding a variety of purposes such as planning and management of mines and environmental impact assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andermann, C., & Gloaguen, R. (2009). Estimation of erosion in tectonically active orogenies. Example from the Bhotekoshi catchment, Himalaya (Nepal). International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30, 3075–3096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnoff, S. (1982). Classification accuracy: a user approach. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 48, 1299–1307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boser, B. E., Guyon, I., & Vapnik, V., (1992). A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, ACM Press, 144–152.

  • Canters, F. (1997). Evaluating the uncertainty of area estimates derived from fuzzy land-cover classification. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63, 403–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X., Chen, J., Matsushita, B., Imura, H., & Wang, L. (2009a). An automatic method for burn scar mapping using support vector machines. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30, 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cawley, G. C., & Talbot, N. L. C. (2010). On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11, 2079–2107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. C., & Lin, C. J. (2011). LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 2(27), 1–27 Software available at: http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes, C., & Vapnik, V. (1995). Support-vector networks. Machine learning, 20(3), 273–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • CPCB, (2009). Comprehensive Environmental Assessment of Industrial Clusters. Central Pollution Control Board, Ministry of Environment and Forests. December 2009. Retrieved from: www.cpcb.nic.in/divisionsofheadoffice/ess/NewItem_152_Final-Book_2.pdf

  • Demirel, N., Emil, M. K., & Duzgun, H. S. (2011). Surface coal mining area monitoring using multi-temporal high resolution satellite imagery. International Journal of Coal Geology, 86, 3–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dietterich, T. G. (1998). Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Computation, 10(7), 1895–1923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauvel, M., Chanussot, J., & Benediktsson, J. A., (2009). Kernel principal component analysis for the classification of hyperspectral remote sensing data over urban areas. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, Article ID: 783194

  • Foody, G. M., Mathur, A., Hernandez, C. S., & Boyd, D. S. (2006). Training set size requirements for the classification of a specific class. Remote Sensing of Environment, 104, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, C. W., Chang, C. C., & Lin, C. J. L., (2010). Practical guide to support vector classification. Available at: http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/-cjlin. Accessed 26 May 2015).

  • Hernandez, C. S., Boyd, D. S., & Foody, G. M. (2007). Mapping specific habitats from remotely sensed imagery: support vector machine and support vector data description based classification of coaster saltmarsh habitats. Ecological Informatics, 2, 88–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, M., Chen, D., Cheng, A., Wei, H., & Stanley, D. (2013). Change detection from remotely sensed images: from pixel based to object-based approaches. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 80, 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalkhan, M. A., Reich, R. M., & Czaplewski, R. L. (1995). Statistical properties of five indices in assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data using simple random sampling. Proceedings ACSM/ASPRS Annual Convention and Exposition, 2, 246–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karan, S. K., & Samadder, S. R. (2016). Reduction of spatial distribution of risk factors for transportation of contaminants released by coal mining activities. Journal of Environmental Management, 180, 280–290.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knorn, J., Rabe, A., Radeloff, V. C., Kuemmerle, T., Kozak, J., & Hostert, P. (2009). Land cover mapping of large areas using chain classification of neighboring Landsat satellite images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113, 957–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudby, A., LeDrew, E., & Brenning, A., (2010). Predictive mapping of reef fish species richness, diversity and biomass in Zanzibar using IKONOS imagery and machine-learning techniques. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114, 1230 – 1241.

  • Koukoulas, S., & Blackburn, G. A. (2001). Introducing new indices for accuracy evaluation of classified images representing semi-natural woodland environments. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 67, 499–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillesand, T., Kiefer, R. W., & Chipman, J., (2014). Remote sensing and image interpretation. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Liu, J. G., & Mason, P., (2013). Essential image processing and GIS for remote sensing. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Lu, D., & Weng, Q., (2007). A survey of image classification methods and techniques for improving classification performance. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28.

  • Lunetta, R. S. (1999). Applications, project formulation, and analytical approach. In R. S. Lunetta & C. D. Elvidge (Eds.), Remote sensing change detection: environmental monitoring methods and applications (pp. 1–9). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantero, P., Moser, G., & Serpico, S. B. (2005). Partially supervised classification of remote sensing images through SVM-based probability density estimation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 43, 559–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melgani, F. (2006). Contextual reconstruction of cloud-contaminated multitemporal multispectral images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 44, 442–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otukei, J. R., & Blaschke, T. (2010). Land cover change assessment using decision trees, support vector machines and maximum likelihood classification algorithms. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 12S, S27–S31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piper, S. E., (1983). The evaluation of the spatial accuracy of computer classification. In Proceedings of the 1983 Machine Processing of Remotely Sensed Data Symposium (303–310). West Lafayette: Purdue University.

  • Prakash, A., & Gupta, R. P. (1998). Land-use mapping and change detection in a coal mining area—a case study in the Jharia Coalfield, India. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 19, 391–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, J. A., & Jia, X., (2006). Remote sensing digital image analysis—hardback. Springer.

  • Rosenfield, G. H., & Fitzpatrik-Lins, K. (1986). A coefficient of agreement as a measure of thematic classification accuracy. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 52, 223–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, B. C., Mahanta, B. N., Saikia, K., Paul, P. R., & Singh, G. (2007). Geo-environmental quality assessment in Jharia Coalfield, India, using multivariate statistics and geographic information system. Environmental Geology, 51(7), 1177–1196.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. H. V. (1997). Provenance of coals from Roman sites in England and Wales. Britannia, 28, 297–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szuster, B. W., Chen, Q., & Borger, M. (2011). A comparison of classification techniques to support land cover and land use analysis in tropical coastal zones. Applied Geography, 31, 525–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, S., Chen, C., Zhan, H., & Zhang, T. (2008). Determination of ocean primary productivity using support vector machines. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, 6227–6236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Meer, F. D., Van der Werff, H. M., van Ruitenbeek, F. J., Hecker, C. A., Bakker, W. H., Noomen, M. F., et al. (2012). Multi-and hyperspectral geologic remote sensing: a review. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 14(1), 112–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WCA, (2014). World Coal Association. Coal and the environment. www.worldcoal.org/coal-the-environment/coal-mining-the-environment. Accessed 24 June 2014.

  • Wehmann, A., (2013). SVM tools for ArcGIS 10.1+. Columbus, OH, Software available at: http://www.adamwehmann.com/

  • Xu, L., Zhang, S., He, Z., & Guo, Y., (2009). The comparative study of three methods of remote sensing image change detection. In Geoinformatics, 2009 17th International Conference on (pp. 1–4). IEEE.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support provided by the Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, Indian School of Mines, Dhanbad, India, for carrying out the research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sukha Ranjan Samadder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karan, S.K., Samadder, S.R. Accuracy of land use change detection using support vector machine and maximum likelihood techniques for open-cast coal mining areas. Environ Monit Assess 188, 486 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5494-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5494-x

Keywords

Navigation