Abstract
The behaviour of an emerging market, the Athens Stock Exchange, after the introduction of the euro is investigated. The latter would make its returns easier to compare; reduce uncertainty; eliminate the exchange rate risk and as a result we expect the new currency to strengthen the argument, in favour of the EMH. The General ASE Composite Index and the FTSE/ASE 20, which consists of “high capitalisation” companies, are used. Five statistical tests are employed to test the residuals of the random walk model: the BDS, McLeod-Li, Engle LM, Tsay and Bicovariance test. Bootstrap and asymptotic values of these tests are estimated. Alternative models from the GARCH family (GARCH, EGARCH and TGARCH) are also presented in order to investigate the behaviour of the series. Lastly, linear, asymmetric and non-linear error correction models are estimated and compared. The preferred model (TGARCH) suggests that leverage effects are present and the news impact curve is asymmetric.
Access this article
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In July 2000 Morgan Stanley announced the change in the classification of the MSCI Greece Index from an emerging to a developed market index with effect from the first of June 2001 (see http://www.msci.com/pressreleases/archive/pr000731.html).
For more information on the indices and their composition, see http://www.ase.gr and http://www.ftse.com. The data are available free from http://www.enet.gr/finance/finance.jsp.
The results of the AR are not reported here but are available from the author.
References
Alogoskoufis G (1995) The two faces if janus: institutions, policy regimes and macroeconomic performance in Greece. Econ Policy 20:148–192
Apergis N, Eleptheriou S (2001) Stock returns and voilatility: evidence from the Athens stock exchange. J Econ Financ 25:50–61
Ashley RA, Patterson DM (2006) Evaluating the effectiveness of state-switching time series models for US real output. J Bus Econ Stat 24:266–277
Barkoulas J, Travlos N (1998) Chaos in an emerging capital market? The case of the Athens stock exchange. Appl Financ Econ 8:231–243
Barnet WA, Gallant AR, Hinich MJ, Jungeilges JA, Caplan DT, Jensen MJ (1997) A single-blind controlled competition amongst tests for nonlinearity and chaos. J Econom 82:157–192
Bollerslev T (1986) Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity. J Econom 31:307–327
Bollerslev T, Engle R, Nelson D (1994) ARCH models. In: Engle R, McFadden DL (eds) Handbook of econometrics chap. 49, vol 4. Elsevier Science, North-Holland, pp 2959–3038
Brock WA, Hsieh DA, LeBaron B (1991) Nonlinear dynamics, chaos, and instability. MIT Press, Cambridge
Brock WA, Dechert W, Scheinkman J, LeBaron B (1996) A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econom Rev 15:197–235
Chappell D, Eldridge RM (2000) Evidence of market efficiency in a war environment. Appl Financ Econ 10(5):489–492
Chappell D, Panagiotidis T (2005) Using the correlation dimension to detect non-linear dynamics: evidence from the Athens stock exchange. Financ Lett 3(4):29–32
de Lima PJF (1996) Nuisance parameter free properties of correlation integral based statistics. Econom Rev 15(3):237–259
Engle RF (1982) autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation. Econom 50:987–1007
Engle RF (2002) New frontiers for ARCH models. J Appl Econom 17:425–446
Engle RF, Ng VK (1993) Measuring and testing the impact of news on volatility. J Financ 48:1022–1082
Escribano A, Granger CWJ (1998) Investigating the relationship between gold and silver prices. J Forecast 17:81–107
Escribano A, Pfann GA (1998) Non-linear error correction, asymmetric adjustment and cointegration. Econ Model 15:197–216
Glosten LR, Jaganathan R, Runkle D (1993) On the relation between the expected value and the volatility of the normal excess return on stocks. J Financ 48:1779–1801
Granger CWJ, Lee TH (1989) Investigation of production, sales and inventory relationships using multicointegration and non-symmetric error correction models. J Appl Econom 4:S145–S159
Granger CWJ, Terasvirta T (1993) Modelling nonlinear economic relationships. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hinich M, Patterson D (2005) Detecting epochs of transient dependence in white noise. In: Binner J, Belongia M (eds) Money, measurement and computation. Palgrave MacMillan, London, pp 61–75
MacKinnon JG, Haug AA, Michelis L (1999) Numerical distribution functions of likelihood ratio tests for cointegration. J Appl Econom 14:563–577
McLeod AI, Li WK (1983) Diagnostic checking ARMA time series models using squared-residual autocorrelations. J Time Ser Anal 4:269–273
Millionis A, Moschos D (2000) On the validity of the weak-form efficient market hypothesis applied to the London stock exchange: comment. Appl Econ Lett 7:419–421
Neftci SN (1991) Naïve trading rules in financial markets and Wiener–Kolmogorov prediction theory. J Bus 64(4):549–571
Nelson DB (1991) Conditional heteroscedasticity in asset returns: a new approach. Econometrica 59:347–370
Niarchos N, Alexakis C (1998) Stock market prices, causality and efficiency: evidence from the Athens stock exchange. Appl Financ Econ 8:167–174
Panagiotidis T (2005) Market capitalisation and efficiency. Does it matter? Evidence from the Athens stock exchange. Appl Financ Econ 15(10):707–713
Patterson DM, Ashley RA (2000) A nonlinear time series workshop. Kluwer Academic, London
Rahbek A, Hansen E, Dennis JG (2002) ARCH Innovations and their impact on cointegration rank testing. Centre for Analytical Finance, University of Copenhagen, Working paper no. 22
Siriopoulos C (1996) Investigating the behaviour of mature and emerging capital markets. Indian J Quant Econ 11(1):76–98
Terasvirta T, Eliasson A-C (2001) Non-linear error correction and the UK demand for broad money, 1878–1993. J Appl Econom 16:277–288
Tsay RS (1986) Nonlinearity tests for time series. Biometrica 73:461–466
Zakoian JM (1994) Threshold heteroskedastic models. J Econ Dyn Control 18(5):931–955
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank, but not in any way complicate, David Chappell, Chris Green, Steve Lawford, Terrence C. Mills and Costas Milas and the participants of the IEFS and Centre for Capital Markets joint Annual Conference held in London Metropolitan University for their useful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Panagiotidis, T. Market efficiency and the Euro: the case of the Athens stock exchange. Empirica 37, 237–251 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-008-9100-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-008-9100-5