Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A New Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A critical review of the multidisciplinary literature on sustainable development reveals a lack of a comprehensive theoretical framework for understanding sustainable development and its complexities. A critical review shows that the definitions of sustainable development are vague; there is a lack of operative definitions and disagreement over what should be sustained; the concept is unclear in terms of emotional commitment; and it “remains a confused topic”, “fraught with contradictions”. This article aims to theoretically synthesize the interdisciplinary literature on sustainable development, and then identify the results by broad categories. Therefore, this article uses conceptual analysis, which reviews multidisciplinary literature on sustainable development, which recognizes patterns and similarities within the literature, then it synthesizes the patterns to different categories and independent concepts, where each concept has distinctive meanings and represents close ideas on sustainability. The analytical process elaborates seven concepts that together assemble the theoretical framework of ‘sustainable development’ and each concept represents distinctive meanings of the theoretical framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Acselrad, H. (1999). Sustainability and territoriality: Meaningful practices and material transformation. In: E. Becker, & Th. Jahn (Eds.), Sustainability and the social sciences: A cross- disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation (pp. 37–68). London: Zed Books.

  • Agyeman, J., Bullard, R. D., & Evans, B. (2002). Exploring the nexus: Bringing together sustainability, environmental justice and equity. Space & Polity, 6(1), 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, R. N. (1997). National environmental policies: The United States. In: M. Jaenicke, & H. J. Weidner (Eds.), National environmental policies: A comparative study of capacity building (pp. 25–43). New York: Springer Verlag.

  • Andrew Dobson (1990). Green Political Thought: An Introduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baeten, G. (2000). The tragedy of the highway: Empowerment, disempowerment and the politics of sustainability discourses and practices. European Planning Studies, 8(1), 69–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatley, T., & Manning, K. (1998). The ecology of place: Planning for environment, economy and community. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berke, P. R., & Conroy, M. (2000). Are we planning for sustainable development? Journal of the American Planning Association, 66(1), 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berke, P. R., & Kartez, J. (1995). Sustainable development as a guide to land use policy. Cambridge, MA: Research Paper, Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin, M. (1980). Toward an Ecological Society. New York and Montreal: Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin, M. (1982). The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy. New Castle: Silver Book Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bookchin, M. (1989). Remaking Society. New York and Montreal: Black Rose Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, J. K. (1994). Inequality as a cause of environmental degradation. Ecological Economics, 11(3), 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, J. K., Klemer, A. R., Templet, P. H., & Willis, C. E. (1999). Power distribution, the environment, and public health: A state-level analysis. Ecological Economics, 29(1), 127–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callenbach, E. (1975). Ecotopia: The Notebooks and Reports of William Weston. Berkeley, CA: Banyan Tree Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collados, C., & Timpothy, D. P. (1999). Natural capital and quality of life: A model for evaluating the sustainability of alternative regional development paths. Ecological Economics, 30(3), 441–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., D’Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & Van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CE–Council of Europe. (1993). The European urban charter, standing conference of local and regional authorities of Europe, Council of Europe, Luxembourg, http://www.iclei.org/europractce/e-intl.htm.

  • CSD–Commission on Sustainable Development. (2001). 9th Session. New York. http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/decmake.htm.

  • Dodds, H. S. (2000). Pathways and paradigms for sustaining human communities. In: Lawrence R. J. Sustaining human settlement: A challenge for the new millennium. (pp. 28–54). Great Britain: Urban International Press.

  • Donella Meadows (1991). Global Citizen. Island Press.

  • Edwards, B. (1999). Sustainable architecture: European directives and building design. Architectural Press.

  • Edwards, B., & Turrent, D. (2000). Sustainable housing: Principles and practice. London and New York: E & FN Spon.

    Google Scholar 

  • England, R. (1998). Should we pursue measurement of the natural capital stock? Ecological Economics, 27(3), 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geisinger, A. (1999). Sustainable development and the domination of nature: Spreading the seed of the western ideology of nature. Environmental Affairs law Review, 27(1), 43–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geldrop, J., & Withagen, C. (2000). Natural capital and sustainability. Ecological Economics, 32(3), 445–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geus, M. de (1999). Ecological utopias: Envisioning the sustainable society. Utrecht: International Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gow, D. (1992). Poverty and natural resources: Principles for environmental management and sustainable development. In: Environmental impact assessment review, 12(1/2), 49–65.

  • Haughton, G. (1999). Environmental justice and the sustainable city. In: D. Satterthwaite (Ed.), Sustainable cities. London: Earthscan.

  • Hawken P. (1993). The ecology of commerce: A declaration of sustainability. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P., & Shaw, T. (1993). Planners, plans and sustainable development. Regional Studies, 27(8), 769–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinterberger, F., Luks, F., & Schmid, B. (1997). Methods: Material flows vs. ‘natural capital’: What makes an economy sustainable? Ecological Economics, 23, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jabareen, Y. (2004). A knowledge map for describing variegated and conflict domains of sustainable development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 47(4), 623–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. (1991). The Green Economy: Environment, Sustainable Development and the Politics of the Future. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, J., Gowdy, J., & Van der Straaten, J. (Eds.) (2001). Sustainability in Action: Sectoral and Regional Case Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, R. (1990). Environment, technology and ethics. In: J. R. Engel & J. G. Engel (Eds.), Ethics of Environment and Development—Global Challenge, International Response. Tucson: University of Arizona Press. pp. 27–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, J. T. (1985). Designing for human ecosystems: Landscape, land use, and natural resources. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyle, J. T. (1994). Regenerative design for sustainable development. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., & Randers, J. (1992) Beyond the limits. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., & Randers, J. (1992). Beyond the Limits: Confronting Global Collapse, Envisioning a Sustainable Future. Post Mills, VT: Chelsea Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, E. G. (1990) Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 415–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozaffar, Q. (2001). Sustainable development: Concepts and rankings. Journal of Development Studies, 3, 134–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumayer, E. (2001). The human development index and sustainability. A constructive proposal, Ecological Economics, 39(1), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

  • Pearce, D., Barbier, E., & Markandya, A. (1990). Sustainable development: Economics and environment in the third world. London: Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D., & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of natural resources and the environment. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qizilbash, M. (1996). Capabilities, Well-Being and Human Development: A Survey. Journal of Development Studies, 33(2), 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reboratti, C. E. (1999). Territory, scale and sustainable development. In: E. Becker, & Th. Jahn (Eds.), Sustainability and the social sciences: A cross-disciplinary approach to integrating environmental considerations into theoretical reorientation (pp. 207–222). London: Zed Books.

  • Redclift, M. R. (1987). Sustainable development: Exploring the contradictions. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. R. (1993). Sustainable development: Concepts, contradictions, and conflicts. In: P. Allen (Ed.), Food for the future: Conditions and contradictions of sustainability. John Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redclift, M. R. (1994). Sustainable development: Economics and the environment. In: Strategies for sustainable development: Local agendas for the southern hemisphere. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Repetto, R. (Ed.) (1985). The global possible: Resources, development, and the new century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

  • Robinson, J., & Tinker, J. (1998). Reconciling ecological, economic, and social imperatives, In: J. Schnurr, & S. Holtz (Eds.) The cornerstone of development: Integrating environmental, social, and economic policies (pp. 9–43). Ottawa: IDRC-International Development Research Center, and Lewis Publishers.

  • Roseland, M. (2000) Sustainable community development: Integrating environmental, economic, and social objectives. Progress in Planning, 54(2), 73–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, W. (1993). Global ecology and the shadow of development. In: W. Sachs (Ed.), Global ecology. A new arena of polital conflict (pp. 3–20). London: Zed Books.

  • Sachs, W. (1999). Planet dialectics: Exploring in environment & development. Fernwood Publishing, Witwatersrand University Press, Zed Books.

  • Sattherwaite, D. (1996). For better living. Down to Earth, 31, 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scrugge, P. (1993). Definitions and principles (Chap. 1). In: S. Park (Ed.), Guidelines for state level sustainable development, Chapel Hill: Center for Policy Alternatives and Environmental Resource Program, University of North Carolina.

  • Solow, R. (1991). Sustainability: An economist’s perspective. The Eighteenth J. Seward Johnson Lecture. Woods Hole, MA: Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution.

  • Solow R. (1992) An almost practical step toward sustainability. Nobel Laureate in Economic Science (MIT).

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of quantitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Calif.: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stymne, S., & Jackson, T. (2000). Intra-generational equity and sustainable welfare: A time series analysis for the UK and Sweden. Ecological Economics, 33(2), 219–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, R. Jr. (1994). Gray world, green heart: Technology, nature, and sustainable landscape. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Earth Charter. (2001). www.earthcharterusa.org; see also: www.earthcharter.org/wssd/summit_report.doc.

  • UNCED – United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. (1992). www.ciesin.org/TG/P1/TREATY/unced.html

  • UNFCCC. (1992). United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. http://unfccc.int/ resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf.

  • UNDP – United Nations Development Programme. (2002). Human development report 2002: Deepening democracy in a fragmented world. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ryn, S., & Calthorpe, P. (1991). Sustainable communities: A new design synthesis for cities, suburbs, and towns. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Ryn, S., & Cowan, S. (1995). Ecological design. Island Press.

  • Villanueva, C. (1997). Community development and the futures of sustainable communities in the Philippines. In: Y. Kaoru (Ed.), Sustainable global community in the information age: Vision from future studies. Praeger Studies on the 21st Century: Praeger, CT.

  • WCED. (1987). Our common future. The brundtland report, world commission for environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • WSSD – World Summit on Sustainable Development. (2002). Report of the World Summit on Sustainable Development. Johannesburg, South Africa.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urban Studies and Planning, MIT – Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building 7-337, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02139-4307, USA

    Yosef Jabareen

Authors
  1. Yosef Jabareen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yosef Jabareen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jabareen, Y. A New Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development. Environ Dev Sustain 10, 179–192 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9058-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9058-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation