Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The role of private sector in the implementation of sustainable development goals

  • Review
  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On September 25, 2015, the Sustainable Development Agenda of 2030 was agreed and adopted by the United Nation. This agenda consists of 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) and 169 targets. It expressed a global call for taking urgent actions to save the planet. In this regard, the private sector is one of the key stakeholders that could shoulder a fundamental responsibility for accelerating the SDGs implementation process. The current article reviews important aspects of the role of the private sector toward SDGs achievement. The corporate social responsibility, circular economy, and the environmental initiatives are required to support the implementation of SDGs. However, for achieving SDGs the private sector faces a number of challenges such as lack of influential leadership, harmonious partnerships, shortage of investments, exhaustiveness and complexity of interlinkages among the goals and their targets, and lack of monitoring and evaluating methods for assessing the progress of implementation. Moreover, there is a dire need for a reliable set of measurable indicators to support the private sector in measuring the implementation progress. This review article highlights the role of private sector in beating the challenges confronting the achievement of SDGs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abe, Y., Zodrow, I., Johnson, D. A., & Silerio, L. (2019). Risk informed and resilient development: Engaging the private sector in the era of the Sendai Framework. Progress in Disaster Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abshagen, M., Cavazzini, A., Graen, L., & Obenland, W. (2018). Analysis Highjacking the SDGs? The private sector and the sustainable development goals. Berlin. Retrieved from https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/271-general/53058-highjacking-the-sdgs-the-private-sector-and-the-sustainable-development-goals.html.

  • Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2018). Initial progress in implementing the sustainable development goals (SDGs): A review of evidence from countries. Sustainability Science, 13(5), 1453–1467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, C., Metternicht, G., & Wiedmann, T. (2019). Prioritising SDG targets: Assessing baselines, gaps and interlinkages. Sustainability Science, 14(2), 421–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardakani, D. A., & Soltanmohammadi, A. (2019). Investigating and analysing the factors affecting the development of sustainable supply chain model in the industrial sectors. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(1), 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axon, S., & James, D. (2018). The UN sustainable development goals: How can sustainable chemistry contribute? A view from the chemical industry. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry, 13, 140–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarre, B., Calabretta, G., Bocken, N. M. P., & Jaskiewicz, T. (2017). Bridging sustainable business model innovation and user-driven innovation: A process for sustainable value proposition design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147, 175–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. B., & Burgess, J. C. (2017). The sustainable development goals and the systems approach to sustainability. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 11(28), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basta, M., Lapalme, J., Paquet, M., Saint-Louis, P., & Abu Zwaida, T. (2018). How are supply chains addressing their social responsibility dilemmas? Review of the last decade and a half. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 833–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, A. J. (2015). The responsibility to protect turns ten. Ethics and International Affairs, 29(2), 161–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, M., Alfredsson, E., Cohen, M., Lorek, S., & Schroeder, P. (2018). Transforming systems of consumption and production for achieving the sustainable development goals: Moving beyond efficiency. Sustainability Science, 13(6), 1533–1547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bexell, M., & Jönsson, K. (2017). Responsibility and the United Nations’ sustainable development goals. Forum for Development Studies, 44(1), 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasco, J., & King, A. (2017). The road ahead: The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2017. KPMG international cooperative (Vol. 8). Swiss. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.238.

  • Blasco, J., King, A., & Jayaram, S. (2018). How to report on the SDGs what good looks like and why it matters. KPMG. Swiss. Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2018/02/how-to-report-on-sdgs.pdf.

  • Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhmann, K., Jonsson, J., & Fisker, M. (2019). Do no harm and do more good too: Connecting the SDGs with business and human rights and political CSR theory. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(3), 389–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero, P. (2019). The SDGs: Changing how development is understood. Global Policy, 10(January), 138–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camacho-Otero, J., Boks, C., & Pettersen, I. (2018). Consumption in the circular economy: A literature review. Sustainability, 10(8), 2758.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato, D., Korhonen, J., & Toppinen, A. (2019). Circular, green, and bio economy: How do companies in land-use intensive sectors align with sustainability concepts? Ecological Economics, 158, 116–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijk, M., de Kraker, J., van Zeijl-Rozema, A., van Lente, H., Beumer, C., Beemsterboer, S., et al. (2017). Sustainability assessment as problem structuring: Three typical ways. Sustainability Science, 12(2), 305–317.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, M., Bengtsson, M., & Akenji, L. (2016). An optimistic analysis of the means of implementation for sustainable development goals: Thinking about goals as means. Sustainability, 8(9), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder, M., & Olsen, S. H. (2019). The design of environmental priorities in the SDGs. Global Policy, 10(January), 70–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esquivel, V., & Sweetman, C. (2016). Gender and the sustainable development goals. Gender and Development, 24(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, A., Wise, R. M., Hansen, H., & Sams, L. (2017). The sustainable development goals: A case study. Marine Policy, 86(July), 94–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, A., & Biekart, K. (2017). Multi-stakeholder initiatives for sustainable development goals: The importance of interlocutors. Public Administration and Development, 37(2), 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, M., & Sabbatino, A. (2018). The role of the private sector in global sustainable development: The UN 2030 Agenda. In G. Grigore, A. Stancu, & D. McQueen (Eds.), Corporate responsibility and digital communities. Palgrave studies in governance, leadership and responsibility. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda-Parr, S. (2016). From the millennium development goals to the sustainable development goals: Shifts in purpose, concept, and politics of global goal setting for development. Gender and Development, 24(1), 43–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda-Parr, S., & McNeill, D. (2015). Post 2015: A new era of accountability? Journal of Global Ethics, 11(1), 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galli, A., Đurović, G., Hanscom, L., & Knežević, J. (2018). Think globally, act locally: Implementing the sustainable development goals in Montenegro. Environmental Science and Policy, 84, 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D., Shah, A., & Tankha, S. (2019). The framing of sustainable consumption and production in SDG 12. Global Policy, 10, 83–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy–A new sustainability paradigm?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757–768.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgeson, L., & Maslin, M. (2018). Putting the United Nations sustainable development goals into practice: A review of implementation, monitoring, and finance. Geo: Geography and Environment, 5(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobierno De Colombia. (2018). The private sector and its contribution to the SDGs : A journey to data gathering through corporate sustainability reporting in Colombia. Retrieved from http://www.co.undp.org/content/dam/colombia/docs/Pobreza/ODS/Private Sector and Its Contribution to the SDGs—A Journey to Data Gathering and Reporting in Colombia DIGITAL.pdf.

  • GRI, UN Global Compact and WBCSD. (2015). SDG compass. The guide for business action on the SDGs. https://sdgcompass.org/wpcontent/uploads/2016/05/019104_SDG_Compass_Guide_2015_v29.pdf. Accessed 14 January 2020.

  • Guevara, S., & Julián, I. P. (2019). Sustainable consumption and production: A crucial goal for sustainable development—Reflections on the Spanish SDG implementation report. Journal of Sustainability Research. https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20190019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2016). Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 16(3), 433–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, T. (2019). The SDGs and the sustainability assessment of private-sector projects: Theoretical conceptualisation and comparison with current practice using the case study of the Asian Development Bank. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 37(1), 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M., Nilsson, M., Raworth, K., Bakker, P., Berkhout, F., De Boer, Y., et al. (2015). Beyond cockpit-ism: Four insights to enhance the transformative potential of the sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 7(2), 1651–1660.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hak, T., Janousková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable development goals: A need for relevant indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60, 565–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPIECA. (2017). Mapping the oil and gas industry to the sustainable development goals: An Atlas. UK. Retrieved from http://www.ipieca.org/media/3093/mapping_og_to_sdg_atlas_lr_2017.pdf.

  • Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolks, A. (2016). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopnina, H. (2016). The victims of unsustainability: A challenge to sustainable development goals. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 23(2), 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018). Circular economy: The concept and its limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, P., Ahmed, F., Singh, R. K., & Sinha, P. (2018). Determination of hierarchical relationships among sustainable development goals using interpretive structural modeling. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(5), 2119–2137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumi, E., Yeboah, T., & Kumi, Y. A. (2019). Private sector participation in advancing the sustainable development goals (SDGs) in Ghana: Experiences from the mining and telecommunications sectors. The Extractive Industries and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2019.12.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lalaguna, P. D. Y., & Dorodnykh, E. (2018). The role of private–public partnerships in the implementation of sustainable development goals: Experience from the SDG Fund. In W. L. Filho (Ed.), Handbook of sustainability science and research (pp. 969–982). Cham: Springer.

  • Le Blanc, D. (2015). Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23, 176–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal Filho, W., Azeiteiro, U., Alves, F., Pace, P., Mifsud, M., Brandli, L., et al. (2018). Reinvigorating the sustainable development research agenda: The role of the sustainable development goals (SDG). International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 25(2), 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leal Filho, W., Tripathi, S. K., Andrade Guerra, J. B. S. O. D., Giné-Garriga, R., OrlovicLovren, V., & Willats, J. (2019). Using the sustainable development goals towards a better understanding of sustainability challenges. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 26(2), 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lima, M. G. B., Kissinger, G., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., Braña-Varela, J., & Gupta, A. (2017). The sustainable development goals and REDD+: Assessing institutional interactions and the pursuit of synergies. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(4), 589–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu, J., Ren, L., Lin, W., He, Y., & Streimikis, J. (2019). Policies to promote corporate social responsibility (CSR) and assessment of CSR impacts. Business Administration and Management, 22(1), 82–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malviya, R. K., Kant, R., & Gupta, A. D. (2018). Evaluation and selection of sustainable strategy for green supply chain management implementation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 27(4), 475–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao, J., Li, C., Pei, Y., & Xu, L. (2018). Circular economy and sustainable development enterprises. Berlin: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8524-6_3.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, A. (2019). Public–private partnerships for sustainable development: Exploring their design and its impact on effectiveness. Sustainability, 11(4), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S. E. (2019). The sustainable development goals confront the infrastructure of measurement. Global Policy, 10(January), 146–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millar, N., McLaughlin, E., & Börger, T. (2019). The circular economy: Swings and roundabouts? Ecological Economics, 158, 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldavska, A. (2017). Defining organizational context for corporate sustainability assessment: Cross-disciplinary approach. Sustainability, 9(12), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moldavska, A., & Welo, T. (2019). A Holistic approach to corporate sustainability assessment: Incorporating sustainable development goals into sustainable manufacturing performance evaluation. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 50, 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moratis, L. (2018). Signalling responsibility? Applying signalling theory to the ISO 26000 standard for social responsibility. Sustainability, 10(11), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morseletto, P. (2020). Targets for a circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, M., Chisholm, E., Griggs, D., Howden-Chapman, P., McCollum, D., Messerli, P., et al. (2018). Mapping interactions between the sustainable development goals: Lessons learned and ways forward. Sustainability Science, 13(6), 1489–1503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Bansal, P. (2016). The long-term benefits of organizational resilience through sustainable business practices. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1615–1631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, D., Cutter, A., & Ullah, F. (2015). Universal sustainable development goals: Understanding the transformational challenge for developed countries. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1684SF_SDG_Universality_Report_-_May_2015.pdf. Accessed on 1 February 2020.

  • Palmer, T. B., & Flanagan, D. J. (2016). The sustainable company: Looking at goals for people, planet and profits. Journal of Business Strategy, 37(6), 28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, C. S. (2018). The UN sustainable development goals (SDGs) are a great gift to business! Procedia CIRP, 69, 21–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pineda-Escobar, M. A. (2019). Moving the 2030 agenda forward: SDG implementation in Colombia. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 19(1), 176–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, T., & Sengupta, M. (2015). The sustainable development goals (SDGs), as drafted: Nice idea, poor execution. Washington International Law Journal, 24(3), 571–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyers, B., Stafford-Smith, M., Erb, K. H., Scholes, R. J., & Selomane, O. (2017). Essential variables help to focus sustainable development goals monitoring. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26, 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridho, T. K., Vinichenko, M., & Makushkin, S. (2018). Participation of companies in emerging markets to the sustainable development goals (SDGs). Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 2018, 741–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riyadh, H. A., Sukoharsono, E. G., & Alfaiza, S. A. (2019). The impact of corporate social responsibility disclosure and board characteristics on corporate performance. Cogent Business and Management, 6(1), 1647917.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizos, V., Behrens, A., Van der Gaast, W., Hofman, E., Ioannou, A., Kafyeke, T., et al. (2016). Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): Barriers and enablers. Sustainability, 8(11), 1212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, C., Cilliers, D. P., Retief, F. P., Alberts, R. C., & Bond, A. J. (2020). Regulators’ perceptions of environmental impact assessment (EIA) benefits in a sustainable development context. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 81, 106360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosati, F., & Faria, L. D. G. (2019). Addressing the SDGs in sustainability reports: The relationship with institutional factors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 215, 1312–1326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salvia, A. L., Leal Filho, W., Brandli, L. L., & Griebeler, J. S. (2019). Assessing research trends related to sustainable development goals: Local and global issues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 841–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saner, R., Yiu, L., & Kingombe, C. (2019). The 2030 Agenda compared with six related international agreements: Valuable resources for SDG implementation. Sustainability Science, 14, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, L., Behrens, P., de Koning, A., Heijungs, R., Sprecher, B., & Tukker, A. (2018). Trade-offs between social and environmental sustainable development goals. Environmental Science and Policy, 90, 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheyvens, R., Banks, G., & Hughes, E. (2016). The private sector and the SDGs: The need to move beyond ‘Business as Usual’. Sustainable Development, 24(6), 371–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönherr, N., Findler, F., & Martinuzzi, A. (2017). Exploring the interface of CSR and the sustainable development goals. Transnational Corporations, 24(3), 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, P., Anggraeni, K., & Weber, U. (2019). The relevance of circular economy practices to the sustainable development goals. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(1), 77–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siew, R. Y. (2015). A review of corporate sustainability reporting tools (SRTs). Journal of Environmental Management, 164, 180–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Z. (2016). Sustainable development goals: Challenges and opportunities. Indian Journal of Public Health, 60(4), 247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O., Ullah, F., Reyers, B., Kanie, N., et al. (2017). Integration: The key to implementing the sustainable development goals. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 911–919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahel, W. R. (2013). The business angle of a circular economy—Higher competitiveness, higher resource security and material efficiency. A New Dynamic. Effective Business in a Circular Economy, 45, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokstad, E. (2015). Sustainable goals from UN under fire. Science, 347(6223), 702–703.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, K., Thomas, S., & Rosano, M. (2017). Using industrial ecology and strategic management concepts to pursue the sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J., Vithayathil, J., & Yim, D. (2018). Are corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives such as sustainable development and environmental policies value enhancing or window dressing? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 971–980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. C., Silvestre, E., Salentine, S., Reynolds, H., & Smith, J. (2016). What systems are essential to achieving the sustainable development goals and what will it take to marshal them? Health Policy and Planning, 31(10), 1445–1447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorlakson, T., de Zegher, J. F., & Lambin, E. F. (2018). Companies’ contribution to sustainability through global supply chains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 115, 2072–2077.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Topple, C., Donovan, J. D., Masli, E. K., & Borgert, T. (2017). Corporate sustainability assessments: MNE engagement with sustainable development and the SDGs. Transnational Corporations, 24(3), 61–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosun, J., & Leininger, J. (2017). Governing the interlinkages between the sustainable development goals: Approaches to attain policy integration. Global Challenges, 1(9), 1700036.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNGA. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the general assembly on 25 September 2015, seventieth session Agenda. Available: A/RES/70/1. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E.

  • Weitz, N., Carlsen, H., Nilsson, M., & Skanberg, K. (2018). Towards systemic and contextual priority setting for implementing the 2030 Agenda. Sustainability Science, 13(2), 531–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Y., Norris, C. B., Lenzen, M., Norris, G., & Murray, J. (2017). How social footprints of nations can assist in achieving the sustainable development goals. Ecological Economics, 135, 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonehara, A., Saito, O., Hayashi, K., Nagao, M., Yanagisawa, R., & Matsuyama, K. (2017). The role of evaluation in achieving the SDGs. Sustainability Science, 12(6), 969–973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zijp, M., Heijungs, R., Van der Voet, E., Van de Meent, D., Huijbregts, M., Hollander, A., et al. (2015). An identification key for selecting methods for sustainability assessments. Sustainability, 7(3), 2490–2512.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Science, University of Bahrain, Sakhir, 32038, Bahrain

    Abdulkarim Hasan Rashed & Afzal Shah

  2. The Supreme Council for Environment, Bahrain Mall, Manama, 18233, Bahrain

    Abdulkarim Hasan Rashed

  3. Department of Chemistry, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, 45320, Pakistan

    Afzal Shah

Authors
  1. Abdulkarim Hasan Rashed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Afzal Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Afzal Shah.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rashed, A.H., Shah, A. The role of private sector in the implementation of sustainable development goals. Environ Dev Sustain 23, 2931–2948 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00718-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00718-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation