Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems paradigms

  • Published:
International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reconfigurable Manufacturing System (RMS) is a new manufacturing systems paradigm that aims at achieving cost-effective and rapid system changes, as needed and when needed, by incorporating principles of modularity, integrability, flexibility, scalability, convertibility, and diagnosability. RMS promises customized flexibility on demand in a short time, while Flexible Manufacturing Systems (FMSs) provides generalized flexibility designed for the anticipated variations and built-in a priori. The characteristics of the two paradigms are outlined and compared. The concept of manufacturing system life cycle is presented. The main types of flexibility in manufacturing systems are discussed and contrasted with the various reconfiguration aspects including hard (physical) and soft (logical) reconfiguration. The types of changeability and transformability of manufacturing systems, their components as well as factories, are presented along with their enablers and compared with flexibility and reconfigurability. The importance of having harmonized human-machine manufacturing systems is highlighted and the role of people in the various manufacturing paradigms and how this varies in pursuit of productivity are illustrated. Finally, the industrial and research challenges presented by these manufacturing paradigms are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amico M, Asl F, Pasek Z, Perrone G (2003) Real options: an application to rms investment evaluation, CIRP 2nd Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor MI, USA

  • Beach R, Muhlemann AP, Price DHR, Paterson A, Sharp JA (2000) A review of manufacturing flexibility. Eur J Oper Res 122:41–57

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Browne J, Dubois D, Rathmill K, Sethi SP, Stecke KE (1984) Classification of flexible manufacturing systems. FMS Mag 2:114–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzacott JA, Kahyaoglu Y (2000) Flexibility and robustness in manufacturing systems. Int J Manuf Technol Manage 2:546–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran DS, Arinez FJ, Duda JW, Linck J (2001, 2002) A decomposition approach for manufacturing system design. J Manuf Syst 20(6):371–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correa HL (1994) Linking flexibility, uncertainty and variability in manufacturing systems: Managing un-planned change in the automotive industry, Avebury, Aldershot, Brookfield, USA

  • D’Souza DE, Williams FP (2000) Toward a taxonomy of manufacturing flexibility dimension. J Oper Res Manage 18:577–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deif AM, ElMaraghy WH (2006) Investigating optimal capacity scalability scheduling in reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol Paper Number 3320, (in press).

  • ElMaraghy HA (May 2005) Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems. Paradigms of manufacturing—a panel discussion, 3rd Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

  • ElMaraghy HA (2000) Flexible Manufacturing systems 91–512 class notes, industrial and manufacturing systems engineering department, University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • ElMaraghy HA, Kuzgunkaya O, Urbanic J (2005) Manufacturing system configurations complexity. 55th CIRP Ann 54(1):445–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujii S, Morita H, Kakino Y, Ihara Y, Takata Y, Murakami D, Miki T, Tatsuta Y (2000) Highly productive and reconfigurable manufacturing system. Proc Pacific Conf Manuf 2:970–980

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick B, Urbanic RJ, ElMaraghy HA (May 2004) Multi-tasking machine tools and their impact on process planning. CIRP 2004 International Design Conference, Cairo, Egypt

  • Hu SJ (May 2005) Paradigms of manufacturing—a panel discussion, 3rd Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

  • Hyatt GA (May 2005) FMS vs. RMS. Paradigms of manufacturing–a panel discussion, 3rd Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

  • Kim Y-S (1999) A system complexity approach for the integration of product development and production system design, M.Sc. at MIT, USA

  • Koren Y (May 2005) What are the differences between FMS & RMS. Paradigms of manufacturing—a panel discussion, 3rd Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

  • Koren Y, Heisel U, Jovane F, Moriwaki T, Pritschow G, Ulsoy G, Van Brussel H (1999) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems. CIRP Ann 48(2):527–540

    Google Scholar 

  • Koren Y, Hu J, (1998) Weber timpact of manufacturing system configuration on performance. CIRP Ann 1:689–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Kota S, Koren Y (August 31, 1999) Reconfigurable machine tool. US Patent 5943750, issued

  • Kuzgunkaya O, ElMaraghy HA (July 2005) Entropy based metric for assessing complexity of manufacturing systems configurations. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst Paper Number: FLEX214–05 (submitted.)

  • Landers R, Min BK, Koren Y (2001) Reconfigurable machine tools. CIRP Ann 49(1):269–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbaum M (1978) Flexibility in decision making: an exploration and unification. Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Canada

  • Mehrabi MG, Ulsoy AG, Koren Y (2000) Reconfigurable manufacturing systems: key to future manufacturing. J Intell Manuf 11:403–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nada O, ElMaraghy HA, ElMaraghy WH (16–19 July 2006) A quality based assessment of manufacturing ystem design alternatives. 16th CIRP International Design Seminar, Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada, Paper No. 10097

  • Next generation manufacturing–a framework for action. Agility Forum Report, NGM Project Office, Bethlehem, PA, 1997

  • (1998) Visionary manufacturing—challenges for 2020. NRC (U.S.) Report, National Academy Press

  • Sethi AK, Sethi SP (1990) Flexibility in manufacturing, a survey. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 2:289–328

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabaka A, ElMaraghy H (2005) Matching products processing requirements and machine structure capabilities in RMS. First International Conference on Changeable, Agile, Reconfigurable and Virtual Production (CARV 2005), 22–23 September 2005, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany

  • Shewchuk JP, Moodie CL (1998) Definition and classification of manufacturing flexibility types and measures. Int J Flexible Manuf Syst 10:325–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slack N (1987) The flexibility of manufacturing system. Int J Oper Prod Manage 7(4):35–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Son SY (2000) Design principles and methodologies for reconfigurable machining systems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  • Spicer JP (2002) A design methodology for scalable machining systems. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

  • Stecke KE (2005) Flexibility is the future of reconfigurability. Paradigms of Manufacturing—A Panel Discussion, 3rd Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

  • Suh NP (1998) Axiomatic design theory for systems. Res Eng Des 10:189–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toni DE, Tonchia S (1998) Manufacturing flexibility: a literature review. Int J Prod Res 36(6):587–1617

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiendahl HP (May 2005) Some remarks on changeability, reconfigurability and flexibility of manufacturing systems. Paradigms of Manufacturing—A Panel Discussion, 3rd Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

  • Wiendahl H-P, Heger CL (August, 2003) Justifying changeability: a methodical approach to achieving cost effectiveness. In: Proceedings of the CIRP 2nd International Conference on Reconfigurable Manufacturing, Michigan

  • Wiendahl HP, Scholtissek P (1994) Management and control of complexity in manufacturing. Ann CIRP 43(2):533–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada R (2000) An overview of IMS-HUTOP Project. Proc Pac Conf on Manuf 2:997–1003

  • Yamada S, Vink P (2000) Organizational aspects of human-machine coexisting systems. Proc Pac Conf Manuf 2:981–988

    Google Scholar 

  • Youssef AMA, ElMaraghy HA (2006) Assessment of manufacturing systems reconfiguration smoothness. Int J Ad Manuf Technol (IJAMT), Paper No. 3641, (in press)

  • Youssef AMA, ElMaraghy HA (2006a) Modelling and optimization of multiple-aspect RMS configurations using gas. Special Issue of International Journal of Production Research on Advances In Evolutionary Computation for Design and Manufacturing Problem, Paper No. IJPR-EC-33 (in press)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Intelligent Manufacturing Systems (IMS) Centre, University of Windsor, Ontario, Canada

    Hoda A. ElMaraghy

Authors
  1. Hoda A. ElMaraghy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hoda A. ElMaraghy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

ElMaraghy, H.A. Flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing systems paradigms. Int J Flex Manuf Syst 17, 261–276 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-006-9028-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10696-006-9028-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation