Abstract
In this commentary to Serrano et al. (2013), I applaud this foundation article for being a breath of fresh air because it addresses the question “What is cognition?” Too often in the cognitive sciences, we leave that question unanswered or worse, unasked. I come not to criticize but to offer a helpful suggestion aimed a pulling together some of the separate strands weaved throughout this article.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2008). The bounds of cognition. Oxford: Blackwell/Wiley.
Adams, F. (2010). Why we still need a mark of the cognitive. Cognitive Systems Research, 11, 324–331.
Adams, F., & Garrison, R. (2012). The mark of the cognitive. In F. Adams, & K. Aizawa (Eds.), Special issue of minds & machines entitled the material basis of cognition and neuroscience. Springer (on-line first appeared November).
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2003). Hearing gesture: How our hands help us think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goldin-Meadow, S. (2004). How our hands help us learn. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 234–241.
Serrano, J. I., del Castillo, M. D., Carretero, M. (2013). Cognitive? Science? Foundations of Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Adams, F. What is a Cognitive Process?. Found Sci 19, 133–135 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-013-9324-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-013-9324-0