Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fracture toughness of high-alloy austenitic-martensitic TRIP steels after Q&P processing

  • Brief Note
  • Published:
International Journal of Fracture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The recently developed austenitic-martensitic TRIP cast steel Fe–14Cr–3Ni–3Mn–0.4Si–0.11N–0.15C was subjected to different Quenching & Partitioning (Q&P) treatments in order to achieve a variation of the microstructural and mechanical properties. Subsequently, the fracture properties of three material variants were studied by means of tensile tests and fracture mechanical 3-point-bending tests to determine J\(\Delta a\) fracture resistance curves. Due to Q&P treatment, the steel achieved considerable strength and ductility values (UTS of about 1500 MPa with a total elongation of almost 30%) which qualify it for the 3rd generation of AHSS. The fracture toughness behavior was significantly influenced by the initial \(\upalpha ^\prime \)-martensite content as well as by the austenite stability, which could be adjusted by varying the Q&P parameters. If the austenite stability was low, the formation of deformation-induced \(\upalpha ^\prime \)-martensite became possible. This TRIP effect is known to be beneficial for fracture toughness of austenitic steels. However, the experimental results suggest that there was a contrary effect of embrittlement due to metastable austenite which undergoes martensitic transformation already in the early stages of deformation. Therefore, the Q&P parameters have to be carefully chosen in order to achieve a remarkable combination of strength, ductility and fracture toughness of the investigated high-alloy austenitic-martensitic TRIP steel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Antolovich SD, Singh B (1970) Observations of martensite formation and fracture in TRIP steels. Metall Trans 1:3463–3465

    Google Scholar 

  • Antolovich SD, Singh B (1971) On the toughness increment associated with the austenite to martensite phase transformation in TRIP steels. Metall Trans 2:2135–2141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM E (1820) Standard test method for measurement of fracture toughness

  • Bouaziz O, Zurob H, Huang M (2013) Driving force and logic of development of advanced high strength steels for automotive applications. Steel Res Int 84:937–947

    Google Scholar 

  • Cayron C, Barcelo F, De Carlan Y (2010) The mechanisms of the fcc-bcc martensitic transformation revealed by pole figures. Acta Mater 58:1395–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke GA (1981) Single-specimen tests for \(\text{J}_{{\rm IC}}\) determination—Revisited. Fracture mechanics. In: Fracture mechanics: Thirteenth conference, ASTM STP 743:553–575

  • Clarke GA, Andrews WR, Paris PC, Schmidt DW (1976) Single specimen tests for \(\text{ J }_{{\rm IC}}\) determination. Mech Crack Growth ASTM STP 590:27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper AJ, Smith RJ, Sherry AH (2017) An assessment of the ductile fracture behavior of hot isostatically pressed and forged 304L stainless steel. Metall Mater Trans A 48A:2207–2221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai QX, Wang AD, Cheng XN, Luo XM (2002) Stacking fault energy of cryogenic austenitic steels. Chin Phys 11:596–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Moor E, Föjer C, Penning J, Clarke AJ, Speer JG (2010) Calorimetric study of carbon partitioning from martensite into austenite. Phys Rev B 82:104210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Moor E, Lacroix S, Clarke AJ, Penning J, Speer JG (2008) Effect of retained austenite stabilized via quench and partitioning on the strain hardening of martensitic steels. Metall Mater Trans A 39A:2586–2595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DIN EN 843-2 (2007) Advanced technical ceramics - Mechanical properties of monolithic ceramics at room temperature - Part 2: Determination of Young’s modulus, shear modulus and Poisson’s ratio

  • Edmonds DV, He K, Rizzo FC, De Cooman BC, Matlock DK, Speer JG (2006) Quenching and partitioning martensite—a novel steel heat treatment. Mater Sci Eng A 438–440:25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foroozmehr F, Verreman Y, Chen J, Thibault D, Bocher P (2017) Effect of inclusions on fracture behavior of cast and wrought 13% Cr–4% Ni martensitic stainless steels. Eng Fract Mech 175:262–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geers MGD, Du C, Maresca F, Kouznetsova VG, Hoefnagels JPM, Curtin WA (2017) Unraveling the apparent ductility of lath martensite. In: 14th International conference on fracture (ICF 14), 2017. Rhodes, Greece

  • Hallberg H, Banks-Sills L, Ristinmaa M (2012) Crack tip transformation zones in austenitic stainless steel. Eng Fract Mech 79:266–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu TY, Jin XJ, Rong YH (2013) Strengthening and toughening mechanisms of quenching–partitioning–tempering (Q–P–T) steels. J Alloys Compd 577S:S568–S571

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 12135 (2016) Metallic materials—Unified method of test for the determination of quasistatic fracture toughness

  • Jacques P, Furnémont Q, Pardeon T, Delanny F (2001) On the role of martensitic tranformation on damage and cracking resistance in TRIP-assisted multiphase steels. Acta Mater 49:139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokosza A, Pacyna J (2008) Effect of retained austenite on the fracture toughness of tempered tool steel. Arch Mater Sci Eng 31:87–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Konopík P, Viehrig HV (2012) Fracture toughness characterisation of the martensitic chromium steel P91. In: 2nd International conference on recent trends in structural materials (COMAT 2012). Plzeň, Poland

  • Krauss G (2001) Deformation and fracture in martensitic carbon steels tempered at low temperatures. Metal Mater Trans A 32A:861–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix G, Pardeon T, Jacques PJ (2008) The fracture toughness of TRIP-assisted multiphase steels. Acta Mater 56:3900–3913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandal G, Ghosh SK, Bera S, Mukherjee S (2016) Effect of partial and full austenitisation on microstructure and mechanical properties of quenching and partitioning steel. Mater Sci Eng A 676:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin S, Fabrichnaya O, Rafaja D (2015a) Prediction of the local deformation mechanisms in metastable austenitic steels from the local concentration of the main alloying elements. Mater Lett 159:484–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin S, Wolf S, Decker S, Krüger L, Martin U (2015b) Deformation bands in high-alloy austenitic 16Cr6Mn6Ni TRIP steel: Phase transformation and its consequences on strain hardening at room temperature. Steel Res Int 86:1187–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matlock DK, Speer JG (2009) Third generation of AHSS: microstructure design concepts. In: Halder A, Suwas S, Bhattacharjee D (eds) Microstructure and texture in steels. Springer, London, pp 185–205

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miihkinen VTT, Edmonds DV (1984) Influence of retained austenite on the fracture toughness of high strength steels. In: 6th International conference on fracture (ICF 6), 1984. New Delhi, India

  • Nohara K, Ono Y (1977) Composition and grain size dependencies of strain-induced martensitic transformation in metastable austenitic stainless steels. J ISIJ 63:212–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson GB (1996) Transformation plasticity and toughening. J Phys IV 6:407–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker ER, Zackay VF (1975) Microstructural features affecting fracture toughness of high strength steel. Eng Fract Mech 7:371–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice JR (1968) A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J Appl Mech 35:379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy H, Ray A, Barat K, Hochmuth C, Sivasprasad S, Tarafder S, Glatzel U, Ray KK (2013) Structural variations ahead of crack tip during monotonic and cyclic fracture tests of AISI 304LN stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A 561:88–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbe KH, Cornec A, Baustian K (1996) Application of fracture mechanics principles to austenitic steels. Int J Pres Vessel Pip 65:193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speer JG, De Moor E, Findley KO, Matlock DK, De Cooman BC, Edmonds DV (2011) Analysis of microstructure evolution in quenching and partitioning automotive sheet steel. Metall Mater Trans A 42A:3591–3601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringfellow RG, Parks DM (1990) Strain-induced transformation toughening in metastable austenitic steels. In: 8th European conference on fracture (ECF 8) 1990. Torino, Italy

  • Tavassoli AA (1995) Assessment of austenitic stainless steels. Fusion Eng Des 29:371–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuboi M, Shibata A, Terada D, Tsuji N (2017) Role of different kinds of boundaries against cleavage crack propagation in low-temperature embrittlement of low-carbon martensitic steel. Metall Mater Trans A 48A:3261–3268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang FY, Zhu FY, Zhou HH, Jiang BZ, Wang G (2013) A novel microstructural design and heat treatment technique based on gradient control of carbon partitioning between austenite and martensite for high strength steels. Sci China Technol Sci 56:1847–1857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang XD, Guo ZH, Rong YH (2011) Mechanism exploration of an ultrahigh strength steel by quenching-partitioning-tempering process. Mater Sci Eng A 529:35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidner A, Martin S, Klemm V, Martin U, Biermann H (2011) Stacking faults in high-alloyed metastable austenitic cast steel observed by electron channelling contrast imaging. Scr Mater 64:513–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiß A, Gutte H, Mola J (2016) Strength and ductility of AISI 304 (X5CrNi18-10) austenitic stainless steel. Metall Mater Trans A 47A:112–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendler M, Reichel B, Weiß A, Krüger L, Mola J (2014) Influence of Carbon on the microstructure and mechanical properties of cast austenitic Fe-19Cr-4Ni-3Mn-0,15N steels. In: 12th International Conference on High Nitrogen Steels (HNS 2014), 2014. Hamburg, Germany

  • Wendler M, Ullrich C, Hauser M, Krüger L, Volkova O, Weiß A, Mola J (2017) Quenching and partitioning (Q&P) processing of fully austenitic stainless steels. Acta Mater 133:346–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu R, Li W, Zhou S, Zhong Y, Wang L, Jin X (2014) Effect of retained austenite on the fracture toughness of quenching and partitioning (Q&P)-treated sheet steels. Metall Mater Trans A 45A:1892–1902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang XS, Sun S, Wu XL, Ma E, Zhang TY (2014) Dissecting the mechanism of martensitic transformation via atomic-scale observations. Sci Rep 4:6141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou Q, Qian L, Tan J, Meng J, Zhang F (2013) Inconsistent effects of mechanical stability of retained austenite on ductility and toughness of transformation-induced plasticity steels. Mater Sci Eng A 578:370–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the German Research Foundation or Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), and was created as part of the Collaborative Research Center TRIP-Matrix-Composites (SFB 799), subproject B2. Furthermore, we would like to thank Mr. R. Prang for his excellent sample preparation preceding the microstructural investigations and Mr. S. Henschel and Mrs. E.-M. Kandler for their help in the fracture surface investigations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Eckner.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eckner, R., Krüger, L., Ullrich, C. et al. Fracture toughness of high-alloy austenitic-martensitic TRIP steels after Q&P processing. Int J Fract 215, 139–151 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-018-0332-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10704-018-0332-5

Keywords

Navigation