Skip to main content
Log in

Centrifuge modelling-based verification of response spectra design methods for some vulnerable structures

  • Published:
Geotechnical & Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Residential RC framed structures suffered heavily during the 2001 Bhuj earthquake in Gujarat, India. These types of structures also saw severe damage in other earthquakes such as the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake in Turkey and 921 Ji-Ji earthquake in Taiwan. In this paper the seismic response of residential structures was investigated using physical modelling. Idealised soft storey and top heavy, two degrees of freedom (2DOF) portal frame structures were developed and tested on saturated and dry sand models at 25 g using the Schofield Centre 10-m Beam Centrifuge. It was possible to recreate observed field behaviour using these models. As observed in many of the recent earthquakes, soft storey structures were found to be particularly vulnerable to seismic loads. Elastic response spectra methods are often used in the design of simple portal frame structures. The seismic risk of these structures can be significantly increased due to modifications such as removal of a column or addition of heavy water tanks on the roof. The experimental data from the dynamic centrifuge tests on such soft storey or top-heavy models was used to evaluate the predictions obtained from the response spectra. Response spectra were able to predict seismic response during small to moderate intensity earthquakes, but became inaccurate during strong earthquakes and when soil structure interaction effects became important. Re-evaluation of seismic risk of such modified structures is required and time domain analyses suggested by building codes such as IBC, UBC or NEHRP may be more appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Γ:

Modal participation factor

r u :

Excess pore pressure ratio

σ v :

Effective vertical stress

u :

Measured pore pressure

u hydrostatic :

Initial hydrostatic pore pressure

References

  • Arulanandan, K. and Scott, R. F. (1994) Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems, In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Verification of Numerical Procedures for the Analysis of Soil Liquefaction Problems, Vols. 1 and 2, A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

  • Fiegel, G. L. and Kutter, B. L. (1994) Liquefaction induced lateral spreading of mildly sloping ground, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering-ASCE, 120(12).

  • Hudson, D. E. (1982) Reading and interpreting strong motion accelerograms, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Monograph, EERI, USA.

  • InstitutionalAuthorNameIBC (2000) International Building Code 2000 International Code Council USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, C. H. (2002) Seismic response of residential structures, MEng Project Report, University of Cambridge, UK.

  • Madabhushi, S. P. G. (1994) Effect of pore fluid in dynamic centrifuge modelling, Proceedings of International Conference CENTRIFUGE’94, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

  • Madabhushi, S. P. G. (2003) The Bhuj Earthquake of 26th January 2001, Earthquake Engineering Field Investigation Team (EEFIT) Report, Institution of Structural Engineers, London.

  • Madabhushi, S. P. G., Collison, C. H. and Wilmhurst, T. J. (1997) Development of a mini electro-magnetic earthquake actuator, Second International Symposium on Structures and Foundations in Civil Engineering, Hong Kong, pp. 231–236.

  • S. P. G. Madabhushi A. N. Schofield (1993) ArticleTitleCentrifuge modelling of tower structures on saturated sands subjected to earthquake perturbations Géotechnique 43 IssueID4 555–565 Occurrence Handle10.1680/geot.1993.43.4.555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. V. (1979) The centrifugal modelling of dynamic soil-structure interaction and earthquake behaviour. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge.

  • NEHRP (1995) Recommended provisions for the development of seismic regulations for new buildings, part 1: Provisions Report No. FEMA 222, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.

  • Schofield, A. N. (1980) Cambridge University geotechnical centrifuge operation, Geotechnique, 30(3).

  • Schofield, A. N. (1981) Dynamic and earthquake geotechnical centrifuge modelling, Proceedings of International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, St. Louis, Vol. 3, pp. 1081–1100.

  • Tan, F. S. C. (1990) Centrifuge and theoretical modelling of conical footings on sand. PhD Thesis, University of Cambridge, UK.

  • D. E. Newland (1993) An Introduction to Random Vibrations, Spectral and Wavelet Analysis EditionNumber3 Prentice Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  • Newmark, N. M. and Hall, W. J. (1982) Earthquake spectra and design, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute Monograph, EERI, USA.

  • UBC (1994) Uniform Building Code of California - UBC 94, California.

  • Weissman, K. and Prevost, J. H. (1989) Centrifuge modelling of dynamic soil structure interaction, Technical Report No. NCEER-89–0040, Princeton University.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. P. G. Madabhushi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madabhushi, S.P.G., Lawson, C.H. Centrifuge modelling-based verification of response spectra design methods for some vulnerable structures. Geotech Geol Eng 24, 793–808 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-005-5035-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-005-5035-9

Keywords

Navigation