Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of Surface Waves in Statistical Correlations of Shear Wave Velocity and Penetration Resistance of Chennai Soils

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Shear wave velocity (V s) is one of the most important input parameter to represent the stiffness of the soil layers. It is preferable to measure V s by in situ wave propagation tests, however it is often not economically feasible to perform the tests at all locations. Hence, a reliable correlation between V s and standard penetration test blow counts (SPT-N) would be a considerable advantage. This paper presents the development of empirical correlations between V s and SPT-N value for different categories of soil in Chennai city characterized by complex variation of soil conditions. The extensive shear wave velocity measurement was carried out using Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) technique at the sites where the SPT-N values are available. The bender element test is performed to compare the field MASW test results for clayey soils. The correlations between shear wave velocity and SPT-N with and without energy corrections were developed for three categories of soil: all soils, sand and clay. The proposed correlations between uncorrected and energy corrected SPT-N were compared with regression equations proposed by various other investigators and found that the developed correlations exhibit good prediction performance. The proposed uncorrected and energy corrected SPT-N relationships show a slight variation in the statistical analysis indicating that both the uncorrected and energy corrected correlations can predict shear wave velocity with equal accuracy. It is also found that the soil type has a little effect on these correlations below SPT-N value of about 10.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM D 1586 (2008) Standard test method for standard penetration test (SPT) and split barrel sampling of soils. Annual book of ASTM standards

  • Ballukraya PN, Ravi R (1994) Hydrogeological environment of Madras city aquifers. J Appl Hydrology 87(1–4):75–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Borcherdt RD (1994) Estimates of site depending response spectra for design methodology and justifications. Earthq Spectra 10(4):617–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brignoli EG, Gotti M, Stokoe KH II (1996) Measurement of shear waves in laboratory specimens by means of piezoelectric transducers. Geotechnical Testing J 19(4):384–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobry R, Borcherdt RD, Crouse CB, Idriss IM, Joyner WB, Martin GR, Power MS, Rinne EE, Seed RB (2000) New site coefficient and site classification system used in recent building code provisions. Earthq Spectra 16(1):41–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyvik R, Madshus C (1985) Lab measurements of Gmax using bender element. Proceedings ASCE convention on advances in the art of testing soils under cyclic conditions, Michigan, pp 186–196

  • ENV 1997-3 (1999) Eurocode 7: geotechnical design. Design assisted by field testing

  • Fujiwara T (1972) Estimation of ground movements in actual destructive earthquakes. Proceedings of the 4th European symposium on earthquake engineering, London, pp 125–132

  • GSI (1999) Explanatory brochure on geological and mineral map of Tamilnadu and Pondicherry, Geological survey of India

  • Hasancebi N, Ulusay R (2007) Empirical correlations between shear wave velocity and penetration resistance for ground shaking assessments. Bull Eng Geol Environ 66(2):203–213. doi:10.1007/s10064-006-0063-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai T (1977) P-and S-wave velocities of the ground in Japan. Proceedings of the IXth international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Japan, vol 2, pp 127–132

  • Imai T, Tonouchi K (1982) Correlation of N-value with S-wave velocity and shear modulus. Proceedings of the 2nd European symposium of penetration testing, Amsterdam, pp 67–72

  • Imai T, Yoshimura Y (1970) Elastic wave velocity and soil properties in soft soil. Tsuchito-Kiso 18(1):17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai T, Yoshimura Y (1975) The relation of mechanical properties of soils to P and S-wave velocities for ground in Japan. Technical note OYO Corporation

  • IS 2131 (1981) Method for standard penetration test for soils. Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyisan R (1996) Correlations between shear wave velocity and in situ penetration test results. Chamber of civil engineers of Turkey. Teknik Dergi 7(2):1187–1199

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafari MK, Asghari A, Rahmani I (1997) Empirical correlation between shear wave velocity (V s) and SPT-N value for south Tehran soils. Proceedings of the 4th international conference on civil engineering, Tehran, Iran

  • Jafari MK, Shafiee A, Ramzkhah A (2002) Dynamic properties of the fine grained soils in South of Tehran. J Seismol Earthq Eng 4(1):25–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan Road Association (1980) Specification and interpretation of bridge design for highway – Part V: resilient design

  • Jinan Z (1987) Correlation between seismic wave velocity and the number of blow of SPT and depth. Selected papers from the Chinese J Geotech Eng ASCE, pp 92–100

  • Kanai K (1966) Conference on cone penetrometer. The Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Ankara, Turkey

  • Kiku H, Yoshida N, Yasuda S, Irisawa T, Nakazawa H, Shimizu Y, Ansal A, Erkan A (2001) In situ penetration tests and soil profiling in Adapazari, Turkey. Proceedings of the ICSMGE/TC4 satellite conference on lessons learned from recent strong earthquakes, pp 259–265

  • Kramer SL (1996) Geotechnical earthquake engineering. Prentice Hall, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee SHH (1990) Regression models of shear wave velocities. J Chinese Insti Eng 13:519–532

    Google Scholar 

  • Long M, Menkiti CO (2007) Geotechnical properties of Dublin boulder clay. Geotechnique 57(7):595–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcuson WF, Curro JR (1981) Field and laboratory determination of soil moduli. J Geotech Eng Div 107(GT10):1269–1291

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayne PW, Rix GJ (1995) Correlations between shear wave velocity and cone tip resistance in natural clays. Soils Foundations 35(2):107–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Nazarian S, Stokoe KH-II, Hudson WR (1983) Use of spectral analysis of surface waves method for determination of moduli and thickness of pavement systems. Transportation Research Record No. 930, pp 38–45

  • Ohba S, Toriumi I (1970) Dynamic response characteristics of Osaka Plain. Proceedings of the annual meeting AIJ

  • Ohsaki Y, Iwasaki R (1973) On dynamic shear module and Poisson’s ratio of soil deposits. Soils Foundations 13(4):61–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta Y, Goto N (1978) Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristics soil indexes. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 6(2):167–187. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290060205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta T, Hara A, Niwa M, Sakano T (1972) Elastic shear moduli as estimated from N-value. Proceedings 7th annual convention of Japan society of soil mechanics and foundation engineering, pp 265–268

  • Park CB, Miller RD, Xia J (1999) Multichannel analysis of surface waves. Geophysics 64(3):800–808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitilakis K, Raptakis D, Lontzetidis K, Tika-Vassilikou T, Jongmans D (1999) Geotechnical and geophysical description of euro-seistest using field and laboratory tests and moderate strong ground motions. J Earthq Eng 3(3):381–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider JA, Hoyos L, Mayne PW, Macari EJ, Rix GJ (1999) Field and laboratory measurement of dynamic shear modulus of piedmont residual soils. ASCE Geotechnical special publication GSP(92), Behavioral characteristics of residual soils, ASCE Reston, VA, pp 12–25

  • Seed HB, Idriss IM (1981) Evaluation of liquefaction potential sand deposits based on observation of performance in previous earthquakes. Preprint 81-544, in situ testing to evaluate liquefaction susceptibility, ASCE National Convention, Missouri, pp 81–544

  • Seismotectonic Atlas of India (2000) Geological Survey of India, New Delhi

  • Shibata T (1970) Analysis of liquefaction of saturated sand during cyclic loading, disaster prevention. Res Insti Bull 13:563–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirley DJ, Hampton LD (1977) Shear wave measurements in laboratory sediments. J Acoustical Society America 63(2):601–613. doi:10.1121/1.381760

    Google Scholar 

  • Sisman H (1995) An investigation on relationships between shear wave velocity and SPT and pressuremeter test results. M.Sc. Thesis, Ankara University, Geophysical Engineering Department, Ankara

  • Subramanian KS, Selvan TA (2001) Geology of Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry. Geological Society of India, Bangalore

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykora DW, Stokoe KH-II (1983) Correlations of in situ measurements in sands of shear wave velocity, soil characteristics and site conditions. Geotechnical engineering report GR83-33, The University of Texas, Austin

  • Terzaghi K, Peck RB (1967) Soil Mechanics in engineering practice. Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Viggiani G, Atkinson JH (1995) Stiffness of fine grained soil at very small strains. Geotechnique 45(2):249–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Xia J, Miller RD (2006) Quantitative estimation of minimum offset for multichannel surface wave survey with actively exciting source. J Appl Geophysics 59(2):117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors wish to thank the Seismology Division, Department of Science and Technology (DST), Govt. of India for funding the sponsored research project titled “Seismological and geotechnical investigations for seismic microzonation for Chennai city” (DST No: 23(497)/SU/2004 Dt. 09/08/2005). Authors extend their thanks to M/s. Geotechnical Solutions, Chennai, M/s. VGN Housing, Chennai and Tamil Nadu Police Housing Corporation, Chennai for providing assistance during field investigations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, 600036, India

    R. Uma Maheswari, A. Boominathan & G. R. Dodagoudar

Authors
  1. R. Uma Maheswari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Boominathan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. R. Dodagoudar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Boominathan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uma Maheswari, R., Boominathan, A. & Dodagoudar, G.R. Use of Surface Waves in Statistical Correlations of Shear Wave Velocity and Penetration Resistance of Chennai Soils. Geotech Geol Eng 28, 119–137 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-009-9285-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-009-9285-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation