Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of Soil Parameters on Resilient Modulus Using Cyclic Tri-Axial Tests on Lateritic Subgrade Soils from Dakshina Kannada, India

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Resilient modulus (Mr) of a soil is used as a basic input in the analysis of sub-grade and sub-base in the mechanistic empirical design approaches. The present work focuses on evolving a cost effective approach for the determination of resilient modulus in the laboratory based on tests performed using the CBR method, and the DCP. Lateritic sub-grades in India exhibit wide-ranging variations in strength and stiffness due to varying fines content, and other characteristics. Additionally, soils of lateritic origin with a higher proportion of fines, also called as lithomargic soils, pose difficulties to pavement engineers due to the poor supporting strength. In order to investigate the strength and stiffness of a wide variety of lateritic soils, it was proposed to perform tests on lateritic soils blended with lithomargic fines in this study. The study focuses on correlating the effect of grain-size, maximum dry-density (MDD), and optimum moisture content (OMC) on the resilient modulus (Mr) measured using the cyclic tri-axial test for various blends of lateritic soils. Tests were performed on soil samples compacted to MDD for molding water contents set to the OMC, dry-side of OMC, and the wet-side of OMC. The results indicated that an increase in the fines-content resulted in an increase in the OMC, and a decrease in the MDD and Mr values. Regressions were developed correlating the fines content to the resilient modulus. This study is expected to provide the necessary basis for estimating the strength of a wide variety of lateritic sub-grades based on the fines content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AASHTO (1986) Standard method for testing resilient modulus. AASTHO T 274-82 AASHTO, Washington

  • AASHTO (2003) Standard method of test for determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials. In: AASHTO T 307-99, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), Washington

  • Akpokpodje EG, Hudec P (1992) Properties of concretionary laterite gravel concrete. Bull Int Assoc of Eng Geol 4:45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Refeai TO, Al-Suhaibani AS (2002) Factors affecting resilient behavior of subgrade soils in Saudi Arabia. J King Saud Univ Eng Sci 2(14):165–182 (A.H. 1422/2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Boateng-Poku Y, Drumm EC (1989) Hyperbolic model for the resilient modulus response of fine-grained subgrade soil. In: Resilient moduli of soils. ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 24, pp 1–14

  • Burczyk JM, Ksaibati K, Anderson-Sprecher R (1994) Factors influencing determination of a sub-grade resilient modulus value transportation research record 1462. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, pp 72–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Drumm EC, Boateng-Poku Y, Pierce TJ (1990) Estimation of subgrade resilient modulus from standard tests. J Geotech Eng 1165:774–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrar MJ, Turner JP (1991) Resilient modulus of Wyoming subgrade soils. Mountain plains consortium rep. no. 91-1. University of Wyoming, Laramie

  • George KP (2006) Portable FWD (PRIMA 100) for in-situ subgrade evaluation. Department of Civil Engineering, in cooperation with Mississippi Department of Transportation (MDOT), and the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Mississippi

  • George V, Kumar A (2016) Studies on resilient modulus using cyclic tri-axial test and correlations to PFWD, DCP, and CBR. Int J Pavement Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2016.1230428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George V, Rao CN, Shivashankar R (2009) PFWD, DCP and CBR correlations for evaluation of lateritic subgrades. Int J Pavement Eng 10(3):189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardcastle JH (1992) Subgrade resilient modulus for idaho pavements. Final report of ITD research project RP 110-D, agreement no. 89-47, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Idaho, Moscow, p 252

  • Hicks RG, Monismith CL (1971) Factors influencing the resilient properties of granular materials, transportation research record 345, transportation research board. National Research Council, Washington, pp 15–31

    Google Scholar 

  • IS: 1498 (1970) Indian standard classification and identification of soils for general engineering purposes. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, pp 23–40

    Google Scholar 

  • IS: 2720 Part IV (1985) Indian standard methods of test of soil for grain size analysis. Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi, pp 73–91

    Google Scholar 

  • IS: 2720 Part VIII (1983) Indian standard methods of test for soils: Part 8: determination of water content—dry density relation using heavy compaction. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim D, Kim RJ (2006) Resilient behavior of compacted subgrade soils under the repeated tri-axial test. Sci Dir Constr Build Mater 21(7):1470–1479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kizza R, Leong EC, Rahardjo H (2014) Martic suction and strength of dynamically compacted soils. In: Khalili R, Khoshghaib A (eds) Unsaturated soils: research strength and applications. Taylor and Francis Group, London, pp 1323–1327

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lekarp F, Isacsson U, Dawson A (2000) State of the art. I: resilient response of unbound aggregates. J Transport Eng 126(1):66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Selig ET (1994) Resilient modulus for fine-grained subgrade soils. J Geotech Eng ASCE 120(6):939–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livneh M, Goldberg Y (2001) Use of falling-weight deflectometer and light drop weight for quality assessment during road formation and foundation construction. In: TRB 80th annual meeting, Washington, pp 69–77

  • M’Clelland J (1841) Calcutta journal of natural history, vol 1. W. Ridsdale, Bishop’s College Press, Calcutta, p 189

    Google Scholar 

  • Madu RM (1980) The performance of laterite stones as concrete aggregates and road chipping. Mater Struct 13:6

    Google Scholar 

  • Malla BR, Joshi S (2008) Subgrade resilient modulus prediction models for coarse and fine-grained soils based on long-term pavement performance data. Int J Pavement Eng 9:431–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehran M, Navarro E, Abdallah I, Nazariann S (2014) Comparison of numerical and experimental responses of pavement systems using various resilient modulus models. Soils Found 54(1):36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monismith CL (1989) MR testing-interpretation of laboratory results for design purposes. In: Workshop on resilient modulus testing, Oregon State University, Corvallis. http://books.google.co.in/books

  • Muthusamy K, Kamaruzaman NW, Ismail MA, Budiea AMA (2015) Durability performance of concrete containing laterite aggregates. KSCE J Civ Eng (0000) 00(0):1–8. www.springer.com/12205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0279-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazarian S, Yuan D, Arellano M (2002) Quality management of base and subgrade materials with seismic methods. In: Proceedings of 81st annual meeting transportation board, Washington, pp 50–60

  • Omotosho O (2004) Influence of gravelly exclusion on compaction of lateritic soils. Geotech Geol Eng 22:351–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pezo R, Hudson WR (1994) Prediction models of resilient modulus for non granular materials. Geotech Test J GTJODJ 17(3):349–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping WV, Ling CC (2007) Enhancement of resilient modulus data for the design of pavement structures in Florida. Final report BD-543-4, Florida A&M University, Florida State University, Tallhassee

  • Rada G, Witczak MW (1981) A comprehensive evaluation of laboratory resilient moduli results for granular soils. Transportation Research Record 810, TRB, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahim AM, George KP (2002) Automated dynamic cone penetrometer for subgrade resilient modulus characterization. In: Proceedings of 81st annual meeting transportation board

  • Raju KN, Ramakrishna R (2006) Properties of laterite aggregate concrete. Mater Struct 5:307

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao CN (2008) Studies on strength and stiffness characteristics for lateritic soil for pavement subgrades. Ph.D. thesis submitted to the Department of Civil Engineering National Institute of Technology, Karnataka, India

  • Sawangsuriya A, Edil T, Bosscher P (2002) Comparison of moduli obtained from the soil stiffness gauge with moduli from other tests, transportation research record 1755. National Research Council, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed H, Chan C, Lee C (1962) Resilience characteristics of subgrade soils and their relation to fatigue in asphalt pavements. In: Proceedings of international conference on the structural design of asphalt pavements, University of Michigan, pp 611–636

  • Taheri A, Tatsuoka F (2012) Primary stress–strain relations inferred from multiple-step triaxial compression test results. Soils Found 52(4):748–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang X, Stoffels SM, Palomino AM (2016) Mechanistic-empirical approach to characterizing permanent deformation of reinforced soft soil subgrade. Geotext Geomembr 44(2016):429–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson MR, Robnett QL (1976) Resilient properties of subgrade soils. In: Transportation engineering series no. 14. Illinois Cooperative Highway and Transportation Series No. 160, University of Illinois

  • Van Gurp CAPM, Groenendijk J, Beuving E (2000) Experience with various types of foundation tests. In: Proceedings of 5th international symposium unbound aggregates in roads (UBAR5). University of Nottingham, United Kingdom, pp 21–23

  • Von Quintus H, Killingsworth B (1998) Analysis relating to pavement material characterizations and their effects on pavement performance. Rep. No. FHWA-RD-97-085, FHWA, U.S. DOT, Washington

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, National Institute of Technology Karnataka, Mangalore, 575025, India

    Anil Kumar & Varghese George

  2. NMAMIT, Nitte, Karkala, India

    Anil Kumar

Authors
  1. Anil Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Varghese George
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Varghese George.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., George, V. Effect of Soil Parameters on Resilient Modulus Using Cyclic Tri-Axial Tests on Lateritic Subgrade Soils from Dakshina Kannada, India. Geotech Geol Eng 36, 3987–4000 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0550-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-018-0550-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation