Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Agronomic and ecophysiological evaluation of an early establishment of perennial wheat lines in Central Italy

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Perennial crops are emerging as an effective strategy for adapting to climate change, but also for mitigating net greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture. This study aims to investigate the agronomic and physiological performance of selected perennial wheat genotypes derived from crosses between Triticum aestivum L. and Thinopyrum spp to evaluate if they could give a contribute both to face climate changes and to restore soil health. Four perennial wheat genotypes were grown in Central Italy and compared in terms of agronomic traits, root development (biomass and length) and ecophysiological parameters with an annual common wheat cultivar. Plants were, on average, taller in perennial wheat genotypes than in annual wheat as well as the number of tillers per plant (+ 49%), root length (+ 43%) and root biomass (+ 31%) in both years, whereas, perennial wheat kernels were smaller (− 15%). Post harvest regrowth occurred in different amounts in all perennial wheat genotypes. In terms of the ecophysiological response, perennial wheat lines revealed higher soil respiration and lower stomatal conductance than annual wheat. On the contrary, transpiration rate, water use efficiency and photosynthesis were higher in annual genotype than in perennial ones. The environmental benefits of adopting perennial grains are discussed together with suggestions on optimal field management and future breeding strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

(data transparency) Data is contained within the article.

References

  • Al-Hajj R, Assi A, Batch F (2016) An evolutionary computing approach for estimating global solar radiation. In IEEE International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), Birmingham, 285–290

  • Bell LW, Byrne F, Ewing M, Wade LJ (2008) A preliminary whole-farm economic analysis of perennial wheat in an Australian farming system. Agric Syst 96:166–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buman RA, Schumacher TE, Riedell WE (1994) A modified soil monolith technique for characterizing root systems. Crop Sci 34:296–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell BM, Thornton P, Zougmoré R, van Asten P, Lippe L (2014) Sustainable intensification: what is its role in climate smart agriculture? Curr Opin Env Sust 8:39–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox TS, Van Tassel DL, Cox CM, DeHaan LR (2010) Progress in breeding perennial grains. Crop Pasture Sci 61:513–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crews TE, Cattani DJ (2018) Strategies, advances, and challenges in breeding perennial grain crops. Sustainability 10:2192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curwen-McAdams C, Arterburn M, Murphy K, Arterburn M, Cai X, Jones SS (2017) Toward a taxonomic definition of perennial wheat: a new species × Tritipyrum aaseae described. Genet Resour Crop Evol 64:1651–1659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • deDorlodot S, Forster B, Pagès L, Price A, Tuberosa R, Draye X (2007) Root system architecture: opportunities and constraints for genetic improvement of crops. Trends Plant Sci 12:474–481

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dohleman FG, Long SP (2009) More productive than maize in the midwest: how does miscanthus Do It? Plant Physiol 150:2104–2115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Fernando A, Costa J, Barbosa B, Monti A, Rettenmaier N (2018) Environmental impact assessment of perennial crops cultivation on marginal soils in the Mediterranean Region. Biomass Bioenerg 111:174–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnier E (1992) Growth analysis of congeneric annual and perennial grass species. J Ecol 80:665–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazza L, Galassi E, Ciccoritti R, Cacciatori P, Pogna NE (2016) Qualitative traits of perennial wheat lines derived from different Thinopyrum species. Genet Resour Crop Evol 63:209–219

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glover JD (2005) The necessity and possibility of perennial grain production systems. Renew Agric Food Syst 20:1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover JD, Reganold JP, Bell LW, Borevitz J, Brummer EC, Buckler ES, Cox CM, Cox TS, Crews TE, Culman SW, DeHaan LR, Eriksson D, Gill BS, Holland J, Hu F, Hulke BS, Ibrahim AMH, Jackson W, JonesSS MSC, Paterson AH, Ploschuk E, Sacks EJ, Snapp S, Tao D, Van Tassel DL, Wade LJ, Wyse DL, Xu Y (2010) Increased food and ecosystem security via perennial grains. Science 328:1638–1639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gomiero T, Pimentel D, Paoletti M (2011) Is there a need for a more sustainable agriculture? Crit Rev Plant Sci 30:6–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Paleo L, Vilela AE, Ravetta DA (2016) Back to perennials: does selection enhance tradeoffs between yield and longevity? Ind Crops Prod 91:272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman RB, Reinsch TG (2002) Bulk density and linear extensibility: core Method. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Dane JH, Topp GC (Eds), Part 4, Physical Methods, SSSA, Incorporated, Madison, SSSA 201–228. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.4.c.9

  • Hargreaves GH (1994) Defining and using reference evapotranspiration. J Irrig Drain Eng 120:1132–1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes RC, Newell MT, DeHaan LR, Murphy KM, Crane S, Norton MR, Wade LJ, Newberry M, Fahim M, Jones SS, Cox TS, Larkin PJ (2012) Perennial cereal crops: an initial evaluation of wheat derivatives. Field Crops Res 133:68–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes RC, Newell MT, Crews TE, Peoples MB (2016) Perennial crops: an initial evaluation of wheat derivatives grown in mixtures with a regenerating annual legume. Renew Agricul Food Syst 32:276–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes RC, Wang S, Newell M, Turner K, Larsen J, Gazza L, Anderson JA, Bell LW, Cattani DJ, Frels K, Galassi E, Morgounov AI, Revell CK, Thapa DB, Sacks EJ, Sameri M, Wade LJ, Westerbergh A, Shamanin V, Amanov A, Li GD (2018) The performance of early-generation perennial winter cereals at 21 sites across four continents. Sustainability 10:1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Indorante SJ, Hammer RD, Koenig PG, Follmer LR (1990) Particle size analysis by a modified pipette procedure. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:560–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International association for cereal science and technology (1994) Approved method of ICC Wien, Austria

  • ISO (2009) ISO 7971–1:2009: Cereals - Determination of bulk density, called mass per hectolitre - reference method. International Organization for Standardization ,Geneva, Switzerland

  • ISO (2010) ISO 520–2010: Cereals and pulses — Determination of the mass of 1 000 grains- reference method. International Organization for Standardization , Geneva, Switzerland

  • Jaikumar NS, Snapp SS, Murphy KM, Jones SS (2012) Agronomic assessment of perennial wheat and rye as cereal crops. Agron J 104:1716–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jia B, Zhou G, Wang F, Wang Y, Yuan W, Zhou L (2006) Partitioning root and microbial contributions to soil respiration in Leymus chinensis populations. Soil Biol Biochem 38:653–660

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan N, Warner KD (2010) Enhancing the multifunctionality of US agriculture. Bioscience 60:60–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaczan D, Arslan A, Lipper L (2013) Climate-Smart Agriculture? A review of current practice of agroforestry and conservation agriculture in Malawi and Zambia. ESA Working Paper No. 13, Agricultural Development Economics Division Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. www.fao.org/economic/esa

  • Kassam A, Friedrich T (2012) An ecologically sustainable approach to agricultural production intensification: Global perspective and developments. Field Action Sci Rep Special Issue 6.http://journals.openedition.org/factsreports/1382

  • Larkin PJ, Newell MT, Hayes RC, Aktar J, Norton MR, Moroni SJ, Wade LJ (2014) Progress in developing perennial wheats for grain and grazing. Crop past Sci 65:1147–1164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KH, Jose S (2003) Soil respiration, fine root production, and microbial biomass in cottonwood and loblolly pine plantations along a nitrogen fertilization gradient. For Ecol Manag 185:263–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manschadi AM, Christopher J, deVoil P, Hammer GL (2006) The role of root architectural traits in adaptation of wheat to water-limited environments. Funct Plant Biol 33:823–837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moore KJ, Anex RP, Elobeid AE, Fei S, Flora CB, Goggi AS, Jacobs KL, Jha P, Kaleita AL, Karlen DL, Laird DA, Lenssen AW, Lübberstedt T, McDaniel MD, Raman DR, Weyers SL (2019) Regenerating agricultural landscapes with perennial groundcover for intensive crop production. Agronomy 9:458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy KM, Lyon SR, Balow KA, Jones SS (2010) Post-sexual cycle regrowth and grain yield of Thinopyrum elongatum x Triticum aestivum amphiploids. Plant Breed 129:480–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell MT, Hayes RC (2017) An initial investigation of forage production and feed quality of perennial wheat derivatives. Crop Pasture Sci 68:1141–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newell MT, Holman BWB, Refshange G, Shanley AR, Hopkins DL, Hayes RC (2020) The effect of a perennial wheat and lucerne biculture diet on feed intake, growth rate and carcass characteristics of Australian lambs. Small Rumin Res. 192:106235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes MR, van Es HM, Schindelbeck R, Ristow AJ, Ryan M (2018) No-till and cropping system diversification improve soil health and crop yield. Geoderma 328:30–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Placido D, Campbell MT, Jin J, Cui X, Kruger GR, Baenziger PS, Walia H (2013) Introgression of novel traits from a wild wheat relative improves drought adaptation in wheat (Triticum aestivum). Plant Physiol 161:1806–1819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pugliese JY, Culman SW, Sprunger CD (2019) Harvesting forage of the perennial grain crop kernza (Thinopyrum intermedium) increases root biomass and soil nitrogen cycling. Plant Soil 437:241–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society policy statements and reports (2009) Reaping the benefits: science and the sustainable intensification of global agriculture. Ref 11/09. http://royalsociety.org/Reapingthebenefits/

  • Ryan MR, Crews TE, Culman SW, DeHaan LR, Hayes RC, Jungers JM, Bakker MG (2018) Managing for multifunctionality in perennial grain crops. Bioscience 68:294–304

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P (2008) Land use change and soil organic carbon dynamics. Nutr Cycling Agroecosyst 81:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Gregory PJ (2013) Climate Change and sustainable food production. Proc Nutr Soc 72:21–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith P, Bustamante M, Ahammad H, Clark H, Dong H, Elsiddig EA, Haberl H, Harper R, House J, Jafari M, Masera O, Mbow C, H Ravindranath N, Rice CW, Robledo Abad C, Romanovskaya A, Sperling F, TubielloF (2014) Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU). In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer O et al., eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA

  • Sobrado MA (2011) Leaf gas exchange and fluorescence of two teosinte species: Zea mays ssp. parviglumis and Z. diploperennis. J Trop Agric 41:91–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsintin NV, Lubinova VF (1959) New species and form of cereals derived from hybridization between wheat and couch grass. Am Naturalist 93:181–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Auken OW, Bush JK (2011) Photosynthetic rates of two species of Malvaceae, Malvaviscus arboreae var. drummondii (wax mallow) and Abutilon theophrasti (velvetleaf). Southwest Nat 56:325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vico G, Brunsell NA (2018) Tradeoffs between water requirements and yield stability in annual vs. perennial crops. Adv Water Resour 112:189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagoner P (1990) Perennial grain new use for intermediate wheatgrass. J Soil Water Conserv 45:81–82

    Google Scholar 

  • West PC, Gibbs HK, Monfreda C, Wagner J, Barford CC, Carpenter SR, Foley JA (2010) Trading carbon for food: global comparison of carbon stocks vs. crop yields on agricultural land. PNAS 107:19645–19648

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M, Ding Z, Lafitte R, Sacks E, Dimayuga G, Holt D (2010) Photosynthetic characteristics in Oryza species. Photosynthetica 48:234–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors dedicate this article to the memory of Prof. Norberto Pogna, an inspirational leader for all of us. We gratefully acknowledge to Giuseppe Mario Lanini and Giacomo Tagliaferri of Institute of Bioeconomy, National Research Council (IBE-CNR) for their help in ecophysiological measurements and in setting up experiment.

Funding

This research was partially supported by Progetto RGV-FAO, (MIPAAF, Italy D.M. 20380/2017).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of BioEconomy, National Research Council (IBE CNR), Via Madonna del Piano, 10, 50019, Sesto Fiorentino (FI), Italy

    Silvia Baronti, Francesca Ugolini, Franco Miglietta, Lorenzo Genesio & Francesco P. Vaccari

  2. CREA Research Centre for Engineering and Agro-Food Processing, Via Manziana, 30, 00189, Rome, Italy

    Elena Galassi, Pierino Cacciatori & Laura Gazza

Authors
  1. Silvia Baronti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elena Galassi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Francesca Ugolini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Franco Miglietta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Lorenzo Genesio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Francesco P. Vaccari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Pierino Cacciatori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Laura Gazza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Gazza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baronti, S., Galassi, E., Ugolini, F. et al. Agronomic and ecophysiological evaluation of an early establishment of perennial wheat lines in Central Italy. Genet Resour Crop Evol 69, 619–633 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-021-01248-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-021-01248-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation