Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Academic achievement among first semester undergraduate psychology students: the role of course experience, effort, motives and learning strategies

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated the relationship between multiple predictors of academic achievement, including course experience, students’ approaches to learning (SAL), effort (amount of time spent on studying) and prior academic performance (high school grade point average—HSGPA) among 442 first semester undergraduate psychology students. Correlation analysis showed that all of these factors were related to first semester examination grade in psychology. Profile analyses showed significant mean level differences between subgroups of students. A structural equation model showed that surface and strategic approaches to learning were mediators between course experience and exam performance. This model also showed that SAL, effort and HSGPA were independent predictors of exam performance, also when controlling for the effect of the other predictors. Hence, academic performance is both indirectly affected by the learning context as experienced by the students and directly affected by the students’ effort, prior performance and approaches to learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (1999). AMOS users’ guide version 4.0. Chicago: SPSS Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. Buckingham: Open UP and SRHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (2001). Enhancing learning: A matter of style or approach? In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 73–103). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. B. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. UK: SRHE and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 445–455). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modelling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, M., & Flood, B. (2003). Assessing the teaching quality of accounting programmes: An evaluation of the course experience questionnaire. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 203–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, T. A., & Woehr, D. J. (1994). Predicting introductory psychology test scores: An engaging and useful topic. Teaching of Psychology, 21, 108–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffield, F., Moseley, D., Hall, E., & Ecclestone, K. (2004). Should we be using learning styles? What research has to say to practice. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diseth, Å. (2001). Validation of a Norwegian version of the approaches and study skills inventory for students (ASSIST): Application of structural equation modelling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diseth, Å. (2003). Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement. European Journal of Personality, 17, 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diseth, Å. (2007). Approaches to learning, course experience and examination grade among undergraduate psychology students: Testing of mediator effects and construct validity. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 373–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diseth, Å., Pallesen, S., Hovland, A., & Larsen, S. (2006). Course experience, approaches to learning and academic achievement. Education and Training, 48, 156–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duff, A. (2003). Quality of learning on an MBA programme: the impact of approaches to learning on academic performance. Educational Psychology, 23, 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. (1987). A model of the teaching–learning process. In J. T. E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck, & D. Warren Piper (Eds.), Improving learning: New perspectives (pp. 178–198). London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J. (1997). The approaches and study skills inventory for students (ASSIST). Edinburgh: Centre for Research on Learning and Instruction, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., & Smith, C. (2002). Personal understanding and target understanding: Mapping influences on the outcomes of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluation of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19, 169–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, X., Wang, L., & Thompson, B. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honkimäki, S., Tynjälä, P., & Valkonen, S. (2004). University students’ study orientations, learning experiences and study success in innovative courses. Studies in Higher Education, 29, 431–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modelling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G. (1993). Testing structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 294–317). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (1998). Influences upon students’ perceptions of workload. Educational Psychology, 18, 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (1979). The process of student learning. Higher Education, 8, 395–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, C. J., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2002). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in distance education. Higher Education, 44, 257–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., & Simons, R. (2002). University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: Implications for theory and practice. Studies in Higher Education, 27, 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students’ evaluation of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11, 253–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning: I—outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newble, D. I., & Clarke, R. (1987). Approaches to learning in a traditional and an innovative medical school. In J. T. E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenck, & D. Warren Piper (Eds.), Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology (pp. 39–48). Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newble, D., & Hejka, E. J. (1991). Approaches to learning of medical students and practicing physicians: Some empirical evidence and its implications for medical education. Educational Psychology, 11, 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newstead, S. E. (1992). A study of two ‘quick-and-easy’ methods of assessing individual differences in student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 299–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pampel, F. C. (2000). Logistic regression: A primer. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L., & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 96–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1979). Student learning and perceptions of the academic environment. Higher Education, 8, 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1988). Situational influences on learning. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 159–184). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1991). A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 16, 129–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students’ approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 368–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rau, W., & Durand, A. (2000). The academic ethic and college grades: Does hard work help students to “make the grade?”. Sociology of Education, 73, 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in a short web-based course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 433–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E. (2006). Investigating the relationship between variations in students’ perceptions of their academic environment and variations in study behaviour in distance education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 867–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. T. E., & Price, L. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of academic quality in electronically delivered courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34, 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, D. R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). ‘Learning style’: Frameworks and instruments. Educational Psychology, 17, 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadlo, G., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2003). Approaches to studying and perceptions of the academic environment in students following problem-based and subject-based curricula. Higher Education Research and Development, 22, 253–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambell, K., & McDowell, L. (1998). The construction of the hidden curriculum: Messages and meanings in the assessment of student learning. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 391–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuman, H., Walsh, E., Olson, C., & Etheridge, B. (1985). Effort and reward: The assumption that college grades are affected by the quantity of study. Social Forces, 63, 945–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scouller, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, 35, 453–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick, B., & Fidell, L. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touron, J. (1983). The determinants of factors related to academic achievement in the university: Implications for the selection and counselling of students. Higher Education, 12, 399–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volet, S. E., & Chalmers, D. (1992). Investigation of qualitative differences in university students’ learning goals based on an unfolding model of stage development. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 17–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachtel, H. (1998). Student evaluation of college teaching effectiveness: A brief review. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23, 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, D. (2001). Correlates of approaches to learning: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 165–195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K. L., Lizzio, A., & Ramsden, P. (1997). The development, validation and appreciation of the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woehr, D. J., & Cavell, T. A. (1993). Self-report measures of ability, effort, and non-academic activity as predictors of introductory psychology test scores. Teaching of Psychology, 20, 156–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

    Åge Diseth, Ståle Pallesen, Geir Scott Brunborg & Svein Larsen

Authors
  1. Åge Diseth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ståle Pallesen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Geir Scott Brunborg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Svein Larsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Åge Diseth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diseth, Å., Pallesen, S., Brunborg, G.S. et al. Academic achievement among first semester undergraduate psychology students: the role of course experience, effort, motives and learning strategies. High Educ 59, 335–352 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9251-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-009-9251-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation