Abstract
Ecosystems are complex and difficult to predict and control. Western science-based societies have tended to simplify ecosystems to manage them. Some indigenous and other rural groups who interact closely with a given resource system seem to have developed practices that are adapted to live with complexity. This paper examines how indigenous Cree hunters in James Bay, subarctic Canada, understand and deal with ecological complexity and dynamics, and how their understanding of uncertainty and variability shape subsistence activities. The focus is the Canada goose (Branta canadensis) hunt which is adaptive to shifts and changes in local and regional conditions. Ecological understandings of Cree hunters allow them to account for and deal with a very large number of variables at multiples scales. The Cree deal with these variables qualitatively, an approach consistent with some scientific ways of dealing with complexity, such as adaptive management and fuzzy logic.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
While Rappaport’s study remains a hallmark as one of the earliest applications of cybernetics and systems thinking in human ecology, it has been criticized for relying too heavily on ecological energetics, and focusing on homeostasis to the exclusion of dynamics (e.g., Vayda and McCay 1975).
The Wemindji-Paakumshumwaau Project: Environment, Development and Sustainability in a James Bay Cree Community www.wemindjiprotectedarea.org.
For more details on the methodological approach, see Peloquin (2007:44–58).
See Peloquin and Berkes (forthcoming) for more details on how this plays out at the level of one hunting territory.
Post-glacial isostatic uplift is the slow rebounding of the land after the release pressure of glacial ice. Near Wemindji, the land is currently ‘growing back’ (as the Cree put it) at a rate of approximately 1 m per century.
The reasons for the decline of eelgrass in Hudson and James Bay have not been resolved but are thought to be associated with changes in water temperature, salinity, and turbidity, with impacts on the ecology of waterfowl, especially brant geese but also Canada geese and ducks (Short 2007).
In fact each box in the figure represents one category of factor that was mentioned by at least one participant in the study (but usually by more). Arrows linking the boxes are relationships, observed or hypothesized, between the different categories of factors that have been mentioned by participants. This diagram is conservative in that many other links are plausible between these factors but they were not explicitly mentioned during our conversations with hunters.
References
Bateson, G., and Bateson, M. C. (1987). Angels Fear: Towards an Epistemology of the Sacred. Bantham, New York.
Berkes, F. (1977). Fishery Resource Use in a Subarctic Indian Community. Human Ecology 5: 289–307.
Berkes, F. (1998). Indigenous knowledge and resource management systems in the Canadian subarctic. In Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (eds.), Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 98–128.
Berkes, F. (2008). Sacred Ecology: Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Management Systems, 2nd edn., Routledge, London.
Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (eds.) (1998). Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Berkes, F., and Kislalioglu Berkes, M. (2009). Ecological Complexity, Fuzzy Logic and Holism in Indigenous Knowledge. Futures 41: 6–12.
Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecological Applications 10: 1251–1262.
Berkes, F., Kislalioglu Berkes, M., and Fast, H. (2007). Collaborative Integrated Management in Canada’s North: The Role of Local and Traditional Knowledge and Community-based Monitoring. Coastal Management 35: 143–162.
Bird-David, N. (1990). The Giving Environment: Another Perspective on the Economic System of Gatherer-hunters. Current Anthropology 31: 189–196.
Carlson, H. M. (2008). Home is the Hunter: The James Bay Cree and their Land. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver.
CRA (Cree Regional Authority) (2005). Workshop on Migratory Birds Data Collection in Eeyou Istchee: Sharing Knowledge, Proceedings of workshop held in Wemindji, February 8–9 2005. http://www.envcree.ca/communities/documents/WorkshopReport.pdf.
Davidson-Hunt, I. J. (2006). Adaptive Learning Networks: Developing Resource Management Knowledge through Social Learning Forums. Human Ecology 34: 593–614.
Davidson-Hunt, I., and Berkes, F. (2003). Learning as you Journey: Anishinaabe Perception of Social–ecological Environments and Adaptive Learning. Ecology and Society 8(1): 5. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol8/iss1/art5.
Demeritt, D. (1998). Constructivism and nature. In Braun, B., and Castree, N. (eds.), Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium. London, Routledge, pp. 173–193.
Dove, M. R. (1985). Swidden Agriculture in Indonesia: The Subsistence Strategies of the Kalimantan Kantu'. Mouton, Berlin.
Feit, H. A. (1987). Waswanipi Cree management of land and wildlife: Cree cultural ecology revisited. In Cox, B. (ed.), Native People, Native Lands: Canadian Indians, Inuit and Métis. Carleton University Press, Ottawa, pp. 75–91.
Flannery, K. V., Marcus, J., and Reynolds, R. G. (1989). The Flocks of the Wamani. A Study of Llama Herders on the Punas of Ayacucho, Peru. Academic, San Diego.
Folke, C., Colding, J., and Berkes, F. (2003). Building resilience and adaptive capacity in social–ecological systems. In Berkes, F., Colding, J., and Folke, C. (eds.), Navigating Social–Ecological Systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 325–387.
Gadgil, M., Berkes, F., and Folke, C. (1993). Indigenous knowledge for biodiversity conservation. Ambio 22 : 151–156.
Grant, S., and Berkes, F. (2007). Fisher Knowledge as Expert System: A Case from the Longline Fishery of Grenada, the Eastern Carribean. Fisheries Research 84: 162–170.
Gudeman, S. (1986). Economics as Culture: Models and Metaphors of Livelihood. Routledge, London.
Gunderson, L. H., and Holling, C. S. (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press, Washington.
Hallowell, A. I. (1960). Ojibwa ontology, behavior, and world view. In Diamond, S. (ed.), Culture in History: Essays in Honour of Paul Radin. Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 19–52.
Harvey, W. F., and Rodrigue, J. (2006). A Breeding Pair Survey of Canada Geese in Northern Québec – 2006. Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Baltimore.
Holling, C. S., and Meffe, G. K. (1996). Command and Control and the Pathology of Natural Resource Management. Conservation Biology 10: 328–337.
Hornig, J. F. (1999). Social and Environmental Impacts of the James Bay Hydroelectric Project. McGill–Queen’s University Press, Montreal.
Hunn, E. S., Johnson, D., Russell, P., and Thornton, T. F. (2003). Huna Tlingit Traditional Environmental Knowledge, Conservation, and the Management of a “Wilderness” Park. Current Anthropology 44: S79–S104.
Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. Routledge, London.
Lansing, J. S. (2006). Perfect Order: Recognizing Complexity in Bali. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
Levin, S. A. (1999). Fragile Dominion: Complexity and the Commons. Perseus, Reading, MA.
Liu, J., Dietz, T., Carpenter, S. R., Alberti, M., Folke, C., Moran, E., Pell, A. N., Deadman, P., Kratz, T., Lubchenco, J., Ostrom, E., Ouyang, Z., Provencher, W., Redman, C. L., Schneider, S. H., and Taylor, W. W. (2007). Complexity of Coupled Human and Natural Systems. Science 317: 1513–1516.
Mackinson, S. (2001). Integrating Local and Scientific Knowledge: An Example in Fisheries science. Environmental Management 27: 533–545.
McDonald, M., Arragutainaq, L., and Novalinga, Z. J. (1997). Voices from the Bay: Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Inuit and Cree in the Hudson Bay Bioregion. Canadian Arctic Resources Committee, Ottawa.
Moller, H., Berkes, F., Lyver, P. O., and Kislalioglu, M. (2004). Combining Science and Traditional Ecological Knowledge: Monitoring Populations for Co-management. Ecology and Society 9 (3): 2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art2/.
Olsson, P., and Folke, C. (2001). Local Ecological Knowledge and Institutional Dynamics for Ecosystem Management: A Study of Lake Racken Watershed, Sweden. Ecosystems 4: 85–104.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007). The Implications of Complexity for Integrated Resources Management. Environmental Modelling & Software 22: 561–569.
Parlee, B., Berkes, F., and Teetl’it Gwich’in Renewable Resource Council (2006). Indigenous Knowledge of Ecological Variability and Commons Management: A Case Study on Berry Harvesting from Northern Canada. Human Ecology 34: 515–528.
Peloquin, C. (2007). Variability, Change and Continuity in Social–Ecological Systems: Insights from James Bay Cree Cultural Ecology. Thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg. http://mspace.lib.umanitoba.ca/dspace/handle/1993/3019.
Peloquin, C., and Berkes, F. (in press). Beyond conservation: Customary land stewardship in a complex and changing world. In Mulrennan, M., Scot C., and Scott, K. (eds.), The Science and Politics of Protected Area Creation: Striking the Balance Vancouver, University of British Columbia Press.
Prato, T. (2005). A Fuzzy Logic Approach for Evaluating Ecosystem Sustainability. Ecological Modelling 187: 361–368.
Preston, R. J. (1978). La relation sacrée entre les Cris et les oies. Recherches Amérindiennes au Québec 8: 147–152.
Preston, R. J. (2002). Cree Narrative: Expressing the Personal Meanings of Events, 2nd edn., McGill–Queen's University Press, Montreal.
Quinn, N., and Holland, D. (1987). Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Rappaport, R. A. (1984). Pigs for the Ancestors: Ritual in the Ecology of a New Guinea People, 2nd edn., Yale University Press, New Haven.
Reed, A., Benoit, R., Lalumière, R., and Julien, M. (1996). Goose Use of the Coastal Habitats of Northeastern James Bay. Canadian Wildlife Service, Environment Canada, Ottawa.
Ridington, R. (1982). Technology, World View, and Adaptive Strategy in a Northern Hunting Society. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology 19: 469–481.
Rosenberg, D. M., Berkes, F., Bodaly, R. A., Hecky, R. E., Kelly, C. A., and Rudd, J. W. M. (1997). Large-scale Impacts of Hydroelectric Development. Environmental Reviews 5: 27–54.
Sardar, Z. (1994). Conquests, Chaos and Complexity: The Other in Modern and Postmodern Science. Futures 26: 665–682.
Scott, C. (1986). Hunting Territories, Hunting Bosses and Communal Production among Coastal James Bay Cree. Anthropologica 28: 163–173.
Scott, C. (1996). Science for the west, myth for the rest? The case of James Bay Cree knowledge construction. In Nader, L. (ed.), Naked Science: Anthropological Inquiry into Boundaries, Power and Knowledge. Routledge, London, pp. 69–86.
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition have Failed. Yale University Press, New Haven.
Short, F.T. (2007). The Status of Eelgrass in James Bay. Report to The Cree Nation of Chisasibi, Durham, NH, University of New Hampshire.
Silvert, W. (1997). Ecological Impact Classification with Fuzzy Sets. Ecological Modelling 96: 1–10.
Toledo, V. M., Ortiz-Espejel, B., Cortés, L., Moguel, P., and Ordoñez, M. D. J. (2003). The Multiple Use of Tropical Forests by Indigenous Peoples in Mexico: A Case of Adaptive Management. Conservation Ecology 7(3): 9. http://www.consecol.org/vol7/iss3/art9/.
Vayda, A. P., and McCay, B. J. (1975). New Directions in Ecology and Ecological Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 4: 293–306.
Zadeh, L. A. (1973). Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Process. Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics SMC-3: 28–44.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the people of Cree Nation of Wemindji for making this study possible. This research was financially supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Canada (SSHRC) CURA grant to The Wemindji-Paakumshumwaau Project (Colin Scott, PI), a SSHRC Graduate Scholarship and NSTP grant to Peloquin. Berkes’ work has also been supported by the SSHRC and the Canada Research Chairs program (http://www.chairs.gc.ca).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Peloquin, C., Berkes, F. Local Knowledge, Subsistence Harvests, and Social–Ecological Complexity in James Bay. Hum Ecol 37, 533–545 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9255-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9255-0