Abstract
Results of international comparison studies show substantially better mathematics performance of the investigated Asian than European students from the early years on. A Taiwanese-German Research Program (TaiGer) engages in exploring differences and similarities in the educational system, in teachers’ knowledge and beliefs and in teaching or learning practice in Taiwan and Germany. Embedded in this Research Program, this contribution focuses on early mathematics education. As mathematics is often seen as an internationally more or less homogeneous discipline, it could be assumed that differences in the educational outcomes could be explained by, e.g. cultural-societal factors, curriculum or instruction practice. This contribution gives an overview about results of studies analyzing the differences between children’s mathematical performance in Asia and Europe or America with a focus on early childhood education. For a sound comparison between countries aiming to analyze if cultural differences or other aspects (e.g. teaching practice or structural differences) are responsible for differences, basic conditions concerning teaching and learning should be controlled. At first sight, it could be recognized that, next to the cultural background, Germany and Taiwan differ extremely in basic frame conditions (e.g. preservice training) concerning early mathematics education. For this reason, this contribution analyzed if, with a third well-considered European country, a comparative design for ongoing research could be possible, where pairwise similarities allow to clarify relations between differences in early mathematics education and the cultural background on the one hand and early mathematics education and institutional frame conditions or the teachers’ professional knowledge on the other hand.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
27 January 2020
The original version of this article unfortunately contains incorrect formatting of section 2 sub-headings and Tables 2 to 5 with typing errors in Tables 4 and 5.
Notes
We are aware, that the term “country” is not exactly suitable, because there are no uniformed cultural contexts within one country and the range of the performance differ within the country as well. If we refer to similarities and differences, we relate to means of achievement of a particular country.
International collaboration funded by DFG Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Germany, and Ministry of Science and Technology, R.O.C., Taiwan
In Switzerland there are three official languages: German, French and Italian.
For readability purpose, we use Germany, Switzerland, Taiwan in the following, though we refer to the official documents of Lower Saxony, Thurgau and Taiwan.
References
Aunio, P., Aubrey, C., Godfrey, R., Yuejuan, P., & Liu, Y. (2008). Children’s early numeracy in England, Finland and People’s republic of China. International Journal of Early Years Education, 16(3), 203–221.
Barton, B. (2017). Mathematics, education, and culture: A contemporary moral imperative. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 35–43). Cham: Springer.
Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G., Döhrmann, M., & Lehmann, R. (2010). Mathematisches und mathematikdidaktisches Wissen angehender Sekundarstufen-I-Lehrkräfte im internationalen Vergleich. [Mathematical and mathematical pedagogical content knowledge of future secondary teachers in an international comparison]. In S. Blömeke, G. Kaiser, & R. Lehmann (Eds.), Professionelle Kompetenz und Lerngelegenheiten angehender Mathematiklehrkräfte für die Sekundarstufe I im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 197–238). Münster: Waxmann.
Blömeke, S., Kaiser, G., & Lehmann, R. (2010). TEDS-M 2008 Primarstufe: Ziele, Untersuchungslage und zentrale Ergebnisse [TEDS-M 2008 primary school: Aims, design and important results]. In S. Blömeke, G. Kaiser, & R. Lehmann (Eds.), TEDS-M 2008 – Professionelle Kompetenz und Lerngelegenheiten angehender Primarstufenlehrkräfte im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 11–38). Münster: Waxmann.
Bundesamt für Statistik. (2017). Die Bevölkerung der Schweiz 2016 [The population of Switzerland 2016]. Neuchâtel: BfS.
Claessens, A., Duncan, G., & Engel, M. (2009). Kindergarten skills and fifth-grade achievement: Evidence from the ECLS-K. Economics of Education Review, 28(4), 415–427.
Claessens, A., & Engel, M. (2013). How important is where you start? Early mathematics knowledge and later school success. Teachers College Record, 115(6), 1–29.
Eccles, J. S. (1992). School and family effects on the ontogeny of children’s interests, self-perceptions, and activity choices. Nebraska symposium on motivation. Developmental perspectives on motivation, 40, 145–208. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1340520. Accessed 24 dec 2019
Ginsburg, H. P., Choi, Y. P., Lopez, L. S., Netly, R., & Chi, C.-Y. (1997). Happy birthday to you: Early mathematical thinking of Asian, south American and US children. In T. Nunes & P. Bryant (Eds.), Learning and teaching mathematics: An international perspective (pp. 163–207). Hove: Psychology Press.
Givvin, K. B., Hiebert, J., Jacobs, J. K., Hollingsworth, H., & Gallimore, R. (2005). Are there National Patterns of teaching? Evidence from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Comparative Education Review, 49(3), 311–343.
Guo, K. (2014). Relation between time for studying mathematics and achievement. Paper presented at the First Chinese Mathematics Education Conference, Beijing.
Hammer, S., Reiss, K., Lehner, M. C., Heine, J.-H., Sälzer, C., & Heinze, A. (2016). Mathematische Kompetenz in PISA 2015: Ergebnisse, Veränderungen und Perspektiven. [Mathematical competence in PISA 2015: Results, changes and perspectives]. In K. Reiss, C. Sälzer, A. Schiepe-Tiska, E. Klieme, & O. Köller (Eds.), PISA 2015. Eine Studie zwischen Kontinuität und Innovation (pp. 219–247). Waxmann: Münster.
Hiebert, J., Gallimore, R., Garnier, H., Givvin, K. B., Hollingsworth, H., & Jacobs, J. (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries. In Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Huntsinger, C. S., Jose, P. E., Liaw, F.-R., & Ching, W.-D. (1997). Cultural differences in early mathematics learning: A comparison of euro-American, Chinese-American, and Taiwan-Chinese families. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 21(2), 371–388.
Kaur, B. (2017). Mathematics classroom studies: Multiple lenses and perspectives. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 45–61). Cham: Springer.
Kaur, B., Anthony, G., Ohtani, M., & Clarke, D. (Eds.). (2013). Student voice in mathematics classrooms around the world. Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.
Krajewski, K., & Schneider, W. (2009). Early development of quantity to number-word linkage as a precursor of mathematical school achievement and mathematical difficulties: Findings from a four-year longitudinal study. Learning and Instruction, 19(6), 513–526.
Kramsch, C. (2003). Language and culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Landesamt für Statistik Niedersachsen. (2019). Themenbereich: Bevölkerung - Endgültige Bevölkerungszahlen ab 2011. [Issue: Population – Final population as of 2011.]. Retrieved from https://www.statistik.niedersachsen.de/startseite/themenbereiche/bevolkerung/endgultige_bevolkerungszahlen_ab_2011_in_der_lsn_online_datenbank/themenbereich-bevoelkerung%2D%2D-endgueltige-bevoelkerungszahlen-ab-2011-138007.html Accessed 24 dec 2019
Lee, J. (2005). Correlations between kindergarten teachers’ attitudes toward mathematics and teaching practice. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 25(2), 173–184.
Leung, F. K. S. (2002). Mathematics education in East Asia and west: Does culture matters? In 13th ICMI Comparative Study Conference. Hongkong: Hongkong University.
Leung, F. K. S. (2017). Making sense of mathematics achievement in East Asia: Does culture really matter? In G. Kaiser (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th international congress on mathematical education (pp. 201–233). Cham: Springer.
Li, X., Liu, S., DeBey, M., McFadden, K., & Pan, Y.-J. (2016). Investigating Chinese preschool teachers’ beliefs in mathematics teaching from a cross-cultural perspective. Early Years. An International Research Journal, 38(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1228615. Accessed 24 dec 2019
Lonnemann, J., Li, S., Zhao, P., Linkersdörfer, J., Lindberg, S., Hasselhorn, M., & Yan, S. (2019). Differences in counting skills between Chinese and German children are accompanied by differences in processing of approximate numerical magnitude information. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02656. Accessed 24 dec 2019
Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173 Accessed 24 dec 2019
Miller, K. F., Smith, C. M., Zhu, J., & Zhang, H. (1995). Preschool origins of cross-National Differences in mathematical competence: The role of number-naming systems. Psychological Science, 6(1), 56–60.
Miura, I. T., Okamoto, Y., Kim, C. C., Steere, M., & Fayol, M. (1993). First graders’ cognitive representation of number and understanding of place value: Cross-national comparisons – France, Japan, Korea, Sweden, and the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 24–30.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012a). TIMSS 2011 international results in mathematics. Boston: TIMSS and PIRLS International Study Center.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012b). TIMSS 2011 International Results in Mathematics (international Association for the Evaluation of educational achievement (IEA)). Amsterdam.
NationMaster (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.nationmaster.com. Accessed 24 dec 2019
Nguyen, T., Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Clements, D. H., Sarama, J. S., Wolfe, C., & Spitler, M. E. (2016). Which preschool mathematics competencies are most predictive of fifth grade achievement? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.02.003. Accessed 24 dec 2019
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do. Student performance in mathematics, Reading and science (revised edition). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264201118-en. Accessed 24 dec 2019
Prenzel, M., Heidemeier, H., Ramm, G., Hohensee, F., & Ehmke, T. (2004). Soziale Herkunft und mathematische Kompetenz. [social background and mathematical competence]. In PISA-Konsortium Deutschland (Ed.), PISA 2003. Der Bildungstand der Jugendlichen in Deutschland – Ergebnisse des zweiten internationalen Vergleichs (pp. 273–282). Waxmann: Münster.
Roesken-Winter, B. (2013). Capturing mathematics teachers’ professional development in terms of beliefs. In Y. Li & J. Moschkovich (Eds.), Proficiency and beliefs in learning and teaching mathematics. Learning from Alan Schoenfeld and Günter Törner (pp. 157–178). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Sälzer, C., Reiss, K., Schiepe-Tiska, A., Prenzel, M., & Heinze, A. (2013). Zwischen Grundlagenwissen und Anwendungsbezug: Mathematische Kompetenz im internationalen Vergleich [between basic knowledge and practical application: Mathematical competence in an international comparison]. In M. Prenzel, C. Sälzer, E. Klieme, & O. Köller (Eds.), PISA 2012. Fortschritte und Herausforderungen in Deutschland (pp. 47–97). Waxmann: Münster.
Saroglou, V., & Cohen, A. B. (2011). Psychology of culture and religion: Introduction to the JCCP special issue. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1309–1319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022111412254. Accessed 24 dec 2019
Schmeisser, C., Krauss, S., Bruckmaier, G., Ufer, S., & Blum, W. (2013). Transmissive and constructivist beliefs of in-service mathematics teachers and of beginning university students. In Y. Li & J. Moschkovich (Eds.), Proficiency and beliefs in learning and teaching mathematics. Learning from Alan Schoenfeld and Günter Törner (pp. 51–67). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Staub, F. C., & Stern, E. (2002). The nature of teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs matters for students’ achievement gains: Quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 344–355.
Stevenson, H. W., Lee, S.-Y., Chen, C., Lummis, M., Stigler, J., Fan, L., & Ge, F. (1990). Mathematics achievement of children in China and the United States. Child Development, 61(4), 1053–1066.
Stigler, J. W., Lee, S.-Y., Lucker, G. W., & Stevenson, H. W. (1982). Curriculum and achievement in mathematics: A study of elementary school children in Japan, Taiwan, and the United States. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(3), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.74.3.315. Accessed 24 dec 2019
The World Factbook. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/docs/rankorderguide.html. Accessed 24 dec 2019
Tobin, J., Hsueh, Y., & Karasawa, M. (2009). Preschool in three cultures. Revisited. London: The University of Chicago Press.
Voss, T., Kleickmann, T., Kunter, M., & Hachfeld, A. (2011). Überzeugungen von Mathematiklehrkräften. [Beliefs of mathematics teachers]. In M. Kunter, J. Baumert, W. Blum, U. Klusmann, S. Krauss, & M. Neubrand (Eds.), Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Ergebnisse des Forschungsprogramms COACTIV (pp. 235–257). Waxmann: Münster.
Wang, J., & Lin, E. (2005). Comparative studies on U.S. and Chinese mathematics learning and the implications for standards-based mathematics teaching reform. Educational Researcher, 34(5), 313. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034005003. Accessed 24 dec 2019
Wang, J., & Lin, E. (2009). A meta-analysis of comparative studies on Chinese and US students' mathematics performance: Implications for mathematics education reform and research. Educational Research Review, 4(3), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2009.06.003. Accessed 24 dec 2019
Zhao, D. (2016). Chinese students’ higher achievement in mathematics. New York, NY: Springer.
Zhou, Z., Peverly, S. T., & Lin, J. (2005). Understanding early mathematical competencies in American and Chinese children. School Psychology International, 26(4), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034305059018. Accessed 24 dec 2019
Acknowledgements
DFG Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Germany, and Ministry of Science and Technology, R.O.C., Taiwan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The original version of this article was revised:The original version of this article unfortunately contains incorrect formatting of section 2 sub-headings and Tables 2 to 5 with typing errors in Tables 4 and 5.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gasteiger, H., Brunner, E. & Chen, CS. Basic Conditions of Early Mathematics Education—a Comparison between Germany, Taiwan and Switzerland. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 19, 111–127 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10044-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10044-x