Skip to main content
Log in

On the Ingredients of the Twin Paradox

  • Published:
International Journal of Theoretical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

If M is a 4-dimensional connected, orientable flat spacetime manifold endowed with a time-arrow, and if the existence of a finite speed limit to energy/information transfers over M can be assessed, then the “twin paradox” necessarily follows (and indeed, the full special relativity theory). Two other implicit ingredients of the paradox are also identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adler, S.L.: Einstein gravity as a symmetry breaking effect in quantum field theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 54(3), 729–765 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aharoni, J.: The Special Theory of Relativity. Dover, New York (1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ashby, N.: Living Rev. Relativ. 6(1), 18 (2003). [Online Article]: cited on 28 January 2003, http://www.livingreviews.org/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby/

    Google Scholar 

  4. Avez, A.: Essais de géometrie Riemannienne hyperbolique globale. Application à la relativité générale. Ann. Inst. Fourier 13(2), 105 (1963)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bacry, H.: Leçons sur la Théorie des Groupes. Gordon & Breach, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bergson, H.: Duration and Simultaneity. Clinamen Press, Manchester (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bros, J.: Sémin. Poincaré 1, 99–154 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coleman, B.: Eur. J. Phys. 24, 301 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Debs, T.A., Redhead, M.L.G.: Am. J. Phys. 64(4), 384 (1996)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Dingle, H.: What does relativity mean? Bull. Inst. Phys. 7, 314 (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eisberg, R.M.: Fundamentals of Modern Physics. Wiley, New York (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  12. de la Harpe, P.: Panor. Synth. 18, 39 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lévay, P.: J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 37, 4593 (2004)

    Article  MATH  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lévy, J.: Relativité et Substratum Cosmique. Lavoisier, Paris (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lévy-Leblond, J.M.: Am. J. Phys. 44, 3 (1976). La relativité aujourd’hui: La Recherche 96(10), 30 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. MacKenzie, K.R.: Thomas precession and the clock paradox. Am. J. Phys. 40(11), 1661 (1972)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Malament, D.: J. Math. Phys. 18, 1399 (1977)

    Article  MATH  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Malament, D.: In: Marcus, B., et al. (eds.) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VII, pp. 405–411. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Malament, D.: Classical relativity theory. In: Gabbay, D.M., Thagard, P., Woods, J. (eds.) Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Physics, vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Matolcsi, T., Goher, A.: Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 32(1), 83 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Matolcsi, T., Matolcsi, M.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 44, 63 (2005)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Misner, C.W., Thorne, K.S., Wheeler, J.A.: Gravitation, p. 164. Freeman, New York (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pierseaux, Y.: Ann. Fond. Louis Broglie 29, 57 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Schild, A.: Am. Math. Mon. 66(1), 1 (1959)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Swiatecki, W.J.: Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 15(2), 275–283 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ungar, A.A.: Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol. 117. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Unruh, W.G.: Parallax distance, time, and the twin “paradox”. Am. J. Phys. 49(6), 589 (1981)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zeeman, E.C.: J. Math. Phys. 4, 490 (1963)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Weyl, H.: Space, Time, Matter. Dover, New York (1952)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Grandou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grandou, T., Rubin, J.L. On the Ingredients of the Twin Paradox. Int J Theor Phys 48, 101–114 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-008-9786-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-008-9786-y

Keywords

Navigation