Abstract
If M is a 4-dimensional connected, orientable flat spacetime manifold endowed with a time-arrow, and if the existence of a finite speed limit to energy/information transfers over M can be assessed, then the “twin paradox” necessarily follows (and indeed, the full special relativity theory). Two other implicit ingredients of the paradox are also identified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, S.L.: Einstein gravity as a symmetry breaking effect in quantum field theory. Rev. Mod. Phys. 54(3), 729–765 (1982)
Aharoni, J.: The Special Theory of Relativity. Dover, New York (1965)
Ashby, N.: Living Rev. Relativ. 6(1), 18 (2003). [Online Article]: cited on 28 January 2003, http://www.livingreviews.org/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby/
Avez, A.: Essais de géometrie Riemannienne hyperbolique globale. Application à la relativité générale. Ann. Inst. Fourier 13(2), 105 (1963)
Bacry, H.: Leçons sur la Théorie des Groupes. Gordon & Breach, New York (1967)
Bergson, H.: Duration and Simultaneity. Clinamen Press, Manchester (1999)
Bros, J.: Sémin. Poincaré 1, 99–154 (2005)
Coleman, B.: Eur. J. Phys. 24, 301 (2003)
Debs, T.A., Redhead, M.L.G.: Am. J. Phys. 64(4), 384 (1996)
Dingle, H.: What does relativity mean? Bull. Inst. Phys. 7, 314 (1956)
Eisberg, R.M.: Fundamentals of Modern Physics. Wiley, New York (1967)
de la Harpe, P.: Panor. Synth. 18, 39 (2004)
Lévay, P.: J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 37, 4593 (2004)
Lévy, J.: Relativité et Substratum Cosmique. Lavoisier, Paris (1996)
Lévy-Leblond, J.M.: Am. J. Phys. 44, 3 (1976). La relativité aujourd’hui: La Recherche 96(10), 30 (1979)
MacKenzie, K.R.: Thomas precession and the clock paradox. Am. J. Phys. 40(11), 1661 (1972)
Malament, D.: J. Math. Phys. 18, 1399 (1977)
Malament, D.: In: Marcus, B., et al. (eds.) Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science VII, pp. 405–411. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1986)
Malament, D.: Classical relativity theory. In: Gabbay, D.M., Thagard, P., Woods, J. (eds.) Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Physics, vol. 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)
Matolcsi, T., Goher, A.: Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys. 32(1), 83 (2001)
Matolcsi, T., Matolcsi, M.: Int. J. Theor. Phys. 44, 63 (2005)
Misner, C.W., Thorne, K.S., Wheeler, J.A.: Gravitation, p. 164. Freeman, New York (1973)
Pierseaux, Y.: Ann. Fond. Louis Broglie 29, 57 (2004)
Schild, A.: Am. Math. Mon. 66(1), 1 (1959)
Swiatecki, W.J.: Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 15(2), 275–283 (2006)
Ungar, A.A.: Fundamental Theories of Physics, vol. 117. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2001)
Unruh, W.G.: Parallax distance, time, and the twin “paradox”. Am. J. Phys. 49(6), 589 (1981)
Zeeman, E.C.: J. Math. Phys. 4, 490 (1963)
Weyl, H.: Space, Time, Matter. Dover, New York (1952)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grandou, T., Rubin, J.L. On the Ingredients of the Twin Paradox. Int J Theor Phys 48, 101–114 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-008-9786-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-008-9786-y