Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many scholars claimed the integration of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education is beneficial to the national economy and teachers and institutes have been working to develop integrated education programs. This study examined a project-based learning (PjBL) activity that integrated STEM using survey and interview methods. The participants were 30 freshmen with engineering related backgrounds from five institutes of technology in Taiwan. Questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were used to examine student attitudes towards STEM before and after the PjBL activity. The results of the survey showed that students’ attitudes to the subject of engineering changed significantly. Most of the students recognized the importance of STEM in the science and engineering disciplines; they mentioned in interview that the possession of professional science knowledge is useful to their future career and that technology may improve our lives and society, making the world a more convenient and efficient place. In conclusion, combining PjBL with STEM can increase effectiveness, generate meaningful learning and influence student attitudes in future career pursuit. Students are positive towards combining PjBL with STEM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besterfield-Sacre M., Moreno M., Shuman L. J., & Atman C. J. (1999). Comparing entering freshman engineers: Institutional differences in student attitudes. ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings, Charlotte, NC.

  • Bingolbali, E., Monaghan, J., & Roper, T. (2007). Engineering students’ conceptions of the derivative and some implications for their mathematical education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 38(6), 763–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boser, R. A., Palmer, J. D., & Daugherty, M. K. (1998). Students attitudes towards technology in selected technology education programs. Journal of Technology Education, 10(1), 4–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bragg, L. (2007). Students’ conflicting attitudes towards games as a vehicle for learning mathematics: A methodological dilemma. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 19(1), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catherine, M., & Barry, J. F. (2008). Learning environment and attitudes associated with an innovative science course designed for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 163–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • ChanLin, L. J. (2008). Technology integration applied to project-based learning in science. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(1), 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crano, W. D., & Prislin, R. (2006). Attitudes and persuasion. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 345–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawley, F. E., & Coe, A. S. (1990). Determinants of middle school students’ intention to enroll in a high school science course: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 461–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • David, G. H., & Sharon, K. S. (2006). Proceedings of the conference on K-12 outreach from university science departments. Retrieved August 10, 2010, from http://www.science-house.org/conf/conf02/proceedings.pdf.

  • Dewaters, J., S. E. Powers. (2006). Improving science and energy literacy through project-based K-12 outreach efforts that use energy and environmental themes. Proceedings of the 113th Annual ASEE Conference & Exposition, Chicago, IL.

  • Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., & Dietz, E. J. (2002). The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research Reading. MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, R. (2006). A cross-domain analysis of change in students’ attitudes towards science and attitudes about the utility of science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 571–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, G. A. (2003). Developing complex understandings: On the relationship of mathematics education research in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 54, 171–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendley, D., Parkinson, J., Stables, A., & Tanner, H. (1995). Gender differences in pupil attitudes to the national curriculum foundation subjects of English, mathematics, science, and technology in key stage 3 in South Wales. Educational Studies, 21, 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillel, J., & Perrett, G. (2006). Undergraduate students’ conceptions of mathematics: An international study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5, 439–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilpert, J., Stump, G., Husman, J., & Kim, W. (2008). An exploratory factor analysis of the Pittsburgh freshman engineering attitudes survey. The 386th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in education conference, New York.

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. W. (2006). Student opinion in England about science and technology. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24(1), 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaman, S., & Celik, S. (2008). An exploratory study on the perspectives of prospective computer teachers following project-based learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18(2), 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J. S., Czeniak, C., & Berger, C. (1999). Teaching children science: A project-based approach. Boston: McGraw-Hill College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, C. D., Zastavker, Y. V., & Ong, M. (2007). Is integration really there? students’ perceptions of integration in their project-based curriculum. The 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Milwaukee, WI.

  • Mamlok-Naaman, R., Ben-Zvi, R., Hofstein, A., Menis, J., & Erduran, S. (2005). Learning science through a historical approach: Does it affect the attitudes of non-science-oriented students towards science? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(3), 485–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mioduser, D., & Betzer, N. (2007). The contribution of project-based-learning to high-achievers’ acquisition of technological knowledge and skills. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18, 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D. G. (1993). Social Psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolen, S. B. (2003). Learning environment, motivation, and achievement in high school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(4), 347–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norwich, B., & Duncan, J. (1990). Attitudes, subjective norm, and perceived preventive factors, intention and learning science: Testing a modified theory of reasoned action. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 60, 312–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. F., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupils’ and parents’ views of the school science curriculum. London: King’s College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piburin, M. D., & Baker, D. R. (1993). If I were the teacher: qualitative study of attitude towards science. Science Education, 77(4), 393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Oliver, S., & Johnson, D. (2006). A systems model of innovation processes in university STEM education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(1), 13–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, H., & Noyes, J. M. (2007). Mobile telephones, computers, and the internet: Sex differences in adolescents’ use and attitudes. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10(3), 482–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24(2), 113–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (2000). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the science. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K., Granvile, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Education Research, 95(6), 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, L., Stanne, M. E., & Donovan, S. S. (1999). Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 21–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, J. R., I. I. I., Alfeld, C., & Pearson, D. (2008). Rigor and relevance: Enhancing high school students’ math skills through career and technical education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 767–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, California: Autodesk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utsumi, M. C., & Mendes, C. R. (2000). Researching the attitudes towards mathematics in basic education. Educational Psychology, 20(2), 237–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, K. A. (2008). The relationship among mathematics anxiety, beliefs about mathematics, mathematics self-efficacy, and mathematics performance in associate degree nursing students. Nursing Education Perspectives, 29(4), 226–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zastavker, Y. V., Ong, M., & Page, L. (2006). Women in engineering: Exploring the effects of project-based learning in a first-year undergraduate engineering program. The 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, San Diego, CA.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly appreciate the financial support provided by Taiwan’s National Science Council, the Republic of China, and also the kind assistance of Miss Chao-I Chu and Miss Hui-Chuan Sun who made this paper possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuo-Hung Tseng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tseng, KH., Chang, CC., Lou, SJ. et al. Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. Int J Technol Des Educ 23, 87–102 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x

Keywords

Navigation