Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of monolithic platinum and iridium as oxygen-evolving anodes during the electrolytic reduction of uranium oxide in a molten LiCl–Li2O electrolyte

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of four electrolytic reduction runs was performed in molten salt at bench scale to compare the performance characteristics of monolithic platinum and iridium as oxygen-evolving anodes, while simultaneously reducing uranium oxide to metal. In each run, 25 g of uranium oxide particulate was loaded into a permeable steel basket, which, in turn, was immersed in a pool of LiCl—1 wt% Li2O at 650 °C. Both anodes, each 3 mm in diameter, were suspended vertically in the salt pool, adjacent to the steel cathode basket. The anodes were connected in parallel to separate direct current power supplies with the uranium oxide-loaded basket as the common cathode. A cell voltage (3.1 V) was intermittently applied to the system with both power supplies operating concurrently, effecting the reduction of uranium oxide to uranium metal at the cathode basket and the simultaneous oxidation of oxygen anions in the salt to oxygen gas at each anode. Anode and cathode potentials and currents were recorded to compare the performance of platinum vis-à-vis iridium. After completing the series of runs, both anodes were removed and subjected to dimensional, chemical, and microscopic analyses. Even though the accumulated charges on each anode over the series of four runs were similar, the platinum anode exhibited up to 29% reduction in cross-sectional area compared to < 3% for the iridium anode.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gourishankar K, Redey L, Williamson M (2002) Electrolytic Reduction of Metal Oxides in Molten Salts. In: Schneider W (ed) Light metals 2002. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Pennsylvania, pp 1075–1082

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goff KM, Wass JC, Marsden KC, Teske GM (2011) Electrochemical processing of used nuclear fuel. Nucl Eng Technol 43:335–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Williamson MA, Willit JL (2011) Pyroprocessing flowsheets for recycling used nuclear fuel. Nuc Eng Technol 43:329–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Inoue T, Koyama T, Arai Y (2011) State of the art of pyroprocessing technology in Japan. Energy Procedia 7:405–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakamura Y, Omori T (2010) Electrolytic reduction and electrorefining of uranium to develop pyrochemical reprocessing of oxide fuels. Nucl Technol 171:266–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee H, Park G-I, Kang K-H, Hur J-M, Kim J-G, Ahn D-H, Cho Y-Z, Kim EH (2011) Pyroprocessing technology development at KAERI. Nucl Eng Technol 43:317–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi E-Y, Jeong SM (2015) Electrochemical processing of spent nuclear fuels: an overview of oxide reduction in pyroprocessing technology. Prog Nat Sci-Mater 25:572–582

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nagarajan K, Reddy BP, Ghosh S, Ravisankar G, Mohandas KS, Mudali UK, Kutty KVG, Viswanathan K, Babu CA, Kalyanasundaram P, Rao PRV, Raj B (2011) Development of pyrochemical reprocessing for spent metal fuels. Energy Procedia 7:431–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Herrmann SD, Li SX (2010) Separation and recovery of uranium metal from spent light water reactor fuel via electrolytic reduction and electrorefining. Nucl Technol 171:247–265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrmann SD, Li SX, Westphal BR (2012) Separation and recovery of uranium and group actinide products from irradiated fast reactor MOX fuel via electrolytic reduction and electrorefining. Sep Sci Technol 47:2044–2059

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sakamura Y, Kurata M, Inoue T (2006) Electrochemical reduction of UO2 in molten CaCl2 or LiCl. J Electrochem Soc 153(3):d31–d39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeong SM, Shin H-S, Cho S-H, Hur J-M, Lee HS (2009) Electrochemical behavior of a platinum anode for reduction of uranium oxide in a LiCl molten salt. Electrochim Acta 54:6335–6340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee S-K, Jeon MK, Kim S-W, Choi E-Y, Lee J, Hong S-S, Oh S-C, Hur J-M (2018) Evaluation of Pt anode stability in repeated electrochemical oxide reduction reactions for pyroprocessing. J Radioanal Nucl Ch 316:1053–1058

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Outotec (2015) HSC chemistry 8. Outotec, Pori

    Google Scholar 

  15. ASM International (2016) ASM alloy phase diagram database. Villars P (ed) https://matdata.asminternational.org/apd/index.aspx

  16. Kasuyu R, Miki T, Morikawa H, Tai Y (2013) Synthesis of alkali metal platinates and their dissolution behavior in hydrochloric acid. J Ceram Soc Jpn 121(10):884–890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Freund F, Williams SC, Johnson RD, Coldea R, Gegenwart P, Jesche A (2016) Single crystal growth from separated educts and its application to lithium transition-metal oxides. Sci Rep 6:35362. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35362

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. O’Malley MJ, Verweij H, Woodward PM (2008) Structure and properties of ordered Li2IrO3 and Li2PtO3. J Solid State Chem 181:1803–1809

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kobayashi H, Kanno R, Tabuchi M, Kageyama H, Nakamura O, Takano M (1997) Structure and charge/discharge characteristics of new layered oxides: Li1.8Ru0.6Fe0.6O3 and Li2IrO3. J Power Sources 68:686–691

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Takayama T, Kato A, Dinnebier R, Nuss J, Kono H, Veiga LSI, Fabbris G, Haskel D, Takagi H (2015) Hyperhoneycomb iridate β-Li2IrO3 as a platform for Kitaev magnetism. Phys Rev Lett 114:077202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Modic KA, Smidt TE, Kimchi I, Breznay NP, Biffin A, Choi S, Johnson RD, Coldea R, Watkins-Curry P, McCandless GT, Chan JY, Gandara F, Islam Z, Vishwanath A, Shekhter A, McDonald RD, Analytis JG (2014) Realization of a three-dimensional spin-anisotropic harmonic honeycomb iridate. Nat Commun 5:4203. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Nuclear Energy, under DOE Idaho Operations Office contract DE-AC07-05ID14517.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. D. Herrmann.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Herrmann, S.D., Tripathy, P.K., Frank, S.M. et al. Comparative study of monolithic platinum and iridium as oxygen-evolving anodes during the electrolytic reduction of uranium oxide in a molten LiCl–Li2O electrolyte. J Appl Electrochem 49, 379–388 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-019-01287-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-019-01287-1

Keywords

Navigation