Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Paradox of Faculty Attitudes toward Student Violations of Academic Integrity

  • Published:
Journal of Academic Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigated faculty attitudes towards student violations of academic integrity in Canada using a qualitative review of 17 universities’ academic integrity/dishonesty policies combined with a quantitative survey of faculty members’ (N = 412) attitudes and behaviours around academic integrity and dishonesty. Results showed that 53.1% of survey respondents see academic dishonesty as a worsening problem at their institutions. Generally, they believe their respective institutional policies are sound in principle but fail in application. Two of the major factors identified by faculty as contributing to academic dishonesty are administrative. Many faculty members feel unsupported by their administration and are reluctant to formally report academic dishonesty due to the excessive burdens of dealing with paperwork and providing proof. Faculty members also cite unprepared students and international students who struggle with language issues and the Canadian academic context as major contributors to academic dishonesty. This study concludes with recommendations for educators and recommendations for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abeyasekera, S. (2005). Quantitative analysis approaches to qualitative data: Why, when and how? In J. D. Holland & J. Campbell (Eds.), Methods in development research: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 97–106). Warwickshire: ITDG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. R., & Ryan, G. W. (2010). Analyzing qualitative data: Systematic approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram Gallant, T. (2008). Academic integrity in the 21st century: A teaching and learning imperative (Ashe higher education reports) (Vol. 33, No. 5). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertram Gallant, T., & Drinan, P. (2008). Toward a model of academic integrity institutionalization: Informing practice in post-secondary education. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 38(2), 25–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloodgood, J. M., Turnley, W. H., & Mudrack, P. (2008) The influence of ethics instruction, religiosity, and intelligence on cheating behavior. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9576-0.

  • Blum, S. D. (2009a). Academic integrity and student plagiarism: A question of education, not ethics. The Chronicle of Higher Education. http://chronicle.com/article/Academic-IntegrityStud/32323/. Accessed 25 Oct 2019.

  • Blum, S. D. (2009b). My word: Plagiarism and college culture. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, W. J. (1964). Student dishonesty and its control in college. New York: Bureau of Applied Research, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, J., & Balujah, T. (2018). Why many international students get a failing grade in academic integrity. The Globe and Mail. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/education/why-many-international-students-get-a-failing-grade-in-academic-integrity/article4199683/. Accessed 30 Oct 2019.

  • Bretag, T., Mahmud, S., Wallace, M., Walker, R., James, C., Green, M., & Partridge, L. (2011). Core elements of exemplary academic integrity policy in Australian higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 7(2), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., & van Haeringen, K. (2018). Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university students. Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1462788.

  • Bretag, T. (2019). Academic integrity and embracing diversity. Paper presented at the Canadian Symposium on Academic Integrity, Calgary, Canada. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/110278. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.

  • Canadian Council on Learning. (2009). Post-secondary education in Canada: Meeting our needs? https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED525254. Accessed 01 Nov 2019.

  • Carpenter, D., Harding, T. Finelli, C., & Mayhew, M. (2005). Work in progress - an investigation into the effect of an institutional honor code policy on academic behavior. In Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference (pp. T2D-13–T2D-14). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2005.1611895.

  • Eysenbach, G. (2005). Using the internet for surveys and research. In J. G. Anderson & C. E. Aydin (Eds.), Evaluating the organizational impact of healthcare information systems (pp. 129–143). New York: Springer. 

  • Christensen Hughes, J. M., & McCabe, D. L. (2006a). Academic misconduct within higher education in Canada. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 36(2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen Hughes, J. M., & McCabe, D. L. (2006b). Understanding academic misconduct. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 36(1), 49–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R., & Lancaster, T. (2006). Eliminating the successor to plagiarism? Identifying the usage of contract cheating sites. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.120.5440&rep=rep1&type=pdf. Accessed 17 Nov 2019.

  • Coalter, T., Lim, C. L., & Wanorie, T. (2007). Factors that influence faculty actions: A study on faculty responses to academic dishonesty. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2007.010112.

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2010). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, G., & Clare, J. (2017). How prevalent is contract cheating and to what extent are students repeat offenders? Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-017-9278-x.

  • Davis, S. F., Drinan, P. F., & Bertram Gallant, T. (2009). Cheating in school: What we know and what we can do. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, S. E. (2017). Comparative analysis of institutional policy definitions of plagiarism: A pan-Canadian university study. Interchange: A Quarterly Review of Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-017-9300-7.

  • Eaton, S. E., & Burns, A. (2018). Exploring the intersection between culturally responsive pedagogy and academic integrity among EAL students in Canadian higher education. Journal of Educational Thought, 51(3), 339–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, S. E., & Edino, R. I. (2018). Strengthening the research agenda of educational integrity in Canada: A review of the research literature and call to action. Journal of Educational Integrity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-018-0028-7.

  • Fink, A. (2009). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flick, U. (2007). Designing qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, F. J. (2002). Survey research methods: Fundamental principles of clinical reasoning & research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, B. (2013). Revisiting the policy cycle. Association of Tertiary Education Management (ATEM): Developing policy in tertiary institutions. Melbourne: RMIT University. https://federation.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/119043/Revisiting_Policy_Cycle_2013_BFreeman.pdf. Accessed 10 Feb 2020.

  • Genereux, R. L., & McLeod, B. A. (1995). Circumstances surrounding cheating a questionnaire study of college students. Research in Higher Education, 36, 687–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glendinning, I. (2014). Responses to student plagiarism in higher education across Europe. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 10(1), 4–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorard, S. (2001). Quantitative methods in educational research: The role of numbers made easy. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grbich, C. (2007). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., Moskovitz, C., & Pemberton, M. A. (2018). Attitudes toward text recycling in academic writing across disciplines. Accountability in Research, 25(3), 142–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2018.1434622.

  • Howard, R. M. (2016). Plagiarism in higher education: An academic literacies issue? – Introduction. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. 499–501). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

  • Howard, R. M. (2000). Sexuality, textuality: The cultural work of plagiarism. College English, 62(4), 473. https://doi.org/10.2307/378866.

  • Hunt, R. (2010). Four reasons to be happy about internet plagiarism. In J. Boss (Ed.), Think: Critical thinking for everyday life (pp. 367–369). Retrieved from http://people.stu.ca/~hunt/www/think4r.pdf. Accessed 01 Nov 2019.

  • International Center for Academic Integrity. (2012). Academic Integrity Rating System. https://academicintegrity.org/academic-integrity-rating-system-ai/. Accessed 10 Nov 2019.

  • Jendrek, M. P. (1989). Faculty reactions to academic dishonesty. Journal of College Student Development, 30, 401–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms attitudes and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurdi, R., Hage, H. S., & Chow, H. P. H. (2011). Academic dishonesty in the Canadian classroom: Behaviours of a sample of university students. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 41(3), 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kier, C. A. (2013). Is it still cheating if it’s not done on purpose? Accidental plagiarism in higher education [PowerPoint presentation]. Paper presented at the 2013 Hawaii International Conference on Education, Honolulu, HI. https://auspace.athabascau.ca/handle/2149/3316. Accessed 25 Sept 2019.

  • Kier, C. A. (2019). Plagiarism intervention using a game-based tutorial in an online distance education course. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-019-09340-6.

  • Lancaster, T. (2019). Social media enabled contract cheating. Paper presented at the Canadian Symposium on Academic Integrity, Calgary, Canada. https://www.slideshare.net/ThomasLancaster/social-media-enabled-contract-cheating-canadian-symposium-on-academic-integrity-calgary-18-april-2019. Accessed 15 Dec 2019.

  • Levin, P. (2003). Beat the witch-hunt! Peter Levin’s guide to avoiding and rebutting accusations of plagiarism, for conscientious students. http://student-friendly-guides.com/wp-content/uploads/Beat-the-Witch-hunt.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2019.

  • Levin, P. (2006). Why the writing is on the wall for the plagiarism police. http://student-friendly-guides.com/wp-content/uploads/Why-the-Writing-is-on-the-Wall.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2019.

  • Leung, C. H., & Cheng, S. C. L. (2017). An instructional approach to practical solutions for plagiarism. Universal Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050922.

  • Liu, D. (2005). Plagiarism in ESOL students: Is cultural conditioning truly the major culprit? ELT Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci043.

  • Mahmud, S., Bretag, T., & Foltýnek, T. (2019). Students’ perceptions of plagiarism policy in higher education: A comparison of the United Kingdom, Czechia, Poland and Romania. Journal of Academic Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-018-9319-0.

  • Martin, B. (1994). Plagiarism: A misplaced emphasis. Journal of Information Ethics, 3(2), 36–47. https://documents.uow.edu.au/~bmartin/pubs/94jie.html. Accessed 15 Sept 2019.

  • McCabe, D. L. (1993). Faculty responses to academic dishonesty: The influence of student honor codes. Research in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991924.

  • McCabe, D. L. (2001). Cheating: Why students do it and how we can help them stop. American Educator. http://www.aft.org/newspubs/periodicals/ae/winter2001/mccabe.cfm. Accessed 12 Oct 2019.

  • McCabe, D. L. (2005). It takes a village: Academic dishonesty & educational opportunity. Liberal Education, 91(3), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L. (2016). Cheating and honor: Lessons from a long-term research project. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 187–198). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Bowers, W. J. (1994). Academic dishonesty among males in college: A thirty year perspective. Journal of College Student Development, 35(1), 280–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Drinan, P. (1999). Toward a culture of academic integrity. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(8), B7–B10.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., & Pavela, G. (2004). Ten (updated) principles of academic integrity: How faculty can foster student honesty. Change. https://doi.org/10.1080/00091380409605574.

  • McCabe, D. L., & Trevino, L. K. (1996). What we know about cheating in college: Longitudinal trends and recent developments. Change, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1996.10544253.

  • McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (1999). Academic integrity in honor code and non-honor code environments: A qualitative investigation. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1999.11780762.

  • McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2.

  • McCabe, D. L., Butterfield, K. D., & Trevino, L. K. (2012). Cheating in college: Why students do it and what educators can do about it. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E. J., & Carrol, J. (2016). Developing a sustainable holistic institutional approach: Dealing with realities “on the ground” when implementing an academic integrity policy. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 449–462). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld J., & Dianda, J. (2007). Academic dishonesty: A survey of policies and procedures at Ontario universities. http://www.queensu.ca/secretariat/senate/Nov15_07/COUPaper.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2019.

  • Newton, P. (2018). How common is commercial contract cheating in higher education and is it increasing? A systematic review. Frontiers in Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2018.00067.

  • Panning Davies, L. J., & Moore Howard, R. (2016). Plagiarism and the internet: Fears, facts, and pedagogies. In T. Bretag (Ed.), Handbook of academic integrity (pp. 591–606). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2003). In other people’s words: Plagiarism by university students: Literature and lessons. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930301677.

  • Pavela, G. (n.d.). Educational resources: Stages of institutional development. https://academicintegrity.org/educational-resources/. Accessed 17 Sept 2019.

  • Pavela, G., & McCabe, D. L. (1993). The surprising return of honor codes. Planning for Higher Education, 21(4), 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rigby, D., Burton, M., Balcombe, K., Bateman, I., & Mulatu, A. (2015). Contract cheating & the market in essays. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 111, 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.12.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, P. M., & Neumann, D. R. (2002). Internet plagiarism among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 43(3), 374–385.

  • Stearns, S. A. (2001). The student–instructor relationship’s effect on academic integrity. Ethics & Behavior, 11(3), 275–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoesz, B., Eaton, S. E., Miron, J. B., & Thacker, E. (2019). Academic integrity and contract cheating policy analysis of colleges in Ontario, Canada. International Journal for Educational Integrity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40979-019-0042-4.

  • Sutherland-Smith, W. (2008). Plagiarism, the Internet and student learning: Improving academic integrity. New York: Routledge.

  • Taylor-Powell, E., & Renner, M. (2003). Analyzing qualitative data. Retrieved https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0145/8808/4272/files/G3658–12.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2019.

  • Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430.

  • Thomas, R. M. (2003). Blending qualitative and quantitative research methods in theses and dissertations. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press/Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, A., & De Bruin, G. P. (2012). Student academic dishonesty: What do academics think and do, and what are the barriers to action? African Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.15249/6-1-8.

  • Tysome, T. (2006). English deficit leads to cheating. Times Higher Education Supplement. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk. Accessed 25 Sept 2019.

  • U15. (n.d.). Our members. Retrieved from http://www.u15.ca/our-members. Accessed 25 Sept 2019.

  • Universities Canada.(n.d.). Member universities. Retrieved from https://www.univcan.ca/universities/member-universities/. Accessed 25 Nov 2019.

  • Vandehey, M. A., Diekhoff, G. M., & LaBeff, E. E. (2007). College cheating: A twenty-year follow-up and the addition of an honor code. The Journal of College Student Development. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.2007.0043.

  • Walker, A. L. (2008). Preventing unintentional plagiarism: a method for strengthening paraphrasing skills. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35, 387–395.

  • Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2001). Academic integrity as an institutional issue. Ethics & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327019EB1103_9.

  • Whitley Jr., B. E., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2002). Academic dishonesty: An educator’s guide. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Douglas MacLeod.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MacLeod, P.D., Eaton, S.E. The Paradox of Faculty Attitudes toward Student Violations of Academic Integrity. J Acad Ethics 18, 347–362 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09363-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09363-4

Keywords

Navigation