Skip to main content
Log in

Live births following preimplantation genetic testing for dynamic mutation diseases by karyomapping: a report of three cases

  • Genetics
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic defects (PGT-M) is a beneficial strategy for the patients suffering from a Mendelian disease, which could protect their offspring from inheriting the disease. The purpose of this study is to report the effectiveness of PGT-M based on karyomapping for three cases of dynamic mutation diseases with trinucleotide repeat expansion.

Methods

PGT-M was carried out on three couples, whose family members were diagnosed with Huntington’s disease or spinocerebellar ataxias 2 or 12. The whole genome amplification was obtained using the multiple displacement amplification (MDA) method. Then, karyomapping was performed to detect the allele that is carrying the trinucleotide repeat expansion using single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) linkage analyses, and the copy number variations (CNVs) of the embryos were also identified. Prenatal diagnosis was performed to validate the accuracy of PGT-M.

Results

PGT-M was successfully performed on the three couples, and they accepted the transfers of euploid blastocysts without the relevant pathogenic allele. The clinical pregnancies were acquired and the prenatal diagnosis of the three families confirmed the effectiveness of karyomapping. The three born babies were healthy and free of the pathogenic alleles HTT, ATXN2, or PPP2R2B corresponding to Huntington’s disease, spinocerebellar ataxias 2 or 12, respectively.

Conclusion

This study shows that karyomapping is a highly powerful and efficient approach for dynamic mutation detection in preimplantation embryos. In this work, we first report the birth of healthy babies that are free of the pathogenic gene for dynamic mutation diseases in patients receiving PGT-M by karyomapping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kay C, Hayden MR, Leavitt BR. Epidemiology of Huntington disease. Handb Clin Neurol. 2017;144:31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ghosh R, Tabrizi SJ. Clinical features of Huntington’s disease. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1049:1–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Group THsDCR. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington’s disease chromosomes. Cell. 1993;72:971–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ziihlke C, Rless O, Bockel B, Lange H, Thies U. Mitotic stability and meiotic variability of the (CAG)n repeat in the Huntington disease gene. Hum Mol Genet. 1993;2:2063–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Soong BW, Morrison PJ. Spinocerebellar ataxias. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;155:143–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruano L, Melo C, Silva MC, Coutinho P. The global epidemiology of hereditary ataxia and spastic paraplegia a systematic review of prevalence studies. Neuroepidemiology. 2014;42:174–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sermon K, Goossens V, Seneca S, Lissens W, Vos AD, Vandervorst M, et al. Preimplantation diagnosis for Huntington’s disease (HD) clinical application and analysis of the HD expansion in affected embryos. Prenat Diagn. 1998;18:1427–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sermon K, Seneca S, Vanderfaeillie A, Lissens W. Preimplantation diagnosis for fragile X syndrome based on the detection of the non-expanded paternal and maternal CGG. Prenat Diagn. 1999;19:1223–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sermon K, Seneca S, Rycke MD, Goossens V. PGD in the lab for triplet repeat diseases-myotonic dystrophy, Huntington’s disease and fragile-X syndrome. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2001;183:S77–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moutou C, Gardes N, Viville S. New tools for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of Huntington’s disease and their clinical applications. Eur J Hum Genet. 2004;12:1007–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Rij MC, De Rademaeker M, Moutou C, Dreesen JC, De Rycke M, Liebaers I, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for Huntington’s disease: the experience of three European centres. Eur J Hum Genet. 2012;20:368–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pecina A, Lozano Arana MD, Garcia-Lozano JC, Borrego S, Antinolo G. One-step multiplex polymerase chain reaction for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of Huntington disease. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2411–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kieffer E, Nicod JC, Gardes N, Kastner C, Becker N, Celebi C, et al. Improving preimplantation genetic diagnosis for fragile X syndrome: two new powerful single-round multiplex indirect and direct tests. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24:221–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Moutou C, Nicod JC, Gardes N, Viville S. Birth after pre-implantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of spinocerebellar ataxia 2 (Sca2). Prenat Diagn. 2008;28:126–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lasken RS. Genomic DNA amplification by the multiple displacement amplification (MDA) method. Biochem Soc Trans. 2009;37:450–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Buijsen RAM, Toonen LJA, Gardiner SL, van Roon-Mom WMC. Genetics, mechanisms, and therapeutic progress in polyglutamine spinocerebellar ataxias. Neurotherapeutics. 2019;16:263–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Handyside AH, Harton GL, Mariani B, Thornhill AR, Affara N, Shaw MA, et al. Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes. J Med Genet. 2010;47:651–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Vanneste E, Voet T, Le Caignec C, Ampe M, Konings P, Melotte C, et al. Chromosome instability is common in human cleavage-stage embryos. Nat Med. 2009;15:577–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Jaroudi S, Sarasa J, Enciso M, et al. The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy. Hum Genet. 2013;132:1001–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Huang L, Ma F, Chapman A, Lu S, Xie XS. Single-cell whole-genome amplification and sequencing: methodology and applications. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2015;16:79–102.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yan L, Huang L, Xu L, Huang J, Ma F, Zhu X, et al. Live births after simultaneous avoidance of monogenic diseases and chromosome abnormality by next-generation sequencing with linkage analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112:15964–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Natesan SA, Bladon AJ, Coskun S, Qubbaj W, Prates R, Munne S, et al. Genome-wide karyomapping accurately identifies the inheritance of single-gene defects in human preimplantation embryos in vitro. Genet Med. 2014;16:838–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Konstantinidis M, Prates R, Goodall NN, Fischer J, Tecson V, Lemma T, et al. Live births following karyomapping of human blastocysts: experience from clinical application of the method. Reprod BioMed Online. 2015;31:394–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Natesan SA, Handyside AH, Thornhill AR, Ottolini CS, Sage K, Summers MC, et al. Live birth after PGD with confirmation by a comprehensive approach (karyomapping) for simultaneous detection of monogenic and chromosomal disorders. Reprod BioMed Online. 2014;29:600–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ben-Nagi J, Wells D, Doye K, Loutradi K, Exeter H, Drew E, et al. Karyomapping: a single centre’s experience from application of methodology to ongoing pregnancy and live-birth rates. Reprod BioMed Online. 2017;35:264–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sermon K. Novel technologies emerging for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2017;17:71–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Treff NR, Fedick A, Tao X, Devkota B, Taylor D, Scott RT Jr. Evaluation of targeted next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic disease. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1377–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Dijk EL, Jaszczyszyn Y, Naquin D, Thermes C. The third revolution in sequencing technology. Trends Genet. 2018;34:666–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the families for taking part and everybody involved in the research for their contributions.

Funding

This work was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFA0110900 to Yingpu Sun and Jiawei Xu, and 2019YFA0802200 to Jiawei Xu), National Natural Science Foundation of China (31870817 to Jiawei Xu.), Scientific and Technological Innovation Talent Project of Universities of Henan Province (20HASTIT045 to Jiawei Xu), and Henan Provincial Obstetrical and Gynecological Diseases (Reproductive Medicine) Clinical Research Center (to Yingpu Sun and Jiawei Xu).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.S. and J.X designed the study; G.Y., S.S., W.S., and H.J. performed embryo culture and biopsy; H.S. and G.L. collected the data; W.N., Y.L., and D.S. analyzed the data; D.S. drafted the manuscript; and J.X. revised it.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jiawei Xu or Yingpu Sun.

Ethics declarations

All couples signed informed consent forms for ICSI treatment, PGT, cryopreservation, thawing, and transfer of embryos. The protocols for this study were evaluated and approved by the Internal Review Board of The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplemental Figure 1

Copy number variations (CNVs) of case 2 and case 3. The CNVs of case 2 are shown by the B-allele and Log R charts in a and b: a. Del(5)(pter-p13.1) in embryo E7; b. Transferred euploid embryo E3. The CNVs of case 3 are displayed in c-g: c. Del(22)(q13.1-q13.2) in embryo E1; d. 47, XXY in embryo E2; e. Monosomy of the 14th chromosome in embryo E4; f. Multiple trisomy of the chromosomes 2, 5, 10, 11, 14, 15 and 16 in embryo E5; g. Transferred euploid embryo E11. (PNG 3305 kb)

High resolution image (TIF 25474 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 34 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shi, D., Xu, J., Niu, W. et al. Live births following preimplantation genetic testing for dynamic mutation diseases by karyomapping: a report of three cases. J Assist Reprod Genet 37, 539–548 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01718-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01718-5

Keywords

Navigation