Skip to main content
Log in

Changing patterns of foreign movie imports, tastes, and consumption in Australia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The movie market in Australia, as in most countries, is highly dominated by Hollywood movies. However, there is an increasing trend of movies being imported from non-US countries. This study extends the one-way flow model of media products to examine whether there has been an increase in the diversity of movie imports in recent years and to explain how this has been influenced by changes in cultural taste over time. Regression analyses of movies imported from 1999 to 2009 confirm the economic theory of one-way media flow that considers both market size and cultural discount. In addition, changes in the Australian population composition and increased exposure to foreign culture are found to influence the diversity in movie imports. The analysis indicates that cultural taste can change through repeated exposure and consumption. Through a longer-term investigation of how cultural tastes form and change over time, we can establish a more nuanced model of international trade in cultural products.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abram, D. J., Straubhaar, J. D., & McCormick, P. (2009). Television flows in the anglophone cultural market from 1962–2001. In Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the International Communication Association.

  • Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2010). Overseas Arrivals and Departures, Australia. Accessed Feb 9, 2012, http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/3401.0Nov%202010?OpenDocument.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2011). Regions of Birth. Accessed July 5, 2013, http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Products/3E70795D258987A3CA2578B000119787?opendocument.

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012). Australia’s Population by Country of Birth. Accessed July 5, 2013, http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/3412.0Main+Features12010-11?OpenDocument.

  • Blackstone, E. A., & Bowman, G. W. (1999). Vertical integration in motion pictures. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 123–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, Steven H., & Miyo, Yuko. (1983). Selective exposure and the reinforcement hypothesis: An intergenerational panel study of the 1980 presidential campaign. Communication Research, 10, 3–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dessy, O. & Gambaro, M. (2009). Demand for movies in Europe and the effects of multiplex diffusion: A panel approach. Working paper, 2009-03. Universita Degli Studi Di Milano. Accessed online July 5, 2013 http://ssrn.com/abstract=1176542.

  • Dupagne, M., & Waterman, D. (1998). Determinants of U.S. television fiction imports in Western Europe. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 42, 208–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenheim, B. J. C. (2000). Asymmetries reconfigured: South American television flows in the 1990s. Canadian Journal of Communication, 25(2), 285–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fu, W. W. (2006). Concentration and homogenization of international movie sources: Examining foreign film import profiles. Journal of Communication, 56(4), 813–835.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, W. W., & Lee, T. K. (2008). Economic and cultural influences on the theatrical consumption of foreign films in Singapore. Journal of Media Economics, 21(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A. (2007). Intra-Asian cultural flow: Cultural homologies in Hong Kong and Japanese television soap operas. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 51(2), 265–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil, R. (2009). Revenue sharing distortions and vertical integration in the movie industry. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 25(2), 579–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, D. (2003). Hollywood sign: Even as locals grow, studio pix up B.O. share. Variety, November 17–23, A1–A6.

  • Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(3), 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Pastina, A., & Straubhaar, J. (2005). Multiple proximities between genres and audiences: The schism between telenovelas’ global distribution and local consumption. Gazette, 67, 271–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. (2002). An economic analysis of the movie industry in Japan. Journal of Media Economics, 15(2), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, D., & Lin, S. F. (2004). The effect of new networks on U.S. television diversity. Journal of Media Economics, 17(2), 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, J., & Walls, W. D. (2013). Australian films at the Australian box office: Performance, distribution, and subsidies. Journal of Cultural Economics, 37(2), 247–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNelly, J. T., & Izcaray, F. (1986). International news exposure and images of nations. Journalism Quarterly, 63(3), 546–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, J. (2001). International trade in film and the self-sufficiency ratio. Journal of Media Economics, 14(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, B., & Wildman, S. (1992). Video economics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. (2004). China’s consumption of Korean television dramas: An empirical test of the “Cultural Discount” concept. Korea Journal, 44(4), 265–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. (2005). The impact of media use and cultural exposure on the mutual perception of Koreans and Japanese. Asian Journal of Communication, 15(2), 178–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. (2011). Market change and diversity in the Korean movie market. Asian Journal of Communication, 21(6), 544–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, M. A. (2009). Movies and the mystery of the missing trade: Is hollywood good for U.S. exporters? International Trade Journal, 23, 231–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Screen Australia (2010). Audiovisual markets: Cinema 2010, from http://www.screenaustralia.gov.au/research/statistics/wcfilmxcountry.aspx.

  • Semetko, H. A., Brzinski, J. B., Weaver, D., & Willnat, L. (1992). TV news and U.S. public opinion about foreign countries: the impact of exposure and attention. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4(1), 18–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, A., & Udornpim, K. (1997). Cultural shareability, archetypes and television soaps. International Communication Gazette, 59(3), 171–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, G. J., & Becker, G. S. (1977). De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. The American Economic Review, 67(2), 76–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straubhaar, J. D. (1991). Beyond media imperialism: Asymmetrical interdependence and cultural proximity. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 8(1), 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straubhaar, J. D. (2007). World television: Global to local. SAGE: SAGE Publications Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straubhaar, J. D. (2008). Global, hybrid or multiple?: Cultural identities in the age of satellite TV and the Internet. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throsby, D. (1999). Cultural capital. Journal of Cultural Economics, 23(1), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, D. (2010). Film, video, DVD and online delivery. In S. Cunningham & G. Turner (Eds.), The media and communications in Australia. Crows Nest: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls, W. D., & McKenzie, J. (2012). The changing role of hollywood in the global movie market. Journal of Media Economics, 25(4), 198–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, D. (1988). World television trade: The economic effects of privatization and new technology. Telecommunications Policy, 12(2), 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, D., & Jayakar, K. P. (2000). The competitive balance of the Italian and American film industries. European Journal of Communication, 15(4), 501–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, D., & Rogers, E. M. (1994). The economics of television program production and trade in Far Eastern Asia. Journal of Communication, 44(3), 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, S. S. (1994). One-way flows and the economics of audiencemaking. In J. S. Ettema & D. C. Whitney (Eds.), Audiencemaking: How the media create the audience (pp. 115–141). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman, S. S., & Siwek, S. (1988). International trade in film and television programs. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I gratefully acknowledge the generosity of the Motion Picture Distributors Association of Australia, who provided me with their valuable data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sora Park.

Additional information

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 10th World Media Economics and Management Conference (Thessaloniki, May 23–27, 2012).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, S. Changing patterns of foreign movie imports, tastes, and consumption in Australia. J Cult Econ 39, 85–98 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-014-9216-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10824-014-9216-3

Keywords

Navigation