Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Does the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption Adequately Protect Orphaned and Vulnerable Children and Their Families?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption, designed to protect the best interests of the child in intercountry adoption, has been signed by 83 nations. We evaluate both the strengths and the weaknesses of the Convention in achieving this purpose and also in protecting a second vulnerable population, birth families. A case study example of the United States’ implementation of the Hague requirements reveals several weaknesses with respect to non-Convention countries as sending nations, financial oversight, and oversight of foreign collaborators. International birth families, especially birth mothers giving consent to an adoption, are often vulnerable because of a lack of power and resources, as well as different cultural understandings of the nature of family and adoption. We conclude that in order to protect vulnerable children and birth families, individual sending and receiving countries need to supplement the Hague Convention with specific, contextually appropriate laws and regulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abebe, T. (2009). Orphanhood, poverty and the care dilemma: Review of global policy trends. Social Work and Society. Retrieved from http://www.socwork.net/2009/1.

  • Bailey, J. D. (2009a). Expectations of the consequences of new international adoption policy in the US. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, XXXVI(2), 169–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. D. (2009). Orphan care: An introduction. Social Work and Society. Available from http://www.socwork.net/2009/1.

  • Balsari, S., Lemery, J., Williams, T. P., & Nelson, B. D. (2010). Protecting the children of Haiti. New England Journal of Medicine. e25(1).

  • Bartholet, E. (2007). International adoption: Thoughts on the human rights issues. Buffalo Human Rights Law Review, 13, 151–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergquist, K. J. S. (2009). Operation babylift or baby abduction?: Implications of the Hague Convention on the humanitarian evacuation and “rescue” of children. International Social Work, 52, 621–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borshay Liem, D. (Producer & Director). (2000). First person plural [Documentary film]. USA: MU films.

  • Bos, P. (2007). Once a mother. Relinquishment and adoption from the perspective of unmarried mothers in south India. PhD dissertation. Nijmegen University. Retrieved from http://dare.ubn.kun.nl/bitstream/2066/73643/1/73643.pdf.

  • Bowie, F. (2004). Adoption and the circulation of children. In F. Bowie (Ed.), Cross-cultural approaches to adoption (pp. 3–20). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braune, F., Biller-Andorno, N., & Wiesemann, C. (2006). Human reproductive cloning: A test case for individual rights? In H. Roetz (Ed.), Cross-cultural issues in bioethics: The example of human cloning (pp. 445–458). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunkers, K. M. (2010). Informal family-based care options: Protecting children’s rights? A case study of Gudifecha in Ethiopia. Geneva, Switzerland: Institut Universitaire Kurt Bosh and Universite de Fribourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunkers, K. M., Groza, V., & Lauer, D. (2009). International adoption and child protection in Guatemala: A case of the tail wagging the dog. International Social Work, 52, 649–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheney, K. (2011). Whose “best interests”? Revisiting African orphan circulation and children’s rights in the age of HIV/AIDS. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Anthropological Association Child Interest Group, Charleston, SC.

  • Christian, C. L., McRoy, R. G., Grotevant, H. D., & Bryant, C. M. (1997). Grief resolution of birthmothers in confidential, time-limited mediated, ongoing mediated, and fully disclosed adoptions. Adoption Quarterly, 1, 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comisión Pro-convención sobre los Derechos del Niño. (1996). Entre el olvido y laesperanza: La niñez de Guatemala [Between negligence and hope: Childhoodin Guatemala]. Guatemala City, Guatemala: Editorial HIGSA GALA.

  • Congreso de la República de Guatemala (2007). Decreto Número 77-2007. Retrieved from http://www.cna.gob.gt/doc/58267%20DECRETO%20DEL%20CONGRESO%2077-2007.pdf.

  • Council on Accreditation (COA) (2007). Hague accreditation and approval standards. New York, NY: Author. Retrieved from http://www.coanet.org/files/Hague_Accreditation_and_Approval_Standards.pdf.

  • Cushman, L. F., Kalmuss, D., & Namerow, P. B. (1997). Openness in adoption: Experiences and social psychological outcomes among birth mothers. Marriage and Family Review, 25, 7–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degeling, J. (2010). The special commission on the 1993 Hague Intercountry Adoption Convention. Ontario Adoption Summit, Waterloo University, Canada. Retrieved from http://adoptionsummit.uwaterloo.ca/documents/TheSpecialCommissionmeetingonthe1993HagueIntercountryAdoption.pdf.

  • Dickens, J. (2009). Social policy approaches to intercountry adoption. International Social Work, 52, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, S. (2009). The missing link: A social orphan protocol to the United Nations convention on the rights of the child. Suffolk University Law School, Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper, 09–02–2008. Retrieved July 01, 2010, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1136879.

  • Dolgin, G. (Producer), Dolgin, G., & Franco, V. (Directors). (2002). Daughter from Danang. [Documentary film.] United States: American Experience and the Independent Television Service in association with the National Asian American Communication Association.

  • Ennew, J. (2005). Prisoners of childhood: Orphans and economic dependency. In J. Qvortrup (Ed.), Studies of modern childhood: Society, agency and culture (pp. 128–146). London, UK: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethiopian Ministry of Health and Federal HIV and AIDS Prevention and Control Office. (2008). Single Point HIV prevalence estimate document. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia French Central Authority, Service de l’Adoption Internationale. Retrieved from http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/fr/actions-france_830/adoption-internationale_2605/index.html.

  • Fadare, J. O., & Porteri, C. (2010). Informed consent in human subject research: A comparison of current international and Nigerian guidelines. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 5(1), 67–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fessler, A. (2006). The girls who went away: The hidden history of women who surrendered children for adoption in the decades before Roe v. Wade. New York, NY: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca, C. (2004). The circulation of children in a Brazilian working-class neighborhood: A local practice in a globalized world. In F. Bowie (Ed.), Cross-cultural approaches to adoption (pp. 165–181). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freundlich, M. (2000). Adoption and ethics: The market forces in adoption. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, D. N., & Weil, M. (2010). Community practice skills: Local to global perspectives. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, J. L., Wilson, S. L., & Schnell, A. M. (2009). Foster parents as a critical link and resource in international adoptions from Guatemala. Adoption Quarterly, 12, 59–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giesbrecht, T. G. (2011). Protecting the integrity of international adoptions through education of birth families prior to consent signing. Presented at the meeting of the Society for Cross-Cultural Research, Charleston, SC.

  • Graff, E. J. (2010). The baby business. Democracy: A journal of ideas, 17 Retrieved from http://www.democracyjournal.org/17/6757.php.

  • Gresham, K., Nackerud, L., & Risler, E. (2004). Intercountry adoption from Guatemala and the United States: A comparative policy analysis. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 1(3/4), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groza, V., Ileana, D., & Irwin, I. (1999). A peacock or a crow? Stories, interviews and commentaries on Romanian adoptions. South Euclid, OH: Willes e-press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, A., & Midgley, J. O. (2004). Social policy for development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, S. (2010). Dreaming a world: Korean birth mothers tell their stories. St. Paul, MN: Yeong & Yeong Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, C. J., Pennell, J., & Weil, M. (2002). Family group conferencing: Evaluation guidelines. Englewood, CO: American Humane Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Högbacka, R. (2010). ‘At the end of the day it’s my child’—in(ter)country adoption as experienced by South African birth mothers. Presented at the International Conference on Adoption Research (ICAR3), Leiden, The Netherlands.

  • Hollingsworth, L. D. (2003). International adoption among families in the United States: Considerations of social justice. Social Work, 48(2), 209–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hollingsworth, L. D. (2008). Commentary: Does the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption address the protection of adoptees’ cultural identity? And should it? Social Work, 53(4), 377–379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Intercountry Adoption Act of 2000, PL. 106–279,114 Stat. 825. (2000).

  • International Committee of the Red Cross. (2010). Haiti earthquake: No effort must be spared in reuniting children with their families. Retrieved February 25, 2010, from http://www.icrc.org/web/eng/siteeng0.nsf/htmlall/haiti-earthquake-interview-020210.

  • International Social Service [ISS]. (2010). Earthquake in Haiti: Intercountry adoption cases. Retrieved from http://www.iss-ssi.org/2009/assets/files/news/haiti_position%20CIR_ENG.pdf.

  • Jacobs, B., Roffenbender, J., Collmann, J., Cherry, K., Bitsói, L. L., Bassett, K., & Evans, C. H., Jr. (2010). Bridging the divide between genomic science and indigenous peoples. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 38(3), 684–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joe, B. (1978). In defense of intercountry adoption. The Social Service Review, 52(1), 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. (2004). Wanting a daughter, needing a son: Abandonment, adoption, and orphanage care in China. St. Paul, MN: Yeong & Yeong Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K., Banghan, H., & Liyao, W. (1998). Infant abandonment and adoption in China. Population and Development Review, 24(3), 469–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson Butterfield, A. K., & Alemu, T. (2006). Adoption in Africa. In K. S. Stolley & V. L. Bullough (Eds.), The Praeger handbook of adoption (Vol. 1, pp. 66–70). New York, NY: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. K., Edwards, R. L., & Puwak, H. (2003). Foster care and adoption policy in Romania: Suggestions for international intervention. Child Welfare, LXXII(5), 489–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogstad, D. J., Diop, S., Diallo, A., Mzayek, F., Keating, J., Koita, O. A., et al. (2010). Informed consent in international research: The rational for different approaches. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 83, 743–747.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, D., & Reese, A. (2010). More on the “Baby Business:” Comments on responses. Retrieved from http://www.brandeis.edu/investigate/gender/adoption/expertsrespond_CAP.html#CAP2.

  • Leinaweaver, J. B. (2008). The circulation of children: Kinship, adoption, and morality in Andean Peru. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liss, M. B., & McKinley-Pace, M. J. (1999). Best interests of the child: New twists on an old theme. In R. Roesch, S. D. Hart, & J. R. P. Ogloff (Eds.), Psychology and the law. The state of the discipline (pp. 339–368). New York, NY: Plenum Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lykes, M. B. (1989). Dialogue with Guatemalan Indian women: Critical perspectives on constructing collaborative research. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Representations: Social constructions of gender (pp. 167–185). Amityville, NY: Baywood Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, K. (2006). Globalization and social work. International and local implications. British Journal of Social Work, 36, 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maskew, T. (2010). Implementing your recommendations: Best practices for maximum impact. Ontario Adoption Summit. Waterloo, Canada: Waterloo University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masson, J. (2001). Intercountry adoption: A global problem or a global solution? Journal of International Affairs, 55(1), 141–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, L. (2007). International adoption and the Hague Convention: Does implementation of the convention protect the best interests of children? Whittier Journal of Child and Family Advocacy, 361, 368–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezmur, B. (2008). From Angelina (to Madonna) to Zoe’s Ark: What are the “A–Z” lessons for intercountry adoptions in Africa. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 23(2), 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezmur, B. D. (2009). Intercountry adoption as a measure of last resort in Africa: Advancing the rights of a child rather than a right to a child. Sur International Journal on Human Rights, 6, 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morales, N., & Rodas, F. (2006). Disturbios: 1 muerto y 28 casas quemadas [Disturbances: 1 dead and 28 houses burned]. Prensa Libre, retrieved from http://linchamientos.blogspot.com/2006/10/disturbios-1-muerto-y-28-casas.html.

  • MSNBC.com News Services. (2010). Many children taken by Americans not orphans (3 Feb). World News. Accessed 14 Feb, 2010, at http://www.msnbc.msn.com/ id/35221007/.

  • Nakkash, R., Makhoul, J., & Afifi, R. (2009). Obtaining informed consent: Observations from community research with refugee and impoverished youth. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35, 638–643. doi:10.1136/jme.2008.028936.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • New York Times (2010). Room for debate: Haiti’s children and the adoption question. Retrieved from http://roomfordebate.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/01/haitis-children-and-the-adoption-question/.

  • Ngabonziza, D. (1991). Moral and political issues facing relinquishing countries. Adoption & Fostering, 15, 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (1999). Sex and social justice. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyserman, D., Coon, H. M., & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pace, C., Emanuel, E. J., Chuenyam, C. D., Bebcuk, J. D., Wendler, J. A., Tavel, J. A., et al. (2005). The quality of informed consent in a clinical research study in Thailand. IRB: Ethics and Human Research, 27, 9–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pardasani, M., Chazin, R., & Fortinsky, L. (2010). The Orphans International Tanzania (OIT) family care model: Strengthening networks and empowering families. Journal of HIV/AIDS & Social Services, 9, 305–321. doi:10.1080/15381501.2010.502811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parents for Ethical Adoption Reform (PEAR). (2010). PEAR’s response to “The baby business.” Available from http://pear-now.blogspot.com/search?q=Paper.

  • Ritvo, J. (Producer), Raizman, D., & Ritvo, J. (Directors). (2008). One family: An Ethiopian adoption. USA: 123 Main Productions.

  • Reichert, E. (2003). Social work and human rights: A foundation for policy and practice. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roby, J. L. (2004). Understanding sending country’s traditions and policies in international adoptions: Avoiding cultural and legal pitfalls. Journal of Law and Family Studies, 303, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roby, J. L. (2007). From rhetoric to best practice: Children’s rights in intercountry adoption. Children’s Legal Rights Journal, 27(3), 48–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roby, J. L., & Ife, J. (2009). Human rights, politics, and intercountry adoption: An examination of two sending countries. International social work, 52, 661–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roby, J., & Matsumura, S. (2002). If I give you my child, aren’t we family? A study of birthmothers participating in Marshall Islands–U.S. adoptions. Adoption Quarterly, 5(4), 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roby, J. L., & Shaw, S. A. (2006). The African orphan crisis and intercountry adoption. Social Work, 51(3), 199–210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roby, J. L., Wyatt, J., & Pettys, G. (2005). Openness in international adoptions: A study of U.S. parents who adopted children from the Marshall Islands. Adoption Quarterly, 8(3), 47–71. doi:10.1300/J145v08n02_03.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotabi, K. S. (2008). Intercountry adoption baby boom prompts new U.S. standards. Immigration Law Today, 27(1), 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotabi, K. S. (2009). Guatemala City: Hunger protests amid allegations of child kidnapping and adoption fraud. Social Work and Society News Magazine. Available from http://www.socmag.net/?p=540.

  • Rotabi, K. S. (2010). From Guatemala to Ethiopia: Shifts in intercountry adoption leaves Ethiopia vulnerable for child sales and other unethical practices. Social Work and Society News Magazine. Available from http://www.socmag.net/?p=615.

  • Rotabi, K. S. (in press). Intercountry adoption. In Healy, L. M., & Link, R. J. (Eds.). Handbook of international social work. London: Oxford University Press.

  • Rotabi, K. S., & Bergquist, K. J. S. (2010). Vulnerable children in the aftermath of Haiti’s earthquake of 2010: A call for sound policy and processes to prevent international child sales and theft. Journal of Global Social Work Practice. Retrieved from http://www.globalsocialwork.org/vol3no1/Rotabi.html.

  • Rotabi, K. S., & Bunkers, K. M. (2008). Intercountry adoption reform based on the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption: An update on Guatemala in 2008. Social Work and Society News Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.socmag.net/?tag=adoption.

  • Rotabi, K. S., & Gibbons, J. L. (2009). Editorial. International Social Work, 52, 571–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotabi, K. S., & Morris, A. W. (2007). Adoption of Guatemalan children: Impending changes under the Hague Convention for Intercountry Adoption. Social Work and Society News Magazine. Retrieved from http://www.socmag.net/?p=171.

  • Rotabi, K. S., Morris, A. W., & Weil, M. O. (2008). International child adoption in a post-conflict society: A multi-systemic assessment of Guatemala. Journal of Intergroup Relations, XXXIV(2), 9–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. S. (1983). Intercountry adoption and policy issues. Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 15(3), 49–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selman, P. (2002). Intercountry adoption in the new millennium: The ‘quiet migration’ revisited. Population Research and Policy Review, 21, 205–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selman, P. (2006). Trends in intercountry adoption 1998–2004: Analysis of data from 20 receiving countries. Journal of Population Research, 23(2), 183–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selman, P. (2009). The rise and fall of intercountry adoption in the 21st century. International Social Work, 52, 575–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selman, P. (2010). Recent trends in intercountry adoption. Ontario Adoption Summit, Waterloo University, Waterloo, Canada. Retrieved from http://adoptionsummit.uwaterloo.ca/documents/01.SELMAN.SUMMIT.REVISED.pdf.

  • Singer, P. (2002). One world: The ethics of globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolin, D. M. (2004). Intercountry adoption as child trafficking. Valparaiso Law Review, 3(2), 281–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolin, D. M. (2005). The two faces of intercountry adoption: The significance of the Indian adoption scandals. Seton Hall Law Review, 35(2), 403–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolin, D. M. (2006). Child laundering: How the intercountry adoption system legitimizes and incentivizes the practices of buying, trafficking, kidnapping, and stealing children. Wayne Law Review, 52(113), 113–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolin, D. M. (2007). Intercountry adoption and poverty: A human rights analysis. Capital University Law Review, 36, 413–453. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/david_smolin/5.

  • Smolin, D. M. (2008). Child laundering and the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption: The future and past of intercountry adoptions. University of Louisville Law Review, 48, 441–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terre des Hommes & UNICEF (Co-producers), & Sylvain, S-A. (Director) (2010). Paper Orphans [Documentary film]. UK: Image Ark Pvt. LTD.

  • The Hague Conference on Private International Law. (1993). The Hague Convention on protection of children and co-operation in respect of Intercountry Adoption (1993). Retrieved from www.hcch.net/index_en.php?act=conventions.pdf&cid=69.

  • The Hague Conference on Private International Law. (2008). The implementation and operation of the 1993 Hague Intercountry Adoption Convention, guide to good practice (p. 15). Guide No.1. Family Law. Bristol, UK: Author.

  • Triseliotis, J. (2000). Intercountry adoption: Global trade or global gift? Adoption & Fostering, 24(2), 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNAIDS, UNICEF & USAID. (2004). Children on the brink. New York, NY: UNICEF. Available from www.unicef.org/publications/index_22212.html.

  • United Nations General Assembly (2010). Sixty-fifth session, Third Committee: Promotion and protection of the right of children. Agenda Item 64, A/C.3/65/L.21/Rev.1, 18 November 2010, New York, NY.

  • United States Department of State Office of Children’s Issues. (2010). Adoption alert: Guatemala. Available from http://adoption.state.gov/news/guatemala.html.

  • United States Department of State Office of Children’s Issues. (n. d.). Accredited adoption providers. Available from http://www.adoption.state.gov/hague/agency4.php?q=0&q1=&q2=0&q4=0&q5=0&dirfl d = 01.

  • Vonk, M. E., Sims, P. J., & Nackerud, L. (1999). Political and personal aspects of intercountry adoption of Chinese children in the United States. Families in Society, 80, 496–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, M. O., & Baden, A. L. (2005). Birth parents in adoption: Research, practice, and counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 33, 13–50. doi:10.1177/0011000004265961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yemm, L. M. (2010). International adoption and the “best interests” of the child: Reality and reactionism in Romania and Guatemala. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 9, 555–574.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Work, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 842027, USA

    Karen Smith Rotabi

  2. Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, 63103, USA

    Judith L. Gibbons

Authors
  1. Karen Smith Rotabi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Judith L. Gibbons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Smith Rotabi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rotabi, K.S., Gibbons, J.L. Does the Hague Convention on Intercountry Adoption Adequately Protect Orphaned and Vulnerable Children and Their Families?. J Child Fam Stud 21, 106–119 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9508-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9508-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation