Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Significant variables for the conservation of mountain invertebrates

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conserving biodiversity on mountains holds particular challenges, with topographic species beta diversity being high. In turn, conserving mountain biodiversity in the heart of a biodiversity hotspot, with intense urbanization on its lower slopes, poses further challenges. We investigate here an iconic mountain at the southern tip of Africa, which is under multiple human pressures, while receiving much conservation attention. We sought here some general principles to guide conservation management of this and other similar mountains. Our focal organisms were surface-active invertebrates, as they are abundant, diverse, and environmentally sensitive at point localities. We show that vegetation structure and elevation were the most important environmental variables determining this diversity. Type of fynbos vegetation, proximity of forest to a river, aspect, and abundance of the alien Argentine ant Linepithema humile, had no significant influence. Suburban woodland species richness and abundance had a non-significant difference to that of natural forest. Fynbos had high species beta diversity of invertebrates, suggesting that large areas of this dominant vegetation type should be conserved. However, many specialist and highly local endemic species were in forest, highlighting the irreplaceability of forest habitats. Such a mountain, with its complex topography, requires total protection, as there is no room for loss of any part of the mountain. We emphasize that, while the upper slope and summit are well protected, the lower slopes are in need of urgent attention, a situation which mirrors that in Europe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abensperg-Traun M, Steven D (1995) The effects of pitfall trap diameter on ant species richness (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and species composition of the catch in a semi-arid eucalypt woodland. Aust J Ecol 20:282–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axmacher JC, Holtmann G, Scheuermann L, Brehm G, Muller-Hohenstein K, Fiedler K (2004) Diversity of geometrid moths (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) along an Afrotropical elevational rainforest transect. Divers Distrib 10:293–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgelt A, New TR (2006) Pitfall trapping for ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in mesic Australia: what is the best trapping period? J Insect Conserv 10:75–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan KEC, Majer JD, Moir ML (2005) Refining sampling protocols for inventorying invertebrate biodiversity: influence of drift-fence length and pitfall trap diameter on spiders. J Arachnol 33:681–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chazdon RL, Colwell RK, Denslow JS, Guariguata MR (1998) Species richness of woody regeneration in primary and secondary rainforests of northeastern Costa Rica. In: Dallmeier F, Comiskey JA (eds) Forest biodiversity research, monitoring and modelling: conceptual background and old world case studies. Pathenon, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR, Warwick RM (2001) Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole FR, Medeiros AC, Loope LL, Zuehlke WW (1992) Effects of the Argentine ant on arthropod fauna of Hawaiian high-elevation shrubland. Ecology 73:1313–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK (2006) EstimateS 8.0.0. http://viceroy.eeb.uconn.edu/EstimateS

  • Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos Trans R Soc B 345:101–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cowling RM, Macdonald IAW, Simmons MT (1996) The Cape Peninsula, South Africa: physiographical, biological and historical background to an extraordinary hot-spot of biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 5:527–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Kock AE, Giliomee JH (1989) A survey of the Argentine ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Mayr), (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in South Africa fynbos. J Entomol Soc S Afr 52:157–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebeyehu S, Samways MJ (2006a) Topographic heterogeneity plays a crucial role for grasshopper diversity in a southern African megadiversity hotspot. Biodivers Conserv 15:231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebeyehu S, Samways MJ (2006b) Conservation refugium value of a large mesa for grasshoppers in South Africa. Biodivers Conserv 15:717–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertsema H, Owen CR (2007) Notes on the habitat and adult behaviour of three red-listed Colophon spp. (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. J Insect Conserv 11:43–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giller S (1996) The diversity of soil communities, the ‘poor man’s tropical rain forest’. Biodivers Conserv 5:135–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamer ML (1998) Checklist of South African millipedes. Annal Natal Mus 39:11–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer ML, Slotow RH (2002) Conservation application of existing data for South African millipedes (Diplopoda). Afr Entomol 10:29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer ML, Samways MJ, Ruhberg H (1997) A review of the Onychophora of South Africa, with discussion of their conservation. Ann Natal Mus 38:283–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin JW, Hilbe J (2007) Generalized linear models and extensions, 2nd edn. Stata Press, College Station, Texas, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Helme NA, Trinder-Smith TH (2006) The endemic flora of the Cape Peninsula, South Africa. S Afr J Bot 72:205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hortal J, Borges PAV, Gaspar C (2006) Evaluating the performance of species richness estimators: sensitivity to sample grain size. J Anim Ecol 75:274–287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Human KG, Gordon DM (1997) Effects of Argentine ants on invertebrate biodiversity in northern California. Conserv Biol 11:1242–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human KG, Weiss S, Weiss A, Sandler B, Gordon DM (1998) Effects of abiotic factors on the distribution and activity of the invasive Argentine ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environ Entomol 27:822–833

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotze DJ, Samways MJ (1999a) Invertebrate conservation at the interface between the grassland matrix and natural Afromontane forest fragments. Biodivers Conserv 8:1339–1363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotze D, Samways M (1999b) Support for the multi-taxa approach in biodiversity assessment, as shown by epigaeic invertebrates in an Afromontane forest archipelago. J Insect Conserv 3:125–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lach L (2008) Argentine ants displace floral arthropods in a biodiversity hotspot. Divers Distrib 14:281–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence BA (1931) The Harvest-spiders (Opiliones) of South Africa. Ann S Afr Mus 29:341–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino MV (2001) Elevation gradients of species-density: historical and prospective views. Global Ecol Biogeogr 10:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell S, Hamer M, Slotow R, Herbert D (2007) Assessment of congruency across invertebrate taxa and taxonomic levels to identify potential surrogates. Biol Conserv 139:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy ED (1990) The distribution of insects along elevational gradients. Oikos 58:313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch MA (1998) The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biol Rev 73:181–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny V, Basset Y (2000) Rare species in communities of tropical insect herbivores: pondering the mystery of singletons. Oikos 89:564–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson DM (1991) A comparison of the efficacy of litter sifting and pitfall traps for sampling leaf litter ants (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) in a tropical wet forest, Costa-Rica. Biotropica 23:166–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson DM (1994) The distribution of leaf-litter invertebrates along a neotropical altitudinal gradient. J Trop Ecol 10:129–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MW (1993) Putting things in even better order—the advantages of canonical correspondence-analysis. Ecology 74:2215–2230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paoletti MG, Bressan M (1996) Soil invertebrates as bioindicators of human disturbance. Crit Rev Plant Sci 15:21–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Picker MD, Samways MJ (1996) Faunal diversity and endemicity of the Cape Peninsula, South Africa—a first assessment. Biodivers Conserv 5:591–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prendini L (2005) Scorpion diversity and distribution in southern Africa: pattern and process. In: Huber BA, Sinclair BJ, Lampe K-H (eds) African biodiversity: molecules, organisms, ecosystems. Springer, Amsterdam, pp 25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2008) Conservation of invertebrate biodiversity on a mountain in a global biodiversity hotspot, Cape Floral Region. Biodivers Conserv 17:3027–3043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2009a) Recovery of invertebrate diversity in a rehabilitated city landscape mosaic in the heart of a biodiversity hotspot. Landsc Urban Plann 93:54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2009b) Conservation of the insect assemblages of the Cape Peninsula biodiversity hotspot. J Insect Conserv 13:627–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratsirarson H, Robertson HG, Picker MD, van Noort S (2002) Indigenous forests versus exotic eucalypt and pine plantations: a comparison of leaf-litter invertebrate communities. Afr Entomol 10:93–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohr JR, Mahan CG, Kim KC (2007) Developing a monitoring program for invertebrates: guidelines and a case study. Conserv Biol 21:422–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Alcaraz E, Avila JM (2000) Effect of elevation and type of habitat on the abundance and diversity of Scarabaeoid dung beetle (Scarabaeoidea) assemblages in a Mediterranean area from Southern Iberian Peninsula. Zool Stud 39:351–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ (1989) Taxon turnover in Odonata across a 3000 m altitudinal gradient in southern Africa. Odonatologica 18:263–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ (1990) Land forms and winter refugia in the conservation of montane grasshoppers in southern Africa. Conserv Biol 4:375–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ (2006) National red list of South African Odonata. Odonatologica 35:341–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Sergio F, Pedrini P (2007) Biodiversity gradients in the Alps: the overriding importance of elevation. Biodivers Conserv 16:3243–3254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder BA, Draney ML, Sierwald P (2006) Development of an optimal sampling protocol for millipedes (Diplopoda). J Insect Conserv 10:277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens GC (1992) The elevational gradient in altitudinal range—an extension of Rapoport latitudinal rule to altitude. Am Nat 140:893–911

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stiller M (2002) Leafhopper (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) diversity in the fynbos biome of South Africa. Denisia 04. Neue Folge 179:379–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Stork NE, Eggleton P (1992) Invertebrates as determinants and indicators of soil quality. Am J Altern Agric 7:38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2002) CANOCO reference manual and user’s guide to canoco for windows: software for canonical community ordination (Version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Tropek R, Spitzer L, Konvicka M (2008) Two groups of epigaeic arthropods differ in colonising of piedmont quarries: the necessity of multi-taxa and life-history traits approaches in the monitoring studies. Community Ecol 9:177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser BG, Hockey PAR (2002) Breeding behaviour and performance of the Knysna Warbler Bradypterus sylvaticus on the Cape Peninsula, South Africa. Ostrich 73:83–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver JC (1995) Indicator species and scale of observation. Conserv Biol 9:939–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock BA (2005) Pitfall trapping in ecological studies. In: Leather S (ed) Insect sampling in forests ecosystems. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Table Mountain Fund and National Research Foundation provided financial support, while South African National Parks and the City of Cape Town gave access to sites. Corey Bazelet, Carmen Boonzaaier, Ansie Dippenaar-Schoeman, Henk Geertsema, Charles Haddad, Michelle Hamer, Mark Harvey and Lorenzo Prendini kindly provided species identifications.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Private Bag X1, Matieland, 7602, South Africa

    J. S. Pryke & M. J. Samways

Authors
  1. J. S. Pryke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. J. Samways
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. S. Pryke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pryke, J.S., Samways, M.J. Significant variables for the conservation of mountain invertebrates. J Insect Conserv 14, 247–256 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-009-9253-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-009-9253-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation