Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A product configuration approach based on online data

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Product design is greatly influenced by product configuration processes and can be suspended or result in failure if the configuration process consumes too much time, cost, or resources; such results can also occur if the end products manufactured based on configurations failed to satisfy customers. Therefore, a configuration approach that saves time, cost, and resources, as well as highly satisfies customers, is necessary and significant. Against the background, this study proposes a configuration approach that uses online data to map customer requirements into product configurations, including the product transaction data and customer review data. The approach generates feasible configurations initially by using transaction data. Next, the approach produces training samples based on positive customer review data. Lastly, the intelligent classifier is trained by the training samples and is utilized to select final configurations from feasible configurations to satisfy customer requirements. A real-world design case of smartphones is used to illustrate the proposed approach, and the results indicate that this approach saves time, cost, and resources and is competitive compared with other product configuration methods. This novel configuration approach provides designers and companies with a superior and efficient method to complete configuration tasks with competiveness and low risk and adds value to the usability and analysis of online data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aldanondo, M., & Vareilles, E. (2008). Configuration for mass customization: How to extend product configuration towards requirements and process configuration. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 19(5), 521–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, H., Hadzic, T., & Pisinger, D. (2010). Interactive cost configuration over decision diagrams. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 37, 99–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, P. A., & Mougenot, C. (2016). Towards user empowerment in product design: A mixed reality tool for interactive virtual prototyping. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-016-1276-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T. B., & Milivojevich, A. (2016). Quality by experimental design. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambria, E., Schuller, B., Xia, Y., & Havasi, C. (2013). New avenues in opinion mining and sentiment analysis. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 28(2), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlgren, L. (2013). Identifying latent needs: Towards a competence perspective on attractive quality creation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(11–12), 1347–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlgren, L., Elmquist, M., & Rauth, I. (2014). Design thinking: Exploring values and effects from an innovation capability perspective. The Design Journal, 17(3), 403–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carulli, M., Bordegoni, M., & Cugini, U. (2013). An approach for capturing the voice of the customer based on virtual prototyping. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 24(5), 887–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemons, E. K., Gao, G., & Hitt, L. M. (2006). When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: A study of craft beer industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(2), 149–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker, R., & Trusov, M. (2010). Estimating aggregate consumer preferences from online product reviews. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(4), 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • der Ryn, S. V. (2013). Opportunities for empathic design. In S. V. der Ryn & F. Allen (Eds.), Design for an empathic world (pp. 101–120). Washington, D.C.: Island Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dopico, J. R. R., Dorado, R., & Pazos, A. (2008). Encyclopedia of artificial intelligence. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dou, R., Zhang, Y., & Nan, G. (2016a). Customer-oriented product collaborative customization based on design iteration for tablet personal computer configuration. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 99, 474–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou, R., Zong, C., & Li, M. (2016b). An interactive genetic algorithm with the interval arithmetic based on hesitation and its application to achieve customer collaborative product configuration design. Applied Soft Computing, 38, 384–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou, R., Zong, C., & Nan, G. (2016c). Multi-stage interactive genetic algorithm for collaborative product customization. Knowledge-Based Systems, 92, 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou, R., Zhang, Y., & Nan, G. (2017). Iterative product design through group opinion evolution. International Journal of Production Research, 55(13), 3886–3905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engler, T. H., Winter, P., & Schulz, M. (2015). Understanding online product ratings: A customer satisfaction model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 27, 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fallman, D., & Stolterman, E. (2010). Establishing criteria of rigour and relevance in interaction design research. Digital Creativity, 21(4), 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. (2013). Techniques and applications for sentiment analysis. Communications of the ACM, 56(4), 82–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C., & Schreier, M. (2011). Customer empowerment in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haug, A., Hvam, L., & Mortensen, N. H. (2012). Definition and evaluation of product configurator development strategies. Computers in Industry, 63(5), 471–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2012.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hienerth, C., Lettl, C., & Keinz, P. (2014). Synergies among producer firms, lead users, and user communities: The case of the Lego producer-user ecosystem. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 848–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjort, K., Lantz, B., Ericsson, D., & Gattorna, J. (2013). Customer segmentation based on buying and returning behaviour. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 43(10), 852–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, M. H., Tsai, K. H., & Hultink, E. J. (2006). The relationships between resource configurations and launch strategies in Taiwan’s IC design industry: An exploratory study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(3), 259–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jannach, D., & Zanker, M. (2013). Modeling and solving distributed configuration problems: A CSP-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 25(3), 603–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiao, Y., Yang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2017). An integration model for generating and selecting product configuration plans. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-017-1324-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, J., Ji, P., & Gu, R. (2016). Identifying comparative customer requirements from product online reviews for competitor analysis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 49, 61–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kangale, A., Kumar, S. K., Naeem, M. A., Williams, M., & Tiwari, M. K. (2016). Mining consumer reviews to generate ratings of different product attributes while producing feature-based review-summary. International Journal of Systems Science, 47(13), 3272–3286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karkare, V. Y., & Gupta, S. R. (2013). A survey on product evaluation using opinion mining. International Journal of Computer Science and Applications, 6(2), 306–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keogh, E., & Mueen, A. (2011). Curse of dimensionality. In C. Sammut & G. I. Webb (Eds.), Encyclopedia of machine learning (pp. 257–258). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. (2014). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, A., & Smith, M. (2007). Data mining in design of products and production systems. Annual Reviews in Control, 31(1), 147–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusiak, A., Smith, M. R., & Song, Z. (2007). Planning product configurations based on sales data. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man & Cybernetics, Part C: Applications & Reviews, 37(4), 602–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le, H. N., Wynn, D. C., & Clarkson, P. J. (2012). Impacts of concurrency, iteration, design review, and problem complexity on design project lead time and error generation. Concurrent Engineering-Research and Applications, 20(1), 55–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leon, H. C. M., Farris, J. A., & Letens, G. (2013). Improving product development performance through iteration front-loading. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 60(3), 552–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, P. (2013). Beyond Kansei engineering: The emancipation of Kansei design. International Journal of Design, 7(2), 83–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Chen, J., & Shang, Y. (2016). An RVM-based model for assessing the failure probability of slopes along the Jinsha river, close to the Wudongde dam site. China. Sustainability, 9(1), 32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J., & Seepersad, C. C. (2007). Empathic lead users: The effects of extraordinary user experiences on customer needs analysis and product redesign. In Proceedings of 19th international conference on design theory and methodology, 3, 289–296. https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2007-35302.

  • Lin, K. Y., Chien, C. F., & Kerh, R. (2016). Unison framework of data-driven innovation for extracting user experience of product design of wearable devices. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 99, 487–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Hu, Z., Mian, A., Tian, H., & Zhu, X. (2014). A new user similarity model to improve the accuracy of collaborative filtering. Knowledge-Based Systems, 56, 156–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J. (2015). A simulation-based method to evaluate the impact of product architecture on product evolvability. Research in Engineering Design, 26(4), 355–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattelmäki, T., Vaajakallio, K., & Koskinen, I. (2014). What happened to empathic design? Design Issues, 30(1), 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagamachi, M., & Lokman, A. M. (2016). Innovations of Kansei engineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Özgür, A., Özgür, L., & Güngör, L. (2005). Text categorization with class-based and corpus-based keyword selection. In P. Yolum, T. Güngör, F. Gürgen, & C. Özturan (Eds.), Computer and Information Sciences—ISCIS 2005 (pp. 606–615). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pal, M., & Foody, G. M. (2012). Evaluation of SVM, RVM and SMLR for accurate image classification with limited ground data. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 5(5), 1344–1355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., Lee, W., & Moon, I. C. (2015). Efficient extraction of domain specific sentiment lexicon with active learning. Pattern Recognition Letters, 56, 38–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., Sharp, H., & Rogers, Y. (2015). Interaction design: Beyond human-computer interaction (4th ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quigley, J. M., & Robertson, K. L. (2015). Configuration management: Theory, practice, and application (p. 2015). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Read, J., Pfahringer, B., Holmes, G., & Frank, E. (2011). Classifier chains for multi-label classification. Machine Learning, 85(3), 333–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, K. M., & Smith, M. L. (2013). The emergence of open development in a network society. In M. L. Smith & K. M. Reilly (Eds.), Open development: Networked innovations in international development (pp. 15–50). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saffer, D. (2009). Designing for interaction: Creating innovative applications and device (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: New Riders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieh, M. D., Yeh, Y. E., & Huang, C. L. (2016). Eliciting design knowledge from affective responses using rough sets and Kansei engineering system. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 7(1), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Z., & Kusiak, A. (2009). Optimising product configurations with a data-mining approach. International Journal of Production Research, 47(7), 1733–1751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolterman, E. (2008). The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripathy, A., Agrawal, A., & Rath, S. K. (2016). Classification of sentiment reviews using n-gram machine learning approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 57, 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ummer, N., Maheswari, U., Matsagar, V. A., & Varghese, K. (2014). Factors influencing design iteration with a focus on project duration. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30(1), 127–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallgarda, V., Winther, M., Morch, N., & Vizer, E. E. (2015). Temporal form in interaction design. International Journal of Design, 9(3), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Tseng, M. M. (2011a). Adaptive attribute selection for configurator design via shapley value. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis & Manufacturing, 25(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060410000624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Tseng, M. M. (2011b). Integrating comprehensive customer requirements into product design. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 60(1), 175–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Tseng, M. M. (2015). A Naïve Bayes approach to map customer requirements to product variants. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 26(3), 501–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Widodo, A., Kim, E. Y., Son, J. D., Yang, B. S., Tan, A. C., Gu, D. S., et al. (2009). Fault diagnosis of low speed bearing based on relevance vector machine and support vector machine. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(3), 7252–7261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynn, D. C., & Eckert, C. M. (2017). Perspectives on iteration in design and development. Research in Engineering Design, 28(2), 153–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. L. (2014). Product configuration: A review of the state-of-the-art and future research. International Journal of Production Research, 52(21), 6381–6398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziv-Av, A., & Reich, Y. (2005). SOS-Subjective objective system for generating optimal product concepts. Design Studies, 26(5), 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71571023), and by Graduate Research and Innovation Foundation of Chongqing, China (CYB17024).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

    Yao Jiao & Yu Yang

Authors
  1. Yao Jiao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yu Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiao, Y., Yang, Y. A product configuration approach based on online data. J Intell Manuf 30, 2473–2487 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1406-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1406-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation