Skip to main content
Log in

Quaternion-based Orientation Estimation Fusing a Camera and Inertial Sensors for a Hovering UAV

  • Published:
Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Orientation estimation in quadrotors is essential for low-level stability control and for high-levelnavigation and motion planning. This is usually carried out by fusing measurements from different sensorsincluding inertial sensor, magnetic compass, sonar, GPS, camera, etc. In indoor environments, the GPSsignal is not available and the Earth’s magnetic field is highly disturbed. In this work we present a newapproach for visual estimation of the yaw angle based on spectral features, and a fusion algorithm usingunit quaternions, both applied to a hovering quadrotor. The approach is based on an Inertial MeasurementUnit and a downward-looking camera, rigidly attached to the quadrotor. The fusion is performed by means of an Extended Kalman Filter with a double measurement update stage. The inertial sensors provideinformation for orientation estimation, mainly for roll and pitch angles, whereas the camera is used for measuring the yaw angle. A new method to integrate the yaw angle in the measurement update of the filteris also proposed, using an augmented measurement vector in order to avoid discontinuities in the filterinnovation vector. The proposed approach is evaluated with real data and compared with ground truthgiven by a Vicon system. Experimental results are presented for both the visual yaw angle estimationand the fusion with the inertial sensors, showing an improvement in orientation estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gupte, S., Mohandas, P.I.T., Conrad, J.M.: A survey of quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles. In: Southeastcon, 2012 Proceedings of IEEE, pp. 1–6 (2012)

  2. Brockers, R., Hummenberger, M., Weiss, S., Matthies, L.: Towards autonomous navigation of miniature uav. In: The IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops (2014)

  3. Li, B., Gallagher, T., Dempster, A.G., Rizos, C.: How feasible is the use of magnetic field alone for indoor positioning? In: International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), pp. 1–9 (2012)

  4. Angermann, M., Frassl, M., Doniec, M., Julian, B.J., Robertson, P.: Characterization of the indoor magnetic field for applications in localization and mapping. In: International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN), pp. 1–9 (2012)

  5. Bristeau, P.J., Callou, F., Vissiere, D., Petit, N.: The navigation and control technology inside the ar.drone micro uav. In: 18th IFACWorld Congress, pp. 1477–1484, Milano (2011)

  6. Simon, D.: Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H Infinity, and Nonlinear Approaches. Wiley-Interscience (2006)

  7. Seung-Min, O.: Multisensor fusion for autonomous uav navigation based on the unscented kalman filter with sequential measurement updates. In: IEEE Conference on Multisensor Fusion and Integration for Intelligent Systems (MFI), pp. 217–222 (2010)

  8. Sabatelli, S., Galgani, M., Fanucci, L., Rocchi, A.: A double-stage kalman filter for orientation tracking with an integrated processor in 9-d imu. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 62(3), 590–598 (March 2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Faugeras, O., Luong, Q.-T.: The geometry of multiple images: the laws that govern the formation of multiple images of a scene and some of their applications. MIT press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hartley, R., Zisserman, A.: Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaminski, J.Y., Shashua, A.: Multiple view geometry of general algebraic curves. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 56(3), 195– 219 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chantler, M.J., Jiahua, W.: Rotation invariant classification of 3d surface textures using photometric stereo and surface magnitude spectra. In: BMVC, pp. 1–10 (2000)

  13. Varma, M., Zisserman, A.: Classifying images of materials: Achieving viewpoint and illumination independence. In: Computer Vision. ECCV, pp. 255–271. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York (2002)

  14. Mundy, J.L., Zisserman, A., et al.: Geometric invariance in computer vision, Vol. 92. MIT press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Forsyth, D.A., Ponce, J.: Computer vision: a modern approach. Prentice Hall Professional Technical Reference (2002)

  16. Harris, C., Stephens, M.: A combined corner and edge detector. Alvey Vision Conf. 15, 50 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baker, S., Matthews, I.: Lucas-kanade 20 years on: A unifying framework: Part 1: The quantity approximated, the warp update rule, and the gradient descent approximation. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 56(3), 221–255 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Araguás, G., Sánchez, J., Canali, L.: Monocular visual odometry using features in the fourier domain. In VI Jornadas Argentinas de Robótica, Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina (2010)

  19. Fischler, M.A., Bolles, R.C.: Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM 24(6), 381–395 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuglin, C.D., Hines, D.C.: The phase correlation image alignment method. Proc. Int. Conf. on Cybernetics and Society 4, 163–165 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zitová, B., Flusser, J.: Image registrationmethods: a survey. Image Vis. Comput. 21(11), 977–1000 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Phillips, W.F., Hailey, C.E.: Review of attitude representations used for aircraft kinematics. J. Aircr. 38(4), 718–737 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nikolas, T., Roumeliotis, S.I.: Indirect Kalman filter for 3D attitude estimation. Technical Report 2005-002, University of Minnesota, Dept. of Comp. Sci. & Eng., (2005)

  24. Arulampalam, S., Maskell, S., Gordon, N., Clapp, T.: A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-gaussian bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans. on Signal Process. 50(2), 174–188 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sabatelli, S., Galgani, M., Fanucci, L., Rocchi, A.: A double stage kalman filter for sensor fusion and orientation tracking in 9d imu. In: IEEE on Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), pp. 1–5 (2012)

  26. Kuipers, J.B.: Quaternions and rotation sequences : a primer with applications to orbits, aerospace, and virtual reality. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee, G.H., Achtelik, M., Fraundorfer, F., Pollefeys, M., Siegwart, R.: A benchmarking tool for mav visual pose estimation. In: 11th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics & Vision (ICARCV), pp. 1541–1546 (2010)

  28. Kelly, A.: Linearized error propagation in odometry. Int. J. Robotics Res 23(2), 179–218 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nourani-Vatani, N., Roberts, J., Srinivasan, M.V.: Practical visual odometry for car-like vehicles. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. ICRA ’09, pp. 3551–3557 (2009)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gastón Araguás.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Araguás, G., Paz, C., Gaydou, D. et al. Quaternion-based Orientation Estimation Fusing a Camera and Inertial Sensors for a Hovering UAV. J Intell Robot Syst 77, 37–53 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-014-0092-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-014-0092-z

Keywords

Navigation