Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of morphological state of graphene on mechanical properties of nanocomposites

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the last decade, graphene has emerged as one of the best-performing reinforcement materials for nanocomposites. Incorporation of graphene into polymer results in a nanocomposite with a new microstructure responsible for its enhanced features. A morphological state of graphene flakes is one of the factors that govern formation of this microstructure. Studies showed that graphene oxide (GO) flakes can be found either as fully exfoliated or intercalated in polymer-based nanocomposites. While traditional parameters are commonly taken into consideration in theoretical assessment of properties of composites by means of micromechanical models, the morphological state is often ignored. This research aims to investigate the effect of morphological state of GO flakes on stiffness of nanocomposites with widely used micromechanical models, e.g. rule of mixtures, Hui–Shia and Halpin–Tsai. Pure sodium alginate and nanocomposites on its basis reinforced with 1.0 and 2.5 wt% GO were used in the study. Parameters required for modelling were quantified with microstructural characterisation. Micromechanical models were adapted to account for the morphological state of intercalation observed in the characterisation study. Tensile experiments were employed to assess the adopted models, and the effect matrix stiffness, GO thickness, spacing of intercalates as well as the Poisson’s ratio and stiffness of inter-flake polymer layers were studied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen MJ, Tung VC, Kaner RB (2010) Honeycomb carbon: a review of graphene. Chem Rev 110:132–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rafiee MA, Rafiee J, Wang Z, Song HH, Yu ZZ, Koratkar N (2009) Enhanced mechanical properties of nanocomposites at low graphene content. ACS Nano 3:3884–3890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li B, Zhong WH (2011) Review on polymer/graphite nanoplatelet nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 46:5595–5614. doi:10.1007/s10853-011-5572-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jang BZ, Zhamu A (2008) Processing of nanographene platelets (NGPs) and NGP nanocomposites: a review. J Mater Sci 43:5092–5101. doi:10.1007/s10853-008-2755-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hernandez Y, Nicolosi V, Lotya M, Blighe FM, Sun ZY, De S et al (2008) High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Nat Nanotechnol 3:563–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ionita M, Pandele MA, Iovu H (2013) Sodium alginate/graphene oxide composite films with enhanced thermal and mechanical properties. Carbohydr Polym 94:339–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee W, Jang S, Kim MJ, Myoung JM (2008) Interfacial interactions and dispersion relations in carbon-aluminium nanocomposite systems. Nanotechnology 19:285701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mortazavi B, Baniassadi M, Bardon J, Ahzi S (2013) Modeling of two-phase random composite materials by finite element, Mori-Tanaka and strong contrast methods. Compos Part B 45:1117–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hu KS, Kulkarni DD, Choi I, Tsukruk VV (2014) Graphene-polymer nanocomposites for structural and functional applications. Prog Polym Sci 39:1934–1972

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Padawer GE, Beecher N (1970) On strength and stiffness of planar reinforced plastic resins. Polym Eng Sci 10:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. May P, Khan U, O’Neill A, Coleman JN (2012) Approaching the theoretical limit for reinforcing polymers with graphene. J Mater Chem 22:1278–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yousefi N, Gudarzi MM, Zheng QB, Lin XY, Shen X, Jia JJ et al (2013) Highly aligned, ultralarge-size reduced graphene oxide/polyurethane nanocomposites: mechanical properties and moisture permeability. Compos Part A 49:42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Halpin JC, Kardos JL (1976) Halpin-Tsai equations—review. Polym Eng Sci 16:344–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang JJ, Huang Y, Zhang L, Wang Y, Ma YF, Guo TY et al (2009) Molecular-level dispersion of graphene into poly(vinyl alcohol) and effective reinforcement of their nanocomposites. Adv Funct Mater 19:2297–2302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kong JY, Choi MC, Kim GY, Park JJ, Selvaraj M, Han M et al (2012) Preparation and properties of polyimide/graphene oxide nanocomposite films with Mg ion crosslinker. Eur Polym J 48:1394–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu HH, Hou LC, Peng WW, Zhang Q, Zhang XX (2012) Fabrication and characterization of polyamide 6-functionalized graphene nanocomposite fiber. J Mater Sci 47:8052–8060. doi:10.1007/s10853-012-6695-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tandon GP, Weng GJ (1984) The effect of aspect ratio of inclusions on the elastic properties of unidirectionally aligned composites. Polym Compos 5:327–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Potts JR, Shankar O, Du L, Ruoff RS (2012) Processing-morphology-property relationships and composite theory analysis of reduced graphene oxide/natural rubber nanocomposites. Macromolecules 45:6045–6055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hui CY, Shia D (1998) Simple formulae for the effective moduli of unidirectional aligned composites. Polym Eng Sci 38:774–782

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bandla S, Hanan JC (2012) Microstructure and elastic tensile behavior of polyethylene terephthalate-exfoliated graphene nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 47:876–882. doi:10.1007/s10853-011-5867-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barrett JSF, Abdala AA, Srienc F (2014) Poly(hydroxyalkanoate) elastomers and their graphene nanocomposites. Macromolecules 47:3926–3941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahmoud WE (2011) Morphology and physical properties of poly(ethylene oxide) loaded graphene nanocomposites prepared by two different techniques. Eur Polym J 47:1534–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Edwards RS, Coleman KS (2013) Graphene synthesis: relationship to applications. Nanoscale 5:38–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Partoens B, Peeters FM (2006) From graphene to graphite: electronic structure around the K point. Phys Rev B 74:0754041–07540411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Luo JJ, Daniel IM (2003) Characterization and modeling of mechanical behavior of polymer/clay nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 63:1607–1616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Suk JW, Piner RD, An JH, Ruoff RS (2010) Mechanical properties of mono layer graphene oxide. ACS Nano 4:6557–6564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ribeiro ACF, Sobral AJFN, Simoes SMN, Barros MCF, Lobo VMM, Cabral AMTDPV et al (2011) Transport properties of aqueous solutions of sodium alginate at 298 15 K. Food Chem 125:1213–1218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Qian XD, Song L, Tai QL, Hu Y, Yuen RKK (2013) Graphite oxide/polyurea and graphene/polyurea nanocomposites: a comparative investigation on properties reinforcements and mechanism. Compos Sci Technol 74:228–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr Zhaoxia Zhou in Department of Materials at Loughborough University for her contribution to obtaining TEM micrographs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vadim V. Silberschmidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bayrak, O., Ionita, M., Demirci, E. et al. Effect of morphological state of graphene on mechanical properties of nanocomposites. J Mater Sci 51, 4037–4046 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9722-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-9722-0

Keywords

Navigation