Skip to main content
Log in

Reusable graphene oxide nanofibers for enhanced photocatalytic activity: a detailed mechanistic study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water pollution due to indiscriminate disposal of industrial dyes poses serious environmental hazards nationally and internationally. Some of the dyes are potentially carcinogenic and may induce mutagenicity and genotoxicity. Recently, graphene-based nanocomposite has attracted considerable interest for photocatalysis-based wastewater treatment. Here, we report the production of graphene-oxide-based hydrophobic PAN/GO nanofibers using electrospinning technique for photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine 6G dye under natural sunlight illumination. The synthesized nanofibers were characterized using X-ray diffraction, EDX, field emission scanning electron microscopy and FTIR spectroscopy. Dye removal efficiency was investigated by monitoring UV–Vis absorption intensity over time. Structural change in dye was studied using FTIR analysis. Kinetics of dye degradation reaction was monitored through pseudo-first-order and pseudo-second-order kinetics model. Effects of nanofiber weight and initial dye concentration on the degradation efficiency were investigated in detail. Reusability and stability of these synthesized nanofibers in dye solution have been studied using scanning electron microscopy and FTIR spectroscopy. A comparative study for dye degradation was also performed using TiO2-coated nanofibers under visible light and UV light illumination. These large-area reusable graphene oxide nanofibers provide a scalable and novel route for photocatalytic degradation of carcinogenic dyes from industrial water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kjellstrom T, Lodh M, McMichael T, Ranmuthugala G, Shrestha R, Kingsl S (2006) Air, water pollution: burden, strategies for control, ch. 43. In: Jamison DT, Breman JG, Measham AR et al (eds) Disease control priorities in developing countries, 2nd edn. World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yagub MT, Sen TK, AfrozeS Ang HM (2014) Dye and its removal from aqueous solution by adsorption: a review. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 209:172–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ratna P, Padhi BS (2012) Pollution due to synthetic dyes toxicity & carcinogenicity studies and remediation. Int J Environ Sci 3:940–955

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kaur S, Rani S, Mahajan RK (2013) Adsorption kinetics for the removal of hazardous dye congo red by biowaste materials as adsorbents. Aust J Chem 2013:12

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ajmal A, Majeed I, Malik RN, IdrissH Nadeem MA (2014) Principles and mechanisms of photocatalytic dye degradation on TiO2 based photocatalysts: a comparative overview. RSC Adv 4:37003–37026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li Y, Xiao H, Chen M, Song Z, Zhao Y (2014) Absorbents based on maleic anhydride-modified cellulose fibers/diatomite for dye removal. J Mater Sci 49:6696–6704. doi:10.1007/s10853-014-8270-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kant R (2012) Textile dyeing industry an environmental hazard. Nat Sci 4:22–26

    Google Scholar 

  8. The world health organization, http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/facts_figures/en/. Accessed on April 2016

  9. Garg VK, Gupta R, Yadav AB, Kumar R (2003) Dye removal from aqueous solution by adsorption on treated sawdust. Bioresour Technol 89:121–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta VK, Suhas S (2009) Application of low-cost adsorbents for dye removal—a review. J Environ Manag 90:2313–2342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Robinson T, McMullan G, Marchant R, Nigam P (2011) Remediation of dyes in textile effluent: a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative. Bioresour Technol 77:247–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shukla A, Zhang YH, Dubey P, Margrave JL, Shukla SS (2002) The role of sawdust in the removal of unwanted materials from water. J Hazard Mater 95:137–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mittal A, Gupta VK, Malviya A, Mittal J (2008) Process development for the batch and bulk removal and recovery of a hazardous, water-soluble azo dye (Metanil Yellow) by adsorption over waste materials (Bottom Ash and De-Oiled Soya). J Hazard Mater 151:821–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Akpan UG, Hameed BH (2009) Parameters affecting the photocatalytic degradation of dyes using TiO2 based photocatalysts: a review. J Hazard Mater 170:520–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen X, Zhang F, Wang Q, Han X, Li X, Liu J, Lin H, Qu F (2015) The synthesis of ZnO/SnO2 porous nanofibers for dye adsorption and degradation. Dalton Trans 44:3034–3042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang L, Diao S, Nie Y, Yan K, Liu N, Dai B, Xie Q, Reina A, Kong J, Liu Z (2011) Photocatalytic patterning and modification of graphene. J Am Chem Soc 133:2706–2713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li H, Bubeck C (2013) Photoreduction processes of graphene oxide and related applications. Macromol Res 21:290–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sutter PW, Flege JI, Sutter EA (2008) Epitaxial graphene on ruthenium. Nat Nanotechnol 7:406–411

    Google Scholar 

  19. Berger C, Song Z, Li X, Wu X, Brown N, Naud N, Mayou D, Li T, Hass J, Marchenkov AN, Conrad EW, First PN, de Heer WA (2006) Electronic confinement and coherence in patterned epitaxial graphene. Science 312:1191–1196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang D, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 306:666–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Stankovich S, Dikin DA, Piner RD, Kohlhaas KA, Kleinhammes A, Jia Y, Wu Y, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS (2007) Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide. Carbon 45:1558–1565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Georgakilas V, Otyepka M, Bourlinos AB, Chandra V, Kim N, Kemp KC, Hobza P, Zboril R, Kim KS (2012) Functionalization of graphene: covalent and non-covalent approaches, derivatives and applications. Chem Rev 112:6156–6214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang H, Maiyalagan T, Wang X (2012) Review on recent progress in nitrogen-doped graphene: synthesis, characterization, and its potential applications. Acs Catal 2:781–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiao S, Shen M, Guo R, Wang S, Shi X (2009) Immobilization of zerovalent iron nanoparticles into electrospun polymer nanofibers: synthesis, characterization, and potential environmental applications. J Phy Chem C 113:18062–18068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Singaravel GP, Hashaikeh R (2016) Fabrication of electrospun LTL zeolite fibers and their application for dye removal. J Mater Sci 51:1133–1141. doi:10.1007/s10853-015-9444-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Xiang Q, Cheng B, Yu J (2015) Graphene based photocatalysts for solar fuel generation. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 54:11350–11366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Xiang Q, Yu J (2013) Graphene-based photocatalysts for hydrogen generation. J Phys Chem Lett 4:753–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yang MQ, Xu YJ (2013) Selective photoredox using graphene-based composite photocatalysts. Phys Chem Chem Phys 15:19102–19118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fu D, Zhang L, Xie R, Xu H, Zhong Y, Sui X, Mao Z (2016) Fabrication of novel rGO/Bi 20 TiO 32 heterojunction for enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. J Photochem Photobiol A 329:18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roso M, Lorenzetti A, Boaretti C, Hrelja D, Modesti M (2015) Graphene/TiO2 based photo-catalysts on nanostructured membranes as a potential active filter media for methanol gas-phase degradation. Appl Catal B 176:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Garg B, Bisht T, Ling YC (2014) Graphene-based nanomaterials as heterogeneous acid catalysts: a comprehensive perspective. Molecules 19:14582–14614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Malwal D, Gopinath P (2016) Fabrication and applications of ceramic nanofibers in water remediation: a review. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 46:500–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Im JS, Kim MI, Lee YS (2008) Preparation of PAN-based electrospun nanofiber webs containing TiO2 for photocatalytic degradation. Mater Lett 62:3652–3655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Kubin RF, Fletcher AN (1983) Fluorescence quantum yields of some rhodamine dyes. J Lumin 27:455–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Selwyn JE, Steinfeld JI (1972) Aggregation of equilibriums of xanthene dyes. J Phys Chem 76:762–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Choyke PL, Alford R, Simpson HM, Duberman J, Craig Hill G, Ogawa M, Regino C, Kobayashi H (2009) Toxicity of organic fluorophores used in molecular imaging: literature review. Mol Imaging 8:341–354

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shahriary L, Athawale AA (2014) Graphene oxide synthesized by using modified hummers approach. Int J Renew Energy Environ Eng 2:58–63

    Google Scholar 

  38. Yan F, Huh P, Li L, Wang Y, Samuelson LA, Kumar J (2009) Photovoltaic performance enhancement in dye-sensitized solar cells with periodic surface relief structures. J Macromol Sci 46:1213–1216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wang Q, Du Y, Feng Q, Huang F, Lu K, Liu J, Wei Q (2013) Nanostructures and surface nanomechanical properties of polyacrylonitrile/graphene oxide composite nanofibers by electrospinning. J Appl Polym Sci 128:1152–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Malwal D, Gopinath P (2015) Fabrication and characterization of poly (ethylene oxide) templated nickel oxide nanofibers for dye degradation. Environ Sci Nano 2:78–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Daneshvar N, Salari D, Khataee AR (2003) Photocatalytic degradation of azo dye acid red 14 in water: investigation of the effect of operational parameter. J Photochem Photobiol A 157:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Asiri AM, Al-Amoudi MS, Al-Talhi TA, Al-Talhi AD (2011) Photodegradation of Rhodamine 6G and phenol red by nanosized TiO2 under solar irradiation. J Saudi Chem Soc 15:121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

S.S like to acknowledge financial support from DST WTI (Grant No: DST/TM/WTI/2K2016/50(G)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soumitra Satapathi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1649 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, S.K., Sokhi, S., Balomajumder, C. et al. Reusable graphene oxide nanofibers for enhanced photocatalytic activity: a detailed mechanistic study. J Mater Sci 52, 5390–5403 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0783-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-0783-5

Keywords

Navigation