Skip to main content
Log in

In situ analysis of the effect of high heating rates and initial microstructure on the formation and homogeneity of austenite

  • Metals
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Decreasing processing time of a quench and temper heat treatment is of high interest for industry due to the possibility of cost reduction. One option to reduce processing time is to shorten the austenitizing cycle by applying high heating rates and minimum holding times. However, due to the high heating rates, the analysis of their influences on the formation kinetics of austenite and its crystallographic parameters is challenging. Thus, this work concentrates on the in situ analysis of the austenitization process by means of high-energy X-ray diffraction to study a range of heating rates applied to ferritic–pearlitic and soft annealed initial microstructures. The transformation kinetics from ferrite/pearlite and soft annealed state to austenite, the cementite dissolution behavior and the homogeneity of the freshly formed austenite were analyzed. The results indicate three distinct steps of austenite formation independent of initial microstructure and heating rate: (1) nucleation of carbon-rich austenite at cementite–ferrite interfaces, (2) growth of austenite phase fraction accompanied by a reduction of the carbon content, until reaching the mean carbon content of the steel, followed by growth of the austenite grain size, (3) regarding austenite homogeneity, the combination of austenitization temperature and initial microstructure are the main influencing factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time due to technical or time limitations.

References

  1. Sackl S, Leitner H, Zuber M, Clemens H, Primig S (2014) Induction hardening vs conventional hardening of a heat treatable steel. Metall Mater Trans A 45(12):5657–5666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Vieweg A, Ressel G, Prevedel P, Marsoner S, Ebner R (2016) Effects of the inductive hardening process on the martensitic structure of a 50CrMo4 steel. In: Conference proceedings of the 23rd IFHTSE congress, pp 216–222

  3. Caballero F, Capdevila C, de Andres CG (2001) Kinetics and dilatometric behaviour of non-isothermal ferrite–austenite transformation. Mater Sci Technol 17(9):1114–1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Esin V, Denand B, Bihan QL, Dehmas M, Teixeira J, Geandier G, Denis S, Sourmail T, Aeby-Gautier E (2014) situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction and dilatometric study of austenite formation in a multi-component steel: influence of initial microstructure and heating rate. Acta Mater 80:118–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li Z-D, Miyamoto G, Yang Z-G, Furuhara T (2009) Nucleation of austenite from pearlitic structure in an Fe–0.6 C–1Cr alloy. Scr Mater 60(7):485–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Oliveira F, Andrade M, Cota A (2007) Materials characterization kinetics of austenite formation during continuous heating in a low carbon steel. Mater Charact 58(3):256–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Martin DS, del Castillo PR-D, de Andres CG (2008) situ study of austenite formation by dilatometry in a low carbon microalloyed steel. Scr Mater 58(10):926–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. de Andrés CG, Caballero F, Capdevila C, Álvarez L (2002) Application of dilatometric analysis to the study of solid–solid phase transformations in steels. Mater Charact 48(1):101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beneteau A, Weisbecker P, Geandier G, Aeby-Gautier E, Appolaire B (2005) Austenitization and precipitate dissolution in high nitrogen steels: an in situ high temperature X-ray synchrotron diffraction analysis using the Rietveld method. Mater Sci Eng A 393:63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Orlich J (1973) Atlas zur Wärmebehandlung der Stähle. Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shtansky D, Nakai K, Ohmori Y (1999) Pearlite to austenite transformation in an Fe–2.6 Cr–1C alloy. Acta Mater 47(9):2619–2632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. King A, Beckmann F, Müller M, Schreyer A, Schell N, Fischer T (2014) The high energy materials science beamline (HEMS) at PETRA III. In: Mechanical stress evaluation by neutrons and synchrotron radiation VI, volume 772 of materials science forum, vol 2. Trans Tech Publications, pp 57–61

  13. Staron P, Fischer T, Lippmann T, Stark A, Daneshpour S, Schnubel D, Uhlmann E, Gerstenberger R, Camin B, Reimers W, Eidenberger E, Clemens H, Huber N, Schreyer A (2011) situ experiments with synchrotron high-energy X-rays and neutrons. Adv Eng Mater 13(8):658–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hammersley AP (1997) FIT2D: an introduction and overview. ESRF internal report ESRF97HA02T

  15. ASTM-E975-13 (2008) Standard practice for X-ray determination of retained austenite in steel with near random crystallographic orientation. ASTM, West Conshohocken

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu Z-K, Höglund L, Jönsson B, Ågren J (1991) An experimental and theoretical study of cementite dissolution in an Fe–Cr–C alloy. Metall Trans A 22(8):1745–1752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Onink M, Tichelaar FD, Brakman CM, Mittemeijer EJ, von der Zwaag S (1995) An in situ hot stage transmission electron microscopy study of the decomposition of Fe–C austenites. J Mater Sci 30:6223–6234. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheng L, Brakman CM, Korevaar BM, Mittemeijer EJ (1987) The temping of iron carbon martensite: dilatometric and calorimetric analysis. Metall Trans A 19A:2415–2426

    Google Scholar 

  19. Speich GR, Szirmae (1969) Formation of austenite from ferrite and ferrite–carbide aggregates. Trans Metall Soc AIME J 245:1063–1074

    Google Scholar 

  20. Feng Z (2015) The lattice parameter of gamma iron and iron chromium alloys. Master’s thesis, Case Western Reserve University

  21. Irvine KJ (1961) High-strength austenitic stainless steels. J Iron Steel Inst 199:153–175

    Google Scholar 

  22. Seki I, Nagata K (2005) Lattice constant of iron and austenite including its supersaturation phase of carbon. ISIJ Int 45(12):1789–1794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cullity B, Stock S (2001) X-ray diffraction, vol 3. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cheng L, Böttger A, De Keijser TH, Mittemeijer E (1990) Lattice parameters of iron-carbon and iron-nitrogen martensites and austenites. Scr Metall Mater 24(3):509–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Avrami M (1941) Kinetics of phase change III, granulation, phase change and microstructure. J Chem Phys 9(2):177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zak AK, Majid WA, Abrishami ME, Yousefi R (2011) X-ray analysis of ZnO nanoparticles by Williamson–Hall and size–strain plot methods. Solid State Sci 13(1):251–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yogamalar R, Srinivasan R, Vinu A, Ariga K, Bose AC (2009) X-ray peak broadening analysis in ZnO nanoparticles. Solid State Commun 149(43–44):1919–1923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Eggbauer A, Lukas M, Prevedel P, Panzenböck M, Ressel G, Ebner R (2018) Effect of initial microstructure, heating rate, and austenitizing temperature on the subsequent formation of martensite and its microstructural features in a QT steel. Steel Res 90:1800317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Borgenstam A, Höglund L, Ågren J, Engström A (2000) DICTRA, a tool for simulation of diffusional transformations in alloys. J Phase Equilibria 21(3):269–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support under the scope of the COMET program within the K2 Center “Integrated Computational Material, Process and Product Engineering (IC-MPPE)” (Project No. 859480). This program is supported by the Austrian Federal Ministries for Transport, Innovation and Technology (BMVIT) and for Digital and Economic Affairs (BMDW), represented by the Austrian research funding association (FFG), and the federal states of Styria, Upper Austria and Tyrol.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annika Eggbauer.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eggbauer, A., Lukas, M., Ressel, G. et al. In situ analysis of the effect of high heating rates and initial microstructure on the formation and homogeneity of austenite. J Mater Sci 54, 9197–9212 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03527-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03527-3

Navigation