Abstract
Decreasing processing time of a quench and temper heat treatment is of high interest for industry due to the possibility of cost reduction. One option to reduce processing time is to shorten the austenitizing cycle by applying high heating rates and minimum holding times. However, due to the high heating rates, the analysis of their influences on the formation kinetics of austenite and its crystallographic parameters is challenging. Thus, this work concentrates on the in situ analysis of the austenitization process by means of high-energy X-ray diffraction to study a range of heating rates applied to ferritic–pearlitic and soft annealed initial microstructures. The transformation kinetics from ferrite/pearlite and soft annealed state to austenite, the cementite dissolution behavior and the homogeneity of the freshly formed austenite were analyzed. The results indicate three distinct steps of austenite formation independent of initial microstructure and heating rate: (1) nucleation of carbon-rich austenite at cementite–ferrite interfaces, (2) growth of austenite phase fraction accompanied by a reduction of the carbon content, until reaching the mean carbon content of the steel, followed by growth of the austenite grain size, (3) regarding austenite homogeneity, the combination of austenitization temperature and initial microstructure are the main influencing factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The raw/processed data required to reproduce these findings cannot be shared at this time due to technical or time limitations.
References
Sackl S, Leitner H, Zuber M, Clemens H, Primig S (2014) Induction hardening vs conventional hardening of a heat treatable steel. Metall Mater Trans A 45(12):5657–5666
Vieweg A, Ressel G, Prevedel P, Marsoner S, Ebner R (2016) Effects of the inductive hardening process on the martensitic structure of a 50CrMo4 steel. In: Conference proceedings of the 23rd IFHTSE congress, pp 216–222
Caballero F, Capdevila C, de Andres CG (2001) Kinetics and dilatometric behaviour of non-isothermal ferrite–austenite transformation. Mater Sci Technol 17(9):1114–1118
Esin V, Denand B, Bihan QL, Dehmas M, Teixeira J, Geandier G, Denis S, Sourmail T, Aeby-Gautier E (2014) situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction and dilatometric study of austenite formation in a multi-component steel: influence of initial microstructure and heating rate. Acta Mater 80:118–131
Li Z-D, Miyamoto G, Yang Z-G, Furuhara T (2009) Nucleation of austenite from pearlitic structure in an Fe–0.6 C–1Cr alloy. Scr Mater 60(7):485–488
Oliveira F, Andrade M, Cota A (2007) Materials characterization kinetics of austenite formation during continuous heating in a low carbon steel. Mater Charact 58(3):256–261
Martin DS, del Castillo PR-D, de Andres CG (2008) situ study of austenite formation by dilatometry in a low carbon microalloyed steel. Scr Mater 58(10):926–929
de Andrés CG, Caballero F, Capdevila C, Álvarez L (2002) Application of dilatometric analysis to the study of solid–solid phase transformations in steels. Mater Charact 48(1):101–111
Beneteau A, Weisbecker P, Geandier G, Aeby-Gautier E, Appolaire B (2005) Austenitization and precipitate dissolution in high nitrogen steels: an in situ high temperature X-ray synchrotron diffraction analysis using the Rietveld method. Mater Sci Eng A 393:63–70
Orlich J (1973) Atlas zur Wärmebehandlung der Stähle. Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung, Düsseldorf
Shtansky D, Nakai K, Ohmori Y (1999) Pearlite to austenite transformation in an Fe–2.6 Cr–1C alloy. Acta Mater 47(9):2619–2632
King A, Beckmann F, Müller M, Schreyer A, Schell N, Fischer T (2014) The high energy materials science beamline (HEMS) at PETRA III. In: Mechanical stress evaluation by neutrons and synchrotron radiation VI, volume 772 of materials science forum, vol 2. Trans Tech Publications, pp 57–61
Staron P, Fischer T, Lippmann T, Stark A, Daneshpour S, Schnubel D, Uhlmann E, Gerstenberger R, Camin B, Reimers W, Eidenberger E, Clemens H, Huber N, Schreyer A (2011) situ experiments with synchrotron high-energy X-rays and neutrons. Adv Eng Mater 13(8):658–663
Hammersley AP (1997) FIT2D: an introduction and overview. ESRF internal report ESRF97HA02T
ASTM-E975-13 (2008) Standard practice for X-ray determination of retained austenite in steel with near random crystallographic orientation. ASTM, West Conshohocken
Liu Z-K, Höglund L, Jönsson B, Ågren J (1991) An experimental and theoretical study of cementite dissolution in an Fe–Cr–C alloy. Metall Trans A 22(8):1745–1752
Onink M, Tichelaar FD, Brakman CM, Mittemeijer EJ, von der Zwaag S (1995) An in situ hot stage transmission electron microscopy study of the decomposition of Fe–C austenites. J Mater Sci 30:6223–6234. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00369670
Cheng L, Brakman CM, Korevaar BM, Mittemeijer EJ (1987) The temping of iron carbon martensite: dilatometric and calorimetric analysis. Metall Trans A 19A:2415–2426
Speich GR, Szirmae (1969) Formation of austenite from ferrite and ferrite–carbide aggregates. Trans Metall Soc AIME J 245:1063–1074
Feng Z (2015) The lattice parameter of gamma iron and iron chromium alloys. Master’s thesis, Case Western Reserve University
Irvine KJ (1961) High-strength austenitic stainless steels. J Iron Steel Inst 199:153–175
Seki I, Nagata K (2005) Lattice constant of iron and austenite including its supersaturation phase of carbon. ISIJ Int 45(12):1789–1794
Cullity B, Stock S (2001) X-ray diffraction, vol 3. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Cheng L, Böttger A, De Keijser TH, Mittemeijer E (1990) Lattice parameters of iron-carbon and iron-nitrogen martensites and austenites. Scr Metall Mater 24(3):509–514
Avrami M (1941) Kinetics of phase change III, granulation, phase change and microstructure. J Chem Phys 9(2):177–184
Zak AK, Majid WA, Abrishami ME, Yousefi R (2011) X-ray analysis of ZnO nanoparticles by Williamson–Hall and size–strain plot methods. Solid State Sci 13(1):251–256
Yogamalar R, Srinivasan R, Vinu A, Ariga K, Bose AC (2009) X-ray peak broadening analysis in ZnO nanoparticles. Solid State Commun 149(43–44):1919–1923
Eggbauer A, Lukas M, Prevedel P, Panzenböck M, Ressel G, Ebner R (2018) Effect of initial microstructure, heating rate, and austenitizing temperature on the subsequent formation of martensite and its microstructural features in a QT steel. Steel Res 90:1800317
Borgenstam A, Höglund L, Ågren J, Engström A (2000) DICTRA, a tool for simulation of diffusional transformations in alloys. J Phase Equilibria 21(3):269–280
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support under the scope of the COMET program within the K2 Center “Integrated Computational Material, Process and Product Engineering (IC-MPPE)” (Project No. 859480). This program is supported by the Austrian Federal Ministries for Transport, Innovation and Technology (BMVIT) and for Digital and Economic Affairs (BMDW), represented by the Austrian research funding association (FFG), and the federal states of Styria, Upper Austria and Tyrol.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eggbauer, A., Lukas, M., Ressel, G. et al. In situ analysis of the effect of high heating rates and initial microstructure on the formation and homogeneity of austenite. J Mater Sci 54, 9197–9212 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03527-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03527-3