Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Thinking About Thinking About Work: A Meta-Analysis of Off-Job Positive and Negative Work-Related Thoughts

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 26 July 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Work is frequently on the minds of employees—even during evenings, weekends, and vacations. The present study is the first comprehensive meta-analysis of off-job work-related thoughts (WRTs; i.e., thoughts employees have about work when they are not at work). We were particularly interested in comparing off-job positive and negative work-related thoughts (PWRTs and NWRTs; i.e., thoughts about positive/negative work experiences or characteristics) to each other and other off-job WRT constructs, which we integrated into a typology. We coded 520 effect sizes from 171 independent samples (N = 58,682) and conducted a random-effects, individual-correction meta-analysis. We found that PWRTs and NWRTs were unrelated, and psychological detachment was negatively related to NWRTs but unrelated to PWRTs. Furthermore, PWRTs and NWRTs exhibited significantly different relationships with various antecedents (e.g., age, negative affectivity) and outcomes (e.g., work engagement, burnout). Compared to PWRTs and NWRTs, psychological detachment and problem-solving pondering exhibited generally weaker relationships with outcomes. NWRTs contaminated with negative affective strains (i.e., negative work-related thoughts and feelings) exhibited generally stronger relationships with outcomes. Overall, our meta-analytic findings indicate that PWRTs and NWRTs are different and underscore the importance of empirically and conceptually separating PWRTs and NWRTs from each other and other off-job WRT constructs. The findings also complement the nascent literature on interventions that target promoting PWRTs and reducing NWRTs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig.1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. In contrast with the other psychological detachment measures, Cropley et al.’s (2012) WRRQ includes two items capturing detachment specifically from work issues. See the online supplementary materials for moderator analyses comparing different measures of psychological detachment. Readers, however, should exercise caution when interpreting these comparisons due to the prevalence of subgroups comprising k = 1 samples.

  2. Compared to NA, positive affectivity, which is the tendency to experience positive affective states and moods (Watson et al., 1988), may predispose individuals to engage in more off-job PWRTs; however, the paucity of studies that include both PA measures and WRT measures precludes us from meta-analytically examining such a relationship.

  3. We thank an anonymous reviewer for suggesting multiple ideas discussed here.

  4. We thank an anonymous reviewer for underscoring the importance of accounting for temporal dynamics in future WRT research.

  5. We thank an anonymous reviewer for this insightful point.

References

References with an asterisk (*) were included in the meta-analysis

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the researchers who responded to our requests for study information and Old Dominion University Libraries staff Beverly Barco, David Corona, Marelene Patac, and Robert Tench for fulfilling our interlibrary loan requests. We also thank Dr. James Smither and our two anonymous reviewers for their patience, encouragement, and invaluable feedback throughout the review process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William P. Jimenez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 800 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jimenez, W.P., Hu, X. & Xu, X.V. Thinking About Thinking About Work: A Meta-Analysis of Off-Job Positive and Negative Work-Related Thoughts. J Bus Psychol 37, 237–262 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09742-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-021-09742-7

Keywords

Navigation