Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Discrete Wavelet Transform and Singular Value Decomposition Based ECG Steganography for Secured Patient Information Transmission

  • Patient Facing Systems
  • Published:
Journal of Medical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

ECG Steganography provides secured transmission of secret information such as patient personal information through ECG signals. This paper proposes an approach that uses discrete wavelet transform to decompose signals and singular value decomposition (SVD) to embed the secret information into the decomposed ECG signal. The novelty of the proposed method is to embed the watermark using SVD into the two dimensional (2D) ECG image. The embedding of secret information in a selected sub band of the decomposed ECG is achieved by replacing the singular values of the decomposed cover image by the singular values of the secret data. The performance assessment of the proposed approach allows understanding the suitable sub-band to hide secret data and the signal degradation that will affect diagnosability. Performance is measured using metrics like Kullback–Leibler divergence (KL), percentage residual difference (PRD), peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR) and bit error rate (BER). A dynamic location selection approach for embedding the singular values is also discussed. The proposed approach is demonstrated on a MIT-BIH database and the observations validate that HH is the ideal sub-band to hide data. It is also observed that the signal degradation (less than 0.6 %) is very less in the proposed approach even with the secret data being as large as the sub band size. So, it does not affect the diagnosability and is reliable to transmit patient information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3
Fig 4
Fig 5
Fig 6
Fig 7
Fig 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ameen M, Liu J, Kwak K (2012) Security and privacy issues in wireless sensor networks for healthcare applications. J Med Syst 36(1):93–101. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9449-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Act, A. (1996) Health insurance portability and accountability act of 1996. Public Law, 104, 191. doi:10.4135/9781452234243.n359

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sufi F, Khalil I (2009) A new feature detection mechanism and its application in secured ECG transmission with noise masking. J Med Syst 33(2):121–132. doi: 10.1007/s10916-008-9172-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheddad A et al. (2010) Digital image steganography: Survey and analysis of current methods, Signal Process, 90(3):727–752. doi:10.1016/j.sigpro.2009.08.010

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hernandez J R, Amado M, Perez-Gonzalez F (2000) DCT-domain watermarking techniques for still images: Detector performance analysis and a new structure. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 9(1): 55–68. doi: 10.1109/83.817598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dogan S, Tuncer T, Avci E, Gulten A (2012) A New Watermarking System Based on Discrete Cosine Transform in Color Biometric Images. J Med Syst 36(4):2379–2385. doi:10.1007/s10916-011-9705-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chin-Chen Chang, Piyu Tsai, Chia-Chen Lin (2005) SVD-based digital image watermarking scheme, Pattern Recognit. Lett. 26(10):1577–1586. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.01.004

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta A K, Raval M S (2012) A robust and secure watermarking scheme based on singular values replacement. Sadhana 37(4):425–440. doi:10.1007/s12046-012-0089-x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ganic E, Eskicioglu A M (2004) Robust DWT-SVD domain image watermarking: embedding data in all frequencies. Proceedings of the 2004 Multimedia and Security Workshop on Multimedia and Security - MM&Sec’04.166-174. doi:10.1145/1022431.1022461

  10. Thabit R, Khoo B E (2014) Robust reversible watermarking scheme using Slantlet transform matrix. J Syst Software 88:74–86. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2013.09.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martins D, Guyennet H et al. (2010) Steganography in MAC Layers of 802.15.4 Protocol for Securing Wireless Sensor Networks. 2010 International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and Security. 4(6):824–828. doi:10.1109/mines.2010.175

  12. Zielińska E, Mazurczyk W, Szczypiorski K (2014) Trends in steganography. Commun ACM 57(3):86–95. doi:10.1145/2566590.2566610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bhat K V, Sengupta I, Das A (2010) An adaptive audio watermarking based on the singular value decomposition in the wavelet domain. Digit Signal Process 20(6):1547–1558. doi:10.1016/j.dsp.2010.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Natgunanathan I, Xiang Y, Rong Y, Peng D (2013) Robust patchwork-based watermarking method for stereo audio signals. Multimed Tools Appl 1–24. doi:10.1007/s11042-013-1454-4

  15. Marvel L M, Boncelet C G, Retter C T (1999) Spread spectrum image steganography. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 8(8):1075–1083. doi:10.1109/83.777088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zaidoon Kh. Al-Ani et al. (2010) Overview: Main fundamentals for steganography. Journal of Computing 2(3):158–165

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bender et al. (1996) Techniques for data hiding. IBM Syst. J. 35(3.4):313–336. doi:10.1147/sj.353.0313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Christian Cachin (2004) An information-theoretic model for steganography. Inform Comput 192(1):41–56. doi:10.1016/j.ic.2004.02.003

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu J, Tang G, Sun Y (2013) A secure steganography for privacy protection in healthcare system. J Med Syst, 37(2). doi:10.1007/s10916-012-9918-z

  20. Xuan Kong, Rui Feng (2001) Watermarking medical signals for telemedicine. IEEE T Inf Technol B 5(3):195–201. doi:10.1109/4233.945290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen S T, Guo Y J, Huang, H N, Kung W M, Tseng K K, Tu S Y (2014) Hiding Patients Confidential Data in the ECG Signal via a Transform-Domain Quantization Scheme. J Med Syst 38(6). doi:10.1007/s10916-014-0054-9

  22. Engin M, Çidam O, Engin E Z (2005) Wavelet transformation based watermarking technique for human electrocardiogram (ECG). J Med Syst 29(6):589–594. doi:10.1007/s10916-005-6126-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nergui M, Acharya U S, Acharya U R, Yu W (2010) Reliable and Robust Transmission and Storage Techniques for Medical Images with Patient Information. J Med Syst 34(6):1129–1139. doi:10.1007/s10916-009-9332-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mehmet Engin, Oğuz Çıdam, Erkan Zeki Engin (2005) Wavelet Transformation Based Watermarking Technique for Human Electrocardiogram (ECG). J Med Syst 29(6):589–594. doi:10.1007/s10916-005-6126-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ibaida A, Khalil I (2013) Wavelet Based ECG Steganography for Protecting Patient Confidential Information in Point-of-Care Systems. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60(12):3322–3330. doi:10.1109/tbme.2013.2264539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tseng K K, He X, Kung W M, Chen S T, Liao M, Huang H N (2014) Wavelet-Based Watermarking and Compression for ECG Signals with Verification Evaluation. Sensors 14(2):3721–3736. doi:10.3390/s140203721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kozat Suleyman S et al. (2009) Embedding and retrieving private metadata in electrocardiograms. J Med Syst 33(4):241–259. doi:10.1007/s10916-008-9185-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nayak J, Subbanna Bhat P, Acharya U R, Sathish Kumar M (2009) Efficient Storage and Transmission of Digital Fundus Images with Patient Information Using Reversible Watermarking Technique and Error Control Codes. J Med Syst 33(3):163–171. doi:10.1007/s10916-008-9176-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Planitz B M, Maeder A J (2005) A study of block-based medical image watermarking using a perceptual similarity metric. DICTA’05. Proceedings Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications 2005. doi:10.1109/dicta.2005.1578168

  30. Gonzalez R C, Woods R E (2002) Digital image processing. 2nd SL, Prentice Hall.

  31. Shensa M J (1992) The discrete wavelet transform: wedding the a trous and Mallat algorithms. IEEE T Signal Proces 40(10):2464–2482. doi:10.1109/78.157290

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Heil C E, Walnut D F (1989) Continuous and discrete wavelet transforms. SIAM Review 31(4):628–666. doi:10.1137/1031129

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Henry E R, Hofrichter J (2010) Singular value decomposition: application to analysis of experimental data. Method ENZYMOL 210: 81–138. doi:10.1016/0076-6879(92)10010-b

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wall M E, Rechtsteiner A, Rocha L M (2003) Singular value decomposition and principal component analysis. A practical approach to microarray data analysis 91–109. doi:10.1007/0-306-47815-3_5

  35. Moody G B, Mark R (1992) MIT-BIH arrhythmia database directory. MITBIH Database Distribution, Harvard–MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. http://www.physionet.org/physiobank/database/html/mitdbdir/mitdbdir.htm. Accessed 23 May 2014

  36. Gari D. Clifford (2002) Signal Processing Methods for Heart Rate Variability. Dissertation, University of Oxford

  37. Pan J, Tompkins W J (1985) A Real-Time QRS Detection Algorithm. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 32(3):230–236. doi:10.1109/tbme.1985.325532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gari D. Clifford (2010) MIT website. www.mit.edu/%7Egari/CODE/ECGtools/ecgBag/. Accessed 23 May 2014

  39. Sankur B (2002) Statistical evaluation of image quality measures. J. Electron. Imaging 11(2):206–223. doi:10.1117/1.1455011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Huynh-Thu Q, Ghanbari M (2008) Scope of validity of PSNR in image/video quality assessment. Electron Lett 44(13):800. doi:10.1049/el:20080522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Al-Fahoum (2006) Quality assessment of ECG compression techniques using a wavelet-based diagnostic measure. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 10(1):182–191. doi:10.1109/titb.2005.855554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Cihan Varol, Coskun Bayrak (2011) Estimation of quality of service in spelling correction using Kullback–Leibler divergence. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(5):6307–6312. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sung-Hyuk Cha (2007) Comprehensive survey on distance/similarity measures between probability density functions. International Journal of Mathematical Models and Methods in Applied Sciences 1:300–307

    Google Scholar 

  44. Couceiro R, Carvalho P et al. (2008) Detection of Atrial Fibrillation using model-based ECG analysis. 2008 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition. doi:10.1109/icpr.2008.4761755

  45. Gacek, Adam, Witold, Pedrycz (2012) ECG Signal Processing, Classification and Interpretation. Springer

  46. Oberkampf, Roy (2010) Verification and validation in scientific computing. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Engineering Design, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India

    S Edward Jero & Palaniappan Ramu

  2. Department of Applied Mechanics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India

    S Ramakrishnan

Authors
  1. S Edward Jero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Palaniappan Ramu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S Ramakrishnan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S Edward Jero.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Patient Facing Systems

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Edward Jero, S., Ramu, P. & Ramakrishnan, S. Discrete Wavelet Transform and Singular Value Decomposition Based ECG Steganography for Secured Patient Information Transmission. J Med Syst 38, 132 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0132-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0132-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation