Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Polylactic Acid/Kenaf and Polylactic Acid/Rise Husk Composites: The Influence of the Natural Fibers on the Mechanical, Thermal and Biodegradability Properties

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymers and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates and compares the performances of polylactic acid (PLA)/kenaf (PLA-K) and PLA/rice husk (PLA-RH) composites in terms of biodegradability, mechanical and thermal properties. Composites with natural fiber weight content of 20% with fiber sizes of less than 100 μm were produced for testing and characterization. A twin-screw extrusion was used to compound PLA and natural fibers, and extruded composites were injection molded to test samples. Flexural and Izod impact test, TGA, soil burial test and SEM were used to investigate properties. All results were compared to a pure PLA matrix sample. The flexural modulus of the PLA increased with the addition of natural fibers, while the flexural strength decreased. The highest impact strength (34 J m−1), flexural modulus (4.5 GPa) and flexural strength (90 MPa) were obtained for the composite made of PLA/kenaf (PLA-K), which means kenaf natural fibers are potential to be used as an alternative filler to enhance mechanical properties. On the other hand PLA-RH composite exhibits lower mechanical properties. The impact strength of PLA has decreased when filled with natural fibers; this decrease is more pronounced in the PLA-RH composite. In terms of thermal stability it has been found that the addition of natural fibers decreased the thermal stability of virgin PLA and the decrement was more prominent in the PLA-RH composite. Biodegradability of the composites slightly increased and reached 1.2 and 0.8% for PLA-K and PLA-RH respectively for a period of 90 days. SEM micrographs showed poor interfacial between the polymer matrix and natural fibers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mohanty AK, Mistra M, Drzal LT (2002) Sustainable biocomposites from renewable resources: opportunities and challenges in the green materials world. J Polym Environ 10:19–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Siracusa V, Rocculi P, Romani S, Rosa MD (2008) Biodegradable polymers for food packaging: a review. Trends in Food Sci Technol 19:634–643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yu L, Dean K, Li L (2006) Polymer blends and composites from renewable resources. Prog Polym Sci 31:576–602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mohanty AK, Misra M, Hinrichsen G (2000) Biofibers, biodegradable polymers and biocomposites: an overview. Macromol Mater Eng 276:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oksman K, Skrifvars M, Selin JF (2003) Natural fibers as reinforcement in polylactic acid (PLA) composites. Compos Sci Technol 63(9):1317–1324

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Huda MS, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2007) The effect of silane treated- and untreated talc on the mechanical and physic-mechanical properties of poly(lactic acid)/newspaper fibers/talc hybrid composites. Composites B 38(3):367–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lim LT, Auras R, Rubino M (2008) Processing technologies for poly(lactic acid). Prog Polym Sci 33(8):820–852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Garlotta D (2001) A literature review of polylactic acid (PLA). J Polym Environ 9(2):63–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Huda MS, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2006) Chopped glass and recycled newspaper as reinforcement fibers in injection molded poly (lactic acid) (PLA) composites: a comparative study. Compos Sci Technol 66(11–12):1813–1824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ochi S (2008) Mechanical properties of kenaf fibers and kenaf/PLA composites. Mech Mater 40(4–5):446–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shanks RA, Hodzic A, Ridderhof D (2006) Composites of poly(lactic acid) with flax fibers modified by interstitial polymerization. J Appl Polym Sci 101(6):3620–3629

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nishino T, Hirao K, Kotera M, Nakamae K, Inagaki H (2003) Kenaf reinforced biodegradable composite. Compos Sci Technol 63:1281–1286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Huda MS, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2008) Effect of fiber surface-treatments on the properties of laminated biocomposites from poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and kenaf fibers. Compos Sci Technol 68(2):424–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Masirek R, Kulinski Z, Chionna D, Piorkowska E, Pracella M (2007) Composites of polylactide with hemp fibers: morphology, thermal and mechanical properties. J Appl Polym Sci 105:255–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Plackett D, Andersen TL, Pedersen WB, Nielsen L (2003) Biodegradable composites based on polylactide and jute fibers. Compos Sci Technol 63:1287–1296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee S, Wang S (2005) Biodegradable polymers/bamboo fiber biocomposite with bio-based coupling agent. Composites A 37:80–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bodros E, Pillin I, Montrelay N, Baley C (2007) Could biopolymers reinforced by randomly scattered flax fiber be used in structural applications? Compos Sci Technol 67(3–4):462–470

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu W, Misra M, Askeland P, Drzal L, Mohanty AK (2005) Green composites from soy based plastic and pineapple leaf fiber: fabrication and properties evaluation. Polymer 46:2710–2721

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bax B, Mussig J (2008) Impact and tensile properties of PLA/cordenka and PLA/flax composites. Compos Sci Technol 68(7–8):1601–1607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ardente F, Beccali M, Cellura M, Mistretta M (2008) Building energy performance: a LCA case study of kenaf-fibres insulation board. Energy Build 40(1):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lakshmi UR, Srivastava VC, Mall ID, Lataye DH (2009) Rice husk ash as an effective adsorbent: evaluation of adsorptive characteristics for indigo carmine dye. J Environ Manag 90(2):710–720

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rozman HD, Yeo YS, Tay GS, Abubakar A (2003) The mechanical and physical properties of polyurethane composites based on rice husk and polyethylene glycol. Polym Test 22(6):617–623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Naurah BMI (2006) Injection moulding parameters and performance of rice husk-high density polyethylene composite. MSc Thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Chemical and Natural Resources Engineering

  24. Premalal HGB, Ismail H, Baharin A (2003) Effect of processing time on the tensile, morphological, and thermal properties of rice husk powder-filled polypropylene composites. Polym Plast Technol Eng 42(5):827–851

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Premalal HGB, Ismail H, Baharin A (2003) Comparison of the mechanical properties of rice husk powder filled polypropylene composites with talc filled polypropylene composites. Polym Test 21(7):833–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhao Q, Tao J, Yam RCM, Mok ACK, Li RKY, Song C (2008) Biodegradation behavior of polycaprolactone/rice husk ecocomposites in simulated soil medium. Polym Degrad Stab 93(8):1571–1576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zampaloni M, Pourboghrat F, Yankovich SA, Rodgers BN, Moore J, Drzal LT, Mohanty AK, Misra M (2007) Kenaf natural fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: a discussion on manufacturing problems and solutions. Composites A 38(6):1569–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ismail H, Nizam JM, Khalil HPSA (2001) The effect of a compatibilizer on the mechanical properties and mass swell of white rice husk ash filled natural rubber/linear low density polyethylene blends. Polym Test 20(2):125–133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang HS, Kim HJ, Son J, Park HJ, Lee BJ, Hwang TS (2004) Rice-husk flour filled polypropylene composites; mechanical and morphological study. Compos Struct 63(3–4):305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bismarck A, Mishra S, Lampke T (2005) Plant fibers as reinforcement for green composites. In: Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT (Taylor & Francis Group, 2005 editors) (eds) Natural fibers, biopolymers and biocomposites, 1st edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (Chapter 2)

  31. Ndazi BS, Karlsson S, Tesha JV, Nyahumwa CW (2007) Chemical and physical modifications of rice husks for use as composite panels. Composites A 38:925–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ohkita T, Lee SH (2006) Thermal degradation and biodegradability of poly(lactic acid)/corn starch biocomposites. J Appl Polym Sci 100(4):3009–3017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shibata S, Cao Y, Fukumoto I (2008) Flexural modulus of the unidirectional and random composites made from biodegradable resin and bamboo and kenaf fibres. Composites A 39(4):640–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mathew AP, Oksman K, Sain M (2005) Mechanical properties of biodegradable composites from polylactic acid (PLA) and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). J Appl Polym Sci 97:2014–2025

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the University of Technology of Malaysia (UTM) for providing the grant that has made this research work possible.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Yussuf.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yussuf, A.A., Massoumi, I. & Hassan, A. Comparison of Polylactic Acid/Kenaf and Polylactic Acid/Rise Husk Composites: The Influence of the Natural Fibers on the Mechanical, Thermal and Biodegradability Properties. J Polym Environ 18, 422–429 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-010-0185-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-010-0185-0

Keywords

Navigation