Abstract
This study investigates the processability and biodegradability of composite bioplastic materials. Biocomposites were processed using twin-screw compounding of the bioplastic poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) with bio-based fillers derived from co-products of biofuel production. An extensive biodegradability evaluation was conducted on each biocomposite material, as well as the base materials, using respirometric testing to analyze the conversion of organic carbon into carbon dioxide. This evaluation revealed that the presence of meal-based fillers in the biocomposites increased the rate of biodegradation of the matrix polymer, degrading at a faster pace than both the pure PBS polymer and the switchgrass (SG) composite. This degradation was further confirmed using FT-IR and thermal analysis of the material structure before and after biodegradation. The increased biodegradation rate is attributed to the high concentration of proteins in the meal-based composites, which enhanced the hydrolytic biodegradation of the material and facilitated micro-organism growth. The SG-based composite degraded slower than the pure polymer due to its lignin content, which degrades via a different mechanism than the polymer, and slowed the biodegradation process.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hargreaves J, Adl M, Warman P (2008) Agric Ecosyst Environ 123:1
Kim HS, Kim HJ, Lee JW, Choi IG (2006) Polym Degrad Stab 91:1117
Plastics—the Facts 2012: An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data for 2011. Plastics Europe Association of Plastics Manufacturers (2012). www.plasticseurope.org/cust/documentrequest.aspx?DocID=54693. Accessed 18 Sept 2013
Davis K (2001) Corn milling, processing and generation of co-products. In: Proceedings of the Minnesota corn growers association technical symposium. Distillers Grains Technology Council
Chen D, Li J, Ren J (2011) Mater Chem Phys 126:524
Liu W, Mohanty AK, Askeland P, Drzal LT, Misra M (2004) Polymer 45:7589–7596
Reddy N, Yang Y (2011) Ind Crops Prod 33:35
Arévalo-Niño K, Sandoval C, Galan L, Imam S, Gordon S, Greene R (1989) Biodegradation 7:231
Otey FH, Westhoff RP, Doane WM (1987) Ind Eng Chem Res 26:1659
Swanson C, Shogren R, Fanta G, Imam S (1993) J Polym Environ 1:155
Aithani D, Mohanty AK (2006) Ind Eng Chem Res 45:6147
Cunningham R, Carr M, Bagley E (1994) J Appl Polym Sci 51:1311
Ohtaki A, Sato N, Nakasaki K (1998) Polym Degrad Stab 61:499
Pagga U, Beimborn DB, Boelens J, De Wilde B (1995) Chemosphere 31:4475
Chiellini E, Corti A, Swift G (2003) Polym Degrad Stab 81:341
Diebel W, Reddy MM, Misra M, Mohanty A (2012) Biomass Bioenerg 37:88
Halverson LJ, Jones TM, Firestone MK (2000) Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1630
David K, Ragauskas AJ (2010) Energy Environ Sci 3:1182
Imam SH, Gordon SH (2002) J Polym Environ 10:147
Tuomela M, Hatakka A, Raiskila S, Vikman M, Itävaara M (2001) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 55:492–499
Corti A, Sudhakar M, Chiellini E (2012) J Polym Environ 20:1007
Acknowledgments
The authors are thankful to the Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation (MEDI), Ontario Research Fund—Research Excellence Round 4 program; the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (OMAF) and Ministry of Rural Affairs (MRA)—New Directions & Alternative Renewable Fuels ‘Plus’ Research Program; and Hannam Soybean Utilization Fund (HSUF) for their financial support to carry out this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anstey, A., Muniyasamy, S., Reddy, M.M. et al. Processability and Biodegradability Evaluation of Composites from Poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) Bioplastic and Biofuel Co-products from Ontario. J Polym Environ 22, 209–218 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-013-0633-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-013-0633-8