Skip to main content
Log in

Processability and Biodegradability Evaluation of Composites from Poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) Bioplastic and Biofuel Co-products from Ontario

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymers and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study investigates the processability and biodegradability of composite bioplastic materials. Biocomposites were processed using twin-screw compounding of the bioplastic poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) with bio-based fillers derived from co-products of biofuel production. An extensive biodegradability evaluation was conducted on each biocomposite material, as well as the base materials, using respirometric testing to analyze the conversion of organic carbon into carbon dioxide. This evaluation revealed that the presence of meal-based fillers in the biocomposites increased the rate of biodegradation of the matrix polymer, degrading at a faster pace than both the pure PBS polymer and the switchgrass (SG) composite. This degradation was further confirmed using FT-IR and thermal analysis of the material structure before and after biodegradation. The increased biodegradation rate is attributed to the high concentration of proteins in the meal-based composites, which enhanced the hydrolytic biodegradation of the material and facilitated micro-organism growth. The SG-based composite degraded slower than the pure polymer due to its lignin content, which degrades via a different mechanism than the polymer, and slowed the biodegradation process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hargreaves J, Adl M, Warman P (2008) Agric Ecosyst Environ 123:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kim HS, Kim HJ, Lee JW, Choi IG (2006) Polym Degrad Stab 91:1117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Plastics—the Facts 2012: An analysis of European plastics production, demand and waste data for 2011. Plastics Europe Association of Plastics Manufacturers (2012). www.plasticseurope.org/cust/documentrequest.aspx?DocID=54693. Accessed 18 Sept 2013

  4. Davis K (2001) Corn milling, processing and generation of co-products. In: Proceedings of the Minnesota corn growers association technical symposium. Distillers Grains Technology Council

  5. Chen D, Li J, Ren J (2011) Mater Chem Phys 126:524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu W, Mohanty AK, Askeland P, Drzal LT, Misra M (2004) Polymer 45:7589–7596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reddy N, Yang Y (2011) Ind Crops Prod 33:35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Arévalo-Niño K, Sandoval C, Galan L, Imam S, Gordon S, Greene R (1989) Biodegradation 7:231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Otey FH, Westhoff RP, Doane WM (1987) Ind Eng Chem Res 26:1659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Swanson C, Shogren R, Fanta G, Imam S (1993) J Polym Environ 1:155

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aithani D, Mohanty AK (2006) Ind Eng Chem Res 45:6147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cunningham R, Carr M, Bagley E (1994) J Appl Polym Sci 51:1311

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohtaki A, Sato N, Nakasaki K (1998) Polym Degrad Stab 61:499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pagga U, Beimborn DB, Boelens J, De Wilde B (1995) Chemosphere 31:4475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Chiellini E, Corti A, Swift G (2003) Polym Degrad Stab 81:341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Diebel W, Reddy MM, Misra M, Mohanty A (2012) Biomass Bioenerg 37:88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Halverson LJ, Jones TM, Firestone MK (2000) Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:1630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. David K, Ragauskas AJ (2010) Energy Environ Sci 3:1182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Imam SH, Gordon SH (2002) J Polym Environ 10:147

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tuomela M, Hatakka A, Raiskila S, Vikman M, Itävaara M (2001) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 55:492–499

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Corti A, Sudhakar M, Chiellini E (2012) J Polym Environ 20:1007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the Ministry of Economic Development and Innovation (MEDI), Ontario Research Fund—Research Excellence Round 4 program; the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (OMAF) and Ministry of Rural Affairs (MRA)—New Directions & Alternative Renewable Fuels ‘Plus’ Research Program; and Hannam Soybean Utilization Fund (HSUF) for their financial support to carry out this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Manjusri Misra or Amar Mohanty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Anstey, A., Muniyasamy, S., Reddy, M.M. et al. Processability and Biodegradability Evaluation of Composites from Poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) Bioplastic and Biofuel Co-products from Ontario. J Polym Environ 22, 209–218 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-013-0633-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-013-0633-8

Keywords

Navigation