Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding Employers’ Hiring Intentions in Relation to Qualified Workers with Disabilities: Preliminary Findings

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction As part of the planning process for a larger survey study to examine factors affecting employers’ intention to hire and hiring of people with disabilities, a series of three semi-structured focus groups were held with key hiring decision makers, such as Human Resources directors, Chief Operating Officers (COOs), or Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) of small, medium, and large Seattle area companies. Aim The chief goals of the focus groups were to elicit and refine the participants’ beliefs, normative influences, and perceived control relative to hiring workers with disabilities. Method Narrative data obtained from the focus group discussion were examined using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to identify themes expressed by the focus group participants within the context of company size. Results Themes did vary by company size, but a prevailing concern across all companies related to questions about the efficiency/effectiveness of contact with vocational rehabilitation agencies. For both small- and mid-sized companies, there was a belief that people with disabilities could not do the work or were somehow less qualified. For large companies, convincing departmental and team managers that outreaching workers with disabilities would be a worthwhile hiring practice remained a challenge. Conclusion The themes derived from this study can be used to help occupational rehabilitation professionals develop educational and marketing interventions to improve employers’ attitudes toward hiring and retaining individuals with disabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hernandez B, Keys C, Balcazar F. Employer attitudes toward workers with disabilities and their ADA employment rights: a literature review. J Rehabil. 2000;66(4):4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Copeland JL. The impact of disability in the workplace: an assessment of employer attitudes toward people with disabilities and the Americans with Disabilities Act [dissertation]. Capella University; 2007.

  3. Unger DD. Employers’ attitudes toward persons with disabilities in the workforce: myths or realities? Focus Autism Other Develop Disabil. 2002;17(1):2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruyère SM, Erickson W, Ferrentino JT. Identity and disability in the workplace. William Mary Law Rev. 2003;44(3):1173–96.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Domzal C, Houtenville A, Sharma R. Survey of employer perspectives on the employment of people with disabilities: technical report. McLean (VA). (Prepared under contract to the Office of Disability and Employment Policy, U.S. Department of Labor) CESSI; 2008.

  6. Sands H, Zalkind SS. Effects of an educational campaign to change employer attitudes toward hiring epileptics. Epilepsia. 1972;13:87–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50:179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ajzen I. Attitudes, personality, and behavior. 2nd ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behavior: a meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol. 2001;40:471–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eng JJ, Martin-Ginis KA. Using the theory of planned behavior to predict leisure time physical activity among people with chronic kidney disease. Rehabil Psychol. 2007;52(4):435–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Blanchard CM, Courneya KS, Rodgers WM, Fraser SN, Murray TC, Daub B, et al. Is the theory of planned behavior a useful framework for understanding exercise adherence during Phase II cardiac rehabilitation? J Card Rehabil. 2003;23:29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Latimer AE, Martin-Ginis KA. The theory of planned behavior in prediction of leisure time physical activity among individuals with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50:389–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Galea MN, Bray SR. Predicting walking intentions and exercise in individuals with intermittent claudication: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Rehabil Psychol. 2006;5:299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown R. Exploring the bottom line: a study of the costs and benefits of workers with disabilities. Chicago: De Paul University; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gilbride DD, Stenstrud R. Demand side job development: a model for the 1990s. J Rehabil. 1992;58(4):34–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support of the Pacific Northwest Business and Technical Assistance Center Grant No. H264B070007, as funded by the U S. Department of Education National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research (NIDRR) is acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert T. Fraser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fraser, R.T., Johnson, K., Hebert, J. et al. Understanding Employers’ Hiring Intentions in Relation to Qualified Workers with Disabilities: Preliminary Findings. J Occup Rehabil 20, 420–426 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9220-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9220-1

Keywords

Navigation