Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Motivational Orientation of People Participating in Vocational Rehabilitation

  • Published:
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose The task of vocational rehabilitation is to support the employee’s chances of continuing in working life. The study aimed to examine the motivational orientation of people participating in vocational rehabilitation and to find out what characteristics of the clients, their life situation, and their beliefs and perceptions were associated with it. Methods A mail questionnaire was answered by 839 rehabilitation clients who had received an affirmative rehabilitation decision under the earnings-related pension scheme 12 months earlier (response rate 67 %). Two variables depicting motivational orientation were formed, i.e., motivation for continuing in working life and motivation for participating in vocational rehabilitation. Logistic regression analyses were applied in examining the factors associated with each motivation variable. Results The results indicate that the two motivational orientations can be regarded as partly separate and partly overlapping constructs. The rehabilitation clients’ motivational orientations were associated with their experiences and their perceptions on environmental factors and future possibilities, both those that precipitated the application for rehabilitation and those that are important in their current life situation and their perceived future possibilities. Conclusions In the planning of individual rehabilitation processes there is a clear need to sort out what factors may hide behind the client’s weak contextual or situational motivation. In the course of the rehabilitation process, it is important to discuss these factors in order to alleviate the clients’ uncertainty towards change and enhance their motivation to participate in rehabilitation and re-think their future prospects of returning to work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fink SL. Crisis and motivation: a theoretical model. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 1965;48:592–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. King P, Barrowclough C. Rating the motivation of elderly patients on a rehabilitation ward. Clin Rehabil. 1989;3:289–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. Qualitative analysis of stroke patients’ motivation for rehabilitation. Brit Med J. 2000;321:1051–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grahn B, Ekdahl C, Borgquist L. Motivation as a predictor of changes in quality of life and working ability in multidisciplinary rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22:639–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Järvikoski A, Ojala S, Ravaja N. Mitä kuntoutustutkimuksen jälkeen? (What after the rehabilitation assessment?) Working reports 7/1992. Helsinki: Rehabilitation Foundation; 1992 (In Finnish.).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tan V, Cheatle MD, Mackin S, Moberg PJ, Esterhai JL. Goal setting as a predictor of return to work in a population of chronic musculoskeletal pain patients. Int J Neurosci. 1997;92:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saeki D, Ogata H, Okubo T, Takahashi K, Hoshuyama T. Impact of factors indicating a poor prognosis on stroke rehabilitation effectiveness. Clin Rehabil. 1993;7:99–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nordt C, Brantschen E, Kawohl W, Bärtsch B, Haker H, Rüsch N, Rössler W. ’Placement budgets’ for supported employment—improving competitive employment for people with mental illness: study protocol of a multicentre randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry. 2012;12:165–70.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Senécal C, Vallerand RJ, Guay F. Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: toward a motivational model. Pers Soc Psychol B. 2001;27:176–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vallerand RJ. Deci and Ryan’s self-determination theory: a view from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Psychol Inq. 2000;11:312–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Guay E, Mageau G, Vallerand RJ. On the hierarchial structure of self-determined motivation: a test of top-down and bottom-up effects. Pers Soc Psychol B. 2003;29:992–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nair KPS. Life goals: the concept and its relevance to rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2003;7:192–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, Rudd A. The concept of patient motivation. a qualitative analysis of stroke professionals’ attitudes. Stroke. 2002;33:444–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jahoda M. Employment and unemployment: a social-psychological analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Proschaska J, DiClemente CC. Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. J Consult Clin Psych. 1983;51:390–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cole G, Leonard B, Hammond S, Fridinger F. Using ′stages of behavioral change′ constructs to measure the short-term effects of a worksite-based intervention to increase moderate physical activity. Psychol Rep. 1998;82:615–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Franche R-L, Krause N. Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12:233–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller RW, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing: preparing people for change. New York: Guilford Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Manthey T, Jackson C, Evans-Brown P. Motivational interviewing and vocational rehabilitation: a review with suggestions for administrators and counselors. J Appl Rehabil Couns. 2001;42:3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gard G, Larsson A. Focus on motivation in the work rehabilitation planning process: a qualitative study from the employer’s perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13:159–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Berglind H, Gerner U. Motivation and return to work among the long-term sick-listed: an action theory perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:719–26.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Ann Rev Psychol. 2001;52:1–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Sullivan D, Strauser DR. Operationalizing self-efficacy, related social cognitive variables, and moderating effects. Implications for rehabilitation research and practice. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2009;52:251–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abele AE, Spurk D. The longitudinal impact of self-efficacy and career goals on objective and subjective career success. J Vocat Behav. 2009;74:53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wallston KA. Hocus-pocus, the focus isn’t strictly on locus: Rotter’s social learning theory modified for health. Cogn Ther Res. 1992;16:183–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wallston KA, Osborn CY, Wagner LJ, Hilker KA. The perceived medical condition self-management scale applied to persons with HIV/AIDS. J Health Psychol. 2011;16:109–15.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jerusalem M, Schwarzer R. Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal processes. In: Schwarzer R, editor. Self-efficacy: thought control of action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere; 1992. p. 195–213.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nikkanen P, Puumalainen J, Hokkanen L, Järvoski A. Kela vaikeavammaisten kuntoutuksen järjestäjänä [Medical rehabilitation for severely disabled persons organsed by the Social Insurance Institution]. In: Järvikoski A, Hokkanen L, Härkäpää K, editors. Asiakkaan äänellä [Voice of the customer]. Research Reports 80/2009. Helsinki: Rehabilitation Foundation; 2009. p. 146–69.

  30. Lindström M, Janzon E. Social capital, institutional (vertical) trust and smoking: a study of daily smoking and smoking cessation among ever smokers. Scand J Public Health. 2007;35:460–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fuglsang L, Jagd S. Making sense of institutional trust in organizations: bridging institutional context and trust. Organization. 2013. doi:10.1177/1350508413496577.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Grönlund K, Setälä M. In honest officials we trust: institutional confidence in Europe. Am Rev Public Adm. 2012;42:523–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Irestig R, Burström K, Wessel M, Lynöe N. How are homeless people treated in the healthcare system and other societal institutions? Study of their experiences and trust. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38:225–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Latham GP, Ernst CT. Keys to motivating tomorrow’s workforce. Human Resource Manage Rev. 2006;16:181–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Cropanzano R, Rupp DE. An overview of organizational justice: implications for work motivation. In: Porter LW, Bigley G, Steers RM, editors. Motivation and work behavior. 7th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Elovainio M, Kivimäki M, Vahtera J. Organizational justice: evidence of a new psychosocial predictor of health. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:105–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gould R, Härkäpää K, Järvikoski A., editors. Toimiiko työeläkekuntoutus? [Functioning of vocational rehabilitation within the earnings-related pension scheme]. Research Reports 01/2012. Helsinki: Finnish Centre for Pensions. 2012.

  38. Järvikoski A, Jyrkämä O, Tossavainen A, Nurminen U-M. Varhaiskuntoutukseen ja työkykyä ylläpitävään toimintaan kohdistuvat odotukset ja valmiudet [Expectations from and readiness to participate in early rehabilitation]. Kuntoutus [Rehabilitation]. 1993;16:16–24.

  39. Härkäpää K. Optimismi, kompetenssi ja selviytymiskeinot. Käsitteiden ja empirian tarkastelua kuntoutuksen näkökulmasta [Optimism, competence and coping strategies. Analysis of concepts and empirical results in the context of rehabilitation]. Helsinki: Rehabilitation Foundation; 1995. Working papers 11.

  40. Kouvo A. The sources of generalized trust and institutional confidence in Europe. Res Finnish Soc. 2011;4:29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schoon L, Cheng H. Determinants of political trust: a lifetime learning model. Dev Psychol. 2011;47:619–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tuomi K, Ilmarinen J, Jahkola A, Katajarinne L, Tulkki A. Work Ability Index. 2nd revised edition. Helsinki: Finnish Institute of Occupational Health. 1998.

  43. Ilmarinen J. The Work Ability Index (WAI). Occup Med. 2007;57:160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Ahlstrom L, Grimby-Ekman A, Hagberg M, Dellve L. The work ability index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health – a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010;36:404–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Estama J, Arola A-M. Kuntoutus ei aina käynnisty [Rehabilitation does not always start up]. In: Järvikoski A, Lindh J, Suikkanen A, editors. Kuntoutus muutoksessa [Rehabilitation in transition]. Rovaniemi: Lapland University Press; 2011. p. 63–72.

  46. Mehnert A, Koch U. Predictors of employment among cancer survivors after medical rehabilitation—a prospective study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013;39:76–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kim JK, Kim JJ. Nonresponse weighting adjustment using estimated response probability. Can J Stat. 2007;35:401–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lehikoinen T, Gould R, Järvikoski A. Tutkimuksen toteutus [Execution of the study]. In: Gould R, Härkäpää K, Järvikoski A, editors. Toimiiko työeläkekuntoutus? [Functioning of vocational rehabilitation within the earnings-related pension scheme]. Research Reports 01/2012. Helsinki: Finnish Centre for Pensions; 2012. pp. 25–36.

  49. Otto K, Dette-Hagenmeyer DE, Dalbert C. Occupational mobility in members of the labor force: explaining the willingness to change occupations. J Career Dev. 2010;36:262–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Huhtaniemi P. The sense of life control and thoughts of early retirement. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis B:210. Turku: University of Turku; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Gould R. Choice or chance—late retirement in Finland. Soc Pol Soc. 2010;5:519–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Von Bonsdorff ME, Huuhtanen P, Tuomi K, Seitsamo J. Predictors of employees’ early retirement intentions: an 11-year longitudinal study. Occup Med. 2010;60:94–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Wang M, Shultz KS. Employee retirement: a review and recommendations for future investigation. J Manage. 2010;36:172–206.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Kim S, Feldman DC. Healthy, wealthy, or wise: predicting actual acceptances of early retirement incentives at three points in time. Pers Psychol. 1998;51:623–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Selander J, Marnetoft SU, Åsell M, Selander U. Internal locus of control and vocational rehabilitation. Work. 2008;30:149–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Härkäpää K, Järvikoski A, Mellin G, Hurri H, Luoma K. Health locus of control beliefs and psychological distress as predictors for treatment outcome in low back pain patients: results of a 3-month follow up of a controlled intervention study. Pain. 1991;46:35–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Härkäpää K. Psychosocial factors as predictors for early retirement in patients with chronic low back pain. J Psychosom Res. 1992;36:553–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Matheson C. The motivation of public sector employees: an outline of six orientations to work. Adm Soc. 2012;44:207–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Elovainio M, Forma P, Kivimäki M, Sinervo T, Sutinen R, Laine M. Job demands and job control as correlates of early retirement thoughts in Finnish social and health care employees. Work Stress. 2005;19:84–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements:

The data of this study was gathered in the project “The functioning of vocational rehabilitation within the earnings-related pension scheme”, supported financially by the Finnish Centre for Pensions. The manuscript of this study was prepared as part of the project “Shared Agency and Empowerment in Rehabilitation” financed by the Academy of Finland.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Lapland, P.O. Box 122, 96101, Rovaniemi, Finland

    Kristiina Härkäpää & Aila Järvikoski

  2. Finnish Centre for Pensions, 00065, Eläketurvakeskus, Helsinki, Finland

    Raija Gould

Authors
  1. Kristiina Härkäpää
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aila Järvikoski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raija Gould
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristiina Härkäpää.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Härkäpää, K., Järvikoski, A. & Gould, R. Motivational Orientation of People Participating in Vocational Rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil 24, 658–669 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9496-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-013-9496-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation