Abstract
Complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) retain an enduring popularity in spite of the fact that there is poor evidence of their efficacy. Public attraction toward CAM may be based, in part, on a public appetite for mysticism; in many countries, increases in interest in CAM may in turn result from decreasing social acceptance of participation in formal religions. The present study examined patterns of CAM availability and self-declared religious affiliation across 30 geographical regions in Ireland. After controlling for differences in population, the data show a statistically significant inverse correlation between CAM availability and religious affiliation. Implications are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bassman L. E., Uellendahl G. (2003). Complementary/alternative medicine: Ethical, professional, and practical challenges for psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 34:264–270
British Medical Association (2000). Acupuncture: Efficacy, safety and practice. Amsterdam: Harwood
Central Statistics Office (Ireland) (2003). Census 2002: Principle demographic results. Dublin: Central Statistics Office
Chalmers T. C., Celano P., Sacks H. S., Smith H. (1983). Bias in treatment assignment in controlled clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine 309:1358–1361
Eisenberg D. M., Delbanco T. L., Kessler R. C. (1993). Unconventional medicine [Letter]. New England Journal of Medicine 329:1203–1204
Ernst E.. (2003). Chiropractic spinal manipulation for neck pain: A systematic review. Journal of Pain 4:417–421
Ernst E., Harkness E.. (2001). Spinal manipulation: A systematic review of sham-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trials. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 22:879–889
Ezzo J., Berman B., Hadhazy V. A., Jadad A. R., Lao L., Singh B. B. (2000). Is acupuncture effective for the treatment of chronic pain? A systematic review. Pain 86:217–225
Furnham A. (1997). Flight from science: Alternative medicine, postmodernism and relativism. In: Fuller R., Noonan Walsh P., McGinley P. (Eds.), A century of psychology: Progress, paradigms and prospects for the new millennium. London, Routledge, pp 171–191
Goldbeck-Wood S., Lie L. G., Yamauchi M., Zinn C., Josefson D., Ingram M. (1996). Complementary medicine is booming worldwide. British Medical Journal 313:131–133
Golden Pages Ltd. (2004). About us. Retrieved 1 September 2004, from http://www.goldenpages.ie/search.asp
Linde K., Clausius N., Ramirez G., Melchart D., Eitel F., Hedges L. V., Jonas W. B. (1997). Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials Lancet 350:834–843
Marks L.. (2005). Religion and bio-psycho-social health: A review and conceptual modelJournal of Religion and Health 44:173–186
Miller W. R., Thoresen C. E. (2003). Spirituality, religion, and health: An emerging research field. American Psychologist 58:24–35
National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (2000). Expanding horizons of healthcare: Five-year strategic plan 2001–2005 (DHHS Publication No. 01-5001). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
Peay M. Y., Peay E. R. (1998). The evaluation of medical symptoms by patients and doctors. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 21:57–81
Saks M. (1998). Medicine and complementary medicine: Challenge and change. In: Scambler G., Higgs P. (eds) Modernity, medicine and health: Medical sociology towards 2000. London, Routledge, pp 198–215
Shang A., Huwiler-Müntener K., Nartey L., Jüni P., Dörig S., Sterne J. A. C., Pewsner D., Egger M. (2005). Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. Lancet 366:726–732
Shermer M.. (2000). How we believe: science, skepticism, and the search for god,2. New York: Freeman
Shulz K. F., Chalmers I., Hayes R. J., Altman D. G. (1995). Empirical evidence of bias: Dimensions of methodological quality are associated with estimate of treatment effects. JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association 273:408–412
Straus S. E. (2000). Preface. In national center for complementary and alternative medicine, expanding horizons of healthcare: Five-year strategic plan 2001–2005 (DHHS Publication No. 01-5001) (pp. 4–5). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
Thoresen C. E. (1999). Spirituality and health: Is there a relationship? Journal of Health Psychology 4:291–300
Verheij R. A., de Bakker D. H., Groenewegen P. P.. (1999). Is there a geography of alternative medical treatment in The Netherlands? Health and Place 5:83–97
Watkins A., Lewith G. (1997). Mind–body medicine: Its popularity and perception. In: Watkins A. (eds) Mind–body medicine: A clinician’s guide to psychoneuroimmunology. New York, Churchill Livingston, pp. 27–40
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Brian M. Hughes is Lecturer in Psychology at the National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hughes, B.M. Regional Patterns of Religious Affiliation and Availability of Complementary and Alternative Medicine. J Relig Health 45, 549–557 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-006-9054-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-006-9054-5